Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Knowledge How To Rebuild Civilization in The Aftermath of A Cataclysm Ebook PDF
The Knowledge How To Rebuild Civilization in The Aftermath of A Cataclysm Ebook PDF
1
“The Knowledge is a terrifically engrossing history of science and
technology. . . . A cunningly packaged yet entertainingly serious essay in the
history of practical ideas.”
—The Guardian (London)
“A whirlwind tour of the history of human endeavor in terms of scientific and
technological discovery. . . . Readers will certainly come away better informed,
more knowledgeable about, and hopefully more interested in the fundamental
science and technology necessary to rebuild a civilized society.”
—Times Higher Education (London)
“A hymn to human ingenuity, charting how we have taken control of the planet,
engineered solutions to the many problems that plagued us as we developed
modern societies, and learned to beat our microbial assailants to live ever
longer lives. Yet it is more than that. It is a manual for rebuilding society in the
face of collapse.”
—New Statesman (London)
“A crash course in the scientific fundamentals underpinning modern-day
living . . . The Knowledge impresses as a condensed history of scientific
progress and will pique curiosity among readers who regret daydreaming
throughout school chemistry lessons.”
—The Observer (London)
“A whistle-stop tour of the history of science and technology . . . full of those
‘oh!’ moments, when you think, ‘well, I never thought of that before.’ ”
—The Telegraph (UK)
“Dartnell’s guide to surviving the apocalypse is as breezy and engaging as it is
informative. I now know exactly what I’m going to do as soon as a mushroom
cloud appears on the horizon. Leap in my golf cart and go straight round to
Dartnell’s place.”
—Daily Mail (London)
“An eye-opener . . . The Knowledge is an amazing checklist of human
discovery.”
—GeekDad
“A marvelously astounding work: In one graceful swoop, Lewis Dartnell takes
our multilayered, interconnected modern world, shows how fragile its
scaffolding is, and then lays out a how-to guide for starting over from scratch.
Imagine Zombieland told by Neil deGrasse Tyson and you’ll get some sense of
what a delight The Knowledge is to read.”
—Seth Mnookin, New York Times bestselling author of The Panic Virus and
associate director of MIT’s graduate program in science writing
“For all those terrified by runaway climate change, supereruptions, planet-killer
asteroids, doomsday viruses, nuclear terrorism, and absolute domination by
2
superintelligent machines, Lewis Dartnell has written a long-overdue guide to
what you should do after the apocalypse: an illuminating and entertaining
vision of how to reboot life, civilization, and everything. Dartnell’s vision of
the survival of the smartest in a postapocalyptic world offers a remarkable and
panoramic view of how civilization actually works.”
—Roger Highfield, journalist, author, and Science Museum (London) executive
“This book is useful if civilization collapses, and entertaining if it doesn’t. After
the cometary impact it may save your life, and if it doesn’t at least you’ll know
why you perished.”
—S. M. Stirling, New York Times bestselling author of The Given Sacrifice
“Dartnell makes the technology and science of everyday life in our civilization
fascinating and understandable. This book may or may not save your life but
it’ll certainly make it more interesting. This is the book we all wish we’d been
given at school: The Knowledge that makes everything else make sense.”
—Ken MacLeod, author of Intrusion and Descent
3
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
4
5
PENGUIN BOOKS
An imprint of Penguin Random House LLC
375 Hudson Street
New York, New York 10014
penguin.com
First published in the United States of America by The Penguin Press, an imprint of Penguin Random House LLC, 2014
Published in Penguin Books 2015
The information contained in this book cannot replace sound judgment and good decision making, which can help reduce risk
exposure, nor does the scope of this book allow for disclosure of all the potential hazards and risks involved. The author and publisher
are not responsible for the instructions and information, as these are not intended for use except in the event of mass disasters, when
the customary ways of doing things are not possible.
Version_2
6
To my wife, Vicky.
Thank you for saying yes.
7
These fragments I have shored against my ruins
T. S. ELIOT, THE WASTE LAND
8
CONTENTS
TITLE PAGE
COPYRIGHT
DEDICATION
EPIGRAPH
INTRODUCTION
9
FURTHER READING AND REFERENCES
BIBLIOGRAPHY
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
INDEX
CREDITS
10
INTRODUCTION
11
of collapse, this might not be too far from the truth. I’m an optimist, though: I
think morality and rationality would ultimately prevail, and settlement and
rebuilding begin.
The world as we know it has ended. The crucial question is: now what?
Once the survivors have come to terms with their predicament—the
collapse of the entire infrastructure that previously supported their lives—
what can they do to rise from the ashes to ensure they thrive in the long term?
What crucial knowledge would they need to recover as rapidly as possible?
This is a survivors’ guidebook. Not one just concerned with keeping
people alive in the weeks after the Fall—plenty of handbooks have been
written on survival skills—but one that teaches how to orchestrate the
rebuilding of a technologically advanced civilization. If you suddenly found
yourself without a working example, could you explain how to build an
internal combustion engine, or a clock, or a microscope? Or, even more basic,
how to successfully cultivate crops and make clothes? The apocalyptic
scenarios I’m presenting here are also the starting point for a thought
experiment: they are a vehicle for examining the fundamentals of science and
technology, which, as knowledge becomes ever more specialized, feel very
remote to most of us.
