Wikidata:Property proposal/supplements

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

supplement to

[edit]

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Creative work

   Done: supplement to (P9234) (Talk and documentation)
Descriptionsubject work or edition updates or otherwise complements the object work or edition
Data typeItem
Domainitem
Allowed valuesQ numbers
Example 1ROF intermediation tool for RDA (Q104554701) is supplement to ROF intermediation tool (Q104538499)
Example 2ROF storage medium format for RDA (Q104554763) is supplement to ROF storage medium format (Q104538540)
Example 3Greek Ethnic Terminology (Q104556340) is supplement to A Lexicon of Greek Personal Names (Q104555561)
Example 4The Foreign Residents of Athens: an Annex to the Lexicon of Greek Personal Names: Attica (Q104556625) is supplement to A Lexicon of Greek Personal Names (Q104555561)
Example 5God and the Bible (Q42190481) is supplement to Literature and Dogma (Q19100181)
Example 6Journal of Cell Science. Supplement (Q27711422) is supplement to Journal of Cell Science (Q1524177)
Example 7Supplement to the Dictionary of American Library Biography (Q31804130) is supplement to Dictionary of American Library Biography (Q31790728)
Planned uselinking RDA/ONIX framework vocabularies to their supplementary vocabularies for RDA, but will have much broader use to link supplementary works and editions to the works/editions that they update or complement
Expected completenessalways incomplete (Q21873886)

Motivation

[edit]

There is currently no good way in Wikidata to state that one work is a supplement to another work. RDA has the relationship element "supplement to work" (alias "is supplement to work") to relate a supplement to a the work that it supplements: http://rdaregistry.info/Elements/w/P10154. Having a property to link a supplementary work to the work it supplements will be a useful addition to Wikidata descriptions of works. UWashPrincipalCataloger (talk) 23:35, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

[edit]

 Support Moebeus (talk) 12:26, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ChristianKl12:50, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RDA also has "is supplement to expression", defined as "Relates an expression to an expression of a work that is updated or otherwise complemented by an augmenting expression." The proposal "supplement to" in Wikidata could be used at both the work and edition levels. UWashPrincipalCataloger (talk) 22:28, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong  Support with the simple label "supplement to". I'd avoid the RDA labels and definitions, they're just a bagunça. Thanks, Prburley (talk)

 Support I would apply this to any kind of work (Q386724) and would consider an expansion pack of a game a narrower concept. There is a need to be very specific about the domain here, since the entities representing work (Q386724) in the semantic web are so numerous, and modeled in so many ways. Can we define this as applicable to works and expressions as defined in the LRM/FRBR? The representation of these ideas in Wikidata is reflective of the general inconsistencies we see across other data models so the domain here is hard to define. --Crystal Clements, University of Washington Libraries (talk) 21:43, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Support Pteropotamus (talk) 10:18, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Support zidmgmt (talk) 11:26, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Support, agreeing with Prburley comment above. Uncommon fritillary (talk) 15:31, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]