Professional Documents
Culture Documents
OJSimpson Case Study
OJSimpson Case Study
INTRODUCTION:
On
Sunday,
June
12,
1994,
just
before
11:00PM
Steven
Schwab
was
walking
his
dog
in
the
Brentwood
section
of
northwest
Los
Angeles
when
he
was
confronted
by
an
excited
and
agitated
dog,
an
Akita.
As
the
dog
followed
Steven
home,
he
noticed
what
appeared
to
be
blood
on
the
dog’s
paws
and
belly.
When
Steven
arrived
home,
the
dog
still
behaved
in
an
unusual
manner.
Steven
alerted
his
neighbor,
Sukru
Boztepe,
and
asked
if
he
could
keep
the
dog
until
the
morning
when
Steven
would
search
for
the
dog’s
owner.
Boztepe
initially
agreed
but
then
decided
to
take
the
dog
for
a
walk
and
see
if
he
could
find
its
owner.
He
proceeded
to
follow
the
dog
and
it
took
him
to
the
front
walkway
of
875
South
Bundy
Drive.
As
Boztepe
looked
up
the
dark
walkway,
he
saw
what
appeared
to
be
a
lifeless
human
body
surrounded
by
a
massive
amount
of
blood.
At
12:13AM
the
first
police
officers
arrived
at
the
scene.
Officers
found
the
body
of
a
woman
clad
in
a
short
black
dress.
She
was
barefoot
and
lying
face
down
with
wounds
to
her
throat
and
neck
area.
Next
to
her
was
the
body
of
a
man.
He
was
lying
on
his
side
and
his
clothes
were
also
saturated
with
blood.
The
woman
was
quickly
identified
by
the
police
as
the
owner
of
the
house,
Nicole
Brown
Simpson,
thirty-‐five
years
old
and
the
ex-‐wife
of
pro
football
player
and
sportscaster
O.J.
Simpson.
The
dead
body
of
the
man
next
to
her
was
identified
through
identification
in
his
wallet,
still
in
his
back
pocket,
as
Ronald
Goldman,
age
twenty-‐five,
a
waiter
at
a
restaurant
Nicole
and
her
family
had
visited
earlier
in
the
evening.
Police
also
discovered
the
2
children
of
Nicole
and
Simpson,
ages
9
and
6,
asleep
in
their
beds
in
the
house.
At
2:10AM
Detective
Supervisor
Phillips
and
Detectives
Fuhrman
and
Roberts
had
arrived
at
the
scene.
Shortly
thereafter,
Phillips
was
notified
that
Detectives
Tom
Lange
and
Phil
Vannatter
from
the
Homicide
Special
Section
of
the
LAPD’s
Robbery
Homicide
Division
were
assigned
as
the
lead
investigators
in
this
case;
these
detectives
were
on
the
scene
by
4:30AM.
In
examining
the
area
in
which
the
bodies
lay,
the
detectives
noticed
several
items:
a
set
of
keys
(determined
to
belong
to
Goldman),
a
dark
blue
knit
cap
(believed
to
be
the
perpetrator’s),
a
beeper
(Goldman’s),
a
blood-‐splattered
white
envelope
that
contained
the
eyeglasses
of
Nicole’s
mother,
who
left
them
at
the
restaurant
earlier
that
night;
Goldman
was
at
Nicole’s
house
to
return
the
glasses.
There
was
also
a
blood-‐soaked
left-‐hand
leather
glove
(also
believed
to
be
the
perpetrator’s).
Leading
away
from
the
bodies
towards
the
back
of
the
property
were
shoe
prints
transferred
to
the
concrete
surface
from
blood
on
the
shoes.
Alongside
the
shoe
print
trail
were
drops
of
blood.
The
shoe
prints
and
the
blood
drops
appeared
to
be
from
the
perpetrator.
Detectives
decided
to
try
to
make
contact
with
Simpson
to
notify
him
of
the
murder
of
his
ex-‐wife
and
to
arrange
for
him
to
collect
his
children,
who
were
still
at
the
house.
It
was
a
five
minute
drive
from
the
South
Bundy
address
to
Simpson’s
estate
on
Rockingham
Avenue.
It
was
now
about
5:00AM.
Once
at
Simpson’s
property,
detectives
observed
a
white
Ford
Bronco,
front
wheels
on
the
curb,
with
the
back
of
the
vehicle
sticking
out
into
the
street.
It
was
determined
to
be
a
vehicle
that
belonged
to
Simpson.
CJ211:
Criminal
Investigation
OJ
Simpson
Case
Case
Study:
Physical
Evidence
On
closer
examination
of
the
vehicle,
Detective
Fuhrman
noticed
what
appeared
to
be
a
spot
of
blood
inside
the
vehicle
near
the
door
handle.
Detectives
called
the
phone
number
to
the
house
to
gain
entry
over
the
5-‐ft.
high
stone
wall
that
surrounded
the
property,
but
no
one
responded.
With
no
response,
Fuhrman
climbed
the
wall
and
let
the
other
detectives
in
by
unlatching
the
lock
of
the
gate.
(According
to
detectives,
this
action
was
taken
because
of
the
belief
that
someone
in
the
house
may
have
been
bleeding
and
in
grave
danger;
however,
defense
attorneys
later
argued
that
this
action
constituted
an
illegal
search
and
seizure
and
hence,
any
evidence
collected
as
a
result
of
the
search
should
be
excluded
from
the
trial.)
The
detectives
knocked
on
the
front
door
of
the
main
house,
but
there
was
no
answer.
They
proceeded
to
the
small
guest
houses
located
on
the
property.
After
they
knocked
on
the
door
of
the
first
house,
a
man
by
the
name
of
Kato
Kaelin,
a
friend
and
house
guest
of
Simpson’s,
answered
the
door.
At
the
next
house,
they
found
Arnelle
Simpson,
Simpson’s
daughter.
Fuhrman
stayed
with
Kaelin
while
the
other
detectives
accompanied
Arnelle
to
the
main
house
to
confirm
that
no
one
else
was
home
or
in
any
sort
of
danger.
The
detectives
returned
to
Kaelin
and
interviewed
him.
He
told
the
detectives
that
before
Simpson
caught
a
late
flight
to
Chicago
the
previous
night,
he
went
with
him
to
a
McDonald’s,
and
then
returned
home.
Kaelin
said
that
when
they
returned
Simpson
went
into
the
house
and
he,
Kaelin,
went
to
his
bungalow.
At
about
10:45PM,
Kaelin
heard
several
loud
banging
noises
outside
near
the
bungalow’s
air
conditioning
unit.
He
said
he
thought
it
was
an
earthquake.
He
then
went
outside
to
investigate
and
saw
a
limousine
parked
at
the
gate
to
take
Simpson
to
the
airport.
A
few
minutes
later,
according
to
Kaelin,
Simpson
was
off
to
the
airport
in
the
limousine.
While
talking
to
Arnelle,
police
were
able
to
determine
that
Simpson
was
staying
at
the
Chicago
O’Hare
Plaza
Hotel.
While
Fuhrman
checked
the
area
around
the
air
conditioning
unit,
Detective
Phillips
called
Simpson
in
Chicago
and
notified
him
of
the
homicide.
According
to
Phillips,
Simpson
appeared
very
concerned
about
what
Phillips
told
him,
but
Simpson
never
asked
for
any
details
about
what
happened,
nor
did
he
even
ask
which
ex-‐wife
had
been
killed.
(Simpson
had
2
ex-‐wives.)
Simpson
told
Phillips
that
he
would
return
to
Los
Angeles
on
the
next
available
flight.
CJ211:
Criminal
Investigation
OJ
Simpson
Case
Case
Study:
Physical
Evidence
Shortly
after
this
phone
call,
Detective
Fuhrman
returned
to
the
house
and
told
Vannatter
of
his
discovery
along
the
side
of
the
house
near
the
air-‐conditioning
unit
in
the
back
of
the
bungalow
occupied
by
Kaelin.
There,
lying
on
the
ground
among
some
leaves,
was
a
blood-‐stained
leather
glove.
(The
defense
later
argued
that
not
only
was
this
“search”
conducted
without
a
warrant,
but
the
glove
was
“planted”
there
by
Fuhrman,
a
racist
cop.
Their
claim
was
that
both
gloves
were
found
at
the
crime
scene,
and
Fuhrman
took
one
of
them
with
him
to
Simpson’s.)
It
appeared
to
be
the
right-‐hand
match
of
the
one
found
at
the
crime
scene
on
Bundy.
All
of
the
detectives
except
for
Vannatter
then
left
to
notify
investigators
at
the
Bundy
address
of
another
possible
crime
scene,
or
an
extension
of
the
Bundy
crime
scene.
Still
at
Rockingham,
Vannatter
discovered
what
appeared
to
be
blood
drops
in
the
driveway.
They
led
to
the
Ford
Bronco.
Inside
the
Bronco,
he
saw
other
red
spots
on
the
driver’s
side
door
and
on
the
console
between
the
2
front
seats.
He
discovered
more
blood
leading
to
the
front
door
of
the
main
house.