People living in developed nations have become disconnected from the
everyday processes of civilization that support them. Individually, we are
astoundingly ignorant of even the basics of the production of food, shelter,
clothes, medicine, materials, or vital substances. Our survival skills have
atrophied to the point that much of humanity would be incapable of sustaining
itself if the life-support system of modern civilization failed, if food no longer
magically appeared on store shelves, or clothes on hangers. Of course, there
was a time when everyone was a survivalist, with a far more intimate
connection to the land and methods of production, and to survive in a post-
apocalyptic world you’d need to turn back the clock and relearn these core
skills.*
What’s more, each piece of modern technology we take for granted
requires an enormous support network of other technologies. There’s much
more to making an iPhone than knowing the design and materials of each of
its components. The device sits as the capstone on the very tip of a vast
pyramid of enabling technologies: the mining and refining of the rare element
indium for the touch screen, high-precision photolithographic manufacturing
of microscopic circuitry in the computing processor chips, and the incredibly
miniaturized components in the microphone, not to mention the network of
cell phone towers and other infrastructure necessary to maintain
telecommunications and the functioning of the phone. The first generation
born after the Fall would find the internal mechanisms of a modern phone
absolutely inscrutable, the pathways of its microchip circuits invisibly small
12
to the human eye and their purpose utterly mysterious. The sci-fi author
Arthur C. Clarke said in 1961 that any sufficiently advanced technology is
indistinguishable from magic. In the aftermath of the Fall, the rub is that this
miraculous technology would have belonged not to some star-faring alien
species, but to people just a generation in our own past.
Even quotidian artifacts of our civilization that aren’t particularly high-
tech still require a diversity of raw materials that must be mined or otherwise
gathered, processed in specialized plants, and assembled in a manufacturing
facility. And all of this in turn relies on electrical power stations and transport
over great distances. This point is made very eloquently in Leonard E. Read’s
1958 essay written from the perspective of one of our most basic tools, “I,
Pencil.” The astounding conclusion is that because the sourcing of raw
materials and the methods of production are so dispersed, there is not a single
person on the face of the Earth who knows how to make even this simplest of
implements.
A potent demonstration of the gulf that now separates our individual
capabilities and the production of even simple gizmos in our everyday life
was offered by Thomas Thwaites when, in 2008, he attempted to make a
toaster from scratch while studying for his MA at the Royal College of Art.
He reverse-engineered a cheap toaster down to its barest essentials—iron
frame, mica-mineral insulating sheets, nickel heating filaments, copper wires
and plug, and plastic casing—and then sourced all the raw materials himself,
digging them out of the ground in quarries and mines. He also looked up
simpler, historical metallurgical techniques, referring to a sixteenth-century
text to build a rudimentary iron-smelting furnace using a metal trash can,
barbecue coals, and a leaf blower for bellows. The finished model is
satisfyingly primitive but also grotesquely beautiful in its own right and
neatly underscores the core of our problem.
Of course, even in one of the extreme doomsday scenarios, groups of
survivors would not need to become self-sufficient immediately. If the great
majority of the population succumbed to an aggressive virus, there would still
be vast resources left behind. The supermarkets would remain stocked with
plentiful food, and you could pick up a fine new set of designer clothes from
the deserted department stores or liberate from the showroom the sports car
you’ve always dreamed about. Find an abandoned mansion, and with a little
foraging it wouldn’t be too hard to salvage some mobile diesel generators to
keep the lighting, heating, and appliances running. Underground lakes of fuel
remain beneath gas stations, sufficient to keep your new home and car
functioning for a significant period. In fact, small groups of survivors could
probably live pretty comfortably in the immediate aftermath of the Fall. For a
while, civilization could coast on its own momentum. The survivors would
13
find themselves surrounded by a wealth of resources there for the taking: a
bountiful Garden of Eden.
But the Garden is rotting.
Food, clothes, medicines, machinery, and other technology inexorably
decompose, decay, deteriorate, and degrade over time. The survivors are
provided with nothing more than a grace period. With the collapse of
civilization and the sudden arrest of key processes—gathering raw materials,
refining and manufacturing, transportation and distribution—the hourglass is
inverted and the sand steadily drains away. The remnants provide nothing
more than a safety buffer to ease the transition to the moment when
harvesting and manufacturing must begin anew.
A REBOOT MANUAL
The most profound problem facing survivors is that human knowledge is
collective, distributed across the population. No one individual knows enough
to keep the vital processes of society going. Even if a skilled technician from
a steel foundry survived, he would only know the details of his job, not the
subsets of knowledge possessed by other workers at the foundry that are vital
for keeping it running—let alone how to mine iron ore or provide electricity
to keep the plant operating. The most visible technology we use daily is just
the tip of a vast iceberg—not only in the sense that it’s based on a great
manufacturing and organizational network that supports production, but also
because it represents the heritage of a long history of advances and
developments. The iceberg extends unseen through both space and time.
