Advanced Sensor Technologies in CAVs for Traditional and Smart Road Condition Monitoring: A Review
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Terminology and General Concepts
3. Review of Sensor Technologies in CAVs
4. Road Condition Monitoring
4.1. Data Processing Techniques and Algorithms for Road Condition Monitoring
- A.
- Signal Processing Techniques
- (a)
- Filtering and noise reduction are significant operations for the improved monitoring of road conditions by CAVs. Advanced filtering techniques, such as Kalman filters, help minimize the effect of sensor noise and environmental disturbances to increase real-time data reliability [84]. Several important improvements have been noted using these methodologies for detecting road anomalies, leading to better safety and operational efficiency [85]. Integration with machine learning-based noise reduction algorithms would refine the data by detecting relevant signals against background noise. Such advanced filtering techniques are required to make autonomous vehicle systems robust under different road conditions [86];
- (b)
- Feature extraction: More recently, the process applied to CAV monitoring is based on feature extraction—road anomaly detection and classification. It involves potholes, cracks, surface wear, etc. The techniques applied include the dimension reduction and feature extraction of meaningful patterns out of large datasets using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Independent Component Analysis (ICA) [87]. Any of the given deeper learning methods, notably Convolutional Neural Networks, will perform very well for this kind of work because of their feature extraction power, which can accurately recognize irregularities in the road surface more or less in real-time [88]. These techniques allow autonomous vehicles to make intelligent decisions in adaptation to dynamically changing conditions of the roads for safety and smooth driving experiences.
- B.
- Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence
- (a)
- Supervised learning: Supervised learning algorithms have been utilized with SVMs and RFs through the use of labeled datasets that make it possible for the autonomous vehicle to detect the conditions of roads and make well-informed decisions. Several researchers have shown the effective use of SVMs for pothole and crack detection and high accuracy in robust diversifying textures of road classification with RFs [89,90]. Constant fine-tuning of supervised learning models ensures that autonomous vehicles react well to all types of road conditions, increasing their efficiency [91];
- (b)
- Unsupervised learning: In detecting patterns from road condition data without labels on their datasets, unsupervised learning techniques are hence very important since labeled data might not always be available. Clustering techniques like the K-means and DBSCAN have been implemented to detect and categorize road anomalies using data collected by vehicle sensors. Research has shown K-means to be effective in classifying road surface irregularity types [92], whereas Zhao et al. (2022) have also demonstrated that DBSCAN can perform outlier detection pointing toward road damage. More recently, using autoencoders for road surface reconstruction, any new deviation from the norm can be detected [93]. An unsupervised learning approach, combined with continuous data collection, allows the autonomous vehicle to learn and adapt to new road conditions, thereby further increasing operational robustness;
- (c)
- Deep learning: Using mainly CNNs and RNNs, deep learning has furthered road condition monitoring to the point where autonomous vehicles can make meaning from complex high-dimensional sensor data. For example, CNNs have been proven very good at feature extraction from visual inputs, and that allows great accuracy in identifying potholes and cracks on the roads [94,95]. RNNs are a type of network designed to handle sequences of data suitable for prediction of the state of the road, given historical data [96]. By fusing this knowledge with the deep learning model through real-time sensor data, self-driving vehicles constantly monitor and adapt to the changing conditions of the road, becoming safe and increasingly more efficient when actually deployed [97].
- C.
- Data Fusion Techniques
- (a)
- Multi-sensor data fusion: The sensors used in recording the road conditions for CAVs remain a crucial issue that will require initiative to improve its accuracy and robustness. Fusing the data from sources such as LiDAR, cameras, and accelerometers will give a very descriptive environment of the road. Previous work has shown that combining the LiDAR data with data obtained from cameras greatly improves the detection of anomalies on the surface [98]. The relevance of the information applied helps add more information that might help identify potholes and bumps [99]. Additionally, the sensor fusion helps reduce false positives and improves real-time decision-making [47]. Thus, the research studies above stress the importance of multi-sensor data fusion in designing an autonomous system that would work safely and efficiently under different road conditions;
- (b)
- Contextual data integration: This has led to real-time sensor data being integrated with monitoring road conditions in CAVs, along with other contextual data, such as weather conditions and traffic patterns at any given instant, including historical road maintenance records. Indeed, recent studies showed that integrating weather data into a model greatly improves the accuracy of predicting road conditions, particularly under adverse conditions [87]. Similarly, other reports showed that integrating traffic flow information also improved predictions of road wear and potential hazards [100]. In addition, Soprayoga et al. (2020) [101] further validated the usefulness of historic maintenance records for spotting locations subject to repetitive problems [102]. This can be achieved by incorporating contextual information to give the most holistic and accurate perception of road conditions for the safe and efficient navigation of vehicle routes [103].
- D.
- Predictive Analytics
- (a)
- Time-series analysis: Probably one of the most key predictive analytics to monitor road conditions in autonomous vehicles would be time-series analysis. This provides for extracting patterns and trends from historical data, projecting these into the future, making it possible to predict road conditions. The literature has identified that ARIMA is efficient in predicting vehicle velocity and road gradient [104]; on their part, Staudemeyer and Morris (2019) explained that LSTMs are actually good models for sequential data as they capture long-term temporal dependencies. They introduced a variable-neuron-based LSTM for enhanced modeling of long-term dependencies that can be applied directly or with minor modifications to road-wear data modeling [101]. Incorporated time series analysis and real-time sensor data give added accuracy to prediction in road conditions, hence allowing proactive maintenance and safety [105]. Integrating these techniques, autonomous vehicles’ operational performance adjustments to the changing road conditions will be implemented in the most efficient and safest manner possible [106];
- (b)
- Anomaly detection: The anomalous condition of the road condition needs to be detected to recognize sudden changes so that the autonomous vehicle can react promptly on encountering a hazard [107,108] illustrated an application of One-Class SVM for the detection of anomalies in road surface data and Isolation Forests, respectively. Applications of deep learning methods, particularly autoencoders, have recently shown huge potential in the identification of subtle anomalies that traditional methods might miss [109]. Integrating these advanced anomaly detection techniques with multi-sensor data fusion strengthens an autonomous vehicle’s ability to detect and adapt to road irregularities in real-time [110]. Within the proactive functioning provided by this, anomaly detection assumes a big role in ensuring safe and reliable operation for autonomous vehicles.
- E.
- Edge and Cloud Computing
- (a)
- Edge computing: This improves the efficiency of monitoring road conditions in CAVs. It also enhances responses; therefore, the number of data transmissions made with processing at the edge of the network reduces latency for better real-time decision-making. Instantaneous anomaly detection and response in smart transportation allows for the improvement of traffic safety [111]. The edge computing architecture in connected vehicles processes information locally, reducing bandwidth requirements and supporting system scalability [112]. Edge computing increases autonomous systems’ resilience by providing guarantees of continuity of operation in areas with poor connectivity [113]. Finally, the integration of machine learning algorithms on edge devices offers more precision and reliability in road condition assessment [114];
- (b)
- Cloud computing: This is a powerful system under the umbrella of cloud computing, responsible for processing and analyzing the enormous data generated by CAVs, with monitoring mechanisms provided for road conditions. Grouped data are further processed efficiently through cloud systems, which bring into play computational resources that may integrate traffic and weather data to help in the prediction of road conditions more accurately [115]. Secure aggregation and global model parameter updates on the aggregated data are conducted on cloud servers, thus ensuring that autonomous systems are updated in real-time with the most recent road condition insights [116]. In addition, cloud computing can provide secure and effective collaborative sharing of data in the Internet of Vehicles (IoV) so as to increase the collective decision-making powers for autonomous vehicles [117].
