Two senior executives are at odds over budget allocation. How can you help them find common ground?
When two senior executives are at odds over budget allocation, it can create a significant challenge within an organization. Budget disputes can stem from differing priorities, departmental needs, or strategic visions for the company's future. As someone involved in executive management, your role is to facilitate a resolution that aligns with the company's overall objectives while addressing the concerns of both parties. Finding common ground requires a structured approach, clear communication, and an understanding of the underlying issues at play.
-
Ruwan W.Over $1B in Increased Client Valuation | Marketing Strategy & Implementation | Data to Dollars | Well-versed in SaaS…2 Replies
-
Parkash AhujaChief Financial Officer | Finance & Operations Transformation | Compliance, Risk Management, Audit, Tax Planning, M&A…1 Reply
-
Karen TamVersatile and outcomes-oriented healthcare strategist | Dedicated to innovation and problem-solving | Passionate people…3 Replies
Begin by identifying the core issues behind the budget conflict. Encourage both executives to articulate their perspectives and the rationale behind their budgetary preferences. Listen actively to understand not just their positions but also their interests—the underlying reasons for their stances. This step is crucial because it moves the conversation from a confrontational stance over specific numbers to a dialogue about shared goals and values.
-
When senior executives disagree over budget allocation, it's crucial to facilitate constructive dialogue. Start by understanding each executive's priorities and concerns. Use data and analytics to provide a factual basis for discussions. Encourage them to focus on shared goals and strategic objectives rather than individual interests. Facilitate a meeting where they can openly discuss their perspectives and seek areas of compromise. If needed, propose alternative allocation scenarios that balance both perspectives. Emphasise the importance of collaboration and maintaining the organisation's overall financial health.
-
When two senior executives find themselves at odds over budget allocation, bridging their differences requires a strategic approach. Here are some steps to help them find common ground: - Define Organizational Strategy and Objectives - Blend Top-Down and Bottom-Up Budgeting - Facilitate Communication - Perform Gap Analysis - Focus on Shared Goals - Quantify Trade-Offs - Consider Involving a Neutral Facilitator Summary: Finding common ground isn’t just about numbers, it is about aligning visions and fostering cooperation for the organization’s benefit
-
En mi opinión, ante este conflicto, lo primero es testear si ambos ejecutivos entienden el objetivo perseguido en los supuestos de la presupuestación. Si ambos concuerdan con la visión y aún persiste la diferencia, es uno de los dos ejecutivos está o no está considerando algún supuesto, o bien, la participación de otro supuesto no declarado. Ahora bien, la discrepancia es parte del desarrollo de la estrategia y su presupuestación. La raíz de esto son los sesgos.
-
The Executive team seems to be at odds over budget allocation. To bridge the gap, let's organise a structured discussion. We need everyone to clearly outline their perspective. What are their top priorities and goals for this budget? Are there any specific constraints they're facing? Encouraging data and evidence-based arguments will be key. This will help us identify the core disagreements and clear up any misunderstandings. With a clearer picture, we can explore potential compromises and alternative solutions to reach a budget everyone can get behind.
Once you understand the issues, work with the executives to set mutual objectives that transcend individual departmental goals. These objectives should reflect the broader strategic priorities of the company. By focusing on common aims, you can shift the discussion from a zero-sum game to a collaborative effort where both parties can see the value in working together towards a shared vision.
-
This area is usually at the heart of the problem. Understanding the goals the company as a whole is working towards enables each department to better understand where they need to invest to achieve those goals. The budgeting process can, and often should, contain some degree of friction. However, it should be to support organizational objectives rather than departmental hierarchy.
With shared objectives in place, explore various options for budget allocation together with the executives. This collaborative approach encourages creative thinking and problem-solving. It also allows both parties to feel involved in the decision-making process, making them more likely to commit to a mutually agreeable solution.
-
It all starts with what is the problem then you also have to define the guiding principles or a framework in which the company want to operate from. There are many ways to allocate budget. Each methodology will likely yield a number of pros and cons and at the end of the day, it will be a judgment call how likely the philosophy and the plan generated from the philosophy, what impact outcomes, perception of fairness, perception of value, and predicted cost versus benefit.
-
The closer you come to having a fully defined and operational business value 'matrix' the more subjectivity can be removed the decision making process. Imagine an approach where each proposal/product/project can be expressed in terms of it's objective business value. I.e. revenue is X, opex reduction is Y, efficiency (time saved) is Z etc etc. Having a system where the business value is objectively scored, and the executives have trust and understanding in the scoring process/result is a massive win. Budget allocation and surrounding conversations should be a much simpler task once this is in place. Without such as approach then decisions are often left to the subjective forces of argument, influence and rank amongst decision makers.
After brainstorming potential solutions, evaluate them against the agreed-upon objectives. This step involves a critical analysis of each option's feasibility, impact, and alignment with the company's strategic goals. By using the objectives as a benchmark, you can help the executives assess which solution best serves the company's interests.
Decision-making is a critical step in resolving budget allocation conflicts. Guide the executives through a process that considers the benefits and trade-offs of each option. Encourage them to prioritize the company's long-term success over short-term departmental gains. A transparent and methodical decision-making process can help build trust between the parties and lead to a resolution that both executives can support.
Finally, once a decision on budget allocation has been made, focus on creating a detailed implementation plan. This plan should include clear timelines, responsibilities, and milestones to ensure that the agreed-upon budget is effectively executed. Effective implementation is key to demonstrating the value of the compromise and can help prevent future disputes by showing that collaborative solutions are not only possible but also beneficial for all involved.
Rate this article
More relevant reading
-
Budgeting & ForecastingHow can you keep your team on budget throughout the year?
-
Budget ManagementHow do you ensure budget alignment and accountability across different departments and teams?
-
Administrative ManagementHow do you align your budget with other plans?
-
Budget AnalysisHow do you align your budget reports with your organization's strategic objectives?