So where would survivors turn? A great deal of information will certainly
remain in the books gathering dust on the shelves of the now-deserted
libraries, bookshops, and homes. The problem with this knowledge, however,
is that it isn’t presented in a way appropriate for helping a fledgling society—
or an individual without specialist training. What do you think you’d
understand if you just pulled a medical textbook off the shelf and flipped
through the pages of terminology and drug names? University medical
textbooks presuppose a huge amount of prior knowledge, and are designed to
work alongside teaching and practical demonstrations from established
experts. Even if there were doctors among the first generation of survivors,
they’d be severely limited in what they could accomplish without test results
or the cornucopia of modern drugs they were trained to use—drugs that
would be degrading on pharmacy shelves or in defunct hospital storage
refrigerators.
Much of this academic literature would itself be lost, perhaps to fires
ripping unchecked through empty cities. Even worse, much of the wealth of
new knowledge generated each year, including that which I and other
14
scientists produce and consume in our own research, is not recorded on any
durable medium at all. The cutting edge of human understanding exists
primarily as ephemeral bits of data: as specialist journals’ academic “papers”
stored on website servers.
And the books aimed at general readers wouldn’t be much more help. Can
you imagine a group of survivors who had access to only the selection of
books stocked in an average store? How far would a civilization get trying to
rebuild itself from the wisdom contained in the pages of self-help guides to
succeeding in business management, thinking yourself thin, or reading the
body language of the opposite sex? The most absurd nightmare would be a
post-apocalyptic society discovering a few yellowed and crumbly books and,
thinking them the scientific wisdom of the ancients, trying to apply
homeopathy to curb a plague or astrology to forecast harvests. Even the books
in the science section would offer little help. The latest pop-sci page-turner
may be engagingly written, make clever metaphorical use of everyday
observations, and leave the reader with a deeper understanding of some new
research, but it probably won’t yield much pragmatic knowledge. In short, the
vast majority of our collective wisdom would not be accessible—at least in a
usable form—to the survivors of a cataclysm. So how best to help the
survivors? What key information would a guidebook need to deliver, and how
might it be structured?
I’m not the first person to wrestle with this question. James Lovelock is a
scientist with a formidable track record for striking at the heart of an issue
long before his peers. He is most famous for his Gaia hypothesis, which
posits that the entire planet—a complex assemblage of rocky crust and oceans
and swirling atmosphere, along with the thin smear of life that has established
itself across the surface—can be understood as a single entity that acts to
damp down instabilities and self-regulate its environment over billions of
years. Lovelock is deeply concerned that one element of this system, Homo
sapiens, now has the capacity to disrupt these natural checks and balances
with devastating effect.
Lovelock draws on a biological analogy to explain how we might
safeguard our heritage: “Organisms that face desiccation often encapsulate
their genes in spores so that the information for their renewal is carried
through the drought.” The human equivalent envisaged by Lovelock is a book
for all seasons, “a primer on science, clearly written and unambiguous in its
meaning—a primer for anyone interested in the state of the Earth and how to
survive and live well on it.” What he proposes is a truly massive undertaking:
recording the complete assemblage of human knowledge in a huge textbook
—a document that you could, at least in principle, read from cover to cover,
and then walk away knowing the essentials of everything that is now known.
15
In fact, the idea of a “total book” has a much longer history. In the past,
encyclopedia compilers appreciated far more acutely than we do today the
fragility of even great civilizations, and the exquisite value of the scientific
knowledge and practical skills held in the minds of the population that
evaporate once the society collapses. Denis Diderot explicitly regarded his
Encyclopédie, published between 1751 and 1772, as a safe repository of
human knowledge, preserving it for posterity in case of a cataclysm that
snuffs our civilization as the ancient cultures of the Egyptians, Greeks, and
Romans had all been lost, leaving behind only random surviving fragments of
their writing. In this way, the encyclopedia becomes a time capsule of
accumulated knowledge, all of it arranged logically and cross-referenced,
protected against the erosion of time in case of a widespread catastrophe.
Since the Enlightenment our understanding of the world has increased
exponentially, and the task of compiling a complete compendium of human
knowledge would be orders of magnitude harder today. The creation of such a
“total book” would represent a modern-era pyramid-building project,
consuming the full-time exertion of tens of thousands of people over many
years. The purpose of this toil would be to ensure not the safe passage of a
pharaoh to eternal bliss in the afterworld, but the immortality of our
civilization itself.
Such an all-consuming undertaking is not inconceivable if the will is
there. My parents’ generation worked hard to put the first man on the moon:
at its peak the Apollo program employed 400,000 people and consumed 4
percent of the total American federal budget. Indeed, you might think that the
perfect compendium of current human knowledge has already been created by
the phenomenal combined effort of the committed volunteers behind
Wikipedia. Clay Shirky, an expert on the sociology and economics of the
Internet, has estimated that Wikipedia currently represents around 100 million
man-hours of devoted effort in writing and editing. But even if you could
print Wikipedia in its entirety, its hyperlinks replaced by cross-referenced
page numbers, you’d still be a far cry from a manual enabling a community to
rebuild civilization from scratch. It was never intended for anything like this
purpose, and lacks practical details and the organization for guiding
progression from rudimentary science and technology to more advanced
applications. Moreover, a hard copy would be unfeasibly large—and how
could you ensure post-apocalyptic survivors would be able to get hold of a
copy?