- F.
- Cooperative Algorithms
- (a)
- Cooperative perception: Cooperative perception is an awareness-sharing process between several CAVs in order to enhance monitoring of the road condition. Pooling sensor data allows for a better understanding of the environment for more clarity. For instance, based on soft actor-critic, cooperative perception models further increase the sensing range for connected vehicles to increase the sensitivity of road hazard detection [118]. Cooperative perception that integrates data from different sensors and infrastructure enhances situational awareness, which is quite useful in urban environments with complex surroundings [119]. Adaptive weighting in V2V cooperative perception further betters real-time response and lessens the impact of variability in communication on situational awareness [120]. Cooperative perception augments the robustness and reliability of autonomous vehicle networks by enabling improved awareness of vulnerable road users and safe interaction under varying traffic conditions [121];
- (b)
- Swarm intelligence: This system employs the principles of collective behavior observed in natural systems such as ant colonies and bird flocks, ensuring optimizations in road-condition monitoring by CAVs. That is to say, autonomous vehicles can monitor and respond to road conditions collectively using decentralized, self-organizing algorithms. Other studies have found that swarm intelligence algorithms enhance the robustness of intrusion detection systems due to the ability of distributed data processing that enables the real-time detection of anomalies in autonomous vehicles [122]. The models in swarm intelligence are categorized on the basis of fault tolerance and adaptability because these are the two preeminent features that a dynamic and unpredictable environment should possess [123]. Moreover, swarm intelligence in IoT-based smart city applications supports real-time decision-making and resource allocation, especially for systems that monitor road conditions [124]. Swarm intelligence algorithms offer the possibility to converge robust solutions in real-time, while data fusion supports enhanced system reliability [125]. These results suggest the potential of swarm intelligence for revolutionizing autonomous vehicle operations toward building more robust, scalable, and adaptive monitoring systems. In conclusion, these new techniques and algorithms make it possible for connected vehicles to monitor, analyze, and react to real-time road situations. In fact, the application of such sensor technologies with advanced data processing will facilitate a real revolution in intelligent transport systems.
Category | Techniques/Algorithm | Functionality | Application | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Signal Processing Techniques | Kalman Filters | Filtering and noise reduction, increase real-time data reliability | Detecting road anomalies, better safety and operational efficiency | [84,85,86] |
Principal Component Analysis (PCA) | Feature extraction, dimension reduction | Road anomaly detection and classification | [87] | |
Independent Component Analysis (ICA) | Feature extraction, meaningful pattern recognition | Road anomaly detection and classification | [87] | |
Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence | Support Vector Machines (SVMs) | Classification of road anomalies and surface conditions | Detecting potholes and cracks with high precision | [89,90,91] |
Random Forests (RFs) | Robust classification of various road textures | Classifying various road textures accurately | [90] | |
K-means Clustering | Detect and categorize road anomalies | Distinguishing between different types of road surface irregularities | [92] | |
DBSCAN | Detect outliers indicative of road damage | Detecting road damage | [93] | |
Autoencoders | Reconstruct road surfaces to identify deviations from the norm | Identifying deviations from the norm, enhanced anomaly detection | [93] | |
Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) | Feature extraction from visual inputs, detect road anomalies | Detecting road anomalies such as potholes and cracks | [94,95,96,97,98,99] | |
Data Fusion Techniques | Multi-Sensor Data Fusion | Integrate data from various sensors for a comprehensive understanding | Improved detection of road surface anomalies | [97,98,99] |
Contextual Data Integration | Combine real-time sensor data with contextual information | Enhanced road condition predictions under adverse conditions | [87,100,101,102] | |
Predictive Analytics | ARIMA | Time-series analysis for predictive analytics | Predicting vehicle velocity and road gradient | [103,104,105,106] |
One-Class SVMs | Anomaly detection in road surface data | Identifying unexpected changes in road conditions | [107,108,109,110] | |
Edge and Cloud Computing | Edge Computing | Real-time data processing at the edge of the network | Instantaneous anomaly detection and response | [111,112,113,114] |
Cloud Computing | Efficient processing and analysis of vast amounts of data | Enhanced road condition monitoring and predictions | [115,116,117] | |
Cooperative Algorithms | Cooperative Perception | Data sharing among vehicles for enhanced road monitoring | Enhanced detection accuracy of road hazards | [118,119,120,121] |
Swarm Intelligence | Decentralized, self-organizing algorithms for collaborative monitoring | Collaborative monitoring of road conditions | [122,123,124,125] |
4.2. Applications of Sensor Technologies in Road Pavement Condition Monitoring
- A.
- Pothole Detection
- B.
- Surface Classification of pavement damages
- C.
- Weather conditions
- D.
- Pavement Crack Detection
- E.
- Pavement Roughness Measurement
5. Challenges and Limitations
5.1. Technical Challenges
- A.
- Sensor Accuracy and Reliability
- B.
- Data Fusion and Interpretation
- C.
- Real-time processing and latency
- D.
- Power Consumption and Durability
5.2. Economic Challenges
- A.
- High Initial Costs
- B.
- Return on Investment (ROI)
- C.
- Cost of Maintenance and Upgrades
5.3. Regulatory and Standardization Challenges
- A.
- Lack of Standardization
- B.
- Privacy and Security Concerns
- C.
- Regulatory Approval and Compliance
- D.
- Ethical and Legal Considerations
5.4. Physical Infrastructure Standards for the Operation of CAVs
6. Conclusions
Research Perspectives
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- World Health Organization. Global Status Report on Road Safety. 2018. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565684 (accessed on 10 August 2024).
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Critical Reasons for Crashes Investigated in the National Motor Vehicle Crash Causation Survey. 2015. Available online: https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/812115 (accessed on 10 August 2024).
- Texas A&M Transportation Institute. 2019 Urban Mobility Report. 2019. Available online: https://mobility.tamu.edu/umr/ (accessed on 10 August 2024).
- Federal Highway Administration. Pavement Maintenance. 2020. Available online: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/maint.cfm (accessed on 10 August 2024).
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communications: Readiness of V2V Technology for Application. PDF File. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 2016. Available online: https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/v2v_pria_12-12-16_clean.pdf (accessed on 10 August 2024).