(The
defense
later
argued
that
this
blood
was
also
planted
and
that
it
actually
came
from
the
sample
that
was
drawn
from
Simpson
at
the
police
department
after
the
initial
interrogation
by
Vannatter
and
Lang.
Interestingly,
the
nurse
who
drew
the
blood
from
Simpson
testified
he
drew
8
ccs
of
blood.
The
LAPD
could
only
account
for
6.5ccs.)
All
this
evidence
was
later
photographed,
the
glove
was
seized,
the
Bronco
was
impounded,
and
the
entire
area
was
secured.
Fuhrman
returned
to
the
Rockingham
scene
to
supervise,
and
Vannatter
proceeded
back
to
Bundy,
and
then,
with
his
partner,
went
to
the
West
Los
Angeles
Police
Station
to
prepare
a
warrant
to
search
Simpson’s
house
and
vehicle.
With
search
warrant
in
hand,
the
detectives
returned
to
the
Rockingham
property.
While
they
were
conducting
their
search
of
the
premises,
Simpson
arrived
home.
Simpson
and
his
attorneys
agreed
that
it
would
be
OK
for
Simpson
to
talk
with
Detectives
Lang
and
Vannatter
about
what
he
knew
about
these
crimes
and
to
do
so
without
his
attorneys
present.
At
1:35PM,
June
13th,
the
“interrogation”
of
Simpson
by
Detectives
Lang
and
Vannatter
began.
After
the
interrogation
was
over,
Simpson
was
fingerprinted,
wounds
on
his
left
hand
were
photographed,
and
a
sample
of
his
blood
was
drawn.
CJ211:
Criminal
Investigation
OJ
Simpson
Case
Case
Study:
Physical
Evidence
The
vial
of
blood
was
labeled
and
was
placed
in
an
evidence
envelope.
Vannatter
then
took
the
sealed
envelope
back
to
Simpson’s
home
and
gave
it
to
Dennis
Fung,
the
criminalist
who
was
responsible
for
collecting
and
recording
the
evidence
at
the
Bundy
and
Rockingham
scenes.
To
maintain
chain
of
custody,
Fung
checked
the
contents
of
the
envelope
and,
according
to
procedure,
wrote
on
the
outside,
“Received
from
Vannatter
on
06/13/94
at
1720
hours.”
IT
was
then
placed
in
the
LAPD’s
crime
scene
truck.
This
whole
sequence
of
events
was
done
in
full
view
of
the
numerous
media
film
crews
who
were
at
the
scene.
(As
far
as
the
defense
was
concerned,
this
showed
that
Simpson’s
blood
was
taken
back
to
the
scene
where
his
blood
was
said
to
have
been
discovered
by
the
police.)
Meanwhile,
back
at
Rockingham,
the
search
of
Simpson’s
residence
revealed
additional
evidence
of
interest
including
blood-‐stained
black
socks
and
additional
blood
drops
inside
the
house
(more
planted
evidence
according
to
the
defense).
In
all,
41
items
of
evidence
were
collected
from
Simpson’s
Bronco,
his
house,
and
the
Bundy
crime
scene.
Through
scientific
analysis,
numerous
links
could
be
drawn
from
this
evidence.
Specifically,
evidence
recovered
from
the
glove
found
at
the
Bundy
crime
scene
consisted
of:
• 1
hair
from
Nicole
• Fibers
consistent
with
Goldman’s
shirt
• Fibers
consistent
with
Goldman’s
jeans
• Dog
hair
from
the
Akita
By
itself,
this
single
glove
was
not
that
useful.
One
would
suppose
from
the
discovery
of
the
glove
that
the
murderer
wore
gloves
while
committing
the
homicides.
On
the
glove
found
at
Simpson’s
Rockingham
estate
were:
• Several
hairs
from
Nicole
• Several
pulled
hairs
from
Goldman
• Fibers
consistent
with
Goldman’s
shirt
• Dog
hair
from
the
Akita
• One
fiber
from
the
Bronco’s
carpet
• Several
black-‐blue
cotton
fibers
consistent
with
fibers
found
on
Goldman’s
shirt
Given
the
blood
and
fibers
found
on
the
glove,
the
fact
that
it
was
found
on
Simpson’s
property,
and
the
identical
matching
glove
was
found
at
the
crime
scene,
the
glove
linked
all
the
key
individuals
and
places
together:
Simpson,
Nicole,
Goldman,
and
the
crime
scene.
As
such,
this
glove
was
an
extremely
valuable
piece
of
evidence.
On
the
socks
found
in
Simpson’s
bedroom
at
Rockingham
were:
• Blue-‐black
cotton
fibers
• Blood
from
Simpson
and
Nicole
If
the
socks
were
Simpson’s
(a
reasonable
conclusion,
as
they
were
found
in
his
bedroom),
and
if
the
blood
was
not
planted
on
them,
the
socks
served
as
corroborative
evidence
that,
at
the
least,
Simpson
was
near
Nicole
when
she
was
bleeding.
Found
on
Goldman’s
shirt
were:
• One
hair
consistent
with
Simpson’s
• 25
hairs
from
Nicole
• Several
hairs
from
the
Akita
• 4
torn
fibers
from
Nicole’s
dress
• Several
fibers
from
the
knit
cap
• 1
fiber
consistent
with
the
lining
of
both
gloves
• Many
blue-‐black
fibers
CJ211:
Criminal
Investigation
OJ
Simpson
Case
Case
Study:
Physical
Evidence
This
evidence
associated
Goldman
with
Simpson,
Nicole,
the
gloves
and
the
cap
of
the
perpetrator,
and
probably
the
clothes
of
the
perpetrator
(blue-‐black
fibers).
On
Ron
Goldman’s
pants
were:
• Several
hairs
consistent
with
Nicole’s
• Several
hairs
from
the
Akita
This
hair
linked
Nicole
with
Goldman,
and
Goldman
with
the
dog.
This
was
relatively
insignificant
evidence
in
establishing
who
was
responsible
for
the
homicides,
but
was
useful
for
other
purposes,
such
as
reconstructing
the
crime.
On
the
blue
knit
cap
found
at
the
Bundy
crime
scene
were:
• Several
hairs
from
the
Akita
• 12
hairs
matching
Simpson’s,
not
pulled
or
torn
• Several
fibers
consistent
with
Goldman’s
shirt
• 1
fiber
consistent
with
the
lining
of
both
gloves
• 1
fiber
consistent
with
the
Bronco’s
carpet
Once
again,
this
evidence
provided
additional
strength
to
the
conclusion
that
Simpson
was
at
the
crime
scene
and
was
wearing,
at
least
temporarily,
the
cap.
There
was
even
more
physical
evidence.
Among
the
blood
evidence
found
at
the
Bundy
crime
scene
were:
• Blood
drops
near
the
victims
that
matched
Simpson’s
• 4
blood
drops
on
the
walkway
that
matched
Simpson’s
• 2
shoe
prints
of
Size
12
Bruno
Magli
shoes
in
blood
that
matched
Nicole’s
• Blood
stains
from
Goldman’s
boot
matched
Goldman’s
and
Nicole’s
Through
DNA
analysis,
the
blood
found
at
the
crime
scene
that
was
not
Nicole’s
or
Goldman’s
was
confirmed
to
be
Simpson’s.
This
evidence
positively
linked
Simpson
to
the
scene
of
the
crime
(plus
his
unexplained
cut
to
his
hand).
In
order
for
Goldman’s
boot
to
leave
a
print
in
Nicole’s
blood,
she
had
to
be
bleeding
first,
then
Goldman.
The
Bruno
Magli
shoe
prints
were
probably
left
by
the
perpetrator.
(In
the
trial,
the
prosecution
introduced
a
photograph
of
Simpson
reporting
from
the
sidelines
of
an
NFL
game
wearing
the
shoes
in
question,
but
the
defense
argued
the
photo
was
a
fraud.)
Among
the
blood
evidence
found
in
and
on
the
Bronco
were:
• Blood
matching
Simpson’s
found
on
the
driver’s
door
interior
and
on
the
instrument
panel
• Blood
on
the
center
console
that
matched
Simpson’s
• Blood
on
the
steering
wheel
that
matched
Simpson’s
and
Nicole’s
• Blood
on
the
center
console
that
matched
Simpson’s
and
Goldman’s
• Blood
on
the
drivers’
side
wall
that
matched
Simpson’s
• Blood
on
the
carpet
that
matched
Nicole’s
• Blood
on
the
center
console
that
matched
Simpson’s,
Nicole’s
,
and
Goldman’s
More
evidence
linked
Simpson
with
the
dead
victims
and
the
crime
scene:
• Blood
on
the
glove
found
at
Rockingham
matched
Goldman’s
• Of
the
4
blood
samples
on
a
sock
in
Simpson’s
bedroom,
2
matched
Nicole’s,
2
matched
Goldman’s
• Blood
drops
in
the
foyer
and
in
the
driveway
that
matched
Simpson’s
More
blood
linked
Simpson
to
the
homicides.