In fact, I believe you can help society recover much better by taking a
slightly more elegant approach.
The solution can be found in a remark made by physicist Richard
Feynman. In hypothesizing about the potential destruction of all scientific
knowledge and what might be done about it, he allowed himself a single
16
statement, to be transmitted securely to whichever intelligent creatures
emerged after the cataclysm: What sentence holds the most information in the
fewest words? “I believe,” said Feynman, “it is the atomic hypothesis . . . that
all things are made of atoms—little particles that move around in perpetual
motion, attracting each other when they are a little distance apart, but
repelling upon being squeezed into one another.”
The more you consider the implications and testable hypotheses emerging
from this simple statement, the more it unfurls to release further revelations
about the nature of the world. The attraction of particles explains the surface
tension of water, and the mutual repulsion of atoms in close proximity
explains why I don’t fall straight through the café chair I’m sitting on. The
diversity of atoms, and the compounds produced by their combinations, is the
key principle of chemistry. This single, carefully crafted sentence
encapsulates a huge density of information, which unravels and expands as
you investigate it.
But what if your word count wasn’t quite so restricted? If allowed the
luxury of being more expansive while retaining the guiding principle of
providing key, condensed knowledge to accelerate rediscovery, rather than
attempting to write a complete encyclopedia of modern understanding, is it
feasible to write a single volume that would constitute a survivor’s quick-start
guide to rebooting technological society?
I think that Feynman’s single sentence can be improved upon in a
fundamentally important way. Possessing pure knowledge alone with no
means to exploit it is impotent. To help a fledgling society pull itself up by its
own bootstraps, you’ve also got to suggest how to utilize that knowledge, to
show its practical applications. For the survivors of a recent apocalypse, the
immediate practical applications are essential. Understanding the basic theory
of metallurgy is one thing, but using the principles to scavenge and reprocess
metals from the dead cities, for instance, is another. The exploitation of
knowledge and scientific principles is the essence of technology, and as we’ll
see in this book, the practices of scientific research and technological
development are inextricably intertwined.
Inspired by Feynman, I’d argue that the best way to help survivors of the
Fall is not to create a comprehensive record of all knowledge, but to provide a
guide to the basics, adapted to their likely circumstances, as well as a
blueprint of the techniques necessary to rediscover crucial understanding for
themselves—the powerful knowledge-generation machinery that is the
scientific method. The key to preserving civilization is to provide a condensed
seed that will readily unpack to yield the entire expansive tree of knowledge,
rather than attempting to document the colossal tree itself. Which fragments,
to paraphrase T. S. Eliot, are best shored against our ruins?
17
The value of such a book is potentially enormous. What might have
happened in our own history if the classical civilizations had left condensed
seeds of their accumulated knowledge? One of the major catalysts for the
Renaissance in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries was the trickle of ancient
learning back into Western Europe. Much of this knowledge, lost with the fall
of the Roman Empire, was preserved and propagated by Arab scholars
carefully translating and copying texts; other manuscripts were rediscovered
by European scholars. But what if these treatises on philosophy, geometry,
and practical mechanisms had been preserved in a distributed network of time
capsules? And similarly, with the right book available, could a post-
apocalyptic Dark Ages be averted?*
ACCELERATED DEVELOPMENT
During a reboot, there’s no reason to retrace the original route to scientific
and technological sophistication. Our path through history has been long and
tortuous, stumbling in a largely haphazard manner, chasing red herrings and
overlooking crucial developments for long periods. But with 20/20 hindsight,
knowing what we know now, could we give directions straight to crucial
advances, taking shortcuts like an experienced navigator? How might we
chart an optimal route through the vastly interlinked network of scientific
principles and enabling technologies to accelerate progress as much as
possible?
Key breakthroughs in our history are often serendipitous—they were
stumbled upon by chance. Alexander Fleming’s discovery of the antibiotic
properties of Penicillium mold in 1928 was a chance occurrence. And indeed,
the observation that first hinted at the deep coupling between electricity and
magnetism—the twitching of compass needles left next to a wire carrying
current—was fortuitous, as was the discovery of X-rays. Many of these key
discoveries could just as easily have happened earlier, some of them
substantially so. Once new natural phenomena have been discovered,
progress is driven by systematic and methodical investigation to understand
their workings and quantify their effects, but the initial uncovering can be
targeted with a few choice hints to the recovering civilization on where to
look and which investigations to prioritize.
Likewise, many inventions seem obvious in retrospect, but sometimes the
time of emergence of a key advance or invention doesn’t appear to have
followed any particular scientific discovery or enabling technology. For the
prospects of a rebooting civilization, these cases are encouraging because
they mean the quick-start guide need only briefly describe a few central
design features for the survivors to figure out exactly how to re-create some
key technologies. The wheelbarrow, for instance, could have occurred
18
centuries before it actually did—if only someone had thought of it. This may
seem like a trivial example, combining the operating principles of the wheel
and the lever, but it represents an enormous labor saver, and it didn’t appear
in Europe until millennia after the wheel (the first depiction of a wheelbarrow
appears in an English manuscript written about 1250 AD).