- Abdelkader, G.; Elgazzar, K.; Khamis, A. Connected Vehicles: Technology Review, State of the Art, Challenges and Opportunities. Sensors 2021, 21, 7712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huang, C.; Du, H.; Zhao, W.; Zhao, Y.; Yan, F.; Lv, C. Advanced Sensing and Control for Connected and Automated Vehicles. Sensors 2022, 22, 1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Elassy, M.; Al-Hattab, M.; Takruri, M.; Badawi, S. Intelligent Transportation Systems for Sustainable Smart Cities. Transp. Eng. 2024, 16, 100252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahbazi, Z.; Nowaczyk, S. Enhancing Energy Efficiency in Connected Vehicles for Traffic Flow Optimization. Smart Cities 2023, 6, 2574–2592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tao, X.; Cheng, L.; Zhang, R.; Chan, W.K.; Chao, H.; Qin, J. Towards Green Innovation in Smart Cities: Leveraging Traffic Flow Prediction with Machine Learning Algorithms for Sustainable Transportation Systems. Sustainability 2024, 16, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gruyer, D.; Orfila, O.; Glaser, S.; Hedhli, A.; Hautière, N.; Rakotonirainy, A. Are Connected and Automated Vehicles the Silver Bullet for Future Transportation Challenges? Benefits and Weaknesses on Safety, Consumption, and Traffic Congestion. Frontiers 2021, 2, 607054. Available online: www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbuil.2018.00057/full (accessed on 13 June 2024). [CrossRef]
- Yusuf, S.A.; Khan, A.; Souissi, R. Vehicle-to-everything (V2X) in the autonomous vehicles domain—A technical review of communication, sensor, and AI technologies for road user safety. Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect. 2024, 23, 100980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sewalkar, P.; Seitz, J. Vehicle-to-pedestrian communication for vulnerable road users: Survey, design considerations, and challenges. Sensors 2019, 19, 358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Islam, M.; Rahman, M.; Chowdhury, M.; Comert, G.; Sood, E.D.; Apon, A. Vision-Based Personal Safety Messages (PSMs) Generation for Connected Vehicles. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2020, 69, 9402–9416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Djahel, S.; Jabeur, N.; Barrett, R.; Murphy, J. Toward V2I communication technology-based solution for reducing road traffic congestion in smart cities. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Symposium on Networks, Computers and Communications (ISNCC), Yasmine Hammamet, Tunisia, 13–15 May 2015; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ucar, A.; Karakose, M.; Kırımça, N. Artificial Intelligence for Predictive Maintenance Applications: Key Components, Trustworthiness, and Future Trends. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ammal, S.M.; Kathiresh, M.; Neelaveni, R. Artificial intelligence and sensor technology in the automotive industry: An overview. In Automotive Embedded Systems: Key Technologies, Innovations, and Applications; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 145–164. [Google Scholar]
- Çınar, Z.M.; Abdussalam Nuhu, A.; Zeeshan, Q.; Korhan, O.; Asmael, M.; Safaei, B. Machine Learning in Predictive Maintenance towards Sustainable Smart Manufacturing in Industry 4.0. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prytz, R. Machine Learning Methods for Vehicle Predictive Maintenance Using Off-Board and On-Board Data. Doctoral Dissertation, Halmstad University Press: Halmstad, Sweden, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Maksimychev, O.I.; Matiukhina, E.N.; Ostroukh, A.V.; Vasiliev, Y.E. Connected Vehicle Remote Diagnostic System. In Proceedings of the 2021 Systems of Signals Generating and Processing in the Field of on Board Communications, Moscow, Russia, 16–18 March 2021; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biswas, A.; Wang, H.-C. Autonomous Vehicles Enabled by the Integration of IoT, Edge Intelligence, 5G, and Blockchain. Sensors 2023, 23, 1963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Garikapati, D.; Shetiya, S.S. Autonomous Vehicles: Evolution of Artificial Intelligence and the Current Industry Landscape. Big Data Cogn. Comput. 2024, 8, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, G.; Zhang, W.; Xiao, Y.; Yao, L.; Fang, Z. Cooperative Perception Technology of Autonomous Driving in the Internet of Vehicles Environment: A Review. Sensors 2022, 22, 5535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fayyad, J.; Jaradat, M.A.; Gruyer, D.; Najjaran, H. Deep Learning Sensor Fusion for Autonomous Vehicle Perception and Localization: A Review. Sensors 2020, 20, 4220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Noor-A-Rahim, M.; Liu, Z.; Lee, H.; Khyam, M.O.; He, J.; Pesch, D.; Moessner, K.; Saad, W.; Poor, J. 6G for vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communications: Enabling technologies, challenges, and opportunities. Proc. IEEE 2022, 110, 712–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jung, C.; Lee, D.; Lee, S.; Shim, D.H. V2X-communication-aided autonomous driving: System design and experimental validation. Sensors 2020, 20, 2903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, Z.; Cai, K. Perceived Risks toward In-Vehicle Infotainment Data Services on Intelligent Connected Vehicles. Systems 2022, 10, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lim, K.L.; Whitehead, J.; Jia, D.; Zheng, Z. State of Data Platforms for Connected Vehicles and Infrastructures. Commun. Transp. Res. 2021, 1, 100013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dibaei, M.; Zheng, X.; Jiang, K.; Abbas, R.; Liu, S.; Zhang, Y.; Xiang, Y.; Yu, S. Attacks and defences on intelligent connected vehicles: A survey. Digit. Commun. Netw. 2020, 6, 399–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, Z.; Kiani, S.L.; Soomro, K. A framework for cloud-based context-aware information services for citizens in smart cities. J. Cloud Comput. 2014, 3, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sagl, G.; Resch, B.; Blaschke, T. Contextual Sensing: Integrating Contextual Information with Human and Technical Geo-Sensor Information for Smart Cities. Sensors 2015, 15, 17013–17035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jing, P.; Huang, H.; Chen, L. An Adaptive Traffic Signal Control in a Connected Vehicle Environment: A Systematic Review. Information 2017, 8, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Zhong, H.; Ma, W.; Abdel-Aty, M.; Park, J. How many crashes can connected vehicle and automated vehicle technologies prevent: A meta-analysis. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2020, 136, 105299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Richter, M.A.; Hagenmaier, M.; Bandte, O.; Parida, V.; Wincent, J. Smart Cities, Urban Mobility and Autonomous Vehicles: How Different Cities Need Different Sustainable Investment Strategies. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2022, 184, 121857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reghuprasad, A.E.; Colombero, C.; Godio, A. Serially Connected Cantilever Beam-Based FBG Accelerometers: Design, Optimization and Testing. Sensors 2023, 23, 3188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sahandabadi, S.; Bhawya; Ahamed, M.J. Application of MEMS Accelerometers in Dynamic Vibration Monitoring of a Vehicle. Micromachines 2023, 14, 923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohammed, Z.; Elfadel, I.M.; Rasras, M. Monolithic Multi Degree of Freedom (MDoF) Capacitive MEMS Accelerometers. Micromachines 2018, 9, 602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazhar, I.; McKee, K. A Review of MEMS Vibrating Gyroscopes and Their Reliability Issues in Harsh Environments. Sensors 2022, 22, 7405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mo, Y.; Vijay, R.; Rufus, R.; de Boer, N.; Kim, J.; Yu, M. Enhanced Perception for Autonomous Vehicles at Obstructed Intersections: An Implementation of Vehicle to Infrastructure (V2I) Collaboration. Sensors 2024, 24, 936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vaiani, L.; De Carlo, M.; Campanella, C.E. Gyroscope Technology and Applications: A Review in the Industrial Perspective. Sensors 2017, 17, 2284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, H.; Zhao, S.; Zhao, W.; Zhang, L.; Shen, J. One-Stage Anchor-Free 3D Vehicle Detection from LiDAR Sensors. Sensors 2021, 21, 2651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tang, J.; Liu, H.; Li, B. Cooperative GNSS-RTK Ambiguity Resolution with GNSS, INS, and LiDAR Data for Connected Vehicles. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Padmaja, B.; Moorthy, C.V.K.N.S.N.; Venkateswarulu, N.; Bala, M.M. Exploration of issues, challenges and latest developments in autonomous cars. J. Big Data 2023, 10, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Razdan, R.; Santos, J. An Overview of Autonomous Vehicles Sensors and Their Vulnerability to Weather Conditions. Sensors 2021, 21, 5397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayala, R.; Mohd, T.K. Sensors in autonomous vehicles: A survey. J. Auton. Veh. Syst. 2021, 1, 031003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, B.; Wang, Y.; Papaioannou, G.; Du, H. Sensor Fusion and Advanced Controller for Connected and Automated Vehicles. Sensors 2023, 23, 7015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yeong, D.J.; Velasco-Hernandez, G.; Barry, J.; Walsh, J. Sensor and sensor fusion technology in autonomous vehicles: A review. Sensors 2021, 21, 2140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scheiner, N.; Kraus, F.; Appenrodt, N.; Dickmann, J.; Sick, B. Object detection for automotive radar point clouds—A comparison. AI Perspect. 2021, 3, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Ponte Müller, F. Survey on Ranging Sensors and Cooperative Techniques for Relative Positioning of Vehicles. Sensors 2017, 17, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, B.-S.; Jin, Y.; Lee, J.; Kim, S. High-Efficiency Super-Resolution FMCW Radar Algorithm Based on FFT Estimation. Sensors 2021, 21, 4018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alonso, L.; Milanés, V.; Torre-Ferrero, C.; Godoy, J.; Oria, J.P.; De Pedro, T. Ultrasonic Sensors in Urban Traffic Driving-Aid Systems. Sensors 2011, 11, 661–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huang, J.; Hei, G.; Wang, W. YOLO-IR-Free: An Improved Algorithm for Real-Time Detection of Vehicles in Infrared Images. Sensors 2023, 23, 8723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, S.; Li, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, M.; Xu, X. Yolo-firi: Improved yolov5 for infrared image object detection. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 141861–141875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasanujjaman, M.; Chowdhury, M.Z.; Jang, Y.M. Sensor Fusion in Autonomous Vehicle with Traffic Surveillance Camera System: Detection, Localization, and AI Networking. Sensors 2023, 23, 3335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Makaveev, M.; Snellen, M.; Smeur, E.J.J. Microphones as Airspeed Sensors for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Sensors 2023, 23, 2463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alaba, S.Y.; Gurbuz, A.C.; Ball, J.E. Emerging Trends in Autonomous Vehicle Perception: Multimodal Fusion for 3D Object Detection. World Electr. Veh. J. 2024, 15, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lewis, G.D.; Merken, P.; Vandewal, M. Enhanced accuracy of CMOS smart temperature sensors by nonlinear curvature correction. Sensors 2018, 18, 4087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, C.; Wang, Y.; Hang, P.; Zuo, Z.; Leng, B. Advanced Sensing and Safety Control for Connected and Automated Vehicles. Sensors 2023, 23, 1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tahir, M.N.; Leviäkangas, P.; Katz, M. Connected Vehicles: V2V and V2I Road Weather and Traffic Communication Using Cellular Technologies. Sensors 2022, 22, 1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, M.; Sheng, J.; Liu, J.; Shi, Z.; Jiu, L. Design and Verification of Humidity Sensors Based on Magnesium Oxide Micro-Arc Oxidation Film Layers. Sensors 2020, 20, 1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Oh, G.; Sim, J.-H.; Won, M.; Jung, M.; Mantry, S.P.; Kim, D.-S. Integrated Temperature–Humidity Sensors for a Pouch-Type Battery Using 100% Printing Process. Sensors 2024, 24, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Farahani, H.; Wagiran, R.; Hamidon, M.N. Humidity Sensors Principle, Mechanism, and Fabrication Technologies: A Comprehensive Review. Sensors 2014, 14, 7881–7939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xu, K.; Ren, X.; Xiang, Y.; Zhang, M.; Zhao, X.; Ma, K.; Tian, Y.; Wu, D.; Zeng, Z.; Wang, G. Multi-Parameter Optimization of Rubidium Laser Optically Pumped Magnetometers with Geomagnetic Field Intensity. Sensors 2023, 23, 8919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bennett, J.S.; Vyhnalek, B.E.; Greenall, H.; Bridge, E.M.; Gotardo, F.; Forstner, S.; Harris, G.I.; Miranda, F.A.; Bowen, W.P. Precision Magnetometers for Aerospace Applications: A Review. Sensors 2021, 21, 5568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Opromolla, R. Magnetometer Calibration for Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Using Cooperative Flight Data. Sensors 2020, 20, 538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rigo, F.; Migliorini, M.; Pozzebon, A. Piezoelectric Sensors as Energy Harvesters for Ultra Low-Power IoT Applications. Sensors 2024, 24, 2587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Covaci, C.; Gontean, A. Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting Solutions: A Review. Sensors 2020, 20, 3512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, H.; Wei, Y.; Zhang, W.; Ai, Y.; Ye, Z.; Wang, L. Development of Piezoelectric Energy Harvester System through Optimizing Multiple Structural Parameters. Sensors 2021, 21, 2876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, J.-J.; Kim, W.-W.; Hwang, W.-J. Design Optimization of Bulk Piezoelectric Acceleration Sensor for Enhanced Performance. Sensors 2019, 19, 3360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bednarz, E., III; Dietrich, C.; Hepner, B.; Patel, J., Jr.; Sabouni, A. Determining Magnitudes of Forces at Known Locations through a Strain Gauge Force Transducer. Sensors 2023, 23, 7017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, Y.; Hao, Q. Development and Application of Resistance Strain Force Sensors. Sensors 2020, 20, 5826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lopot, F.; Dub, M.; Flek, J.; Hadraba, D.; Havlíček, M.; Kučera, L.; Štoček, O.; Veselý, T.; Janáček, J. Gearbox Mechanical Efficiency Determination by Strain Gauges Direct Application. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 11150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Falcetelli, F.; Martini, A.; Di Sante, R.; Troncossi, M. Strain Modal Testing with Fiber Bragg Gratings for Automotive Applications. Sensors 2022, 22, 946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jung, D.; Zhang, Z.; Winslett, M. Vibration analysis for IoT enabled predictive maintenance. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 33rd International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), San Diego, CA, USA, 19–22 April 2017; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Theissler, A.; Pérez-Velázquez, J.; Kettelgerdes, M.; Elger, G. Predictive maintenance enabled by machine learning: Use cases and challenges in the automotive industry. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2021, 215, 107864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koene, I.; Klar, V.; Viitala, R. Iot Connected Device for Vibration Analysis and Measurement. HardwareX 2020, 7, e00109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elliott, D.; Keen, W.; Miao, L. Recent advances in connected and automated vehicles. J. Traffic Transp. Eng. 2019, 6, 109–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, L.; Xin, X.; Zhaoliang, Z.; Jiaqi, M. GNSS/IMU/LiDAR fusion for vehicle localization in urban driving environments within a consensus framework. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2023, 205, 110862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Wang, H.; Chen, L. Surrounding objects detection and tracking for autonomous driving using LiDAR and radar fusion. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 2021, 34, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, C.; Xu, K.; Feng, L.; Liang, B. RetroV2X: A New Vehicle-to-everything (V2X) Paradigm with Visible Light Backscatter Networking. Fundam. Res. 2023; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Formentin, S.; Onesto, L.; Colombo, T.; Pozzato, A.; Savaresi, S.M. h-TPMS: A hybrid tire pressure monitoring system for road vehicles. Mechatronics 2021, 74, 102492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pangestu, A.; Sodikin, I.; Yusro, M.; Sapundani, R.; Al Hakim, R.R.; Wilyanti, S. IoT–based tire pressure monitoring system for air and temperature pressure using MPX5500D and LM35 sensor. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 8th International Conference on Computing, Engineering and Design (ICCED), Sukabumi, Indonesia, 28–29 July 2022; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, N.; Askari, H.; Huang, Y.; Zhou, J.; Khaajepour, A. Tire force estimation in intelligent tires using machine learning. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2020, 23, 3565–3574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bersani, M.; Vignati, M.; Mentasti, S.; Arrigoni, S.; Cheli, F. Vehicle state estimation based on Kalman filters. In Proceedings of the 2019 AEIT International Conference of Electrical and Electronic Technologies for Automotive (AEIT AUTOMOTIVE), Turin, Italy, 2–4 July 2019; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Rathee, M.; Bačić, B.; Doborjeh, M. Automated road defect and anomaly detection for traffic safety: A systematic review. Sensors 2023, 23, 5656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Norouzi, A.; Heidarifar, H.; Borhan, H.; Shahbakhti, M.; Robert Koch, C. Integrating machine learning and model predictive control for automotive applications: A review and future directions. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2023, 120, 105878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ranyal, E.; Sadhu, A.; Jain, K. Road Condition Monitoring Using Smart Sensing and Artificial Intelligence: A Review. Sensors 2022, 22, 3044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, L.; Zhang, X.; Shen, J. Road surface condition classification using deep learning. J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent. 2019, 64, 102638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.-Y.; Le TH, M.; Kim, Y.-M. Prediction and detection of potholes in urban roads: Machine learning and deep learning based image segmentation approaches. Dev. Built Environ. 2023, 13, 100109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamakshi, V.; Krishnan, N.C. Explainable Image Classification: The Journey So Far and the Road Ahead. AI 2023, 4, 620–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blasch, E.; Pham, T.; Chong, C.Y.; Koch, W.; Leung, H.; Braines, D.; Abdelzaher, T. Machine learning/artificial intelligence for sensor data fusion–opportunities and challenges. IEEE Aerosp. Electron. Syst. Mag. 2021, 36, 80–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, T.; Lechner, B.; Wong, Y.D. Response-based methods to measure road surface irregularity: A state-of-the-art review. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 2019, 11, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, T.; Xie, Y.; Ding, M.; Yang, L.; Tomizuka, M.; Wei, Y.A. A road surface reconstruction dataset for autonomous driving. Sci. Data 2024, 11, 459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Koch, C.; Brilakis, I. Pothole detection in asphalt pavement images. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2011, 25, 507–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, D.; Lu, J.; Guo, G. Road anomaly detection through deep learning approaches. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 117390–117404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, Y.; Li, F.; Zhou, S.; Zhang, S.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Li, Y. Use of recurrent neural networks considering maintenance to predict urban road performance in Beijing, China. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 2023, 381, 20220175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gupta, A.; Anpalagan, A.; Guan, L.; Khwaja, A.S. Deep learning for object detection and scene perception in self-driving cars: Survey, challenges, and open issues. Array 2021, 10, 100057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caltagirone, L.; Bellone, M.; Svensson, L.; Wahde, M. LIDAR–camera fusion for road detection using fully convolutional neural networks. Robot. Auton. Syst. 2019, 111, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, C.; Wang, Z.; Hu, S.; Lepine, J.; Na, X.; Ainalis, D.; Stettler, M. An automated machine-learning approach for road pothole detection using smartphone sensor data. Sensors 2020, 20, 5564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sayed, S.A.; Abdel-Hamid, Y.; Hefny, H.A. Artificial intelligence-based traffic flow prediction: A comprehensive review. J. Electr. Syst. Inf. Technol. 2023, 10, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suprayoga, G.B.; Bakker, M.; Witte, P.; Spit, T. A systematic review of indicators to assess the sustainability of road infrastructure projects. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 2020, 12, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, S.; Shu, K.; Chen, C.; Cao, D. Planning and decision-making for connected autonomous vehicles at road intersections: A review. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 2021, 34, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, B.; Li, P.; Guo, X.; Zhao, H.; Chen, Y. A Novel Online Prediction Method for Vehicle Velocity and Road Gradient Based on a Flexible-Structure Auto-Regressive Integrated Moving Average Model. Sustainability 2023, 15, 15639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Staudemeyer, R.C.; Morris, E.R. Understanding LSTM—a tutorial into long short-term memory recurrent neural networks. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1909.09586. [Google Scholar]
- Selmy, H.A.; Mohamed, H.K.; Medhat, W. A predictive analytics framework for sensor data using time series and deep learning techniques. Neural Comput. Appl. 2024, 36, 6119–6132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, S.; Hu, X.; Zhao, J.; Wang, R.; Qiao, M. A Review of Decision-Making and Planning for Autonomous Vehicles in Intersection Environments. World Electr. Veh. J. 2024, 15, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Savant Todkar, S.; Baltazart, V.; Ihamouten, A.; Dérobert, X.; Guilbert, D. One-class SVM based outlier detection strategy to detect thin interlayer debondings within pavement structures using Ground Penetrating Radar data. J. Appl. Geophys. 2021, 192, 104392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yasuno, T.; Fujii, J.; Ogata, R.; Okano, M. VAE-iForest: Auto-encoding Reconstruction and Isolation-based Anomalies Detecting Fallen Objects on Road Surface. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2203.01193. [Google Scholar]
- Tien, C.-W.; Huang, T.-Y.; Chen, P.-C.; Wang, J.-H. Using autoencoders for anomaly detection and transfer learning in IoT. Computers 2021, 10, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thudumu, S.; Branch, P.; Jin, J.; Singh, J. A comprehensive survey of anomaly detection techniques for high dimensional big data. J. Big Data 2020, 7, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, X.; Ke, R.; Yang, H.; Liu, C. When intelligent transportation systems sensing meets edge computing: Vision and challenges. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 9680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Liu, T.; Kim, B.; Lin, C.W.; Shiraishi, S.; Xie, J.; Han, Z. Architectural design alternatives based on cloud/edge/fog computing for connected vehicles. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2020, 22, 2349–2377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, S.; Liu, L.; Tang, J.; Yu, B.; Wang, Y.; Shi, W. Edge computing for autonomous driving: Opportunities and challenges. Proc. IEEE 2019, 107, 1697–1716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hua, H.; Li, Y.; Wang, T.; Dong, N.; Li, W.; Cao, J. Edge computing with artificial intelligence: A machine learning perspective. ACM Comput. Surv. 2023, 55, 1–35. [Google Scholar]