In
addition
to
the
physical
evidence,
there
were
the
interesting
facts
that
Simpson
had
7
abrasions
and
3
cuts
to
his
left
hand
(and
that
the
left
hand
glove
was
found
at
the
crime
scene)
and
CJ211:
Criminal
Investigation
OJ
Simpson
Case
Case
Study:
Physical
Evidence
Simpson
did
not
have
a
reasonable
explanation
for
these
injuries
or
his
whereabouts
during
the
time
the
homicides
occurred.
On
Friday,
June
17,
1994,
an
arrest
warrant
for
OJ
Simpson
was
prepared.
Simpson’s
new
attorney,
Robert
Shapiro,
was
instructed
by
police
to
accompany
Simpson
to
police
headquarters.
He
was
to
surrender
at
11:00AM.
Simpson
was
nowhere
to
be
found.
Police
later
discovered
that
he
was
with
his
friend
Al
Cowling
driving
around
Orange
County,
near
Los
Angeles,
in
Simpson’s
Bronco.
The
police
followed
them
and
the
convoy
became
the
now
infamous
slow-‐speed
chase.
It
ended
hours
later
at
Simpson’s
residence
at
Rockingham.
Simpson
was
arrested
and
taken
into
custody
for
the
murders
of
Nicole
Brown
Simpson
and
Ron
Goldman.
The
investigation
that
led
to
his
arrest
is
only
the
first
part
of
the
story.
The
jury
trial
began
January
23,
1995
and
the
case
took
many
twists
and
turns
until
Simpson
was
found
not
guilty
on
October
2,
1995.
The
jury
deliberated
for
less
than
5
hours.
(Brandl,
2004).
CJ211:
Criminal
Investigation
OJ
Simpson
Case
Case
Study:
Physical
Evidence
AUTOPSY
REPORT
94-‐05136
I
performed
an
autopsy
on
the
body
of
BROWN-‐SIMPSON,
NICOLE
at
the
DEPARTMENT
OF
CORONER
Los
Angeles,
California
on
June
14,
1994
@0730
HOURS
From
the
anatomic
findings
and
pertinent
history,
I
ascribe
the
death
to:
MULTIPLE
SHARP
FORCE
INJURIES
Due
To
Or
As
a
Consequence
of
Anatomical Summary:
II. Multiple stab wound of neck and scalp (total of seven).
III. Multiple injuries of hands, including incised wound, ring finger of right hand (defense wound).
1. The body is described in the Standard Anatomical Position. Reference is to this position only.
2.
Where
necessary,
injuries
are
numbered
for
reference.
This
is
arbitrary
and
does
not
correspond
to
any
order
in
which
they
may
have
been
incurred.
All
the
injuries
are
antemortem,
unless
otherwise
specified.
3.
The
term
"anatomic"
is
used
as
a
specification
to
indicate
correspondence
with
the
description
as
set
forth
in
the
textbooks
of
Gross
Anatomy.
It
denotes
freedom
from
significant,
visible
or
morbid
alteration.
EXTERNAL EXAMINATION:
The
body
is
that
of
a
well-‐developed,
well-‐nourished
Caucasian
female
stated
to
be
35
years
old.
The
body
weighs
129
pounds
and
measures
65
inches
from
crown
to
sole.
The
hair
on
the
scalp
is
brown.
The
irides
are
brown
with
the
pupils
fixed
and
dilated.
The
sclerae
and
conjunctive
are
unremarkable,
without
evidence
of
petechial
hemorrhages
on
either.
Both
upper
and
lower
teeth
are
natural,
without
evidence
of
injury
to
the
cheeks,
lips
or
gums.
There
are
no
tattoos,
deformities
or
amputations.
Two
linear
surgical
scars
are
found
beneath
each
breast,
transversely
oriented
and
measuring
2
inches
in
length.
Rigor mortis is fixed at the time of autopsy examination (please see form 1).
The
body
appears
to
the
examiner
as
stated
above.
Identification
is
by
toe-‐tag
and
the
autopsy
is
not
material
to
identification.
The
body
is
not
embalmed.
The
head
is
normocephalic
and
there
is
external
evidence
of
antemortem
injury
to
be
described
below.
Otherwise,
the
external
auditory
canals,
eyes,
nose
and
mouth
are
not
remarkable.
The
neck
shows
sharp
force
injury
to
be
described
below,
and
the
larynx
is
visible
through
the
gaping
wound.
CJ211:
Criminal
Investigation
OJ
Simpson
Case
Case
Study:
Physical
Evidence
No
recent
traumatic
injuries
are
noted
on
the
chest
or
abdomen;
tan
lines
are
seen
on
the
lower
abdomen
(bathing
suit).
The
genitalia
are
that
of
adult
female
with
no
gross
evidence
of
injuries.
Examination
of
the
posterior
surface
at
the
trunk
shows
some
excoriations
compatible
with
postmortem
injuries
on
the
upper
back,
right
side,
on
the
medial
aspect
of
the
right
scapula
and
on
the
lateral
aspect
of
the
right
scapula
(compatible
with
ant
to
insect
bites).
An
abrasion
above
the
left
scapula
measures
3/4
x
1/2
inch
and
is
red-‐brown
in
color
and
appears
antemortem.
Otherwise,
the
lower
back
and
remainder
of
the
posterior
aspect
of
the
body
shows
no
evidence
or
recent
injuries.
Refer to available photographs and diagrams and the specific documentation of the autopsy protocol.
CLOTHING:
The
decedent
was
wearing
a
short
black
dress,
blood
stained.
Also,
she
was
wearing
a
pair
of
black
panties
To
the
unaided
eye
examination
there
was
no
evidence
of
cut
or
tear.
The
incised
wound
of
the
neck
is
gaping
and
exposes
the
larynx
and
cervical
vertebral
column.
It
measures
5
1/2
x
2
1/2
inches
in
length
and
is
found
at
the
level
of
the
superior
border
of
the
larynx.
After
approximation
of
the
edges,
it
is
seen
to
be
diagonally
oriented
on
the
right
side
and
transversely
oriented
from
the
midline
to
the
left
side.
On
the
right
side
it
is
upwardly
angulated
toward
the
right
earlobe
and
extends
for
4
inches
from
the
midline.
On
the
left
side
it
is
transversely
oriented
and
extends
2
1/2
inches
to
the
anterior
border
of
the
left
sternocleidomastoid
muscle.
The
edges
of
the
wound
are
smooth,
with
subcutaneous
and
intramuscular
hemorrhage,
fresh,
dark
red
purple,
is
evident.
On
the
right
side
the
upwardly
angulated
wound
passes
through
the
skin,
the
subcutaneous
tissue,
the
platysma,
passing
under
the
ramus
of
the
right
mandible
and
upward
as
it
passes
through
the
strap
muscles
on
the
right,
towards
the
digastric
muscle
on
the
right,
and
through
the
thyrohyoid
membrane
and
ligament.
Further
dissection
discloses
that
it
passes
posteriorly
and
transects
the
distal
one-‐third
of
the
epiglottis,
the
hypo-‐pharynx,
and
passes
into
the
body
of
the
3rd
cervical
vertebra
where
it
transversely
oriented
3/4
inch
incised
wound
is
seen
in
the
bone,
extending
it
for
a
depth
of
1/4
inch
into
the
bone.
The
spinal
canal
and
cord
are
not
entered.
On
the
right
side
superiorly
the
wound
passes
towards
the
insertion
of
the
sternocleidomastoid
muscle,
and
then
becomes
more
superficial
and
tapers
as
it
terminates
in
the
skin
below
the
right
earlobe.
On
the
left
side
the
wound
is
transversely
oriented
and
extends
for
2
1/2
inches
where
the
wound
path
intersects
the
stab
wounds
on
the
left
side
of
the
neck
to
be
described
below.
Dissection
discloses
that
the
right
common
carotid
artery
is
transected
with
hemorrhage
in
the
surrounding
carotid
sheath
and
there
is
a
1/4
incised
wound
or
nick
in
the
right
internal
jugular
vein
with
surrounding
soft
tissue
hemorrhage.
On
the
left
side
the
left
common
carotid
artery
is
transected
with
hemorrhage
in
the
surrounding
carotid
sheath
and
the
left
internal
jugular
vein
is
subtotally
transected
with
only
a
thin
strand
of
tissue
remaining
posteriorly
with
surrounding
soft
tissue
hemorrhage.
The
injuries
on
the
left
side
of
the
neck
intersect
and
the
pathways
of
the
stab
wounds
on
the
left
side
to
be
described
below.
There is fresh hemorrhage and bruising noted along the entire incised wound path.
Depth
of
penetration
is
not
given
because
the
neck
can
be
either
flexed
or
extended,
and
the
length
of
the
wound
is
greater
than
the
depth.
Opinion:
This
is
a
fatal
incised
wound
or
sharp
force
injury,
associated
with
transection
of
the
left
and
right
carotid
arteries
and
incisions
of
the
left
and
right
internal
jugular
veins
with
exsanguinating
hemorrhage.
1.
This
stab
wound
overlaps
that
of
the
incised
wound
of
the
neck
described
above.
The
wound
measures
5/8
inch
in
length,
is
vertically
oriented,
and
has
a
squared-‐off
end
inferiorly
approximately
1/32
inch
and
a
pointed
end
superiorly.