Other innovations have such wide-ranging effects, aiding a great diversity
of other developments, that you would want to beeline directly toward them
to support many other elements of the post-apocalyptic recovery. The
movable-type printing press is one such gateway technology that accelerated
development and had incomparable social ramifications in our history. With a
little guidance, mass-produced books could reappear early in the rebuilding of
a new civilization, as we’ll see later.
And when developing new technologies, some steps in the progression
could be skipped altogether. The quick-start guide could aid a recovering
society by showing how to leapfrog straight over intermediate stages from our
history to more advanced, yet still achievable, systems. There are a number of
encouraging cases of this kind of technological leapfrogging in the
developing nations in Africa and Asia today. For example, many remote
communities unconnected to power grids are receiving solar-power
infrastructure, hopping over centuries of the Western progression dependent
on fossil fuels. Villagers living in mud huts in many rural parts of Africa are
leapfrogging straight to mobile phone communications, bypassing
intermediate technologies such as semaphore towers, telegraphs, or land-line
telephones.
But perhaps the most impressive feat of leapfrogging in history was
achieved by Japan in the nineteenth century. During the Tokugawa shogunate,
Japan isolated itself for two centuries from the rest of the world, forbidding its
citizens to leave or foreigners to enter, and permitting only minimal trade with
a select few nations. Contact was reestablished in the most persuasive manner
in 1853 when the US Navy arrived in the Bay of Edo (Tokyo) with
powerfully weaponized steam-powered warships, far superior to anything
possessed by the technologically stagnant Japanese civilization. The shock of
realization of this technological disparity triggered the Meiji Restoration.
Japan’s previously isolated, technologically backward feudal society was
transformed by a series of political, economic, and legal reforms, and foreign
experts in science, engineering, and education instructed the nation how to
build telegraph and railroad networks, textile mills and factories. Japan
industrialized in a matter of decades, and by the time of the Second World
War was able to take on the might of the US Navy that had forced this process
in the first place.
Could a preserved cache of appropriate knowledge allow a post-
apocalyptic society to similarly achieve a rapid developmental trajectory?
19
Unfortunately, there are limits to how far ahead you can push a
civilization by skipping intermediate stages. Even if the post-apocalyptic
scientists fully understand the basis underlying an application and have
produced a design that would work in principle, it may still be impossible to
build a working prototype. I call this the Da Vinci effect. The great
Renaissance inventor generated endless designs for mechanisms and
contraptions, such as his fantastic flying machines, but few of them were ever
realized. The problem was largely that Da Vinci was too far ahead of his time.
Correct scientific understanding and ingenious designs aren’t sufficient: you
also need a matching level of sophistication in construction materials with the
necessary properties and available power sources.
So the trick for a quick-start guide must be to provide appropriate
technology for the post-apocalyptic world, in the same way that aid agencies
today supply suitable intermediate technologies to communities in the
developing world. These are solutions that offer a significant improvement on
the status quo—an advance from the existing, rudimentary technology—but
which are still able to be repaired and maintained by local workmen with the
practical skills, tools, and materials available. Thus the aim for an accelerated
reboot of civilization is to jump directly to a level that saves centuries of
incremental development, but that can still be achieved with rudimentary
materials and techniques—the sweet-spot intermediate technology.
It is these features of our own history—serendipitous discoveries,
inventions that were not waiting for any prerequisite knowledge, gateway
technologies that stimulated progress in many areas, and opportunities to
leapfrog over intermediate stages—that give us optimism that a well-designed
quick-start manual for civilization could give directions toward the most
fertile investigations and the crucial principles behind key technologies,
guiding an optimal route through the web of science and technology, and so
greatly accelerate rebuilding. Imagine science when you’re not fumbling
around in the dark, but your ancestors have equipped you with a flashlight
and a rough map of the landscape.
If a rebooting civilization is not required to follow our own idiosyncratic
path of progress, it will experience a completely different sequence of
advances. Indeed, rebooting along the same trajectory that our current
civilization followed may now be very difficult. The Industrial Revolution
was powered largely by fossil energy. Most of these easily accessible fossil
energy sources—deposits of coal, oil, and natural gas—have now been mined
toward depletion. Without access to such readily available energy, how could
a civilization following ours haul itself through a second industrial
revolution? The solution, as we’ll see, will lie in an early adoption of
renewable energy sources and careful recycling of assets—sustainable
20
development will likely be forced on the next civilization out of sheer
necessity: a green reboot.
In the process, unfamiliar combinations of technologies will emerge over
time. We will take a look at examples of where a recovering society is likely
to take a different trajectory in its development—the path not traveled—as
well as utilizing technological solutions that for us have fallen by the
wayside. To us, Civilization 2.0 might look like a mishmash of technologies
from different eras, not unlike the genre of fiction known as steampunk.
Steampunk narratives are set in an alternative history that has followed a
different pattern of development and is often characterized by a fusion of
Victorian technology with other applications. A post-apocalyptic reboot with
very different rates of progress in separate fields of science and technology is
likely to lead to such an anachronistic patchwork.
