OSCN Found Document:Validity or Applicability of Rules - Action - Parties - Presumption of Validity - Burden Of Proof When Rule Appealed - Declaratory Judgment
Title 75. Statutes and Reports

Oklahoma Statutes Citationized
  Title 75. Statutes and Reports
    Chapter 8 - Administrative Procedures Act
        Section 306 - Validity or Applicability of Rules - Action - Parties - Presumption of Validity - Burden Of Proof When Rule Appealed - Declaratory Judgment
Cite as: O.S. �, __ __


A. The validity or applicability of a rule may be determined in an action for declaratory judgment in the district court of the county of the residence of the person seeking relief or, at the option of such person, in the county wherein the rule is sought to be applied, if it is alleged the rule, or its threatened application, interferes with or impairs, or threatens to interfere with or impair, the legal rights or privileges of the plaintiff.

B. The agency shall be made a party to the action.

C. Rules promulgated pursuant to the provisions of the Administrative Procedures Act are presumed to be valid until declared otherwise by a district court of this state or the Supreme Court. When a rule is appealed pursuant to the Administrative Procedures Act it shall be the duty of the promulgating agency to show and bear the burden of proof to show:

1. that the agency possessed the authority to promulgate the rule;

2. that the rule is consistent with any statute authorizing or controlling its issuance and does not exceed statutory authority;

3. that the rule is not violative of any other applicable statute or the Constitution; and

4. that the laws and administrative rules relating to the adoption, review and promulgation of such rules were faithfully followed.

The provisions of this subsection shall not be construed to impair the power and duty of the Attorney General to review such rules and regulations and issue advisory opinions thereon.

D. A declaratory judgment may be rendered whether or not the plaintiff has requested the agency to pass upon the validity or applicability of the rule in question.

Historical Data


Laws 1963, HB 865, c. 371, � 6; Amended by Laws 1977, SB 220, c. 114, � 1, eff. October 1, 1977; Amended by Laws 1987, HB 1493, c. 207, � 17.