The
minimal
depth
of
the
penetration,
from
left
to
right,
is
1
1/2
to
2
inches
where
it
intersects
the
incised
wound.
Penetration
is
through
the
skin,
subcutaneous
tissue
and
muscle,
and
injury
to
the
internal
jugular
vein
or
common
carotid
artery
cannot
be
excluded.
2.
Stab
wound
of
left
side
of
neck:
This
is
a
1/8
inch
superficial
slit-‐like
incision
into
the
skin
and
dermis;
no
squared-‐off
or
dull
end
is
evident.
3.
Stab
wound
on
left
side
of
neck:
This
is
a
diagonally
oriented
stab
wound
measuring
1/2
inch
in
length;
there
is
a
pointed
end
on
the
posterior
aspect
and
a
squared-‐off
end
anterior
less
than
1/32
inch
in
length.
The
edges
are
smooth,
and
dissection
disposes
a
depth
of
penetration
for
1
1/2
to
2
inches
where
the
stab
wound
intersects
that
of
the
incised
wound
of
the
neck;
the
stab
wounds
are
approximately
1
inch
from
the
left
lateral
termination
of
the
incised
wound.
Fresh
hemorrhage
is
noted
along
the
wound
path
which
goes
through
the
skin,
subcutaneous
tissue
and
muscle.
Opinion:
This
stab
wound
cannot
be
distinguished
from
injuries
caused
by
the
incised
wound
of
the
neck
and
may
have
injured
the
left
common
carotid
artery
and/or
the
left
internal
jugular
vein.
4.
Stab
wound
of
the
left
side
of
neck:
This
is
a
diagonally
oriented
stab
wound
measuring
7/8
inch
in
length;
on
the
posterior
aspect
there
is
a
pointed
end
and
on
the
anterior
aspect
a
squared
-‐off
or
dull
end
approximately
1/32
inch
in
width;
otherwise
the
edges
are
smooth.
Subsequent
dissection
discloses
the
wound
path
through
the
skin,
subcutaneous
tissue
and
muscle
where
it
intersects
the
incised
wound
of
the
neck.
Depth
of
penetration
is
1
-‐
1/2
inches.
Opinion:
This
stab
wound
may
have
injured
the
left
common
carotid
artery
and/or
the
left
internal
jugular
vein
as
described
above.
5.
Stab
wound
of
scalp,
left
parietal:
This
diagonally
oriented
stab
wound
is
located
on
the
left
parietal
scalp,
which
is
shaved
postmortem
for
visualization.
It
measures
1/2
inch
in
length
and
no
definite
squared-‐off
or
dull
end
is
evident,
both
ends
appearing
to
be
rounded.
Depth
of
penetration
is
through
the
scalp,
to
the
galea,
approximately
3/8
-‐
1/2
inch.
There
is
deep
scalp
hemorrhage
and
a
subgaleal
bruise,
measuring
1
1/2
x
1
1/2
inches;
there
is
no
cutting
wound
or
injury
to
the
skull
and
there
is
no
penetration
into
the
cranium.
Opinion: This is a superficial stab wound or cutting wound of the scalp, non-‐fatal.
6.
Stab
wound
or
cutting
wound
of
scalp:
This
is
transversely
oriented
and
is
found
in
the
right
posterior
parietal-‐occipital
region.
The
transversely
oriented
wound
measures
1
1/2
inches
in
length
and
has
a
pointed
end
to
the
left
and
a
fork
or
split
into
the
right.
Depth
of
penetration
is
3/8
-‐
1
1/2
inches
with
fresh
deep
scalp
bruising.
Opinion: This is a non-‐fatal, stabbing or cutting wound of the scalp.
7.
Stab
wound
or
cutting
wound
of
the
scalp,
right
parietal-‐occipital:
This
is
vertically
oriented,
measures
3/16
inch
in
length
and
involves
the
skin
only.
No
squared-‐off
or
dull
end
is
evident,
both
ends
or
aspects
being
pointed
or
tapered.
There is a small amount of deep scalp hemorrhage or bruising, no subgaleal hemorrhage.
Opinion: This is a non-‐fatal superficial stabbing or cutting wound of the scalp.
8.
Blunt
force
injury
to
head:
On
the
right
side
of
the
scalp,
4
inches
above
the
right
external
auditory
canal
there
is
a
scalp
bruise;
this
is
revealed
after
postmortem
shaving
of
the
scalp.
It
measures
1
x
1
inches
and
is
red-‐violet
or
purple
in
color.
The
skin
is
smooth,
non-‐abraded
or
lacerated.
Subsequent
autopsy
discloses
fresh
deep
scalp
hemorrhage
and
fresh
dark
red-‐
purple
subgaleal
hemorrhage
or
bruising
measuring
2
x
1
1/4
inches.
Inferiorly
the
bruise
extends
to
the
superficial
right
temporal
muscle.
There
is
no
associated
skull
fracture.
Further
examination
discloses
that
there
is
a
split
or
forked
end
on
the
ulnar
aspect
and
pointed
end
on
the
radial
aspect.
There
is
a
small
amount
of
dermal
hemorrhage.
On the dorsal surface of the right hand, at the base of the ring finger, there is a 1/16 inch punctate abrasion.
Left hand: On the dorsal surface of the left hand, there is a punctate abrasion, red-‐brown in color at the base of the ring finger.
There is a 1/2 inch superficial incised skin cut, 1/2 inch in length, diagonally oriented, on the top of the left hand, midportion.
INTERNAL EXAMINATION
The
body
is
opened
with
the
usual
Y-‐shaped
thoracoabdominal
incision
revealing
the
abdominal
wall
adipose
tissue
to
measure
1/4
-‐
3/8
inch
in
thickness.
The
anterior
abdominal
wall
has
its
normal
muscular
components
and
there
is
no
evidence
of
abdominal
wall
injury.
Exposure
of
the
body
cavities
shows
the
contained
organs
in
their
usual
anatomic
locations
with
their
usual
anatomic
relationships.
No
free
fluid
or
blood
is
found
within
the
pleural,
pericardial,
or
the
peritoneal
cavities.
The
serosal
surfaces
are
smooth,
thin,
and
glistening
and
there
are
no
intra-‐abdominal
adhesions.
There are no internal traumatic injuries involving the thorax or thoracic viscera, abdomen or abdominal viscera.
Autopsy
findings,
or
the
lack
of
them,
are
considered
apart
from
those
already
stated.
The
following
observations
pertain
to
findings
other
than
the
injuries
and
changes
that
are
described
above.
Examination
of
the
breasts
reveals
bilateral
silastic
implants
that
are
intact.
Otherwise,
no
other
significant
changes
are
noted
in
the
breasts.
The
remainder
of
the
musculoskeletal
system
and
subcutaneous
tissue
are
anatomic.
The
external
injuries
to
the
scalp
have
been
described.
A
small
abrasion,
red-‐brown
in
color,
measuring
3/8
x
1/4
inch
and
appearing
to
be
antemortem
is
found
lateral-‐posterior
to
the
right
eyebrow
and
this
is
a
non-‐patterned
superficial
abrasion.
The
hemorrhage
beneath
the
scalp,
due
to
the
sharp
force
injuries
have
been
described.
There
is
no
hemorrhage
deep
into
the
temporal
muscles.
There are no tears of the dura mater and no recent epidural, subdural, or subarachnoid hemorrhage.
The dura is stripped to reveal no fractures of the bones of the calvarium or base of the skull.
The pituitary gland is normally situated in the sella turcica and is not enlarged.
The cranial nerves are enumerated and they are intact, symmetrical and anatomic in size, location and course.
The
component
vessels
of
the
circle
of
Willis
are
identified.
They
are
anatomic
in
size,
course,
configuration
and
distribution.
The
blood
vessels
are
intact,
free
of
aneurysms
or
other
anomaly,
and
non-‐occluded
and
show
no
significant
atherosclerosis.
Examination
of
the
non-‐formalin
fixed,
fresh
brain
shows:
The
cerebral
hemispheres,
cerebellum,
brainstem,
pons
and
medulla
to
show
their
normal
anatomical
structures.
The
cerebellar,
the
pontine
and
medullary
surfaces
present
no
lesions.
Multiple
CJ211:
Criminal
Investigation
OJ
Simpson
Case
Case
Study:
Physical
Evidence
sections
reveal
an
anatomic
appearing
cortex,
white
matter,
ventricular
system
and
basal
ganglia.
There
is
no
evidence
of
hemorrhage,
cyst
or
neoplasm
involving
the
brain
substance.
The
spinal
chord,
in
the
vicinity
of
the
cervical
incised
wound
is
dissected;
there
is
no
evidence
or
intraspinal
hemorrhage
and
no
evidence
of
sharp
force
injury
to
the
spinal
chord.
Not dissected.
The
oral
cavity,
viewed
from
below,
is
anatomic.
The
teeth
are
examined
and
there
is
no
evidence
of
injury
and
there
is
no
evidence
of
injury
to
the
cheeks,
lips,
gums,
or
tongue.
No
blood
is
present.
Injuries
to
the
upper
airway
including
the
incised
wound
of
the
hypopharynx
and
epiglottis
have
been
described.