CONTENTS
A reboot manual would work best on two levels. First, you need a certain
amount of practical knowledge handed to you on a plate, so as to recover a
base level of capability and a comfortable lifestyle as quickly as possible, and
to halt further degeneration. But you also need to nurture the recovery of
scientific investigation and provide the most worthwhile kernels of
knowledge to begin exploring.*
We’ll start with the basics and see how you can provide the fundamental
elements of a comfortable life for yourself after the Fall: sufficient food and
clean water, clothes and building materials, energy and essential medicines.
There will be a number of immediate concerns for the survivors: cultivable
crops must be gathered from farmland and seed caches before they die and
are lost; diesel can be rendered from biofuel crops to keep engines running
until the machinery fails, and parts can be scavenged to reestablish a local
power grid. We’ll look at how best to cannibalize components and scavenge
materials from the detritus of the dead civilization: the post-apocalyptic world
will demand ingenuity in repurposing, tinkering, and jury-rigging.
Once the essentials are in place, I’ll explain how to reinstate agriculture
and safely preserve a stockpile of food, and how plant and animal fibers can
be turned into clothes. Materials such as paper, ceramic pottery, brick, glass,
and wrought iron are today so commonplace that they are considered prosaic
and boring—but how could you actually make them if you needed to? Trees
yield an enormous amount of remarkably useful stuff: from timber material
for construction to charcoal for purifying drinking water, as well as providing
a fiercely burning solid fuel. A whole range of crucial compounds can be
baked out of wood, and even ashes contain a substance (called potash) needed
for making essential items such as soap and glass, as well as producing one of
21
the ingredients of gunpowder. With basic know-how you can extract a great
deal of other critically useful substances from your natural surroundings—
soda, lime, ammonia, acids, and alcohol—and start a post-apocalyptic
chemical industry. And as your capabilities recover, the quick-start guide will
help the development of explosives suitable for mining and for demolishing
the carcasses of ancient buildings, as well as the production of artificial
fertilizer, and of the light-sensitive silver compounds used in photography.
In later chapters we’ll see how to relearn medicine, harness mechanical
power, master the generation and storage of electricity, and assemble a simple
radio set. And since The Knowledge contains information on how to make
paper, ink, and a printing press, the book itself contains the genetic
instructions for its own reproduction.
How much can one book invigorate our understanding of the world? I
obviously can’t begin to pretend this single volume represents a complete
documentation of the sum total of human knowledge of science and
technology. But I think it provides enough of a grounding in the fundamentals
to help survivors in the early years after a Fall, and broad directions for
tracing an optimal route through the web of science and technology for a
greatly accelerated recovery. And, following the principle of providing
condensed kernels of knowledge that unravel under investigation, a single
volume can encapsulate a vast treasure trove of information. By the time you
put down this manual, you’ll understand how to rebuild the infrastructure for
a civilized lifestyle. You’ll also, I hope, have a firmer grip on some of the
beautiful fundamentals of science itself. Science is not a collection of facts
and figures: it is the method you need to apply to confidently work out how
the world works.
The purpose of a quick-start guide is to ensure that the fire of curiosity, of
inquiry and exploration, continues to burn fiercely. The hope is that even in
the maw of a cataclysmic shock the thread of civilization is not broken and
the surviving community does not regress too far or stagnate; that the core of
our society can be preserved; and that these crucial kernels of knowledge,
nurtured in the post-apocalyptic world, will flourish once again.
This is the blueprint for a rebooting civilization—but also a primer on the
fundamentals of our own.
22
CHAPTER 1
23
untrustworthy partner or punished by the state: cheats don’t prosper. This tacit
agreement between the individuals in a society to cooperate and behave for
the collective good, sacrificing a certain amount of their own personal
freedom in exchange for benefits such as the mutual protection offered by the
state, is known as the social contract. It is the very foundation of all collective
endeavor, production, and economic activity of a civilization, but the structure
begins to strain and social cohesion loosens once individuals perceive greater
personal gains in cheating, or suspect that others will cheat them.
During a severe crisis the social contract can snap altogether, precipitating
a complete disintegration of law and order. We need look no further than the
most technologically advanced nation on the planet to see the effects of a
localized fracture in the social contract. New Orleans was physically
devastated by the rampage of Hurricane Katrina, but it was the desperate
realization by the city’s inhabitants that local governance had evaporated and
no help would be arriving anytime soon that precipitated the rapid
degeneration of normal social order and the outbreak of anarchy.
So after a cataclysmic event, we might expect organized gangs to emerge
to fill the power vacuum left behind after the evaporation of governance and
law enforcement, laying claim to their own personal fiefdoms. Those who
seize control of the remaining resources (food, fuel, and so on) will
administer the only items that have any inherent value in the new world order.
Cash and credit cards will be meaningless. Those appropriating the caches of
preserved food as their own “property” will become very wealthy and
powerful—the new kings—controlling the allocation of food to buy loyalty
and services in the same way that ancient Mesopotamian emperors did. In this
environment, people with special skills, such as doctors and nurses, might do
well to keep this to themselves, as they may be forced to serve the gangs as
highly specialized slaves.
Lethal force may be applied swiftly to deter looters and raids from rival
gangs, and as resources become depleted the competition will get only fiercer.
A common mantra of people who actively prepare for the apocalypse (called
Preppers) is: “It is better to have a gun and not need it than to need a gun and
not have it.”