- Chu, W.; Wuniri, Q.; Du, X.; Xiong, Q.; Huang, T.; Li, K. Cloud Control System Architectures, Technologies and Applications on Intelligent and Connected Vehicles: A Review. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 2021, 34, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chellapandi, V.P.; Yuan, L.; Brinton, C.G.; Żak, S.H.; Wang, Z. Federated learning for connected and automated vehicles: A survey of existing approaches and challenges. IEEE Trans. Intell. Veh. 2023, 9, 119–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, T.; Wu, J.; Li, G. IoV data sharing scheme based on the hybrid architecture of blockchain and cloud-edge computing. J. Cloud Comput. 2023, 12, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, Q.; Zhou, X.; Qiu, T.; Zhang, Q.; Qu, W. Soft Actor–Critic-Based Multilevel Cooperative Perception for Connected Autonomous Vehicles. IEEE Internet Things J. 2022, 9, 21370–21381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, Z.; Wu, G.; Barth, M.J.; Liu, Y.; Sisbot, E.A.; Oguchi, K.; Huang, Z. A survey and framework of cooperative perception: From heterogeneous singleton to hierarchical cooperation. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2208.10590. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, C.; Chen, J.; Chen, Y.; Payton, R.; Riley, M.; Yang, S.H. Self-supervised adaptive weighting for cooperative perception in V2V communications. IEEE Trans. Intell. Veh. 2023, 9, 3569–3580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shan, M.; Narula, K.; Wong, Y.F.; Worrall, S.; Khan, M.; Alexander, P.; Nebot, E. Demonstrations of cooperative perception: Safety and robustness in connected and automated vehicle operations. Sensors 2020, 21, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reddy, D.K.K.; Nayak, J.; Behera, H.S.; Shanmuganathan, V.; Viriyasitavat, W.; Dhiman, G. A Systematic Literature Review on Swarm Intelligence Based Intrusion Detection System: Past, Present and Future. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 2024, 31, 2717–2784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Zhang, S.; Ma, T.; Xiao, Y.; Chen, M.Z.; Wang, L. Swarm intelligence: A survey of model classification and applications. Chin. J. Aeronaut. 2024; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zedadra, O.; Guerrieri, A.; Jouandeau, N.; Spezzano, G.; Seridi, H.; Fortino, G. Swarm intelligence and IoT-based smart cities: A review. In The Internet of Things for Smart Urban Ecosystems; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 177–200. [Google Scholar]
- Chakraborty, A.; Kar, A.K. Swarm intelligence: A review of algorithms. In Nature-Inspired Computing and Optimization: Theory and Applications; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 475–494. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, D.; Liu, Z.; Gu, X.; Wu, W.; Chen, Y.; Wang, L. Automatic detection of pothole distress in asphalt pavement using improved convolutional neural networks. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 3892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Varona, B.; Monteserin, A.; Teyseyre, A. A deep learning approach to automatic road surface monitoring and pothole detection. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 2020, 24, 519–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xin, H.; Ye, Y.; Na, X.; Hu, H.; Wang, G.; Wu, C.; Hu, S. Sustainable Road Pothole Detection: A Crowdsourcing Based Multi-Sensors Fusion Approach. Sustainability 2023, 15, 6610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, K.R. Smart pothole detection using deep learning based on dilated convolution. Sensors 2021, 21, 8406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jawad, Y.K.; Nitulescu, M. Improving Driving Style in Connected Vehicles via Predicting Road Surface, Traffic, and Driving Style. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 3905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahian Jahromi, B.; Tulabandhula, T.; Cetin, S. Real-time hybrid multi-sensor fusion framework for perception in autonomous vehicles. Sensors 2019, 19, 4357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, N.; Xu, Z.; Liu, Z.; Chen, Y.; Miao, Y.; Li, Q.; Wang, L. Data augmentation and intelligent recognition in pavement texture using a deep learning. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2022, 23, 25427–25436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, J.; Huang, M.C.; Yu, X.B. Deep learning based on connected vehicles for icing pavement detection. AI Civ. Eng. 2023, 2, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Busch, A.; Fink, D.; Laves, M.H.; Ziaukas, Z.; Wielitzka, M.; Ortmaier, T. Classification of Road Surface and Weather-Related Condition Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. In Advances in Dynamics of Vehicles on Roads and Tracks; Klomp, M., Bruzelius, F., Nielsen, J., Hillemyr, A., Eds.; IAVSD 2019, Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tasgaonkar, P.P.; Garg, R.D.; Garg, P.K. Vehicle Detection and Traffic Estimation with Sensors Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems. Sens. Imaging 2020, 21, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Appiah, E.O.; Mensah, S. Object detection in adverse weather condition for autonomous vehicles. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2024, 83, 28235–28261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, S.; Bai, Y.; Bocus, M.J.; Fan, R. Digital transformation for intelligent road condition assessment. In Intelligent Systems in Digital Transformation: Theory and Applications; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 511–533. [Google Scholar]
- Gupta, P.; Dixit, M. Image-based crack detection approaches: A comprehensive survey. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2022, 81, 40181–40229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, G.; Liu, Y.; Shen, D.; Wang, B. Automatic pixel-level bridge crack detection using learning context flux field with convolutional feature fusion. J. Civ. Struct. Health Monit. 2024, 14, 1155–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Wang, Y.; Luo, H.; Lv, G.; Guo, F.; Xie, Q. Pavement surface defect recognition method based on vehicle system vibration data and feedforward neural network. Int. J. Pavement Eng. 2023, 24, 2188594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sghaier, S.; Krichen, M.; Ben Dhaou, I.; Elmannai, H.; Alkanhel, R. Identification, 3D-Reconstruction, and Classification of Dangerous Road Cracks. Sensors 2023, 23, 3578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, K.; Tan, G.; Lu, M.; Wu, J. CRSM: A practical crowdsourcing-based road surface monitoring system. Wirel. Netw. 2016, 22, 765–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gamage, Y.T.; Thotawaththa, T.A.I.; Wijayasiri, A. Measuring Road Roughness through Crowdsourcing while Minimizing the Conditional Effects. Int. J. ITS Res. 2022, 20, 581–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Wang, L.; Miao, Y.; Tong, X.; Ye, Z. Road Roughness Detection Based on Discrete Kalman Filter Model with Driving Vibration Data Input. Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rebelo, F.; Dabiri, A.; Silva, H.; Oliveira, J. Laboratory Investigation of Sensors Reliability to Allow Their Incorporation in a Real-Time Road Pavement Monitoring System. In Trends on Construction in the Digital Era; Gomes Correia, A., Azenha, M., Cruz, P.J.S., Novais, P., Pereira, P., Eds.; ISIC 2022, Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; Volume 306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Masud, M.M.; Haider, S.W.; Selezneva, O.; Wolf, D.J. Representative Weigh-In-Motion (WIM) System Accuracy and Guidelines for Equipment Selection Based on Sensor, Site, and Calibration-Related Factors. Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. 2024, 17, 732–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, J.; Gao, F.; Li, P.; Ji, X. Data Acquisition Mechanism of Wireless Sensor Network Pavement Monitoring System Based on Hybrid Compressive Sensing. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2021, 121, 1707–1724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shon, H.; Cho, C.S.; Byon, Y.J.; Lee, J. Autonomous condition monitoring-based pavement management system. Autom. Constr. 2022, 138, 104222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neves, J.; Cristina, A.; Qamhia, I.; Al-Qadi, I.L.; Tutumluer, E. Full-scale accelerated pavement testing and instrumentation. In Advances on Testing and Experimentation in Civil Engineering: Geotechnics, Transportation, Hydraulics and Natural Resources; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 163–186. [Google Scholar]