Otherwise,
the
mucosa
of
the
larynx,
piriform
sinuses,
trachea
and
major
bronchi
are
anatomic.
No
mucosal
lesions
are
evident
and
no
blood
is
present.
The
hyoid
bone
and
thyroid
cartilages
are
intact,
inasmuch
as
the
incised
wound
passes
through
the
thyrohyoid
membrane
and
ligament
and
both
greater
cornuas
of
the
thyroid
cartilage
are
intact.
Hemorrhage
is
present
in
the
tissue
adjacent
to
the
neck
organs
due
to
the
incised
would
as
described
above.
There
is
no
hemorrhage
into
the
substance
of
the
thyroid
gland
which
anatomic
in
size
and
location.
The
parathyroid
glands
are
not
identified.
Lungs:
Right
lung
weighs
330
grams;
left
lung
300
grams.
The
external
appearance
and
that
of
the
sectioned
surface
of
the
lungs
show
minimal
congestion
and
otherwise
no
injuries
or
lesions.
No
foreign
material,
infarction,
or
neoplasm
is
encountered.
The
pulmonary
arteries
are
free
of
thromboemboli.
CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM:
The
heart
weighs
280
grams,
and
is
anatomic
in
size
and
configuration.
The
chambers,
valves
and
myocardium
are
anatomic,
and
a
minimal
amount
of
liquid
blood
is
found
within
the
cardiac
chambers.
No
focal
endocardial,
valvular,
or
myocardial
lesions
are
seen.
There
are
no
congenital
anomalies.
Multiple
transverse
sections
of
the
left
and
right
coronary
arteries
reveal
them
to
be
thin-‐walled
and
patent
throughout
with
no
significant
atherosclerosis.
The
aorta
and
major
branches
are
anatomic
and
show
only
minimal
lipid
streaking
of
the
intima.
The
portal
and
caval
veins
and
the
major
branches
are
anatomic.
Note: The injuries of the common carotid arteries and internal jugular veins have been described above.
GASTROINTESTINAL SYSTEM:
The mucosa and wall of the esophagus are intact and gray-‐pink and no lesions or injuries are evident.
The gastric mucosa is intact and pink. No mucosal lesions are evident and there are no residuals of medication or blood.
Examination
of
the
gastric
contents
reveals
approximately
500
ml.
of
chewed
semisolid
food
in
the
stomach.
Recognizable
food
particles
are
identified
as
follows:
pieces
of
pasta
appearing
to
be
rigatoni,
fragments
of
apparent
spinach
leaves;
and
the
remainder,
chewed,
partially
digested
non-‐recognizable
food
material.
The
mucosa
of
the
duodenum,
jejunum,
ileum,
colon
and
rectum
are
intact.
The
lumen
is
patent.
No
mucosal
lesions
are
evident,
and
no
blood
is
present.
The
fecal
content
is
usual
in
appearance.
The
liver
weighs
1370
grams.
The
capsular
surface
is
intact.
The
subcapsular
and
the
cut
surface
of
the
liver
are
uniformly
brown-‐red
in
color,
and
free
of
nodularity
and
are
usual
in
appearance.
The
biliary
duct
system,
including
the
gallbladder,
are
CJ211:
Criminal
Investigation
OJ
Simpson
Case
Case
Study:
Physical
Evidence
free
of
anomaly
and
no
lesions
are
evident.
The
mucosa
is
intact
and
bile
stained.
The
lumen
are
patent
and
no
calculi
are
present.
The pancreas is anatomic both externally and on cut surface.
The
spleen
weighs
90
grams
and
has
an
intact
capsule.
Cut
surface
shows
the
usual
dark
red-‐purple
parenchyma
which
is
firm
and
no
lesions
are
evident.
The blood, the bone marrow and the usually-‐named aggregates of lymph nodes do not appear to be significantly altered.
The adrenal glands are their usual size and location and cut surface presents no lesions.
URINARY SYSTEM:
Each
kidney
weights
100
grams.
The
kidneys
are
anatomic
in
size,
location
and
configuration.
The
capsules
are
stripped
to
show
a
pale
brown
surface.
On
section
the
cut
surface
shows
no
abnormalities
of
the
cortex
and
medulla.
The
calyces,
pelves,
ureters
and
urinary
bladder
are
unaltered
in
appearance.
The
mucosa
is
gray-‐pink,
no
calculi
are
present
and
no
blood
is
present.
The
uterus,
tubes,
and
adnexa
are
anatomic.
Cut
surface
of
the
uterus
shows
no
lesions
and
a
thin
light
brown
endometrium.
The
vagina
has
its
normal
mucosal
surface
and
no
lesions
or
injuries
are
evident.
HISTOLOGY:
Representative
portions
of
the
various
organs,
including
the
larynx
and
hyoid,
are
preserved
in
10%
formaldehyde
and
placed
in
a
single
storage
container.
TOXICOLOGY:
A sample of cardiac chamber blood and urine are submitted for toxicologic analysis.
SEROLOGY:
A sample of intracardiac blood is submitted in an EDTA tube,
RADIOLOGY:
None.
PHOTOGRAPHY:
In addition to the routine identification photographs, pertinent photographs are taken of the external injury.
WITNESSES:
Detective
Van
Natter
and
Lange,
Los
Angeles
Police
Department,
Robbery-‐Homicide,
were
present
during
the
autopsy.
CJ211:
Criminal
Investigation
OJ
Simpson
Case
Case
Study:
Physical
Evidence
DIAGRAMS
USED:
Forms 16, 20, 20D, 20F, 20G, 20H, 22, 23, 24 and 29 were utilized during the performance of the autopsy.
OPINION:
Death
is
attributed
to
multiple
sharp
force
injuries,
including
a
deep
incised
wound
of
the
neck
and
multiple
stab
wounds
of
the
neck.
The
sharp
force
injuries
led
to
transection
of
the
left
and
right
common
carotid
arteries,
and
incisions
of
the
left
and
right
internal
jugular
vein
causing
fatal
exsanguinating
hemorrhage.
The
sharp
force
injury
to
the
scalp
were
superficial,
non-‐
fatal.
Injuries
present
on
the
hands,
including
the
incised
wound
of
the
right
hand
are
compatible
so-‐called
defense
wounds.
Routine
toxicologic
studies
were
ordered.
/s/ Irwin L. Golden M.D. IRWIN L. GOLDEN DEPUTY MEDICAL EXAMINER
CJ211:
Criminal
Investigation
OJ
Simpson
Case
Case
Study:
Physical
Evidence
INTERVIEW/INTERROGATION
The
following
are
excerpts
from
the
interrogation
of
OJ
Simpson
by
Los
Angeles
Police
Department
Detectives
Tom
Lange
and
Philip
Vannatter
during
the
early
afternoon
of
June
13,
1994.
Simpson’s
ex-‐wife
Nicole
Brown
Simpson
and
Ronald
Goldman
were
murdered
outside
Nicole’s
home
at
approximately
10:30pm
on
June
12,
1994.
The
initial
investigation
suggested
that
Simpson
could
have
been
the
perpetrator
(e.g.,
blood
drops
found
on
Simpson’s
Bronco
and
at
his
house,
and
a
bloody
glove
that
was
found
at
the
crime
scene
matched
the
one
found
in
Simpson’s
property).
Detectives
Lange
and
Vannatter
spent
32
minutes
questioning
Simpson
about
his
possible
role
in
the
double
homicide.
This
transcript
provides
a
good
example
of
a
poorly
conducted
interrogation,
and
is
illustrative
for
that
purpose.
This
transcript
is
edited
for
length-‐it
begins
after
Simpson
has
been
read
his
Miranda
warning
and
he
agrees
to
waive
them.
The
asterisks
indicate
a
break
in
the
sequence
of
questions.
Vannatter:
Okay.
All
right,
what
we’re
gonna
do
is,
we
want
to…We’re
investigating,
obviously,
the
death
of
your
ex-‐wife
and
another
man.
Lange:
Somebody
told
us
that.
****
Questions
about
Simpson
and
his
relationship
with
Nicole
Brown
Simpson,
their
divorce,
and
their
attempts
at
reconciliation.
****
Questions
about
a
previous
domestic
violence
incident
between
Simpson
and
Nicole.
****
Questions
about
Nicole’s
maid,
who
lived
at
her
house.
Lange:
Phil,
what
do
you
think?
Maybe
we
can
just
recount
last
night…
Vannatter:
Yeah.
When
was
the
last
time
you
saw
Nicole?
Simpson:
We
were
leaving
a
dance
recital.
She
took
off
and
I
was
talking
to
her
parents.
Vannatter:
Where
was
the
dance
recital?
Simpson:
Paul
Revere
High
School.
Vannatter:
And
that
was
for
one
of
your
children?
Simpson:
Yeah,
for
my
daughter
Sydney.
Vannatter:
And
about
what
time
was
that
yesterday?
Simpson:
It
ended
about
six-‐thirty,
quarter
to
seven,
something
like
that,
you
know,
in
the
ballpark,
right
in
that
area.
And
they
took
off.
Vannatter:
They?
Simpson:
Her
and
her
family,
her
mother
and
father,
sisters,
my
kids,
you
know.