Citationizer Summary of Documents Citing This Document
Cite Name Ebene
Oklahoma Attorney General's Opinions
 CiteNameEbene
 2001 OK AG 48, Question Submitted by: The Honorable Ben H. Robinson, State Senator, District 9Cited
 2002 OK AG 46, Question Submitted by: The Honorable Bernest H. Cain, Jr., State Senator, District 46Discussed
 2006 OK AG 30, Question Submitted by: Ed Fite, Administrator, Oklahoma Scenic Rivers CommissionCited
 2013 OK AG 3, Question Submitted by: The Honorable Mark McBride, State Representative District 53Cited
 2020 OK AG 13, Question Submitted by: The Honorable Joy Hofmeister, Oklahoma State Superintendent of Public InstructionDiscussed at Length
 1987 OK AG 97, Question Submitted by: The Honorable Henry Bellmon, Governor of OklahomaCited
 1995 OK AG 88, Question Submitted by: The Honorable Randall Erwin, Oklahoma House of Representatives, District 19Discussed
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals Cases
 CiteNameEbene
 2016 OK CR 26, 387 P.3d 951, STATE v. HOVETDiscussed
Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals Cases
 CiteNameEbene
 1991 OK CIV APP 90, 820 P.2d 454, 62 OBJ 3686, West v. Oklahoma Water Resources Bd.Discussed at Length
 1993 OK CIV APP 96, 860 P.2d 804, 64 OBJ 3000, Jones v. Oklahoma Merit Protection Com'nDiscussed
 2007 OK CIV APP 16, 152 P.3d 263, CAMPBELL WHOLESALE COMPANY, INC. v. OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSIONCited
 2017 OK CIV APP 12, 423 P.3d 678, TRUEL v. ANDOLINI'S, LLCDiscussed at Length
 2018 OK CIV APP 30, 416 P.3d 1082, OSU-AJ HOMESTEAD MEDICAL CLINIC v. THE OKLAHOMA HEALTH AUTHORITYDiscussed
 2021 OK CIV APP 40, 502 P.3d 188, BD. OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS v. STATE ex. rel. OFFICE OF JUVENILE AFFAIRSCited
Oklahoma Supreme Court Cases
 CiteNameEbene
 1987 OK 103, 746 P.2d 172, 58 OBJ 3054, Walters v. Oklahoma Ethics Com'nDiscussed at Length
 1988 OK 99, 769 P.2d 1302, 59 OBJ 2452, Allen v. State ex rel. Bd. of Trustees of Oklahoma Uniform Retirement System for Justices and JudgesCited
 1990 OK 6, 787 P.2d 843, Dow Jones & Co., Inc. v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Tax Com'nCited
 1990 OK 121, 803 P.2d 1119, 61 OBJ 3027, Texas County Irr. and Water Resources Ass'n v. Oklahoma Water Resources Bd.Discussed
 1991 OK 122, 825 P.2d 1285, 62 OBJ 3658, Board of Law Library Trustees of Oklahoma County v. State ex rel. PetuskeyDiscussed
 1992 OK 110, 835 P.2d 97, 63 OBJ 2287, Oklahoma Tax Com'n v. City Vending of Muskogee, Inc.Cited
 1993 OK 113, 868 P.2d 676, 4 OBJ 2845, DuLaney v. Oklahoma State Dept. of HealthDiscussed
 1994 OK 142, 897 P.2d 1116, 65 OBJ 4181, Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Oklahoma Corp. Com'nCited
 2001 OK 40, 28 P.3d 539, 72 OBJ 1783, DEWEY v. STATE ex. rel. OKLAHOMA FIREFIGHTERS PENSION & RETIREMENT SYSTEMDiscussed
 1973 OK 150, 517 P.2d 800, RUTLEDGE v. OKLAHOMA ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CON. BD.Cited
 2002 OK 94, 61 P.3d 219, WASTE CONNECTIONS, INC. v. OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITYDiscussed at Length
 2003 OK 18, 65 P.3d 612, INDEP. SCH. DIST. NO. I-20 OF MUSKOGEE COUNTY v. OKLA. STATE DEPT. OF EDUCATIONDiscussed at Length
 1996 OK 11, 911 P.2d 272, 67 OBJ 542, Cox v. DawsonCited
 2009 OK 19, 210 P.3d 835, MUSGROVE MILL, LLC v. CAPITOL-MEDICAL CENTER IMPROVEMENT & ZONING COMM.Cited
 2013 OK 98, 315 P.3d 989, HEDRICK v. COMMISSIONER OF DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETYCited
 2014 OK 52, 330 P.3d 519, MURRAY COUNTY v. HOMESALES, INC.Discussed
 1979 OK 122, 600 P.2d 328, GAMBLE v. BENTONCited
 2020 OK 83, 475 P.3d 834, PURCELL v. PARKERCited
 2021 OK 31, 489 P.3d 36, STATE ex rel. OKLA. STATE BD. OF MEDICAL LICENSURE AND SUPERVISION v. RIVEROCited
 2022 OK 14, 503 P.3 1211, OWENS v. ZUMWALTDiscussed at Length
 2022 OK 50, 510 P.3d 845, BAILEY v. STATE ex rel. BD. OF TESTS FOR ALCOHOL AND DRUG INFLUENCEDiscussed
 1981 OK 50, 628 P.2d 1156, Associated Builders and Contractors of Oklahoma v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Dept. of LaborCited
 1982 OK 60, 645 P.2d 1011, Grand River Dam Authority v. StateDiscussed at Length
 1982 OK 94, 651 P.2d 125, Conoco, Inc. v. State Dept. of HealthDiscussed at Length
 1999 OK 43, 990 P.2d 845, 70 OBJ 1560, Independent Finance Institute v. ClarkCited
 1984 OK 73, 695 P.2d 498, Ricks Exploration Co. v. Oklahoma Water Resources Bd.Discussed
Title 75. Statutes and Reports
 CiteNameEbene
 75 O.S. 250.4, Compliance with Act - ExceptionsCited
 75 O.S. 250.4, Compliance with Act - ExceptionsCited
 75 O.S. 252, Filing as Condition of Validity - Notification of Failure to ComplyCited
 75 O.S. 253, Emergency RulesCited
Citationizer: Table of Authority
Cite Name Ebene
None Found.