Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 CASA V USAF Complaint 24-Cv-01604
1 CASA V USAF Complaint 24-Cv-01604
COMPLAINT
1. Plaintiff Center to Advance Security in America (“CASA”) brings this action against the
U.S. Air Force (“USAF”) under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552 (“FOIA”),
seeking declaratory and injunctive relief to compel compliance with the requirements of
FOIA.
2. This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(B) and 28
U.S.C. §§ 1331.
3. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(B) and 28 U.S.C. § 1391(e).
PARTIES
security of the American people. CASA educates and informs the American people about
1
Case 1:24-cv-01604 Document 1 Filed 05/31/24 Page 2 of 7
the actions of their government and its officials that impact their safety; peace and security;
5. Defendant USAF is a federal agency within the meaning of FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 552(f)(1).
USAF has possession, custody, and control of records responsive to Plaintiff’s FOIA
request.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
6. On August 23, 2023, CASA submitted a FOIA request (attached as Exhibit A) seeking the
(“THEMU”):
2. We are seeking records on the directive to open the THEMU facility, its
operations and procedures, and the exchanged communications between
and among the relevant following officials:
a. Lt. Col. (Dr.) Joshua Smalley
b. Chari’ McMahon
c. Maj. Gen. Leah Lauderback
d. Frank Kendall, Secretary of the Air Force
e. Kristyn E. Jones, Under Secretary
f. Lt. Gen. Robert I. Miller, Surgeon General
g. Mg. John J. Degoes, Deputy Surgeon General
h. Mg. Jeannie M. Leavitt, Chief of Safety
3. We are seeking all emails, text messages, chat sessions, or other forms
of written or electronic communication used to discuss the development
of the 59th Medical Wing’s “THEMU” and communications by and
between those in #2 above containing the following phrases and/or
words: “directive,” “open,” “facility,” “transgender,” “reconstructive
surgery,” “gender dysphoria,” “profiling,” “cross-sex hormone
therapy,” “surgical consultations,” “transition,” “male,” “female,”
“gender assigned at birth,” “nonbinary,” “mental health,” “gender
fluid”, “LGBTQ”, “LGBTQIA+”, “ally”, “cisgender”, or any related
terms or phrases.
2
Case 1:24-cv-01604 Document 1 Filed 05/31/24 Page 3 of 7
4. All records exchanged by or between any official listed above with any
individual working for one of the following media outlets (with
suggested email addresses) on the topic of development of “THEMU.”
a. Politico (@politico.com)
b. Military Times (@militarytimes)
c. New York Times (@nytimes.com)
d. Washington Post (@washingtonpost.com)
e. NBC News (@nbcnews.com)
f. ABC News (@abcnews.com)
g. LA Times (@latimes.com)
h. CBS News (@cbsnews.com)
i. Fox News (@foxnews.com)
j. Wall Street Journal (@wsj.com)
k. USA Today (@usatoday.com)
l. Fortune (@fortune.com)
m. Forbes (@forbes.com)
n. Vanity Fair (@vanityfair.com)
o. CNN (@cnn.com)
p. Associated Press (@ap.com)
q. George Washington University’s Project for Media and National
Security
r. PBS (@pbs.org)
3
Case 1:24-cv-01604 Document 1 Filed 05/31/24 Page 4 of 7
6. The timeline for the records requested is from January 20, 2021, to the
date the search begins.
7. The release of these documents is in the public interest because it will help the public
understand whether and how the U.S. government is prioritizing military readiness and is
appropriately using taxpayer resources to keep Americans safe. CASA’s explicit purpose
in requesting these documents is to inform the public so they can be engaged with their
leaders and ensure their decisions are consistent with America’s best interests.
8. On August 23, 2023, USAF confirmed receipt of CASA’s request and assigned it Case
Number 2023-05809-F.
9. USAF sent another email on the same day stating that the status of the request had been
updated to “Received.”
10. On August 29, 2023, USF sent CASA an acknowledgement email. The email stated that
USAF was unable to process CASA’s request within the timeline required by FOIA
The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) provides for the collection of fees
based on the costs of processing a FOIA request and your fee category.
Based upon the information provided in your request, we have placed you
in the "other" category.
11. UAF did not provide a time estimate for when it would respond to CASA’s request, instead
stating only that it would “strive to provide an update between 90 and 120 days.”
4
Case 1:24-cv-01604 Document 1 Filed 05/31/24 Page 5 of 7
12. USAF’s email also deferred granting CASA’s fee waiver request “until the review of
13. After this acknowledgement email, CASA received no further communications from
14. Notwithstanding the agency’s representation that it would “strive to provide an update
between 90 and 120 days,” over 120 days have passed with no update.
15. Indeed, to date CASA has received neither a further response nor any other communication
16. As the record described above indicates, over 280 days have elapsed since USAF received
CASA’s request. Yet USAF still has not determined whether it will comply with CASA’s
request. See Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. FEC, 711 F.3d 180
(D.C. Cir. 2013). USAF has not produced responsive documents to CASA, has not
along with the reasons for any such withholding—and has not informed CASA of its ability
17. Given these facts, it appears that USAF has not met its statutory obligations to provide the
18. Through USAF’s failure to make a determination within the time period required by law,
CASA has constructively exhausted its administrative remedies and seeks immediate
judicial review.
5
Case 1:24-cv-01604 Document 1 Filed 05/31/24 Page 6 of 7
COUNT I
Violation of FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 552
Wrongful Withholding of Non-Exempt Responsive Records
19. CASA repeats and incorporates by reference each of the foregoing paragraphs as if fully
20. CASA properly submitted a request for records within the possession, custody, and control
of USAF.
21. USAF is an agency subject to FOIA, and therefore has an obligation to release any non-
exempt records and provide a lawful reason for withholding any materials in response to a
23. USAF’s failure to provide all non-exempt responsive records violates FOIA.
24. Plaintiff CASA is therefore entitled to declaratory and injunctive relief requiring Defendant
to promptly produce all non-exempt records responsive to its FOIA request and provide an
index justifying the withholding of any responsive records withheld under claim of
exemption.
REQUESTED RELIEF
(1) Assume jurisdiction in this matter and maintain jurisdiction until Defendant complies
with the requirements of FOIA and any and all orders of this Court.
(2) Order Defendant to produce, within ten days of the Court’s order, or by other such date
as the Court deems appropriate, any and all non-exempt records responsive to CASA’s
6
Case 1:24-cv-01604 Document 1 Filed 05/31/24 Page 7 of 7
FOIA request and an index justifying the withholding of all or part of any responsive
(3) Award CASA the costs of this proceeding, including reasonable attorney’s fees and
552(a)(4)(E).
(4) Grant CASA other such relief as the Court deems just and proper.
/s/Gary M. Lawkowski
Gary M. Lawkowski
D.D.C. Bar ID: VA125
DHILLON LAW GROUP, INC.
2121 Eisenhower Avenue, Suite 608
Alexandria, Virginia 22314
Telephone: 703-574-1654
[email protected]