Scribd Logo
Hochladen

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Licking County Prosecutor's Office Confirms Magistrate George Is Not An Employee of Domestic Division

    Uploaded by

    KimBeem
    278 views2 pages
    The Ohio Revised Code (ORC) requires that Civil Protection Orders (CPO's) are handled by the Domestic Relations Division of the Court of Common Pleas. The prosecutor's office has confirmed that Magistrate George is an employee of the General Division rather than Domestic Relations. So why is Magistrate George hearing CPO cases? In consideration of the ORC, are the order heard by Magistrate George valid?

    Original Title

    Licking County Prosecutor's office confirms Magistrate George is not an employee of Domestic Division

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The Ohio Revised Code (ORC) requires that Civil Protection Orders (CPO's) are handled by the Domestic Relations Division of the Court of Common Pleas. The prosecutor's office has confirmed that Magistrate George is an employee of the General Division rather than Domestic Relations. So why is Magistrate George hearing CPO cases? In consideration of the ORC, are the order heard by Magistrate George valid?

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    278 views2 pages

    Licking County Prosecutor's Office Confirms Magistrate George Is Not An Employee of Domestic Division

    Uploaded by

    KimBeem
    The Ohio Revised Code (ORC) requires that Civil Protection Orders (CPO's) are handled by the Domestic Relations Division of the Court of Common Pleas. The prosecutor's office has confirmed that Magistrate George is an employee of the General Division rather than Domestic Relations. So why is Magistrate George hearing CPO cases? In consideration of the ORC, are the order heard by Magistrate George valid?

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    4/24/2018 Gmail - Public Records Request dated March 13, 2018

    Kim Beem <[email protected]>

    Public Records Request dated March 13, 2018


    3 messages

    Carnes, Carolyn <[email protected]> Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 10:03 AM


    To: Kim Beem <[email protected]>
    Cc: "Snyder, Ann" <[email protected]>, "Wright, Richard" <[email protected]>

    Ms. Beem:

    Pursuant to your email of March 13, 2018, directed to the Licking County Domestic Relations Court requesting copies of
    personnel files for Magistrates Snyder, Rickrich and George, please find enclosed redacted copies of the personnel files
    for Magistrate Ann Snyder and Magistrate C. William Rickrich.

    Please be advised that the Domestic Relations Court does not maintain a personnel file for Magistrate George, as he is
    an employee of the general division of the Licking County Common Pleas Court. Therefore, a public records request
    must be submitted to that division directly in order to obtain his information.

    Carolyn J. Carnes
    Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, Chief - Civil Division
    Licking County Prosecutor's Office
    Telephone: (740) 670-5255
    Facsimile: (740) 670-5241
    Email: [email protected]

    The information contained in this electronic mail transmission is intended by the Licking County Prosecutor's Office for the
    use of the named individual or entity to which it is directed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and
    exempt from disclosure under applicable law. It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, anyone other than the
    named addressee (or a person authorized to deliver it to the named addressee). It should not be copied or forwarded to
    any unauthorized persons. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your
    system without reading, copying or forwarding it, and promptly notify the sender of the error by reply email or by calling
    the Licking County Prosecutor's Office at (740) 670-5255, so that our address record can be corrected.

    20180319095004248.pdf
    1082K

    Kim Beem <[email protected]> Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 11:37 AM


    To: "Carnes, Carolyn" <[email protected]>
    Cc: "Snyder, Ann" <[email protected]>, "Wright, Richard" <[email protected]>, "Hayes, Bill"
    <[email protected]>, "Marcelain, Tom" <[email protected]>, "Branstool, David" <[email protected]>,
    [email protected], "Tasha Ruth,SCO" <[email protected]>, [email protected]

    Ms. Carnes:

    According to Judge Marcelain, magistrates are sworn in to both divisions so there would be no reason that a personnel
    file would not be available through Domestic Court for Magistrate George. I know for a fact that he handled (poorly, I
    might add) a CPO full hearing which Ohio law requires to be handled by Domestic Division. Licking County has chosen
    to circumvent the Ohio Revised Code with respect to CPO's and CSPO's with this unusual approach that Judge
    Marcelain refers to as one stop shopping. It also should be noted that although Judge Marcelain has indicated that
    magistrates are appointed to both General and Domestic divisions, the documents you provided show that Magistrates
    Snyder and Rickrich are assigned to Domestic Court.

    As the prosecutor's office provides legal advice to the Licking County Courts, a directive may be appropriate regarding the
    questionable practices of the Licking County Courts. Based on your assertion about Magistrate George, his rulings
    https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=ca88d736e8&jsver=OeNArYUPo4g.en.&view=pt&q=CCarnes%40lcounty.com&qs=true&search=query&th=162a6ce4a23d3
    4/24/2018 Gmail - Public Records Request dated March 13, 2018

    regarding CPO's should be null and void and I shall treat it accordingly due to the lack of jurisdiction.

    Regards,
    Kim Beem
    [Quoted text hidden]

    Tom Marcelain Explanation on LC circumventing ORC.pdf


    145K

    Kim Beem <[email protected]> Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 3:49 PM


    To: "Carnes, Carolyn" <[email protected]>
    Cc: "Hayes, Bill" <[email protected]>, "Marcelain, Tom" <[email protected]>, "Branstool, David"
    <[email protected]>, Richard Wright <[email protected]>, [email protected]

    Ms. Carnes:

    If all magistrates have been appointed to both general and domestic divisions, as claimed by Judge Marcelain, why did
    your response regarding Magistrates Snyder and Rickrich only include appointments made by former Judge Steiner to
    Domestic Court? How would it be possible that you accurately fulfilled the public records request and that Judge
    Marcelain's assertion is accurate? It's unfortunate that I continue to have to pursue this but since neither the Prosecutor's
    office nor the judges are willing to acknowledge the real issue of Licking County not following the Ohio Revised Code.
    Noting this failure is simply my lay opinion of a plain and unambiguous reading of the code. As you may know, former
    Justices Stratton and McGee-Brown asserted Licking County was not following the law on other issues and Justice
    O'Connell questioned the approach of Licking County. Those oral arguments are now sealed but I am quite certain
    Fairfield County APA Reamer can provide you with an accounting....as former Justice Pfeifer said to Reamer at the time,
    he was hammered pretty good.

    Let's make this easy, just admit that what the County is doing is wrong and fix it - sort of like the integrity piece Prosecutor
    Hayes used as a campaign promise.

    Regards,
    Kim Beem
    [Quoted text hidden]

    20180319095004248.pdf
    1082K

    https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=ca88d736e8&jsver=OeNArYUPo4g.en.&view=pt&q=CCarnes%40lcounty.com&qs=true&search=query&th=162a6ce4a23d3

    You might also like