Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Lesson 2: MORAL AND NON-MORAL STANDARDS

Learning Objective:
 Distinguish between moral and non-moral standards
 Identify examples of moral and non-moral standards

INTRODUCTION
We often hear the terms "moral standards" and "non-moral standards."
What do these refer to? What about the word "immoral?" Is there such a thing as
immoral standards? Is immoral synonymous with non-moral?

MOTIVATING ACTIVITY:
1. Classify the following into groups: moral standards and non-moral standards.
1. No talking while your mouth is full.
2. Do not lie.
3. Wear black or white for mourning; never red.
4. The males should be the one to propose marriage not females.
5. Don't steal.
6. Observe correct grammar when writing and speaking English.
7. Submit school requirements on time.
8. If you are a male, stay by the danger side (roadside) when walking with a
female.
9. Go with the fashion or you are not "in"
10. Don't cheat others.
11. Don't kill.
12. When you speak pronounce words correctly.
13. Focus the microscope properly.
14. Maintain a 36-24-36 body figure.

LESSON PROPER:
Moral Standards and Non-Moral Standards
Since ethics is a study of moral standards, then the first question for the
course is, what are moral standards?

The following are supposed to be examples of moral standards:


 "Stealing is wrong."
 "Killing is wrong,”
 “Telling lies is wrong."
 "Adultery is wrong."
 "Environment preservation is the right thing to do."
 "Freedom with responsibility is the right way."
 "Giving what is due to others is justice".
* Hence, moral standards are norms or prescriptions that serve as the frameworks
for determining what ought to be done or what is right or wrong action, what is
good or bad character.

In the Activity phase of this Lesson the following can be classified as moral
standards:
 Do not lie.
 Don't steal.
 Don't cheat others.
 Don't kill

Moral Standards:
1. consequences standards (like Stuart Mill's utilitarianism)
2. non-consequence standards (like Aristotle's Virtue, St Thomas Natural Law, or Immanuel Kant’s
Good Will or Sense of duty).

Consequence standards depend on results, outcome. An act that results in the


general welfare, in the greatest good of the greatest number, is moral. To take
part in a project that results in the improvement of the majority of people is,
therefore, moral.
Non-consequence standards are based on:
1) Natural law is the law of God revealed through human reason. It is the "law of
God written in the hearts of men." To preserve human life is in accordance with
the natural law, therefore it is moral.
2) Good Will or Intention and on a Sense of Duty. Respect for humanity,
treatment of the other as a human person, an act that is moral, springs from a
sense of duty, a sense of duty that you wish will apply to all human persons.

Non-Moral Standards:
 social rules
 demands of etiquette
 good manners
 folkways
 rules of behavior set by parents, teachers and school
 standards of grammar or language, arts and sports

*They are guides of action which should be followed as expected by society.


Sometimes they may not be followed or some people may not follow them. From
time to time, changes are made regarding good manners or etiquette. In sociology,
non-moral standards or rules are called folkways. In short, non-moral actions are
those where moral categories cannot be applied.

In the Activity phase of this Lesson, the following are non-moral standards:
 No talking while your mouth is full.
 Wear black or white for mourning; never red.
 The males should be the one to propose marriage not females.
 Observe correct grammar when writing and speaking English.
 Submit school requirements on time.
 If you are a male, stay by the danger side (roadside) when walking with a
female.
 When you speak pronounce words correctly.
 Focus the microscope properly.
 Maintain a good body figure.
*An indicator whether or not a standard is moral or non-moral lies in its
compliance as distinguished from its non-compliance. Non-compliance with moral
standards causes a sense of guilt, while non-compliance with a non-moral
standard may only cause shame or embarrassment.

What Makes Standards Moral?


 The question means what obliges us to follow a moral standard?
 For theists, believers in God's existence, moral standards are commandments
of God revealed to man through prophets.
 According to the Old Testament, the Ten Commandments were revealed by
God to Moses.
 One who believes in God vows to Him and obliges himself/herself to follow His
Ten Commandments.
 For theists, God is the ultimate source of what is moral revealed to human
persons.
How about Non-theists?
 Moral standards are based on the wisdom of sages like Confucius or
philosophers like Immanuel Kant.

 In China, 1993 B. C., Confucius taught the moral


standard, "Do unto others what you like others to do
unto you" and persuaded people to follow this rule
because it is the right way, the gentleman's way.

 Immanuel Kant, the German philosopher, formulated a


criterion for determining what makes a moral standard
moral. It is stated as follows:
o "Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at
the same time will that it should become a universal
law." In other words, if a maxim or standard cannot
pass this test, it cannot be a moral standard.
o For instance, does the maxim "Stealing is wrong" pass
this test? Can one will that this maxim be a universal maxim? The answer is
in the affirmative. The opposite of the maxim would not be acceptable.
o Moral standards are standards that we want to be followed by all; otherwise,
one would be wishing one's own ill fortune. Can you wish "do not kill" to be a
universal maxim? The answer has to be yes because if you say "no" then you
are not objecting to someone killing you.
o Thus, the universal necessity of the maxim, what makes it a categorical
imperative is what makes it obligatory. "Stealing is wrong" means "one ought
not to steal" and "Do not kill" means "one ought not to kill." It is one's
obligation not to steal or kill. Ultimately, the obligation arises from the need
of self-preservation.

REFERENCE:
Corpuz, R., Corpuz, B. (2020). Ethics . Manila, Philippines. LORIMAR Publishing.

You might also like