Vannatter:
And
then
you
went
your
separate
ways?
Simpson:
Yeah,
actually
she
left,
and
then
they
came
back,
and
her
mother
got
in
a
car
with
her,
and
the
kids
all
piled
into
her
sister’s
car,
and
they…
CJ211:
Criminal
Investigation
OJ
Simpson
Case
Case
Study:
Physical
Evidence
Simpson:
Yeah.
Vannatter:
And
you
spoke
with
her
parents?
Simpson:
Yeah.
Vannatter:
Okay,
what
time
did
you
leave
the
recital?
Simpson:
Right
about
that
time.
We
were
all
leaving.
We
were
all
leaving
then.
Her
mother
said
something
about
me
joining
them
for
dinner,
and
I
said
no
thanks.
Vannatter:
Where
did
you
go
from
there,
OJ?
Simpson:
Ah,
home,
home
for
a
while,
got
my
car
for
a
while,
tried
to
find
my
girlfriend
for
a
while,
came
back
to
the
house.
Vannatter:
Who
was
home
when
you
got
home?
Simpson:
Kato.
Vannatter:
Kato?
Anybody
else?
Was
your
daughter
there,
Arnelle?
Simpson:
Arnelle,
yeah.
Vannatter:
So
what
time
do
you
think
you
got
back
home,
actually
physically
got
home?
Simpson:
Seven-‐something.
Vannatter:
Seven-‐something?
And
then
you
left,
and…
Simpson:
Yeah,
I’m
trying
to
think,
did
I
leave?
You
know,
I’m
always…I
had
to
run
and
get
my
daughter
some
flowers.
I
was
actually
doing
the
recital,
so
I
rushed
and
got
her
some
flowers,
and
I
came
home,
and
then
I
called
Paula
as
I
was
going
to
her
house,
and
Paula
wasn’t
home.
Vannatter:
Paula
is
your
girlfriend?
Simpson:
Girlfriend,
yeah.
****
Questions
about
Paula,
the
spelling
of
her
name
and
her
address,
the
reason
why
he
was
supposed
to
be
in
Chicago
that
morning
(to
play
in
a
charity
golf
tournament).
Vannatter:
Oh,
Okay.
What
time
did
you
leave
last
night,
leave
the
house?
Simpson:
To
go
the
airport?
Vannatter:
Mmm
hmm.
Simpson:
About..the
limo
was
supposed
to
be
there
at
ten
forty-‐five.
Normally,
they
get
there
a
little
earlier.
I
was
rushing
around,
somewhere
between
there
and
eleven.
Vannatter:
So
approximately
ten
forty-‐five
to
eleven.
Simpson:
Eleven
o’clock,
yeah,
somewhere
in
that
area.
CJ211:
Criminal
Investigation
OJ
Simpson
Case
Case
Study:
Physical
Evidence
Simpson:
No
Lange:
What
time
was
the
recital?
Simpson:
Over
at
about
six-‐thirty.
Like
I
said,
I
came
home,
I
got
my
car,
I
was
going
to
see
my
girlfriend.
I
was
calling
her,
and
she
wasn’t
around.
Lange:
So
you
drove
the…you
came
home
in
the
Rolls
and
then
you
got
in
the
Bronco?
Simpson:
In
the
Bronco,
‘cause
my
phone
was
in
the
Bronco.
And
because
it’s
a
Bronco.
It’s
a
Bronco,
it’s
what
I
drive,
you
know.
I’d
rather
drive
it
than
any
other
car.
And,
you
know,
as
I
was
going
over
there,
I
called
her
a
couple
of
times,
and
she
wasn’t
there,
and
I
left
a
message,
and
then
I
checked
my
messages,
and
there
were
no
messages.
She
wasn’t
there,
and
she
may
have
to
leave
town.
Then
I
came
back
and
ended
up
sitting
with
Kato.
Lange:
Okay.
What
time
was
this
again
that
you
parked
the
Bronco?
Simpson:
Eight-‐something,
maybe.
He
hadn’t
done
a
Jacuzzi,
we
had…went
and
got
a
burger,
and
I’d
come
home
and
kind
of
leisurely
got
ready
to
go.
I
mean,
we’d
done
a
few
things…
Lange:
You
weren’t
a
hurry
when
you
came
back
with
the
Bronco?
Simpson:
No.
Lange:
The
reason
I
ask
you,
the
car
was
parked
kind
of
at
a
funny
angle,
stuck
out
in
the
street.
Simpson:
Well,
it’s
parked
because…I
don’t
know
if
it’s
a
funny
angle
or
what.
It’s
parked
because
when
I
was
hustling
at
the
end
of
the
day
to
get
all
my
stuff,
and
I
was
getting
my
phone
and
everything
off
it,
when
I
just
pulled
it
out
of
the
gate
there,
it’s
like,
it’s
a
tight
turn.
Lange:
So
you
had
it
inside
the
compound
then?
Simpson:
Yeah.
Lange:
Oh,
Okay.
Simpson:
I
brought
it
inside
the
compound
to
get
my
stuff
out
of
it,
and
then
I
put
it
out,
and
I’d
run
back
inside
the
gate
before
the
gate
closes.
****
Questions
about
the
telephone
number
for
OJ’s
office.
Vannatter:
How
about
the
injury
on
your
hand?
Simpson:
I
don’t
know.
The
first
time,
when
I
was
in
Chicago
and
all,
but
at
the
house
I
was
just
running
around.
Vannatter:
How
did
you
do
it
in
Chicago?
Simpson:
I
broke
a
glass.
One
of
you
guys
had
just
called
me,
and
I
was
in
the
bathroom,
and
I
just
went
bonkers
for
a
little
bit.
Lange:
Is
that
how
you
cut
it?
Simpson:
Mmm,
it
was
cut
before,
but
I
think
I
just
opened
it
again,
I’m
not
sure.
CJ211:
Criminal
Investigation
OJ
Simpson
Case
Case
Study:
Physical
Evidence
Lange:
Do
you
recall
bleeding
at
all
in
your
truck,
in
the
Bronco?
Simpson:
I
recall
bleeding
at
my
house,
and
then
I
went
to
the
Bronco.
The
last
thing
I
did
before
I
left,
when
I
was
rushing,
was
went
and
got
my
phone
out
of
the
Bronco.
Lange:
Mmm
hmm.
Where’s
the
phone
now?
Simpson:
In
my
bag.
Lange:
You
have
it?
Simpson:
In
that
black
bag.
Lange:
You
brought
a
bag
here
with
you?
Simpson:
Yeah,
it’s…
Lange:
So
do
you
recall
bleeding
at
all?
Simpson:
Yeah,
I
mean,
I
knew
I
was
bleeding,
but
it
was
no
big
deal.
I
bleed
all
the
time.
I
play
golf
and
stuff,
so
there’s
always
something,
nicks
and
stuff,
here
and
there.
Lange:
So
did
you
do
anything?
When
did
you
put
the
band-‐aid
on
it?
Simpson:
Actually,
I
asked
the
girl
this
morning
for
it.
Lange:
And
she
got
it?
Simpson:
Yeah,
‘cause
last
night
with
Kato,
when
I
was
leaving,
he
was
saying
something
to
me,
and
I
was
rushing
to
get
my
phone,
and
I
put
a
little
thing
on
it,
and
it
stopped.
****
Questions
about
who
has
the
keys
to
the
Bronco
and
who
was
the
last
person
to
drive
it.
****
Questions
about
the
last
time
Simpson
was
at
Nicole’s
house.
****
Questions
about
whether
he
had
a
conversation
with
Nicole
last
night
and
the
nature
of
that
conversation.
Vannatter:
What
were
you
wearing
last
night,
OJ?
Simpson:
What
did
I
wear
on
the
golf
course
yesterday?
Some
of
these
kind
of
pants,
some
of
these
kind
of
pants.
I
mean,
I
changed
different
for
whatever
it
was.
I
just
had
on
some…
Vannatter:
Just
these
black
pants?
Simpson:
Just
these…they’re
called
Bugle
Boy.
Vannatter:
These
aren’t
the
pants?
Simpson:
No.
Vannatter:
Where
are
the
pants
that
you
wore?
CJ211:
Criminal
Investigation
OJ
Simpson
Case
Case
Study:
Physical
Evidence
Simpson:
Going
down
to…And
cops
down
there
know
about
it
because
I’ve
told
two
marshals
about
it.
At
a
mall,
I
was
going
down
for
a
christening,
and
I
had
just
left
and
it
was
like
three-‐thirty
in
the
morning
and
I’m
in
a
lane,
and
also
the
car
in
front
of
me
is
going
real
slow,
and
I’m
slowing
down
‘cause
I
figure
he
sees
a
cop,
‘cause
we’re
all
going
pretty
fast
and
I’m
going
to
change
lanes,
but
there’s
a
car
next
to
me,
and
I
can’t
change
lanes.
Then
that
goes
for
a
while,
and
I’m
going
to
slow
down
and
go
around
him,
but
the
car
butts
up
to
me,
and
I’m
like
caught
between
three
cars.
They
were
Oriental
guys,
and
they
were
not
letting
me
go
anywhere.