One pattern likely to recur over the weeks and months after the Fall is that
small communities of people will gather together in a defensible location for
mutual support and protection of their own stash of consumables, looking for
safety in numbers. These small dominions will need to patrol and protect their
own borders in the way that whole nations do today. Ironically, the safest
place for a group to barricade themselves in and hunker down during the
turbulence would be one of the fortresses dotted across the country, but now
turned inside out in its purpose. Prisons are largely self-contained compounds
with high walls, sturdy gates, barbed wire, and watchtowers, originally
24
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
DANCE ON STILTS AT THE GIRLS’ UNYAGO, NIUCHI
I see increasing reason to believe that the view formed some time
back as to the origin of the Makonde bush is the correct one. I have
no doubt that it is not a natural product, but the result of human
occupation. Those parts of the high country where man—as a very
slight amount of practice enables the eye to perceive at once—has not
yet penetrated with axe and hoe, are still occupied by a splendid
timber forest quite able to sustain a comparison with our mixed
forests in Germany. But wherever man has once built his hut or tilled
his field, this horrible bush springs up. Every phase of this process
may be seen in the course of a couple of hours’ walk along the main
road. From the bush to right or left, one hears the sound of the axe—
not from one spot only, but from several directions at once. A few
steps further on, we can see what is taking place. The brush has been
cut down and piled up in heaps to the height of a yard or more,
between which the trunks of the large trees stand up like the last
pillars of a magnificent ruined building. These, too, present a
melancholy spectacle: the destructive Makonde have ringed them—
cut a broad strip of bark all round to ensure their dying off—and also
piled up pyramids of brush round them. Father and son, mother and
son-in-law, are chopping away perseveringly in the background—too
busy, almost, to look round at the white stranger, who usually excites
so much interest. If you pass by the same place a week later, the piles
of brushwood have disappeared and a thick layer of ashes has taken
the place of the green forest. The large trees stretch their
smouldering trunks and branches in dumb accusation to heaven—if
they have not already fallen and been more or less reduced to ashes,
perhaps only showing as a white stripe on the dark ground.
This work of destruction is carried out by the Makonde alike on the
virgin forest and on the bush which has sprung up on sites already
cultivated and deserted. In the second case they are saved the trouble
of burning the large trees, these being entirely absent in the
secondary bush.
After burning this piece of forest ground and loosening it with the
hoe, the native sows his corn and plants his vegetables. All over the
country, he goes in for bed-culture, which requires, and, in fact,
receives, the most careful attention. Weeds are nowhere tolerated in
the south of German East Africa. The crops may fail on the plains,
where droughts are frequent, but never on the plateau with its
abundant rains and heavy dews. Its fortunate inhabitants even have
the satisfaction of seeing the proud Wayao and Wamakua working
for them as labourers, driven by hunger to serve where they were
accustomed to rule.
But the light, sandy soil is soon exhausted, and would yield no
harvest the second year if cultivated twice running. This fact has
been familiar to the native for ages; consequently he provides in
time, and, while his crop is growing, prepares the next plot with axe
and firebrand. Next year he plants this with his various crops and
lets the first piece lie fallow. For a short time it remains waste and
desolate; then nature steps in to repair the destruction wrought by
man; a thousand new growths spring out of the exhausted soil, and
even the old stumps put forth fresh shoots. Next year the new growth
is up to one’s knees, and in a few years more it is that terrible,
impenetrable bush, which maintains its position till the black
occupier of the land has made the round of all the available sites and
come back to his starting point.
The Makonde are, body and soul, so to speak, one with this bush.
According to my Yao informants, indeed, their name means nothing
else but “bush people.” Their own tradition says that they have been
settled up here for a very long time, but to my surprise they laid great
stress on an original immigration. Their old homes were in the
south-east, near Mikindani and the mouth of the Rovuma, whence
their peaceful forefathers were driven by the continual raids of the
Sakalavas from Madagascar and the warlike Shirazis[47] of the coast,
to take refuge on the almost inaccessible plateau. I have studied
African ethnology for twenty years, but the fact that changes of
population in this apparently quiet and peaceable corner of the earth
could have been occasioned by outside enterprises taking place on
the high seas, was completely new to me. It is, no doubt, however,
correct.
The charming tribal legend of the Makonde—besides informing us
of other interesting matters—explains why they have to live in the
thickest of the bush and a long way from the edge of the plateau,
instead of making their permanent homes beside the purling brooks
and springs of the low country.
“The place where the tribe originated is Mahuta, on the southern
side of the plateau towards the Rovuma, where of old time there was
nothing but thick bush. Out of this bush came a man who never
washed himself or shaved his head, and who ate and drank but little.
