Next Article in Journal
Planning for Sustainable Agri-Food Production: Factual or Fictional? An Example from Iceland
Previous Article in Journal
PVC Dechlorination for Facilitating Plastic Chemical Recycling: A Systematic Literature Review of Technical Advances, Modeling and Assessment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Advanced Sensor Technologies in CAVs for Traditional and Smart Road Condition Monitoring: A Review

by
Masoud Khanmohamadi
and
Marco Guerrieri
*
Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering (DICAM), University of Trento, Via Mesiano 77, 3812 Trento, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2024, 16(19), 8336; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198336
Submission received: 16 August 2024 / Revised: 10 September 2024 / Accepted: 22 September 2024 / Published: 25 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Transportation)

Abstract

:
This paper explores new sensor technologies and their integration within Connected Autonomous Vehicles (CAVs) for real-time road condition monitoring. Sensors like accelerometers, gyroscopes, LiDAR, cameras, and radar that have been made available on CAVs are able to detect anomalies on roads, including potholes, surface cracks, or roughness. This paper also describes advanced data processing techniques of data detected with sensors, including machine learning algorithms, sensor fusion, and edge computing, which enhance accuracy and reliability in road condition assessment. Together, these technologies support instant road safety and long-term maintenance cost reduction with proactive maintenance strategies. Finally, this article provides a comprehensive review of the state-of-the-art future directions of condition monitoring systems for traditional and smart roads.

1. Introduction

Road condition monitoring is essential to enhance traffic safety and prevent accidents. According to the World Health Organization, about 1.35 million people die annually from road traffic crashes [1], many of them because of bad road conditions: potholes, wet or icy surfaces, and debris. Thanks to the advanced sensor technologies in Automated Connected Vehicles (CAVs), these hazards can be detected and signals issued to the driver, significantly reducing the chances of an accident. An autonomous vehicle depends on accurate information about road conditions for modifications in driving behavior, which contributes to improving control and stability on various surfaces. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) report, almost 22% of vehicle crashes in the United States are attributed to road-condition-related issues; this means that effective monitoring systems are critical for this technology [2].
In addition to guaranteed safety, monitoring the road conditions contributes much to traffic efficiency and maintenance practices. Real-time monitoring allows traffic to be rerouted through traffic management systems from the areas of trouble; thus, reduced congestion is achieved with better traffic flow. According to the Texas A&M Transportation Institute, congestion costs the U.S. economy over USD 166 billion annually from lost productivity and fuel waste [3]. Informed by continuous monitoring, road maintenance can be efficient enough to extend the lifespan of infrastructure and simultaneously cut maintenance costs. For example, the Federal Highway Administration reports that preventive maintenance can save up to USD 10 in future repair costs for every USD 1 spent [4]. Prioritization of repairs with the correct data will allow for the proper allocation of resources in municipalities, ensuring better and safer travel for everybody.
The concepts of “sensor technologies” and “road monitoring” have been of great interest for many years now, as highlighted by the Google Trends time series (Figure 1 and Figure 2). However, road monitoring has seen growing interest starting from 2021 (Figure 2). Instead, the concentration of “connected vehicles” has undergone ever-increasing growth in the last decade, starting from a score of 20% in 2014 up to a score of 100% in 2024 (Figure 3). These time series show a generalized community interest in new mobility technologies and the application of sensors to road monitoring.
The main contributions of this work are fourfold. It will first explain what a connected vehicle is and its place in today’s transportation system. Second is a critical review of the various sensor technologies placed on connected vehicles for monitoring road conditions; this includes details on how the sensors could be applied to intelligent transportation systems, enabling better road safety, traffic efficiency, and infrastructure maintenance. Third, this study delves into the practical applications of sensor technologies such as pothole detection, surface classification, weather impact assessment, crack detection, road roughness measurement, lane detection, and traffic sign recognition. This further helps to establish how applications improve real-time road monitoring, leading to proactive maintenance and efficient traffic management. Finally, this work elaborates on the challenges and limitations in deploying sensor technologies such as sensor accuracy, data fusion, real-time processing, power consumption, and regulatory issues. This paper discusses the possible solutions and directions to solve these challenges, setting a future path for developing such road condition monitoring systems and their incorporation into practical and sustainable implementations within connected vehicles.

2. Terminology and General Concepts

Connected vehicles: The term connected vehicles, which are also sometimes called intelligent or smart vehicles, refers to an automobile that is equipped with internet connectivity and a range of different sensors, hence allowing it to communicate with others of its kind (vehicle-to-vehicle or V2V), with infrastructure (vehicle-to-infrastructure or V2I), and with everything else—including pedestrians and network services—through the vehicle-to-everything or V2X concept. These vehicles are provided with advanced communication technologies of dedicated short-range communications (DSRC) or cellular networks—4G/5G and satellite systems—to share real-time data among each other and increase the driving experience and safety [5]. When brought into the IoT and edge computing frameworks, CAVs are further integrated for the desired development of intelligent transportation systems. They enable policy-making at a global traffic level and decision-making at the local level to increase traffic flow and reduce travel times [6,7]. The functionalities of connected vehicles are numerous and multifaceted but the most important ones include the following.
Real-time traffic information: Real-time traffic information on connected vehicles is one of the critical steps in transportation technology toward safe and efficient systems. Realized through the technologies of V2V (vehicle-to-vehicle) and V2I (vehicle-to-infrastructure), drivers receive real-time traffic data to adjust their routes automatically, reducing congestion. In this context, integrating such data for real-time traffic management ensures precise, accurate, and timely decision-making toward mitigating traffic jams and optimizing travel time. Research has shown that these systems can significantly increase traffic flow efficiency and decrease road transportation’s environmental burden by reducing delay times and fuel consumption [8,9,10]. Further, real-time traffic information has significant economic benefits because lower congestion implies lower transportation costs and higher productivity [11]. With the maturation of technology, further extensive optimization in traffic and urban mobility management becomes more feasible than ever.
Enhanced safety features: Enhanced security characteristics are realized in the connected vehicles through the sharing of real-time information with other vehicles (V2V), infrastructure (V2I), pedestrians (V2P), and networks (V2N). This is through the use of V2X—vehicle-to-everything communication technologies. The widespread communication ensures maximized situational awareness and detection of hazards, therefore averting accidents and increasing road safety. V2V communications mean data sharing between vehicles associated with critical information such as speed, position, and direction, which is highly relevant for crash avoidance [12]. Connected vehicles also promise enhanced pedestrian safety through V2P communications, which makes the drivers aware of the movement of a pedestrian even outside his line of sight, further reducing the risk of accidents in urban environments [13,14]. Equally important is the optimization of traffic flow and reduction in congestion to further reduce risks of accidents—such as the associated sudden stops and erratic driving behaviors—through intelligent traffic management via V2I communication. In other words, the changes clearly prove how connected vehicle technology is transforming road safety in terms of smart and vastly safer transportation systems [14,15].
Remote diagnostics and maintenance: Based on advanced telematics and IoT technologies, remote diagnostics and maintenance for connected vehicles carry out real-time monitoring and management of the vehicle’s health and performance. This helps to read the possibility of problems beforehand, thereby reducing failure cases while optimizing the maintenance schedule. Recent studies have shown that through data collected from various vehicle sensors, these remote diagnostic systems can predict possible failures and schedule maintenance as needed to enhance vehicle uptime and reliability even more [16,17]. Further research shows that machine learning algorithms are embedded in the analysis of big data that emanates from such connected vehicles for more accurate diagnostics and predictive maintenance [18,19]. Recent research has proven that these systems, due to their increase in operational efficiency, cut costs significantly by minimizing unscheduled maintenance and downtime [20]. These advanced studies depict a new change in the automotive industry for efficient and reliable transportation.
Autonomous driving support: Real-time data processing, using machine learning algorithms and communication networks, enhances independent driving support for autonomous vehicles by allowing them to operate in complex environments and be able to interact with all the surrounding infrastructure. Recent studies found that autonomous driving systems enable the use of advanced sensors and real-time data analytics to enhance situational awareness and safety [21,22,23]. Furthermore, research emphasizes the contribution of deep learning and artificial intelligence to improving accuracy and dependability in autonomous navigation systems [24,25]. Further studies also show that V2X (vehicle-to-everything) communication frameworks play a vital role in enabling autonomous vehicles to interact with traffic lights, other vehicles, and pedestrian systems for a safe, integrated driving environment [25,26]. In sum, these innovations in automated driving help underline the transformable effect of connected vehicle technologies in modern transport.
Infotainment and convenience services: The connectivity systems in connected vehicles are taking the experience of driving to an entirely new, different level by pushing the bars of comfort, entertainment, and communication mobility to unimaginable levels. These real-time data and cloud connectivity systems give drivers and their passengers a complete suite of offerings, from streaming entertainment and navigation help to seamless integration for smartphone services. The basis of these systems lies in recent research that brings modern data analysis and machine learning for the sake of individualized content and recommendations based on the user’s preferences and driving patterns. More research is inclined toward robust communication networks and the Internet of Things, thus making these services reliable and secure, with users enjoying seamless connectivity with updates up to the minute [6,27,28,29]. Even more, new research insights show the integration of the infotainment systems into the greater infrastructure of smart cities in order to bring the experience of context-aware information and services [30,31]. All these advances ensure that the driving experience is pleasurable, convenient, and utterly connected, fitting with the developments happening in the automotive industry.
A connected vehicle is a significant element in advanced transportation systems that seek to improve road safety and traffic efficiency and reduce environmental footprints. Connected vehicle applications within intelligent transportation systems will allow for more harmonized and efficient road operations. Another example is being able to optimally time the traffic signals and tune the speed limits dynamically by the real-time traffic situation, which would subsequently significantly reduce traffic congestion and associated emissions using connected vehicles. Citing Jing et al. 2017, it reduces delays and fuel consumption by 5–10% [32]. Additionally, connected vehicles contribute to a safer transport ecosystem by providing the potential for more timely and informed interventions in safety-critical situations. Connected and automated vehicle (CAV) technologies are projected to reduce crashes by approximately 57.97% [33]. Moreover, they are necessary to drive smart cities: integrated data from all possible sources, of which one is connected vehicles, help cities improve urban mobility and the quality of life [34].
In summary, connected vehicles will have advanced functionalities. They will be integrated into modern transportation systems, including Smart roads, transforming the individual driving experience and contributing to more widespread societal goals of safety, efficiency, and sustainability.