And
finally
I
went
on
the
shoulder,
and
I
sped
up,
and
then
I
held
my
phone
up
so
they
could
see
the
light
part
of
it,
you
know,
‘cause
I
have
tinted
windows,
and
they
kind
of
scattered,
and
I
chased
one
of
them
for
a
while
to
make
him
think
I
was
chasing
him
before
I
took
off.
Lange:
Were
you
in
the
Bronco?
Simpson:
No.
Lange:
What
were
you
driving?
Simpson:
My
Bentley.
It
has
tinted
windows
and
all,
so
I
figured
they
thought
they
had
a
nice
little
touch.
Lange:
Did
you
think
they
were
trying
to
rip
you
off?
Simpson:
Definitely,
they
were.
And
then
the
next
thing,
you
know,
Nicole
and
I
went
home.
At
four
in
the
morning
I
got
there
to
Laguna,
and
when
we
woke
up,
I
told
her
about
it,
and
told
her
parents
about
it,
told
everybody
about
it,
you
know?
And
when
I
saw
two
marshals
at
a
mall,
I
walked
up
and
told
them
about
it.
Vannatter:
What
did
they
do,
make
a
report
on
it?
Simpson:
They
didn’t
know
nothing.
I
mean,
they’ll
remember
me
and
remember
I
told
them.
Vannatter:
Did
Nicole
mention
that
she’d
been
getting
any
threats
lately
to
you?
Anything
she
was
concerned
about
or
the
kids’
safety?
Simpson:
To
her?
Vannatter:
Yes.
Simpson:
From?
Vannatter:
From
anybody?
Simpson:
No,
not
at
all.
Vannatter:
Was
she
very
security
conscious?
Did
she
keep
that
house
locked
up?
Simpson:
Very.
Vannatter:
The
intercom
didn’t
work,
apparently,
right?
CJ211:
Criminal
Investigation
OJ
Simpson
Case
Case
Study:
Physical
Evidence
****
Questions
about
the
gift,
when
he
gave
it
to
her,
and
that
she
gave
it
back
to
him.
Lange:
Did
Mr.
Weitzman,
your
attorney,
talk
to
you
anything
about
this
polygraph
we
brought
up
before?
What
are
your
thoughts
on
that?
Simpson:
Should
I
talk
about
my
thoughts
on
that?
I’m
sure
eventually
I’ll
do
it,
but
it’s
like
I’ve
got
some
weird
thoughts
right
now.
I’ve
had
weird
thoughts…You
know,
when
you’ve
been
with
a
person
for
seventeen
years,
you
think
everything.
I’ve
got
to
understand
what
this
thing
is.
If
it’s
true
blue,
I
don’t
mind
doing
it.
Lange:
Well,
you’re
not
compelled
at
all
to
take
this,
number
one,
and
number
two,
I
don’t
know
if
Mr.
Weitzman
explained
it
to
you-‐this
goes
to
the
exclusion
of
someone
as
much
as
to
the
inclusion
so
we
can
eliminate
people.
And
just
to
get
things
straight.
Simpson:
But
does
it
work
for
elimination?
Lange:
Oh
yes,
we
use
it
for
elimination
more
than
anything.
Simpson:
Well,
I’ll
talk
to
him
about
it.
Lange:
Understand,
the
reason
we’re
talking
to
you
is
because
you’re
the
ex-‐husband.
Simpson:
I
know
I’m
the
number
one
target,
and
now
you
tell
me
I’ve
got
blood
all
over
the
place.
Lange:
Well,
there’s
blood
in
your
house
and
in
the
driveway,
and
we’ve
got
a
search
warrant,
and
we’re
going
to
go
get
the
blood.
We
found
some
in
your
house.
Is
that
your
blood
that’s
there?
Simpson:
If
it’s
dripped,
it’s
what
I
dripped
running
around
trying
to
leave.
Lange:
Last
night?
Simpson:
Yeah,
and
I
wasn’t
aware
that
it
was…I
was
aware
that
I…you
know,
I
was
trying
to
get
out
of
the
house,
I
didn’t
even
pay
any
attention
to
it.
I
saw
it
when
I
was
in
the
kitchen
and
I
grabbed
a
napkin
or
something,
and
that
was
it.
I
didn’t
think
about
it
after
that.
Vannatter:
That
was
last
night
after
you
got
home
from
the
recital
when
you
were
rushing?
Simpson:
That
was
last
night
when
I
was…I
don’t
know
what
I
was.
I
was
in
the
car
getting
my
junk
out
of
the
car.
I
was
in
the
house
throwing
hangars
and
stuff
in
my
suitcase.
I
was
doing
my
little
crazy
what
I
do.
I
mean,
I
do
it
everywhere.
Anybody
who
has
ever
picked
me
up
says
that
Simpson’s
a
whirlwind.
He’s
running,
he’s
grabbing
things,
and
that’s
what
I
was
doing.
Vannatter:
Well,
I’m
going
to
step
out
and
I’m
going
to
get
a
photographer
to
come
down
and
photograph
your
hand
there.
And
then
here
pretty
soon,
we’re
going
to
take
you
downstairs
and
get
some
blood
from
you,
okay?
I’ll
be
right
back.
Lange:
So
it
was
about
five
days
ago
you
last
saw
Nicole?
Was
it
at
the
house?
CJ211:
Criminal
Investigation
OJ
Simpson
Case
Case
Study:
Physical
Evidence
Simpson:
Okay,
the
last
time
I
saw
Nicole,
physically
saw
Nicole,
I
saw
her
obviously
last
night.
The
time
before,
I’m
trying
to
think.
I
went
to
Washington,
D.C.,
so
I
didn’t
see
her,
so
I’m
trying
to
think.
I
haven’t
seen
her
since
I
went
to
Washington.
I
went
to
Washington,
what’s
the
date
today?
Lange:
Today’s
Monday,
the
13th
of
June.
Simpson:
Okay,
I
went
to
Washington
on
maybe
Wednesday.
Thursday
I
think
I
was
in….Thursday,
I
was
in
Connecticut,
then
Long
Island
Thursday
afternoon
and
all
of
Friday.
I
got
home
Friday
night,
Friday
afternoon,
I
played,
you
know…Paula
picked
me
up
at
the
airport.
I
played
golf
Saturday,
and
when
I
came
home
I
think
my
son
was
there.
So
I
did
something
with
my
son.
I
don’t
think
I
saw
Nicole
at
all
then.
And
then
I
went
to
a
big
affair
with
Paula
Saturday
night,
and
I
got
up
and
played
golf
Sunday,
which
pissed
Paula
off,
and
I
saw
her
at
the…
Lange:
Okay,
the
last
time
you
saw
Nicole,
was
that
at
her
house?
Simpson:
I
don’t
remember.
I
wasn’t
in
her
house,
so
it
couldn’t
have
been
at
her
house,
so
it
was,
you
know,
I
don’t
even
physically
remember
the
last
time
I
saw
her.
I
may
have
seen
her
even
jogging
one
day.
Lange:
Let
me
get
this
straight.
You’ve
never
physically
been
inside
the
house?
Simpson:
Not
in
the
last
week.
****Additional
questions
about
when
he
last
saw
Nicole
and
when
he
was
last
at
her
house.
Lange:
We’re
ready
to
terminate
this
at
14:07.
By
most
accounts,
this
interrogation
was
a
failure.
The
detectives
learned
very
little
as
a
result
of
the
questioning
of
the
prime
suspect.
They
came
nowhere
even
close
to
obtaining
a
confession
or
even
getting
a
firm
account
of
his
activities
the
previous
night.
(Brandl,
2004).
CJ211:
Criminal
Investigation
OJ
Simpson
Case
Case
Study:
Physical
Evidence
Excerpts from two 911 calls from Nicole Brown Simpson (Oct.
25, 1993):
NICOLE: Can you send someone to my house?
DISPATCHER: What's the problem there?
NICOLE: My ex-husband has just broken into my house and he's ranting and raving outside the front
yard.
DISPATCHER: Has he been drinking or anything?
NICOLE: No. But he's crazy.
DISPATCHER: And you said he hasn't been drinking?
NICOLE: No.
DISPATCHER: Did he hit you?
NICOLE: No.
DISPATCHER: Do you have a restraining order against him?
NICOLE: No.
DISPATCHER: What's your name?
NICOLE: Nicole Simpson.
DISPATCHER: And your address?
NICOLE: 325 Gretna Green Way.
DISPATCHER: Okay, we'll send the police out.
NICOLE: Nicole: Thank you.
DISPATCHER: Dispatcher: Uh-huh.
(The dispatcher issues a call for any patrol car to respond to the address at Gretna Green. Minutes
later, Nicole Simpson called back.)
NICOLE: Could you get somebody over here now, to ... Gretna Green. He's back. Please?
DISPATCHER: What does he look like?
NICOLE: He's O.J. Simpson. I think you know his record. Could you just send somebody over here?
DISPATCHER: What is he doing there?
NICOLE: He just drove up again. (She begins to cry) Could you just send somebody over?
DISPATCHER: Dispatcher: Wait a minute. What kind of car is he in?
NICOLE: He's in a white Bronco, but first of all he broke the back door down to get in.
DISPATCHER: Wait a minute. What's your name?
NICOLE: Nicole Simpson.
DISPATCHER: OK, is he the sportscaster or whatever?
NICOLE: Yeah. Thank you.
DISPATCHER: Wait a minute, we're sending police. What is he doing? Is he threatening you?
NICOLE: He's (expletive) going nuts. (sobs)
DISPATCHER: Has he threatened you in any way or is he just harassing you?
NICOLE: (Sighs) You're going to hear him in a minute. He's about to come in again.
DISPATCHER: OK, just stay on the line...
NICOLE: I don't want to stay on the line. He's going to beat the (expletive) out of me.
DISPATCHER: Wait a minute, just stay on the line so we can know what's going on until the police
get there, OK? OK, Nicole?
NICOLE: Uh-huh.
DISPATCHER: Just a moment. Does he have any weapons?
NICOLE: I don't know. He went home and he came back. The kids are up there sleeping and I don't
want anything to happen.
DISPATCHER: OK, just a moment. Is he on drugs or anything?
NICOLE: No.
DISPATCHER: Just stay on the line. Just in case he comes in I need to hear what's going on, all
CJ211:
Criminal
Investigation
OJ
Simpson
Case
Case
Study:
Physical
Evidence
right?
NICOLE: Can you hear him outside?
DISPATCHER: Is he yelling?
NICOLE: Yep.
DISPATCHER: OK. Has he been drinking?
NICOLE: No.
DISPATCHER: OK. (Speaking over radio to police units) ... All units: additional on domestic violence,
325 South Gretna Green Way, the suspect has returned in a white Bronco. Monitor comments.
Incident 48221.
DISPATCHER: OK, Nicole?
NICOLE: Uh-huh.
DISPATCHER: Is he outdoors?
NICOLE: He's in the back yard.
DISPATCHER: He's in the back yard?
NICOLE: Screaming at my roommate about me and at me.
DISPATCHER: OK. What is he saying?
NICOLE: Oh, something about some guy I know and hookers and Keith and I started this (expletive)
before and ...
DISPATCHER: Um-hum.
NICOLE: And it's all my fault and 'Now what am I going to do, get the police in this' and the whole
thing. It's all my fault, I started this before. (sigh) Brother. (inaudible)
DISPATCHER: OK, has he hit you today or...?
NICOLE: No.
DISPATCHER: OK, you don't need any paramedics or anything.
NICOLE: Uh-uh
DISPATCHER: OK, you just want him to leave?
NICOLE: My door. He broke the whole back door in.
DISPATCHER : And then he left and he came back?
NICOLE: Then he came and he practically knocked my upstairs door down but he pounded it and he
screamed and hollered and I tried to get him out of the bedroom because the kids are sleeping in
there.
DISPATCHER: Um-hum. OK.
NICOLE: And then he wanted somebody's phone number and I gave him my phone book or I put my
phone book down to write down the phone number that he wanted and then he took my phone book
with all my stuff in it.
DISPATCHER: OK. So basically you guys have just been arguing? (Simpson is yelling)
DISPATCHER: Is he inside right now.
NICOLE: Yeah.
DISPATCHER: OK, just a moment.
SIMPSON.: Do you understand me? (inaudible) Keith is a nothing. A skunk, and he still calls me.
(inaudible)
DISPATCHER: Is he talking to you?
NICOLE: Yeah.
DISPATCHER: Are you locked in a room or something?
NICOLE: No. He can come right in. I'm not going where the kids are because the kids ...
DISPATCHER: Do you think he's going to hit you?
NICOLE: I don't know.
DISPATCHER: Stay on the line. Don't hang it up, OK?
NICOLE: OK.
DISPATCHER: What is he saying?
NICOLE: What?
DISPATCHER: What is he saying?
CJ211:
Criminal
Investigation
OJ
Simpson
Case
Case
Study:
Physical
Evidence
DISPATCHER: OK. The police should be on the way it just seems like a long time because it's kind of
busy in that division right now.
(Yelling continues)
Dispatcher to police: Regarding Gretna Green Way, the suspect is still there and yelling very loudly.
DISPATCHER: Is he still arguing? (Knock at the door.)
DISPATCHER: Was someone knocking on your door?
NICOLE: It was him.
DISPATCHER: He was knocking on your door?
NICOLE: There's a locked bedroom and he's wondering why.
DISPATCHER: Oh. He's knocking on the locked door?
NICOLE: Yeah. You know what, O.J.? That window above you is also open. Could you just go,
please? Can I get off the phone?
DISPATCHER: You want, you feel safe hanging up?
NICOLE: Well, you're right
DISPATCHER: You want to wait til the police get there?
NICOLE: Yeah.
DISPATCHER: Nicole?
NICOLE: Um-hmm.
DISPATCHER: Is he still arguing with you?
NICOLE: Um-hum.
DISPATCHER: He's moved a little?
NICOLE: But I'm just ignoring him.
DISPATCHER: Okay. But he doesn't know you're...
NICOLE: It works best.
DISPATCHER: Okay. Are the kids are still asleep?
NICOLE: Yes. They're like rocks.
DISPATCHER: What part of the house is he in right now?
NICOLE: Downstairs.
DISPATCHER: Downstairs?
NICOLE: Yes.
DISPATCHER: And you're upstairs?
NICOLE: No, I'm downstairs in the kitchen.
SIMPSON: (continues yelling)
DISPATCHER: Do you see the police, Nicole?
NICOLE: No, but I will go out there right now.
DISPATCHER: OK, you want to go out there?
NICOLE: Yeah.
DISPATCHER: OK.
NICOLE: I'm going to hang up.
DISPATCHER: OK
(Linder, 1999).
CJ211:
Criminal
Investigation
OJ
Simpson
Case
Case
Study:
Physical
Evidence
To whom it may concern: First, everyone understand I have nothing to do with Nicole's murder. I loved her,
always have and always will. If we had a problem, it's because I loved her so much.
Recently, we came to the understanding that for now we were not right for each other, at least for now. Despite
our love we were different, and that's why we mutually agreed to go our separate ways. It was tough splitting for
a second time, but we both knew it was for the best.
Inside I had no doubt that in the future, we would be close as friends or more. Unlike what has been written in the
press, Nicole and I had a great relationship for most of our lives together, Like all long-term relationships, we had
a few downs and ups. I took the heat New Year's 1989 because that's what I was supposed to do. I did not plead
no contest for any other reason but to protect our privacy and was advised it would end the press hype.
I don't want to belabor knocking the press, but I can't believe what is being said. Most of it is totally made up. I
know you have a job to do, but as a last wish, please, please, please, leave my children in peace. Their lives will
be tough enough.
I want to send my love and thanks to all my friends. I'm sorry I can't name every one of you, especially A.C. man,
thanks for being in my life. The support and friendship I received from so many: Wayne Hughes, Lewis Markes,
Frank Olson, Mark Packer, Bender, Bobby Kardashian.
I wish we had spent more time together in recent years. My golfing buddies, Hoss, Alan Austin, Mike, Craig,
Bender, Wyler, Sandy, Jay, Donnie, thanks for the fun. All my teammates over the years, Reggie, you were the
soul of my pro career. Ahmad, I never stopped being proud of you. Marcus, You've got a great lady in Catherine,
don't mess it up. Bobby Chandler, thanks for always being there. Skip and Kathy, I love you guys, without you I
never would have made it through this far. Marguerite, thanks for the early years. We had some fun. Paula, what
can I say? You are special. I'm sorry we're not going to have our chance. God brought you to me I now see. As I
leave, you'll be in my thoughts.
I think of my life and feel I've done most of the right things. What the outcome, people will look and point. I can't
take that. I can't subject my children to that. This way they can move on and go on with their lives. Please, if I've
done anything worthwhile in my life. Let my kids live in peace from you (press).
I've had a good life. I'm proud of how I lived. My mama taught me to do unto other. I treated people the way I
wanted to be treated. I've always tried to be up and helpful so why is this happening? I'm sorry for the Goldman
family. I know how much it hurts.
Nicole and I had a good life together. All this press talk about a rocky relationship was no more than what every
long-term relationship experiences. All her friends will confirm that I have been totally loving and understanding
of what she's been going through. At times I have felt like a battered husband or boyfriend but I loved her, make
that clear to everyone. And I would take whatever it took to make it work.
Don't feel sorry for me. I've had a great life, great friends. Please think of the real O.J. and not this lost person.
(Linder,
1999).
CJ211:
Criminal
Investigation
OJ
Simpson
Case
Case
Study:
Physical
Evidence
References
Brandl,
S.G.
(2004).
Criminal
Investigation.
Pearson
Education,
Inc.,
Boston,
MA.
Justice
Junction.
(2004).
The
Autopsy
Report
of
Nicole
Brown
Simpson.
Retrieved
from
http://www.justicejunction.com/judicial_injustice_oj_autopsy_report_nbs.htm.
Linder,
D.O.
(1999).
A
Trial
Account:
OJ
Simpson.
Retrieved
from
http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/Simpson/simpson.htm.
Source
of
a
lot
of
documents
(original):
http://simpson.walraven.org/.