- Xing, J.; Wu, W.; Cheng, Q.; Liu, R. Traffic state estimation of urban road networks by multi-source data fusion: Review and new insights. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Its Appl. 2022, 595, 127079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jagatheesaperumal, S.K.; Bibri, S.E.; Ganesan, S.; Jeyaraman, P. Artificial Intelligence for road quality assessment in smart cities: A machine learning approach to acoustic data analysis. Comput. Urban Sci. 2023, 3, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lal, N.; Kumar, S.; Chaurasiya, V.K. A Road Monitoring Approach with Real-Time Capturing of Events for Efficient Vehicles Safety in Smart City. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2020, 114, 657–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, T.; Feng, B.; Huo, J.; Xiao, Y.; Wang, W.; Peng, J.; Li, Z.; Du, C.; Wang, W.; Zou, G.; et al. Artificial Intelligence Meets Flexible Sensors: Emerging Smart Flexible Sensing Systems Driven by Machine Learning and Artificial Synapses. Nano-Micro Lett. 2024, 16, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dutta, J.; Mathew, R. An Overview of Sensors in Intelligent Transportation Systems and Electric Vehicles. In AI Enabled IoT for Electrification and Connected Transportation; Marati, N., Bhoi, A.K., De Albuquerque, V.H.C., Kalam, A., Eds.; Transactions on Computer Systems and Networks; Springer: Singapore, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dacanay, J.P.T.; Torio-Kaimo, L.V.; Bronuela-Ambrocio, L.B. An Assessment of Road Condition Monitoring Practice and Technologies in the Philippines. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Civil Engineering. ICOCE 2023. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, Singapore, 24–26 March 2023; Strauss, E., Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2024; Volume 371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, D.; Jung, M.; Yang, W.; Kim, A. LiDAR odometry survey: Recent advancements and remaining challenges. Intell. Serv. Robot. 2024, 17, 95–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Javadnejad, F.; Jahanbakh, M.; Pinto, C.A.; Saeidi, A. Analyzing incentives and barriers to electric vehicle adoption in the United States. Environ. Syst. Decis. 2023, 44, 575–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, A.; Zheng, Z. Connected and Automated Vehicles: Opportunities and Challenges for Transportation Systems, Smart Cities, and Societies. In Automating Cities; Wang, B.T., Wang, C.M., Eds.; Advances in 21st Century Human Settlements; Springer: Singapore, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verma, S.K.; Verma, R.; Singh, B.K.; Sinha, R.S. Management of Intelligent Transportation Systems and Advanced Technology. In Intelligent Transportation System and Advanced Technology; Upadhyay, R.K., Sharma, S.K., Kumar, V., Eds.; Energy, Environment, and Sustainability; Springer: Singapore, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rana, M.M.; Hossain, K. Connected and Autonomous Vehicles and Infrastructures: A Literature Review. Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. 2023, 16, 264–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, W.; Zaheer, Q.; Qiu, S.; Wang, W.; Ai, C.; Wang, J.; Wang, S.; Hu, W. Transportation Infrastructure Management. In Digital Twin Technologies in Transportation Infrastructure Management; Springer: Singapore, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amditis, A.; Lytrivis, P.; Portouli, E. Sensing and Actuation in Intelligent Vehicles. In Handbook of Intelligent Vehicles; Eskandarian, A., Ed.; Springer: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stenholm, D.; Corin Stig, D.; Ivansen, L.; Bergsjo, D. A framework of practices supporting the reuse of technological knowledge. Environ. Syst. Decis. 2019, 39, 128–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noura, M.; Atiquzzaman, M.; Gaedke, M. Interoperability in Internet of Things: Taxonomies and Open Challenges. Mobile Netw. Appl. 2019, 24, 796–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, Z.; Wei, Y.; Yang, S.; Li, P.; Yang, F.; Yang, B.; Wang, L. IoT-enhanced smart road infrastructure systems for comprehensive real-time monitoring. Internet Things Cyber-Phys. Syst. 2024, 4, 235–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhirani, L.L.; Mukhtiar, N.; Chowdhry, B.S.; Newe, T. Ethical Dilemmas and Privacy Issues in Emerging Technologies: A Review. Sensors 2023, 23, 1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ismagilova, E.; Hughes, L.; Rana, N.P.; Dwivedi, Y.K. Security, Privacy and Risks Within Smart Cities: Literature Review and Development of a Smart City Interaction Framework. Inf. Syst. Front. 2022, 24, 393–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gomes Correia, M.; Ferreira, A. Road Asset Management and the Vehicles of the Future: An Overview, Opportunities, and Challenges. Int. J. ITS Res. 2023, 21, 376–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hansson, S.O.; Belin, M.Å.; Lundgren, B. Self-Driving Vehicles—An Ethical Overview. Philos. Technol. 2021, 34, 1383–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryan, M. The Future of Transportation: Ethical, Legal, Social and Economic Impacts of Self-driving Vehicles in the Year 2025. Sci. Eng. Ethics 2020, 26, 1185–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Irannezhad, E.; Xue, S.; Karl, C. Minimum Physical Infrastructure Standard for the Operation of Automated Driving Part A: Infrastructure Investment; Project FPI6258; ARRB Group Limited: Port Melbourne, Australia, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- ITF. Preparing Infrastructure for Automated Vehicles; ITF Research Report; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Pompigna, A.; Mauro, R. Smart roads: A state of the art of highways innovations in the Smart Age. Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J. 2022, 25, 100986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guerrieri, M. Smart Roads Geometric Design Criteria and Capacity Estimation Based on AV and CAV Emerging Technologies. A Case Study in the Trans-European Transport Network. Int. J. Intell. Transp. Syst. Res. 2021, 19, 429–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dinnella, N.; Chiappone, S.; Guerrieri, M. The innovative “NDBA” concrete safety barrier able to withstand two subsequent TB81 crash tests. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2020, 115, 104660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Corriere, F.; Divincenzo, D.; Guerrieri, M. A logic fuzzy model for evaluation of the railway station’s practice capacity in safety operating conditions. Arch. Civ. Eng. 2013, 59, 3–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guerrieri, M.; Corriere, F.; Parla, G.; Ticali, D. Estimation of pollutant emissions from road traffic by image processing techniques: A case study in a suburban area. ARPN J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2013, 8, 668–676. [Google Scholar]
- Guerrieri, M.; Parla, G.; Ticali, D. A theoretical and experimental approach to reconstructing the transverse profile of worn-out rails. Ing. Ferrov. 2012, 67, 23–37. [Google Scholar]
- Guerrieri, M.; Corriere, F.; Lo Casto, B.; Rizzo, G. A model for evaluating the environmental and functional benefits of innovative roundabouts. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2015, 39, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nalin, A.; Vignali, V.; Lantieri, C.; Zamengo, B.; Simone, A. Assessing veracity of big data: An in-depth evaluation process from the comparison of Mobile phone traces and groundtruth data in traffic monitoring. J. Transp. Geogr. 2024, 118, 103930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guerrieri, M.; Parla, G.; Khanmohamadi, M.; Neduzha, L. Asphalt Pavement Damage Detection through Deep Learning Technique and Cost-Effective Equipment: A Case Study in Urban Roads Crossed by Tramway Lines. Infrastructures 2024, 9, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baldo, N.; Rondinella, F.; Celauro, C. Prediction of Airport Pavement Moduli by Machine Learning Methodology Using Non-destructive Field Testing Data Augmentation. In Trends on Construction in the Digital Era; Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 306 LNCE; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 62–75. [Google Scholar]
- Rasol, M.; Schmidt, F.; Ientile, S.; Lucas, A.; Boumediene, N.; Kane, M.; Chevalier, C. Progress and monitoring opportunities of skid resistance in road transport: A critical review and road sensors. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 3729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barbieri, D.M.; Lou, B. Instrumentation and testing for road condition monitoring—A state-of-the-art review. NDTE Int. 2024, 146, 103161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sensor Type | Functionality | Application |
---|---|---|
Accelerometers | Measure forces of acceleration, vehicle dynamics, motion | Electronic stability control, airbag deployment, predictive maintenance |
Gyroscopes | Determine angular velocity, navigation stability, control | IMUs in navigation systems, stability control, ADAS |
LiDAR | Create high-detail environment maps, advanced object detection | Collision avoidance, navigation, urban environments |
Cameras (Optical Sensors) | Visual information, navigation, object perception, decision-making | Object recognition, lane detection, traffic sign recognition, traffic flow measurement, pavement distress analysis |
Radar Sensors | Object detection and tracking, all-weather operation | Adaptive cruise control, collision avoidance |
Ultrasonic Sensors | Short-range detection, parking aid, collision mitigation | Urban areas, slow-speed vehicle detection |
Infrared Sensors | Object detection and monitoring in low light/adverse conditions | Enhanced detection at night or in fog |
Microphones (Acoustic Sensors) | Noise cancellation, detection of vehicle proximity and obstacles | ADAS, hands-free functionality, voice commands |
Temperature Sensors | Regulate thermal conditions for proper operation and safety | Engine, battery, cabin temperature management |
Humidity Sensors | Detect moisture, prevent corrosion/mold/electrical failures | Battery health, HVAC system maintenance |
Magnetometers | Measure magnetic fields for guidance and orientation | Reliable navigation data, urban canyon environments |
Piezoelectric Sensors | Convert mechanical energy into electrical signals, monitor vibrations/pressure | Energy harvesting, real-time monitoring, predictive maintenance |
Strain Gauges | Measure mechanical strain, monitor stress and deformation | Chassis, suspension systems, gearbox monitoring |
Vibration Sensors | Monitor mechanical and road-induced vibrations | Engine, suspension, drivetrains monitoring |
GPS (Global Positioning System) Sensors | Collect location data, navigation, fleet management | Real-time tracking, route optimization |
Electromagnetic Sensors | Object detection, collision avoidance, autonomous navigation | Enhanced detection in varied driving conditions |
Proximity Sensors | Identify proximity of entities to minimize collisions | Parking assistance, blind-spot detection |
Tire Pressure Monitoring Sensors | Send real-time data of tire pressure, prevent blowouts | Optimize vehicle functionality, tire maintenance |
Application | Description | Techniques/Methods | References |
---|---|---|---|
Pothole Detection | Utilizes CNNs, LiDAR, accelerometer data fusion, and edge computing for accurate pothole detection, enhancing road safety and quality. | CNNs, LiDAR, and accelerometer data fusion, edge computing | [126,127,128,129] |
Surface Classification | Employs distributed sensors, AI methodologies, and hybrid frameworks combining camera, LiDAR, and radar for accurate surface classification. | Distributed sensors, AI methodologies, hybrid frameworks | [87,130,131,132] |
Weather Impact | Uses LSTM networks, deep convolutional neural networks, and sensor data fusion to predict and classify road conditions under various weather impacts. | LSTM networks, deep convolutional neural networks, sensor data fusion | [133,134,135,136] |
Crack Detection | Applies digital image processing, machine learning, and high-resolution cameras for real-time crack detection, enhancing road maintenance and safety. | Digital image processing, machine learning, high-resolution cameras | [137,138,139,140,141] |
Road Roughness Measurement | Leverages accelerometers, GPS, dynamics sensors, and Kalman filter models to measure road roughness and detect cracks, improving road quality and safety. | Accelerometers, GPS, dynamics sensors, Kalman filter models | [142,143,144] |
Category | Challenge | Description | References |
---|---|---|---|
Technical Challenges | Sensor Accuracy and Reliability | Ensuring sensor accuracy and reliability in pavement monitoring; challenges include thermal stress and sensor degradation over time. | [145,146,147] |
Data Fusion and Interpretation | Complex integration of diverse data from multiple sensors due to varying data formats and resolutions. | [148,149,150] | |
Real-time Processing and Latency | Stringent requirements for real-time data transmission, processing, and response times; balancing computational demands with real-time responsiveness. | [151,152] | |
Power Consumption and Durability | High power consumption of advanced sensors and the need for durability and calibration in harsh conditions. | [153,154,155] | |
Economic Challenges | High Initial Costs | Significant initial costs for deploying advanced sensor technologies, including acquisition, integration, and calibration. | [156,157,158] |
Return on Investment (ROI) | Comprehensive understanding of the return on investment, including improved road safety, traffic management, reduced maintenance costs, and environmental impacts. | [159,160,161] | |
Cost of Maintenance and Upgrades | Ongoing costs of maintaining and upgrading sensor systems, including periodic maintenance, replacement, and technology upgrades. | [162,163] | |
Regulatory and Standardization Challenges | Lack of Standardization | Absence of standardized protocols and interfaces across different sensor types and manufacturers, hindering interoperability. | [164,165] |
Privacy and Security Concerns | Significant privacy and security concerns due to the vulnerability of real-time data to cyber-attacks. | [166,167] | |
Regulatory Approval and Compliance | Complex regulatory landscape with varying regulations by region, making it difficult to obtain necessary approvals and ensure compliance. | [6,168] | |
Ethical and Legal Considerations | Ethical and legal aspects of autonomous vehicles, including responsibility allocation, public opinions on safety, and programming for life-and-death decisions. | [169,170] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Khanmohamadi, M.; Guerrieri, M. Advanced Sensor Technologies in CAVs for Traditional and Smart Road Condition Monitoring: A Review. Sustainability 2024, 16, 8336. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198336
Khanmohamadi M, Guerrieri M. Advanced Sensor Technologies in CAVs for Traditional and Smart Road Condition Monitoring: A Review. Sustainability. 2024; 16(19):8336. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198336
Chicago/Turabian StyleKhanmohamadi, Masoud, and Marco Guerrieri. 2024. "Advanced Sensor Technologies in CAVs for Traditional and Smart Road Condition Monitoring: A Review" Sustainability 16, no. 19: 8336. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198336