3. Review of Sensor Technologies in CAVs

Connected and Automated Vehicles (CAVs) are based on different advanced sensor technologies (cf. Table 1 and Figure 4) to control the traffic environment and achieve safe operation. The suite of sensors used is likely to comprise accelerometers, gyroscopes, LiDAR cameras, radar, and others helping detect pavement anomalies like potholes, cracks, and rough surfaces based on real-time data processing. This section will not address the functioning of every sensor in great detail but rather summarize its roles and functions within CAVs with an overall emphasis on safety and environment monitoring.
The bottom line is, vehicle dynamics—acceleration forces/vibrations and motion—need to be monitored. This makes it highly compact and precise with the advantage of MEMS (Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems) technology, which reduces power consumption. For example, the systems responsible for the electronic stability control and predictive maintenance of vehicles are dependent on a fast H2H bus to enhance performance and comfort levels [35,36,37]. Another important sensor type, the “gyroscope”, measures angular velocity and helps maintain an accurate positioning of the vehicle, including support through auto-follow features (by twisting your neck) and stabilization. These sensors, particularly those based on MEMS devices [38], are part of systems such as inertial measurement units (IMUs) to improve navigation and safety, specifically in critical situations like accidents [39,40].
LiDAR sensors offer detailed 3D environmental maps of current market demands, which are necessary for object detection and collision avoidance in complex environments as well as navigation. These complement other sensors, especially when vulnerable vision-based sensors fail—e.g., in the presence of poor lighting or occlusion [40,41,42,43]—by emitting laser beams to form high-definition maps. Cameras achieve the same with visual information, providing object recognition abilities as well as identifying everything from lanes to other objects around them. Nevertheless, they can be impaired by adverse weather conditions and, therefore, operate in a more performant way when combined with the use of other sensor systems such as radar or LiDAR [41,44,45,46,47].
Radar sensors detect objects reliably under all weather conditions as they determine distances and speeds in driving directions by radio waves. Radar is also more useful when environmental factors like rain and fog decrease the effectiveness of other sensors. It is used commonly in functions like adaptive cruise control, blind spot detection, and collision avoidance. Ultrasonic sensors, on the other hand, are typically used for short-range detection like parking assistance and slow-speed collision mitigation. Practical and low-cost sensors [46,48,49,50,51] have been implemented in urban scenarios.
Object detection is vital and can be achieved more accurately using infrared sensors compared to traditional sensors, especially in low-light conditions or advancing weather. Infrared sensors detect thermal radiation and thus can work well at night or in fog. Together with algorithms such as YOLO-FIRI, these sensors enable superior vehicle detection and safety when used in a larger sensor fusion context of CAVs [52,53,54]. A lot of this work is now centered around the use of sound waves for obstacle identification and proximity assessments through acoustic sensors or microphones. They are also employed for applications providing hands-free features and voice-activated systems, improving the safety of drivers and decreasing distraction between operations [55,56].
Temperature and humidity sensors regulate the thermal and moisture conditions of different parts like the engine and battery in vehicles. In harsh environment applications, they provide extra protection against overheating and corrosion or failure due to electrical breakdown through the integrated sensors. Advanced CMOS-based temperature sensors are integrated into CAVs and their enhancements for reliable, predictive maintenance [57,58,59,60,61,62]. Magnetometers measure a magnetic field and are necessary for navigation, particularly when GPS is weak or unavailable [63,64,65].
The third type of sensor monitors the mechanical data like vibrations, stress, and pressure on the vehicle components, which includes piezoelectric sensors and strain gauges. By using these sensors, real-time structural health monitoring and predictive maintenance can be performed that helps prolong vehicle life and reduce unscheduled repairs. Energy harvesting is one of the most important concerns in CAVs, and piezoelectric sensors are capable devices for this goal [66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73]. These are further complemented by vibration sensors, capable of detecting incipient mechanical failures in critical components such as engines and drivetrains [74,75], whereas GPS-enabled location tracking becomes useful for navigation and fleet management operations, providing real-time positional data with a high degree of precision [76] or broad accuracy range, respectively [77]. They provide real-time location and smart routing, which improve transport efficiency and security. Moreover, the integration of GPS with inertial measurement units makes it even more accurate, particularly in places like urban canyons that face signal obstruction. Further, together with VIA communication devices, GPS sensors are also used to regulate traffic flow and avoid occurrences by enabling critical position data exchange between vehicles (V2X) [12,77,78].
Electromagnetic sensors contribute to CAV safety by detecting object distances, enabling collision avoidance, and supporting autonomous navigation. These sensors are increasingly being integrated with LiDAR and radar to enhance detection performance under various conditions. Like GPS, electromagnetic and proximity sensors are also integrated with V2X systems, boosting situational awareness and traffic flow by sharing real-time information between vehicles and infrastructure. Proximity sensors, using ultrasonic, infrared, or capacitive technologies, ensure close-range object detection, crucial for tasks like parking assistance and blind-spot detection. Tire Pressure Monitoring Sensors (TPMS) further enhance vehicle safety by continuously monitoring tire pressure, preventing accidents caused by underinflated tires and improving fuel efficiency [26,47,54,60,79,80,81,82,83].

4. Road Condition Monitoring

4.1. Data Processing Techniques and Algorithms for Road Condition Monitoring

Road condition monitoring is considered one of the most important subjects in intelligent transportation systems concerning CAVs. When integrated with advanced techniques and algorithms, the availability of advanced sensor technologies allows for online road condition monitoring and analysis. This section focuses on the techniques and algorithms used to process the data from the sensor for the assessment and accurate monitoring of road conditions (Table 2).
A.
Signal Processing Techniques
(a)
Filtering and noise reduction are significant operations for the improved monitoring of road conditions by CAVs. Advanced filtering techniques, such as Kalman filters, help minimize the effect of sensor noise and environmental disturbances to increase real-time data reliability [84]. Several important improvements have been noted using these methodologies for detecting road anomalies, leading to better safety and operational efficiency [85]. Integration with machine learning-based noise reduction algorithms would refine the data by detecting relevant signals against background noise. Such advanced filtering techniques are required to make autonomous vehicle systems robust under different road conditions [86];
(b)
Feature extraction: More recently, the process applied to CAV monitoring is based on feature extraction—road anomaly detection and classification. It involves potholes, cracks, surface wear, etc. The techniques applied include the dimension reduction and feature extraction of meaningful patterns out of large datasets using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Independent Component Analysis (ICA) [87]. Any of the given deeper learning methods, notably Convolutional Neural Networks, will perform very well for this kind of work because of their feature extraction power, which can accurately recognize irregularities in the road surface more or less in real-time [88]. These techniques allow autonomous vehicles to make intelligent decisions in adaptation to dynamically changing conditions of the roads for safety and smooth driving experiences.
B.
Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence
(a)
Supervised learning: Supervised learning algorithms have been utilized with SVMs and RFs through the use of labeled datasets that make it possible for the autonomous vehicle to detect the conditions of roads and make well-informed decisions. Several researchers have shown the effective use of SVMs for pothole and crack detection and high accuracy in robust diversifying textures of road classification with RFs [89,90]. Constant fine-tuning of supervised learning models ensures that autonomous vehicles react well to all types of road conditions, increasing their efficiency [91];
(b)
Unsupervised learning: In detecting patterns from road condition data without labels on their datasets, unsupervised learning techniques are hence very important since labeled data might not always be available. Clustering techniques like the K-means and DBSCAN have been implemented to detect and categorize road anomalies using data collected by vehicle sensors. Research has shown K-means to be effective in classifying road surface irregularity types [92], whereas Zhao et al. (2022) have also demonstrated that DBSCAN can perform outlier detection pointing toward road damage. More recently, using autoencoders for road surface reconstruction, any new deviation from the norm can be detected [93]. An unsupervised learning approach, combined with continuous data collection, allows the autonomous vehicle to learn and adapt to new road conditions, thereby further increasing operational robustness;
(c)
Deep learning: Using mainly CNNs and RNNs, deep learning has furthered road condition monitoring to the point where autonomous vehicles can make meaning from complex high-dimensional sensor data. For example, CNNs have been proven very good at feature extraction from visual inputs, and that allows great accuracy in identifying potholes and cracks on the roads [94,95]. RNNs are a type of network designed to handle sequences of data suitable for prediction of the state of the road, given historical data [96]. By fusing this knowledge with the deep learning model through real-time sensor data, self-driving vehicles constantly monitor and adapt to the changing conditions of the road, becoming safe and increasingly more efficient when actually deployed [97].
C.
Data Fusion Techniques
(a)
Multi-sensor data fusion: The sensors used in recording the road conditions for CAVs remain a crucial issue that will require initiative to improve its accuracy and robustness. Fusing the data from sources such as LiDAR, cameras, and accelerometers will give a very descriptive environment of the road. Previous work has shown that combining the LiDAR data with data obtained from cameras greatly improves the detection of anomalies on the surface [98]. The relevance of the information applied helps add more information that might help identify potholes and bumps [99]. Additionally, the sensor fusion helps reduce false positives and improves real-time decision-making [47]. Thus, the research studies above stress the importance of multi-sensor data fusion in designing an autonomous system that would work safely and efficiently under different road conditions;
(b)
Contextual data integration: This has led to real-time sensor data being integrated with monitoring road conditions in CAVs, along with other contextual data, such as weather conditions and traffic patterns at any given instant, including historical road maintenance records. Indeed, recent studies showed that integrating weather data into a model greatly improves the accuracy of predicting road conditions, particularly under adverse conditions [87]. Similarly, other reports showed that integrating traffic flow information also improved predictions of road wear and potential hazards [100]. In addition, Soprayoga et al. (2020) [101] further validated the usefulness of historic maintenance records for spotting locations subject to repetitive problems [102]. This can be achieved by incorporating contextual information to give the most holistic and accurate perception of road conditions for the safe and efficient navigation of vehicle routes [103].
D.
Predictive Analytics
(a)
Time-series analysis: Probably one of the most key predictive analytics to monitor road conditions in autonomous vehicles would be time-series analysis. This provides for extracting patterns and trends from historical data, projecting these into the future, making it possible to predict road conditions. The literature has identified that ARIMA is efficient in predicting vehicle velocity and road gradient [104]; on their part, Staudemeyer and Morris (2019) explained that LSTMs are actually good models for sequential data as they capture long-term temporal dependencies. They introduced a variable-neuron-based LSTM for enhanced modeling of long-term dependencies that can be applied directly or with minor modifications to road-wear data modeling [101]. Incorporated time series analysis and real-time sensor data give added accuracy to prediction in road conditions, hence allowing proactive maintenance and safety [105]. Integrating these techniques, autonomous vehicles’ operational performance adjustments to the changing road conditions will be implemented in the most efficient and safest manner possible [106];
(b)
Anomaly detection: The anomalous condition of the road condition needs to be detected to recognize sudden changes so that the autonomous vehicle can react promptly on encountering a hazard [107,108] illustrated an application of One-Class SVM for the detection of anomalies in road surface data and Isolation Forests, respectively. Applications of deep learning methods, particularly autoencoders, have recently shown huge potential in the identification of subtle anomalies that traditional methods might miss [109]. Integrating these advanced anomaly detection techniques with multi-sensor data fusion strengthens an autonomous vehicle’s ability to detect and adapt to road irregularities in real-time [110]. Within the proactive functioning provided by this, anomaly detection assumes a big role in ensuring safe and reliable operation for autonomous vehicles.
E.
Edge and Cloud Computing
(a)
Edge computing: This improves the efficiency of monitoring road conditions in CAVs. It also enhances responses; therefore, the number of data transmissions made with processing at the edge of the network reduces latency for better real-time decision-making. Instantaneous anomaly detection and response in smart transportation allows for the improvement of traffic safety [111]. The edge computing architecture in connected vehicles processes information locally, reducing bandwidth requirements and supporting system scalability [112]. Edge computing increases autonomous systems’ resilience by providing guarantees of continuity of operation in areas with poor connectivity [113]. Finally, the integration of machine learning algorithms on edge devices offers more precision and reliability in road condition assessment [114];
(b)
Cloud computing: This is a powerful system under the umbrella of cloud computing, responsible for processing and analyzing the enormous data generated by CAVs, with monitoring mechanisms provided for road conditions. Grouped data are further processed efficiently through cloud systems, which bring into play computational resources that may integrate traffic and weather data to help in the prediction of road conditions more accurately [115]. Secure aggregation and global model parameter updates on the aggregated data are conducted on cloud servers, thus ensuring that autonomous systems are updated in real-time with the most recent road condition insights [116]. In addition, cloud computing can provide secure and effective collaborative sharing of data in the Internet of Vehicles (IoV) so as to increase the collective decision-making powers for autonomous vehicles [117].
F.
Cooperative Algorithms
(a)
Cooperative perception: Cooperative perception is an awareness-sharing process between several CAVs in order to enhance monitoring of the road condition. Pooling sensor data allows for a better understanding of the environment for more clarity. For instance, based on soft actor-critic, cooperative perception models further increase the sensing range for connected vehicles to increase the sensitivity of road hazard detection [118]. Cooperative perception that integrates data from different sensors and infrastructure enhances situational awareness, which is quite useful in urban environments with complex surroundings [119]. Adaptive weighting in V2V cooperative perception further betters real-time response and lessens the impact of variability in communication on situational awareness [120]. Cooperative perception augments the robustness and reliability of autonomous vehicle networks by enabling improved awareness of vulnerable road users and safe interaction under varying traffic conditions [121];
(b)
Swarm intelligence: This system employs the principles of collective behavior observed in natural systems such as ant colonies and bird flocks, ensuring optimizations in road-condition monitoring by CAVs. That is to say, autonomous vehicles can monitor and respond to road conditions collectively using decentralized, self-organizing algorithms. Other studies have found that swarm intelligence algorithms enhance the robustness of intrusion detection systems due to the ability of distributed data processing that enables the real-time detection of anomalies in autonomous vehicles [122]. The models in swarm intelligence are categorized on the basis of fault tolerance and adaptability because these are the two preeminent features that a dynamic and unpredictable environment should possess [123]. Moreover, swarm intelligence in IoT-based smart city applications supports real-time decision-making and resource allocation, especially for systems that monitor road conditions [124]. Swarm intelligence algorithms offer the possibility to converge robust solutions in real-time, while data fusion supports enhanced system reliability [125]. These results suggest the potential of swarm intelligence for revolutionizing autonomous vehicle operations toward building more robust, scalable, and adaptive monitoring systems. In conclusion, these new techniques and algorithms make it possible for connected vehicles to monitor, analyze, and react to real-time road situations. In fact, the application of such sensor technologies with advanced data processing will facilitate a real revolution in intelligent transport systems.
Table 2. Main techniques and algorithms for road condition monitoring.
Table 2. Main techniques and algorithms for road condition monitoring.
CategoryTechniques/AlgorithmFunctionalityApplicationReferences
Signal Processing TechniquesKalman FiltersFiltering and noise reduction, increase real-time data reliabilityDetecting road anomalies, better safety and operational efficiency[84,85,86]
Principal Component Analysis (PCA)Feature extraction, dimension reductionRoad anomaly detection and classification[87]
Independent Component Analysis (ICA)Feature extraction, meaningful pattern recognitionRoad anomaly detection and classification[87]
Machine Learning and Artificial IntelligenceSupport Vector Machines (SVMs)Classification of road anomalies and surface conditionsDetecting potholes and cracks with high precision[89,90,91]
Random Forests (RFs)Robust classification of various road texturesClassifying various road textures accurately[90]
K-means ClusteringDetect and categorize road anomaliesDistinguishing between different types of road surface irregularities[92]
DBSCANDetect outliers indicative of road damageDetecting road damage[93]
AutoencodersReconstruct road surfaces to identify deviations from the normIdentifying deviations from the norm, enhanced anomaly detection[93]
Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs)Feature extraction from visual inputs, detect road anomaliesDetecting road anomalies such as potholes and cracks[94,95,96,97,98,99]
Data Fusion TechniquesMulti-Sensor Data FusionIntegrate data from various sensors for a comprehensive understandingImproved detection of road surface anomalies[97,98,99]
Contextual Data IntegrationCombine real-time sensor data with contextual informationEnhanced road condition predictions under adverse conditions[87,100,101,102]
Predictive AnalyticsARIMATime-series analysis for predictive analyticsPredicting vehicle velocity and road gradient[103,104,105,106]
One-Class SVMsAnomaly detection in road surface dataIdentifying unexpected changes in road conditions[107,108,109,110]
Edge and Cloud ComputingEdge ComputingReal-time data processing at the edge of the networkInstantaneous anomaly detection and response[111,112,113,114]
Cloud ComputingEfficient processing and analysis of vast amounts of dataEnhanced road condition monitoring and predictions[115,116,117]
Cooperative AlgorithmsCooperative PerceptionData sharing among vehicles for enhanced road monitoringEnhanced detection accuracy of road hazards[118,119,120,121]
Swarm IntelligenceDecentralized, self-organizing algorithms for collaborative monitoringCollaborative monitoring of road conditions[122,123,124,125]

4.2. Applications of Sensor Technologies in Road Pavement Condition Monitoring

Road Condition Monitoring (RCM) systems are typically classified into two very different types: destructive testing, which requires the removal of pavement samples to carry out specific laboratory tests; and non-destructive testing (NDT), which allows the pavement to be examined in situ without altering its configuration in any way.
Advanced sensor technologies have been integrated into next-generation vehicles, and various practical applications are in the field of road condition monitoring with the NDT approach. The areas of application are meant to ensure safety, efficiency, and the general driving experience by providing real-time data and analysis of the most common pavement distress (Figure 5). This section now gives some of the key applications of road pavement monitoring (Table 3).
A.
Pothole Detection
Pothole detection in road condition monitoring is of great importance to CAVs; therefore, many sophisticated techniques are applied to enhance the accuracy and reliability of the process. One of the technologies largely used for its efficiency in processing and interpreting visual data is Convolutional Neural Networks, which has shown leading performance in pothole identification [126]. The fusion of LiDAR with the accelerometer data increases the detection and classification of irregularities, bringing 3D insight into consideration for higher levels of accuracy [127]. The fusion of the accelerometer and video data further improve the reliability and accuracy of the detection process, thereby reducing false-positive results [128]. In this regard, edge computing ensures real-time pothole detection to guarantee immediate actions with low latency and high operational safety [129]. These studies have collectively emphasized the effectiveness of machine learning, multi-sensor integration, and edge computing in the development of sophisticated and reliable pothole detection systems. They are crucial for furthering autonomous vehicle technology in sustaining road safety and quality.
B.
Surface Classification of pavement damages
Surface classification is therefore of great importance to monitoring road conditions for CAVs, thus improving their safety and operational efficiency. Next-generation distributed sensors and vision-based artificial intelligence methodologies evaluate pavement distress by the measured data, their classification, and localization for improving the effectiveness of developed models in real-world applications [87]. It was shown that ensemble learning techniques give much better quality in the prediction of road surface quality from the data collected [130]. In accordance with the above, Jahromi et al. [131] presented a hybrid configuration of a camera, LiDAR, and radar sensors optimally configured for each fusion approach. Compared to benchmark models, this new architecture ensured better accuracy in road detection while keeping real-time efficiency. Furthermore, the ability to design a new deep learning concept allowed for the construction of a convolutional neural network-based road classification network, namely RCNet. This has been proven to work with great performance and accurate classification of road surfaces, even in the most complex road environments [132]. This definition is pushing forward the boundaries in our quest for fully autonomous driving systems and opens the doors to safer and more efficient transportation networks.
C.
Weather conditions
CAVs equipped with advanced sensor technologies and deep learning algorithms are on the cutting edge for detecting icy road conditions. Using Long Short-Term Memory Networks, such devices analyze real-time data from vehicle sensors and predict pavement states: 100% for dry, 99.06% for snowy, and 98.02% for icy. This proactive detection system enables vehicles to modify driving parameters, significantly reducing accident risks and improving the overall road safety environment during such severe weather conditions [133]. Sensor technologies within connected vehicles greatly enhance the monitoring of road conditions with respect to weather changes. Such systems are also able to classify road surface conditions that have been influenced by the weather through deep convolutional neural networks, such as Inception-v3, GoogLeNet, and SqueezeNet. The optimization in performance of these networks was designed to focus on regions of interest with high precision identification for wet, icy, or snow-covered roads. This advanced classification helps make real-time decisions, improving vehicle safety and adaptability in adverse weather conditions [134]. The application of the methods provided by the deep learning of convolutional neural networks allows systems to classify road surfaces under the influence of adverse weather, such as rain, snow, and ice. Such a classification, supported by data fusion from multiple sensors, makes real-time traffic management and vehicle safety more effective by providing timely and precise information on the current state of the road and enabling better driver and autonomous system decision-making [135]. Systems using deep learning techniques such as YOLOv7 with Enhanced Super-Resolution Generative Adversarial Networks (ESRGAN) are used to enhance images before object detection is degraded by adverse weather. This hybrid approach increases detection accuracy to around 80% under challenging conditions, enabling the benefits of better decision-making and safety of autonomous vehicles [136].
D.
Pavement Crack Detection
The sensor technology in CAVs has substantially contributed to the monitoring of road conditions and the technologies related to crack detection. Digital image processing, along with machine learning approaches, provides a real-time sensing capability for detecting cracks on road surfaces. When integrated with advanced algorithms, high-resolution cameras offer better accuracy in detection, allowing maintenance work to be performed in real-time. This guarantees road safety and prolongs the life of infrastructure [137]. In addition, deep learning and CNNs are advanced image-based methodologies capable of detecting and analyzing cracks correctly in real-time, thus saving time in detection and maintenance work due to improved accuracy and reduced human errors [138]. Using ConvNets with a learning context flux field allows the detection of minute cracks at the pixel level, even when the background is complicated. This further enhances precision in the identification of road cracks for timely repair and safety. Context flux field applies spatial context in the encoding of the relative position of crack pixels, performing better in detecting varied crack widths than traditional methods [139]. There is a recent improvement in combining INS with autonomous vehicles, which helps in the collection of vehicle altitude change data by combining acceleration sensors, gyroscopes, and GPS. The data are further processed to classify the road condition with a high level of precision in machine learning, yielding an F1 score of 99.61% [140]. In addition, based on advances in semiconductor technologies and wireless sensor networks, the cracking information, in terms of area and depth, could be automated by 3D reconstruction through stereoscopic analysis to improve efficiency and accuracy in road inspections [141].
E.
Pavement Roughness Measurement
Sensor technologies should be employed in CAVs as they are essential for monitoring pavement roughness, particularly for crack detection. The CRSM (Crowdsourcing-based Road Surface Monitoring) system utilizes low-end accelerometers and GPS devices mounted on vehicles to record vibration patterns and location data. This information is processed through a lightweight data mining algorithm to identify anomalies in the road surface and transmit potential crack information to a central server. Applied to 100 taxis in Shenzhen, CRSM achieved a 90% success rate in identifying road potholes, proving its effectiveness in real-time road roughness measurement [142]. Onboard dynamics sensors embedded in connected vehicles capture vibration and motion data to assess road surface conditions. Advanced signal processing and machine learning techniques enable the accurate identification of road roughness and cracks without direct contact. This method supports continuous monitoring, significantly benefiting road quality and safety maintenance by providing timely data for maintenance planning and intervention [143]. In CAVs, the incorporation of sensor technologies significantly enhances road roughness measurement by using a discrete Kalman filter model with driving vibration data input. This model utilizes vehicle dynamics, filters vibration signals, and correlates them with the International Roughness Index (IRI). This cost-effective approach, requiring minimal data acquisition equipment, achieves an accuracy of approximately 88.58%, demonstrating strong engineering applicability for real-time roughness detection on asphalt and cement concrete pavements [144].
The more recent applications can thus exploit CAVs, or human-driven vehicles (HDVs) equipped with modern sensor technology, to greatly enhance monitoring of the condition of pavements even at the road network level (Figure 6).

5. Challenges and Limitations

Although the technology in sensors for road condition monitoring in CAVs has significantly progressed, it has a lot of challenges and limitations (Table 4) that require attention to reach its maximum potential. Most of these challenges are technical, economical, and regulatory in nature, meaning a broad-spectrum approach based on interdisciplinary collaboration and innovation is needed.

5.1. Technical Challenges

A.
Sensor Accuracy and Reliability
Some technical challenges arise when it comes to how to ensure the accuracy and reliability of sensors in pavement monitoring for CAVs. As identified in the work of Rebelo et al. (2023) [145], thermal stress and sensor degradation over time were a challenge. They insisted that for the right long-term monitoring to be achieved, there must be robust sensor design and calibration [145]. The study by Masud et al. (2024) [146] outlined the selection and calibration of weigh-in-motion (WIM) systems used in pavement monitoring, addressing factors affecting sensor accuracy, such as site conditions and calibration methods. The study indicates that BP sensors exhibit the least measurement errors, followed by LC and QP sensors, while the highest errors are shown by the PC sensors [146]. However, the methods of data acquisition within the wireless sensor network that are used for pavement monitoring face challenges in relation to energy consumption, data accuracy, and network reliability. To address the challenge, Xiao et al. (2021) [147] proposed a hybrid compressive sensing (HCS) methodology that minimizes the transmission of data and balances the energy dissipated among different sensor nodes in WSNs. The system enhances the accuracy and robustness of the pavement monitoring sensors with the integrated vibration data acquisition and HCS model, thereby ensuring that data are collected in real-time and reliably [147].
B.
Data Fusion and Interpretation
The data fusion and interpretation of pavement for monitoring within CAVs involve numerous technical challenges. The addition of such multidimensional data, which comes from different sensors that are heterogeneously formatted and of various resolutions, brings a lot of complexity with it since these sensors may include accelerometers, gyroscopes, or strain gauges. Advanced algorithms for correct merging and interpretation must be developed to secure information on pavement conditions with assurance. Other challenges are data variability, synchronization, and the assurance of system robustness under diverse environmental conditions [148]. The necessity of providing real-time capabilities—making available insights into information when they are needed— demands considerable computational resources and a truly robust network infrastructure [149]. Further improvements in the reliability of pavement condition assessments are obtained using techniques of adaptive filtering and machine learning; the effectiveness of this technique is demonstrated in extensive field testing [150].
C.
Real-time processing and latency
The issues related to real-time processing and latency in CAVs are multidimensional, whereby the requirements needed for data transmission, processing, and time for the response are very strict. Connected vehicles require real-time processing capabilities to make spontaneous decisions regarding the safe and efficient navigation they will take. High computational demands for processing sensor data may introduce unacceptable latency in safety-critical applications. A major technical challenge, however, lies in creating complex data processing that satisfies real-time requirements. Key breakthroughs with edge computing and optimization algorithms have been directed at minimizing latency issues. This illustrates the preciseness and real-time capabilities of AI-driven solutions in detecting road defects, together with predicting road maintenance needs [151]. Research about real-time data capturing with regard to vehicle-to-vehicle communication underlines the necessity of instant data processing and its implications for safety and efficiency [152].
D.
Power Consumption and Durability
Many advanced sensors draw huge power, which may be a limiting factor, particularly for battery-powered systems. On top of this, the sensors should be rugged and stay calibrated over time, usually in harsh environmental conditions [153]. Dutta et al. (2022) [154] revealed that a sensor system capable of functioning continuously over a long duration—during which it does not make frequent demands in terms of maintenance—would prove to be energy efficient and low in its power use; they believe that energy harvesting methodologies and low-power communication protocols are excellent ways to increase the life of a sensor further. It is very necessary to make the sensor setup robust so that the system becomes reliable and the pavement can be continuously monitored [154]. Regular maintenance or calibration of the pavement monitoring sensors could become a huge cost and logistical issue. Such demands would increase the cost of operation and make sensor networks more difficult to maintain [155]. Therefore, in effectively monitoring road conditions, the design of ruggedized and reliable sensors with low maintenance requirements is crucial. Innovations in low-power sensor design and sturdy materials are key to developing these systems.

5.2. Economic Challenges

A.
High Initial Costs
Take, for example, high-resolution LiDAR and radar systems that feature sophisticated sensor technologies. Theoretically, good hardware implementation of such technologies is indispensable for proper and reliable autonomous vehicle operation. The high financial impact comes to a large extent from the purchase of such sophisticated sensors and their integration and calibration for proper performance under real-world conditions [156]. Such high costs may result in wide adoption not occurring, especially in low-income areas or among small transportation fleets [157]. Over time, with technology maturing and economies of scale manifesting, the costs have a great potential to reduce. However, the current expense is a big barrier [158].
B.
Return on Investment (ROI)
Justifying investment in these advanced sensor systems involves a comprehensive understanding of their return: direct benefits to society, which lead to increased road safety and traffic management [159]; indirect benefits to society, such as reducing infrastructure maintenance costs and environmental impacts [160]. Therefore, long-term economic benefits through these investments will need to be proven by a detailed cost–benefit analysis to convince stakeholders that they are worth it [161].
C.
Cost of Maintenance and Upgrades
Above and beyond the initial investments are the costs of maintenance and upgrading sensor systems. In fact, these sensors face physical degradation over time and may hence require maintenance or replacement on a cyclical basis [162]. With technological progression, the existing systems should, therefore, be upgraded to keep abreast with new standards and improve their performance [163]. Such upgrades remain as ongoing costs and can accumulate to very high figures in large-scale implementations.

5.3. Regulatory and Standardization Challenges

A.
Lack of Standardization
A lack of standard protocols and interfaces among different sensor types and manufacturers may lead to poor interoperability and integration. The industry standards can make it much easier to ensure in any way possible that the sensing from different-vendor sensors can work seamlessly together [164]. Protocols developed and adopted need to be standardized and efficient in order to deploy systems for road condition monitoring on a large scale [165].
B.
Privacy and Security Concerns
The large-scale deployment of sensors for monitoring road conditions gives rise to major issues related to privacy and security. Cyber-attacks on any sensor needing to collect and send real-time data are possible, threatening vehicle safety and user privacy [166]. Strong cybersecurity, along with privacy aspects to be taken care of through law and technology design, would be key in gaining public trust and ensuring sensitive information is not leaked [166].
C.
Regulatory Approval and Compliance
The regulatory framework for deploying sensor technologies is immense and could, at times, in effect, become complex in covering its peripheries. Regulations are not uniform and, at times, are very complex in such a way that obtaining required approvals and compliance becomes a big challenge [6]. Harmonization of such technology among regions with simple rules on how to deploy and operate it will make the process of adoption easy and reduce regulatory burdens [167,168].
D.
Ethical and Legal Considerations
Hansson et al. (2021) further expound on the ethical as well as legal aspects of self-driving cars, including some of the following—apportioning responsibility, blame moving from drivers to makers and maintainers, lacunae in accountability, and more. Finally, it comments on the public opinion on whether self-driving cars are safe, and the moral dilemma around them. This is supported by the fact that strict safety standards might serve as a barrier to the wide introduction of self-driving cars, while it could have saved many lives in traffic [169]. Ryan (2020) looked at the ethics in automated systems of self-driving vehicles regarding the liability of their developers for safety. He considers the reduction in traffic accidents, the programming of vehicles to make life-and-death decisions, and the societal impacts. Important ethical questions that have been raised include transparency in the algorithms, accountability, and effects on employment and privacy [170].
The real use of CAVs on existing public roads has advanced more slowly than initially expected in most countries. Nevertheless, many CAVs and the related sensors used to control these vehicles do exist already, and more will appear soon, as shown in Figure 7 [171].

5.4. Physical Infrastructure Standards for the Operation of CAVs

Innovative road infrastructures, such as smart roads, are a crucial component of the operating environment of CAVs and establish where and how they can be adopted. Operating CAVs requires a specific Operational Design Domain (ODD) within the confines of the physical road [172]. Therefore, existing and new roads must match the performance and the requirements of CAVs. From this point of view, digitalized infrastructures, sensors, and smart roads are topics of great importance in the current academic community, as shown in Figure 8. This figure represents the term (keyword) co-occurrence, which is a bibliographic analysis method used to identify the main areas of interest and detect topics/subtopics that occur most frequently in the scientific literature. Figure 8 is obtained from the Scopus database and VOSviewer. The size of the nodes is proportional to the number of times a term has been used in the scientific literature. The thickness of the links between the nodes is proportional to the strength of the connection.
Research demonstrates that Smart roads essentially adopt cooperative technologies of intelligent transport systems (C-ITS) to enable communication and cooperation between CAVs. Smart roads [173,174] may employ one or more of the following traffic control systems (Figure 9): lanes for AVs and CAVs; Internet of Things (IoT) sensors for monitoring traffic flows, structures (bridges, viaducts, road safety barriers, etc.), weather, and air pollutants; ramp-metering systems; Hard-Shoulder Running (HSR) systems; variable speed limits (VSL); Green Islands (GIs); electric priority lanes; Piezoelectric devices to generate electrical energy; Smart street lights; Wi-Fi in motion; and safety barriers equipped with an accident monitoring system (AMS) [175].
In light of these considerations, policymakers should prepare for a future environment that augments the integration of CAVs, sensors, big data analysis techniques, and AI algorithms [176,177,178,179] in smart roads through investments to transform traditional roads and conventional or innovative intersections into digitalized infrastructures [150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182], with related benefits in reducing the costs of equipment for pavement analysis [183,184], many of which would no longer be necessary thanks to the use of sensors implemented in CAVs.

6. Conclusions

In the fast-evolving field of intelligent transportation systems, sensor technologies in CAVs for road condition monitoring remain at the forefront with considerable recent advancement. Additionally, deep learning and machine learning techniques (e.g., CNN and LSTM) can detect and classify road anomalies such as potholes and surface cracks in a very precise and accurate way. The integration of multi-sensor data fusion from sources that include LiDAR, cameras, and accelerometers results in increased accuracy of anomaly detection and evaluation of road conditions in real time, whether it is a smart road or a traditional one. Additionally, edge computing and cloud computing are responsible for enabling such a great amount of data processing, which guarantees the monitoring of road conditions promptly and accurately, raising the operational safety and efficiency of autonomous vehicles to a high level. These developments would help policymakers and road operators and strongly support the wider goals of smart city initiatives and sustainable urban mobility.

Research Perspectives

Future research should focus on several lines to expand the current advances. The first important line is the development of low power-consuming and long-lifetime sensor systems that can work in a reliable way in many harsh environments. This requires standardizing protocols and interfaces between the many different types of sensors to pave the way for interoperability and seamless integration between vehicles and smart roads. In addition, and more importantly, advancements in cyber security measures in terms of the data collected with such sensors and the trust within the public domain are required. In conclusion, machine learning- and AI-based predictive maintenance strategies could be incorporated to optimize road condition monitoring systems by making them proactive rather than relying on reactive practices.
The future of smart vehicles and road systems is closely linked to advancements in sensor technologies, AI, and the connectivity infrastructure. The most important paths include improved vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communication that will benefit from 5G and future 6G networks, thus allowing vehicles to reliably exchange information with infrastructure in real-time. Further on, road systems based on AI will bring about predictive analysis of traffic management and road conditions; smart roads with sensors connected through the IoT will allow for it to monitor events first-hand. These updates will also include decentralized algorithms based on swarm intelligence that enhance the collective vehicle learning capability as well as green innovators such as energy efficiency designs or reduced carbon footprint.
Overcoming the depicted research and practical challenges can thus unleash the full potential of these systems for making a smarter, safer, and sustainable road transportation network.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.K. and M.G.; methodology, M.K.; software, M.G.; formal analysis, M.K.; investigation, M.K.; writing—original draft preparation, M.K.; writing—review and editing, M.K. and M.G.; supervision, M.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors acknowledge the Italian Ministry of Universities and Research (MUR) in the framework of the project DICAM–EXC (Departments of Excellence 2023–2027, grant No. L232/2016).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No additional data beyond what are presented in this manuscript were used in this study. All relevant data are contained within the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Global Status Report on Road Safety. 2018. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565684 (accessed on 10 August 2024).
  2. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Critical Reasons for Crashes Investigated in the National Motor Vehicle Crash Causation Survey. 2015. Available online: https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/812115 (accessed on 10 August 2024).
  3. Texas A&M Transportation Institute. 2019 Urban Mobility Report. 2019. Available online: https://mobility.tamu.edu/umr/ (accessed on 10 August 2024).
  4. Federal Highway Administration. Pavement Maintenance. 2020. Available online: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/maint.cfm (accessed on 10 August 2024).
  5. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communications: Readiness of V2V Technology for Application. PDF File. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 2016. Available online: https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/v2v_pria_12-12-16_clean.pdf (accessed on 10 August 2024).
  6. Abdelkader, G.; Elgazzar, K.; Khamis, A. Connected Vehicles: Technology Review, State of the Art, Challenges and Opportunities. Sensors 2021, 21, 7712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Huang, C.; Du, H.; Zhao, W.; Zhao, Y.; Yan, F.; Lv, C. Advanced Sensing and Control for Connected and Automated Vehicles. Sensors 2022, 22, 1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Elassy, M.; Al-Hattab, M.; Takruri, M.; Badawi, S. Intelligent Transportation Systems for Sustainable Smart Cities. Transp. Eng. 2024, 16, 100252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shahbazi, Z.; Nowaczyk, S. Enhancing Energy Efficiency in Connected Vehicles for Traffic Flow Optimization. Smart Cities 2023, 6, 2574–2592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tao, X.; Cheng, L.; Zhang, R.; Chan, W.K.; Chao, H.; Qin, J. Towards Green Innovation in Smart Cities: Leveraging Traffic Flow Prediction with Machine Learning Algorithms for Sustainable Transportation Systems. Sustainability 2024, 16, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gruyer, D.; Orfila, O.; Glaser, S.; Hedhli, A.; Hautière, N.; Rakotonirainy, A. Are Connected and Automated Vehicles the Silver Bullet for Future Transportation Challenges? Benefits and Weaknesses on Safety, Consumption, and Traffic Congestion. Frontiers 2021, 2, 607054. Available online: www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbuil.2018.00057/full (accessed on 13 June 2024). [CrossRef]
  12. Yusuf, S.A.; Khan, A.; Souissi, R. Vehicle-to-everything (V2X) in the autonomous vehicles domain—A technical review of communication, sensor, and AI technologies for road user safety. Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect. 2024, 23, 100980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sewalkar, P.; Seitz, J. Vehicle-to-pedestrian communication for vulnerable road users: Survey, design considerations, and challenges. Sensors 2019, 19, 358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Islam, M.; Rahman, M.; Chowdhury, M.; Comert, G.; Sood, E.D.; Apon, A. Vision-Based Personal Safety Messages (PSMs) Generation for Connected Vehicles. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2020, 69, 9402–9416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Djahel, S.; Jabeur, N.; Barrett, R.; Murphy, J. Toward V2I communication technology-based solution for reducing road traffic congestion in smart cities. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Symposium on Networks, Computers and Communications (ISNCC), Yasmine Hammamet, Tunisia, 13–15 May 2015; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ucar, A.; Karakose, M.; Kırımça, N. Artificial Intelligence for Predictive Maintenance Applications: Key Components, Trustworthiness, and Future Trends. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ammal, S.M.; Kathiresh, M.; Neelaveni, R. Artificial intelligence and sensor technology in the automotive industry: An overview. In Automotive Embedded Systems: Key Technologies, Innovations, and Applications; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 145–164. [Google Scholar]
  18. Çınar, Z.M.; Abdussalam Nuhu, A.; Zeeshan, Q.; Korhan, O.; Asmael, M.; Safaei, B. Machine Learning in Predictive Maintenance towards Sustainable Smart Manufacturing in Industry 4.0. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Prytz, R. Machine Learning Methods for Vehicle Predictive Maintenance Using Off-Board and On-Board Data. Doctoral Dissertation, Halmstad University Press: Halmstad, Sweden, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  20. Maksimychev, O.I.; Matiukhina, E.N.; Ostroukh, A.V.; Vasiliev, Y.E. Connected Vehicle Remote Diagnostic System. In Proceedings of the 2021 Systems of Signals Generating and Processing in the Field of on Board Communications, Moscow, Russia, 16–18 March 2021; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Biswas, A.; Wang, H.-C. Autonomous Vehicles Enabled by the Integration of IoT, Edge Intelligence, 5G, and Blockchain. Sensors 2023, 23, 1963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Garikapati, D.; Shetiya, S.S. Autonomous Vehicles: Evolution of Artificial Intelligence and the Current Industry Landscape. Big Data Cogn. Comput. 2024, 8, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cui, G.; Zhang, W.; Xiao, Y.; Yao, L.; Fang, Z. Cooperative Perception Technology of Autonomous Driving in the Internet of Vehicles Environment: A Review. Sensors 2022, 22, 5535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Fayyad, J.; Jaradat, M.A.; Gruyer, D.; Najjaran, H. Deep Learning Sensor Fusion for Autonomous Vehicle Perception and Localization: A Review. Sensors 2020, 20, 4220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Noor-A-Rahim, M.; Liu, Z.; Lee, H.; Khyam, M.O.; He, J.; Pesch, D.; Moessner, K.; Saad, W.; Poor, J. 6G for vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communications: Enabling technologies, challenges, and opportunities. Proc. IEEE 2022, 110, 712–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jung, C.; Lee, D.; Lee, S.; Shim, D.H. V2X-communication-aided autonomous driving: System design and experimental validation. Sensors 2020, 20, 2903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yu, Z.; Cai, K. Perceived Risks toward In-Vehicle Infotainment Data Services on Intelligent Connected Vehicles. Systems 2022, 10, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lim, K.L.; Whitehead, J.; Jia, D.; Zheng, Z. State of Data Platforms for Connected Vehicles and Infrastructures. Commun. Transp. Res. 2021, 1, 100013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dibaei, M.; Zheng, X.; Jiang, K.; Abbas, R.; Liu, S.; Zhang, Y.; Xiang, Y.; Yu, S. Attacks and defences on intelligent connected vehicles: A survey. Digit. Commun. Netw. 2020, 6, 399–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Khan, Z.; Kiani, S.L.; Soomro, K. A framework for cloud-based context-aware information services for citizens in smart cities. J. Cloud Comput. 2014, 3, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sagl, G.; Resch, B.; Blaschke, T. Contextual Sensing: Integrating Contextual Information with Human and Technical Geo-Sensor Information for Smart Cities. Sensors 2015, 15, 17013–17035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Jing, P.; Huang, H.; Chen, L. An Adaptive Traffic Signal Control in a Connected Vehicle Environment: A Systematic Review. Information 2017, 8, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, L.; Zhong, H.; Ma, W.; Abdel-Aty, M.; Park, J. How many crashes can connected vehicle and automated vehicle technologies prevent: A meta-analysis. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2020, 136, 105299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Richter, M.A.; Hagenmaier, M.; Bandte, O.; Parida, V.; Wincent, J. Smart Cities, Urban Mobility and Autonomous Vehicles: How Different Cities Need Different Sustainable Investment Strategies. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2022, 184, 121857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Reghuprasad, A.E.; Colombero, C.; Godio, A. Serially Connected Cantilever Beam-Based FBG Accelerometers: Design, Optimization and Testing. Sensors 2023, 23, 3188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sahandabadi, S.; Bhawya; Ahamed, M.J. Application of MEMS Accelerometers in Dynamic Vibration Monitoring of a Vehicle. Micromachines 2023, 14, 923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mohammed, Z.; Elfadel, I.M.; Rasras, M. Monolithic Multi Degree of Freedom (MDoF) Capacitive MEMS Accelerometers. Micromachines 2018, 9, 602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mazhar, I.; McKee, K. A Review of MEMS Vibrating Gyroscopes and Their Reliability Issues in Harsh Environments. Sensors 2022, 22, 7405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mo, Y.; Vijay, R.; Rufus, R.; de Boer, N.; Kim, J.; Yu, M. Enhanced Perception for Autonomous Vehicles at Obstructed Intersections: An Implementation of Vehicle to Infrastructure (V2I) Collaboration. Sensors 2024, 24, 936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Vaiani, L.; De Carlo, M.; Campanella, C.E. Gyroscope Technology and Applications: A Review in the Industrial Perspective. Sensors 2017, 17, 2284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Li, H.; Zhao, S.; Zhao, W.; Zhang, L.; Shen, J. One-Stage Anchor-Free 3D Vehicle Detection from LiDAR Sensors. Sensors 2021, 21, 2651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Tang, J.; Liu, H.; Li, B. Cooperative GNSS-RTK Ambiguity Resolution with GNSS, INS, and LiDAR Data for Connected Vehicles. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Padmaja, B.; Moorthy, C.V.K.N.S.N.; Venkateswarulu, N.; Bala, M.M. Exploration of issues, challenges and latest developments in autonomous cars. J. Big Data 2023, 10, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Razdan, R.; Santos, J. An Overview of Autonomous Vehicles Sensors and Their Vulnerability to Weather Conditions. Sensors 2021, 21, 5397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ayala, R.; Mohd, T.K. Sensors in autonomous vehicles: A survey. J. Auton. Veh. Syst. 2021, 1, 031003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Li, B.; Wang, Y.; Papaioannou, G.; Du, H. Sensor Fusion and Advanced Controller for Connected and Automated Vehicles. Sensors 2023, 23, 7015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yeong, D.J.; Velasco-Hernandez, G.; Barry, J.; Walsh, J. Sensor and sensor fusion technology in autonomous vehicles: A review. Sensors 2021, 21, 2140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Scheiner, N.; Kraus, F.; Appenrodt, N.; Dickmann, J.; Sick, B. Object detection for automotive radar point clouds—A comparison. AI Perspect. 2021, 3, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. De Ponte Müller, F. Survey on Ranging Sensors and Cooperative Techniques for Relative Positioning of Vehicles. Sensors 2017, 17, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kim, B.-S.; Jin, Y.; Lee, J.; Kim, S. High-Efficiency Super-Resolution FMCW Radar Algorithm Based on FFT Estimation. Sensors 2021, 21, 4018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Alonso, L.; Milanés, V.; Torre-Ferrero, C.; Godoy, J.; Oria, J.P.; De Pedro, T. Ultrasonic Sensors in Urban Traffic Driving-Aid Systems. Sensors 2011, 11, 661–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Huang, J.; Hei, G.; Wang, W. YOLO-IR-Free: An Improved Algorithm for Real-Time Detection of Vehicles in Infrared Images. Sensors 2023, 23, 8723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Li, S.; Li, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, M.; Xu, X. Yolo-firi: Improved yolov5 for infrared image object detection. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 141861–141875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hasanujjaman, M.; Chowdhury, M.Z.; Jang, Y.M. Sensor Fusion in Autonomous Vehicle with Traffic Surveillance Camera System: Detection, Localization, and AI Networking. Sensors 2023, 23, 3335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Makaveev, M.; Snellen, M.; Smeur, E.J.J. Microphones as Airspeed Sensors for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Sensors 2023, 23, 2463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Alaba, S.Y.; Gurbuz, A.C.; Ball, J.E. Emerging Trends in Autonomous Vehicle Perception: Multimodal Fusion for 3D Object Detection. World Electr. Veh. J. 2024, 15, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lewis, G.D.; Merken, P.; Vandewal, M. Enhanced accuracy of CMOS smart temperature sensors by nonlinear curvature correction. Sensors 2018, 18, 4087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Huang, C.; Wang, Y.; Hang, P.; Zuo, Z.; Leng, B. Advanced Sensing and Safety Control for Connected and Automated Vehicles. Sensors 2023, 23, 1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Tahir, M.N.; Leviäkangas, P.; Katz, M. Connected Vehicles: V2V and V2I Road Weather and Traffic Communication Using Cellular Technologies. Sensors 2022, 22, 1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Pan, M.; Sheng, J.; Liu, J.; Shi, Z.; Jiu, L. Design and Verification of Humidity Sensors Based on Magnesium Oxide Micro-Arc Oxidation Film Layers. Sensors 2020, 20, 1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Oh, G.; Sim, J.-H.; Won, M.; Jung, M.; Mantry, S.P.; Kim, D.-S. Integrated Temperature–Humidity Sensors for a Pouch-Type Battery Using 100% Printing Process. Sensors 2024, 24, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Farahani, H.; Wagiran, R.; Hamidon, M.N. Humidity Sensors Principle, Mechanism, and Fabrication Technologies: A Comprehensive Review. Sensors 2014, 14, 7881–7939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Xu, K.; Ren, X.; Xiang, Y.; Zhang, M.; Zhao, X.; Ma, K.; Tian, Y.; Wu, D.; Zeng, Z.; Wang, G. Multi-Parameter Optimization of Rubidium Laser Optically Pumped Magnetometers with Geomagnetic Field Intensity. Sensors 2023, 23, 8919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Bennett, J.S.; Vyhnalek, B.E.; Greenall, H.; Bridge, E.M.; Gotardo, F.; Forstner, S.; Harris, G.I.; Miranda, F.A.; Bowen, W.P. Precision Magnetometers for Aerospace Applications: A Review. Sensors 2021, 21, 5568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Opromolla, R. Magnetometer Calibration for Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Using Cooperative Flight Data. Sensors 2020, 20, 538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Rigo, F.; Migliorini, M.; Pozzebon, A. Piezoelectric Sensors as Energy Harvesters for Ultra Low-Power IoT Applications. Sensors 2024, 24, 2587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Covaci, C.; Gontean, A. Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting Solutions: A Review. Sensors 2020, 20, 3512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Yang, H.; Wei, Y.; Zhang, W.; Ai, Y.; Ye, Z.; Wang, L. Development of Piezoelectric Energy Harvester System through Optimizing Multiple Structural Parameters. Sensors 2021, 21, 2876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Park, J.-J.; Kim, W.-W.; Hwang, W.-J. Design Optimization of Bulk Piezoelectric Acceleration Sensor for Enhanced Performance. Sensors 2019, 19, 3360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Bednarz, E., III; Dietrich, C.; Hepner, B.; Patel, J., Jr.; Sabouni, A. Determining Magnitudes of Forces at Known Locations through a Strain Gauge Force Transducer. Sensors 2023, 23, 7017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Zhao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, Y.; Hao, Q. Development and Application of Resistance Strain Force Sensors. Sensors 2020, 20, 5826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Lopot, F.; Dub, M.; Flek, J.; Hadraba, D.; Havlíček, M.; Kučera, L.; Štoček, O.; Veselý, T.; Janáček, J. Gearbox Mechanical Efficiency Determination by Strain Gauges Direct Application. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 11150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Falcetelli, F.; Martini, A.; Di Sante, R.; Troncossi, M. Strain Modal Testing with Fiber Bragg Gratings for Automotive Applications. Sensors 2022, 22, 946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Jung, D.; Zhang, Z.; Winslett, M. Vibration analysis for IoT enabled predictive maintenance. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 33rd International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), San Diego, CA, USA, 19–22 April 2017; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  75. Theissler, A.; Pérez-Velázquez, J.; Kettelgerdes, M.; Elger, G. Predictive maintenance enabled by machine learning: Use cases and challenges in the automotive industry. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2021, 215, 107864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Koene, I.; Klar, V.; Viitala, R. Iot Connected Device for Vibration Analysis and Measurement. HardwareX 2020, 7, e00109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Elliott, D.; Keen, W.; Miao, L. Recent advances in connected and automated vehicles. J. Traffic Transp. Eng. 2019, 6, 109–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Gao, L.; Xin, X.; Zhaoliang, Z.; Jiaqi, M. GNSS/IMU/LiDAR fusion for vehicle localization in urban driving environments within a consensus framework. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2023, 205, 110862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Liu, Z.; Wang, H.; Chen, L. Surrounding objects detection and tracking for autonomous driving using LiDAR and radar fusion. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 2021, 34, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Xu, C.; Xu, K.; Feng, L.; Liang, B. RetroV2X: A New Vehicle-to-everything (V2X) Paradigm with Visible Light Backscatter Networking. Fundam. Res. 2023; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Formentin, S.; Onesto, L.; Colombo, T.; Pozzato, A.; Savaresi, S.M. h-TPMS: A hybrid tire pressure monitoring system for road vehicles. Mechatronics 2021, 74, 102492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Pangestu, A.; Sodikin, I.; Yusro, M.; Sapundani, R.; Al Hakim, R.R.; Wilyanti, S. IoT–based tire pressure monitoring system for air and temperature pressure using MPX5500D and LM35 sensor. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 8th International Conference on Computing, Engineering and Design (ICCED), Sukabumi, Indonesia, 28–29 July 2022; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Xu, N.; Askari, H.; Huang, Y.; Zhou, J.; Khaajepour, A. Tire force estimation in intelligent tires using machine learning. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2020, 23, 3565–3574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Bersani, M.; Vignati, M.; Mentasti, S.; Arrigoni, S.; Cheli, F. Vehicle state estimation based on Kalman filters. In Proceedings of the 2019 AEIT International Conference of Electrical and Electronic Technologies for Automotive (AEIT AUTOMOTIVE), Turin, Italy, 2–4 July 2019; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  85. Rathee, M.; Bačić, B.; Doborjeh, M. Automated road defect and anomaly detection for traffic safety: A systematic review. Sensors 2023, 23, 5656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Norouzi, A.; Heidarifar, H.; Borhan, H.; Shahbakhti, M.; Robert Koch, C. Integrating machine learning and model predictive control for automotive applications: A review and future directions. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2023, 120, 105878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ranyal, E.; Sadhu, A.; Jain, K. Road Condition Monitoring Using Smart Sensing and Artificial Intelligence: A Review. Sensors 2022, 22, 3044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Cheng, L.; Zhang, X.; Shen, J. Road surface condition classification using deep learning. J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent. 2019, 64, 102638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Lee, S.-Y.; Le TH, M.; Kim, Y.-M. Prediction and detection of potholes in urban roads: Machine learning and deep learning based image segmentation approaches. Dev. Built Environ. 2023, 13, 100109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Kamakshi, V.; Krishnan, N.C. Explainable Image Classification: The Journey So Far and the Road Ahead. AI 2023, 4, 620–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Blasch, E.; Pham, T.; