DoL won't delay fiduciary rule, will go into effect June 9
In a surprise move that caught the financial services industry off guard, the fiduciary rule will go into effect on June 9 without further delay, Secretary of Labor Alexander Acosta says.
The Trump administration official ended weeks of speculation as to whether the Department of Labor would again delay implementation, disclosing the agency’s intentions in an opinion article in The Wall Street Journal.
The department had pushed back the initial implementation date by 60 days after President Trump issued an executive memo calling for a review of the regulation.
The review is ongoing, Acosta writes, but delaying the regulation a second time would not be consistent with the law, adding that the Labor Department had "found no principled legal basis to change the June 9 date while we seek public input." He says he he hopes the SEC will "be a full participant" in the review because of its regulatory expertise.
- Fiduciary rule will prevail even if repeal is attempted: Borzi
- Merrill Lynch's revised fiduciary plan relaxes ban on commissions
- LPL CEO foresees more fiduciary 'disruption'
Although the Labor Department could still make revisions to regulation after completing its review, fiduciary supporters welcomed the news.
"Evidence shows lobbyists' attacks on the rule are unfounded. This was the right decision for investors and honest firms," Barbara Roper, director of investor protection at the Consumer Federation of America, tweeted at Acosta.
“We are confident that any data-driven, robust analysis that fairly considers the facts will prove again that Americans saving for retirement deserve to have their best interests put above their financial advisers’ economic interests,” adds Dennis Kelleher, president of advocacy group Better Markets.
Many Trump supporters and financial advisers were sure to be frustrated as news of the administration’s decision spread Tuesday morning.
The Financial Services Institute, a lobbying group that has vehemently opposed the Obama administration initiative, said it was "disappointed in this latest development."