He went out and made a human figure from the wood of a tree
growing in the open country, which he took home to his abode in the
bush and there set it upright. In the night this image came to life and
was a woman. The man and woman went down together to the
Rovuma to wash themselves. Here the woman gave birth to a still-
born child. They left that place and passed over the high land into the
valley of the Mbemkuru, where the woman had another child, which
was also born dead. Then they returned to the high bush country of
Mahuta, where the third child was born, which lived and grew up. In
course of time, the couple had many more children, and called
themselves Wamatanda. These were the ancestral stock of the
Makonde, also called Wamakonde,[48] i.e., aborigines. Their
forefather, the man from the bush, gave his children the command to
bury their dead upright, in memory of the mother of their race who
was cut out of wood and awoke to life when standing upright. He also
warned them against settling in the valleys and near large streams,
for sickness and death dwelt there. They were to make it a rule to
have their huts at least an hour’s walk from the nearest watering-
place; then their children would thrive and escape illness.”
The explanation of the name Makonde given by my informants is
somewhat different from that contained in the above legend, which I
extract from a little book (small, but packed with information), by
Pater Adams, entitled Lindi und sein Hinterland. Otherwise, my
results agree exactly with the statements of the legend. Washing?
Hapana—there is no such thing. Why should they do so? As it is, the
supply of water scarcely suffices for cooking and drinking; other
people do not wash, so why should the Makonde distinguish himself
by such needless eccentricity? As for shaving the head, the short,
woolly crop scarcely needs it,[49] so the second ancestral precept is
likewise easy enough to follow. Beyond this, however, there is
nothing ridiculous in the ancestor’s advice. I have obtained from
various local artists a fairly large number of figures carved in wood,
ranging from fifteen to twenty-three inches in height, and
representing women belonging to the great group of the Mavia,
Makonde, and Matambwe tribes. The carving is remarkably well
done and renders the female type with great accuracy, especially the
keloid ornamentation, to be described later on. As to the object and
meaning of their works the sculptors either could or (more probably)
would tell me nothing, and I was forced to content myself with the
scanty information vouchsafed by one man, who said that the figures
were merely intended to represent the nembo—the artificial
deformations of pelele, ear-discs, and keloids. The legend recorded
by Pater Adams places these figures in a new light. They must surely
be more than mere dolls; and we may even venture to assume that
they are—though the majority of present-day Makonde are probably
unaware of the fact—representations of the tribal ancestress.
The references in the legend to the descent from Mahuta to the
Rovuma, and to a journey across the highlands into the Mbekuru
valley, undoubtedly indicate the previous history of the tribe, the
travels of the ancestral pair typifying the migrations of their
descendants. The descent to the neighbouring Rovuma valley, with
its extraordinary fertility and great abundance of game, is intelligible
at a glance—but the crossing of the Lukuledi depression, the ascent
to the Rondo Plateau and the descent to the Mbemkuru, also lie
within the bounds of probability, for all these districts have exactly
the same character as the extreme south. Now, however, comes a
point of especial interest for our bacteriological age. The primitive
Makonde did not enjoy their lives in the marshy river-valleys.
Disease raged among them, and many died. It was only after they
had returned to their original home near Mahuta, that the health
conditions of these people improved. We are very apt to think of the
African as a stupid person whose ignorance of nature is only equalled
by his fear of it, and who looks on all mishaps as caused by evil
spirits and malignant natural powers. It is much more correct to
assume in this case that the people very early learnt to distinguish
districts infested with malaria from those where it is absent.
This knowledge is crystallized in the
ancestral warning against settling in the
valleys and near the great waters, the
dwelling-places of disease and death. At the
same time, for security against the hostile
Mavia south of the Rovuma, it was enacted
that every settlement must be not less than a
certain distance from the southern edge of the
plateau. Such in fact is their mode of life at the
present day. It is not such a bad one, and
certainly they are both safer and more
comfortable than the Makua, the recent
intruders from the south, who have made USUAL METHOD OF
good their footing on the western edge of the CLOSING HUT-DOOR
plateau, extending over a fairly wide belt of
country. Neither Makua nor Makonde show in their dwellings
anything of the size and comeliness of the Yao houses in the plain,
especially at Masasi, Chingulungulu and Zuza’s. Jumbe Chauro, a
Makonde hamlet not far from Newala, on the road to Mahuta, is the
most important settlement of the tribe I have yet seen, and has fairly
spacious huts. But how slovenly is their construction compared with
the palatial residences of the elephant-hunters living in the plain.
The roofs are still more untidy than in the general run of huts during
the dry season, the walls show here and there the scanty beginnings
or the lamentable remains of the mud plastering, and the interior is a
veritable dog-kennel; dirt, dust and disorder everywhere. A few huts
only show any attempt at division into rooms, and this consists
merely of very roughly-made bamboo partitions. In one point alone
have I noticed any indication of progress—in the method of fastening
the door. Houses all over the south are secured in a simple but
ingenious manner. The door consists of a set of stout pieces of wood
or bamboo, tied with bark-string to two cross-pieces, and moving in
two grooves round one of the door-posts, so as to open inwards. If
the owner wishes to leave home, he takes two logs as thick as a man’s
upper arm and about a yard long. One of these is placed obliquely
against the middle of the door from the inside, so as to form an angle
of from 60° to 75° with the ground. He then places the second piece
horizontally across the first, pressing it downward with all his might.
It is kept in place by two strong posts planted in the ground a few
inches inside the door. This fastening is absolutely safe, but of course
cannot be applied to both doors at once, otherwise how could the
owner leave or enter his house? I have not yet succeeded in finding
out how the back door is fastened.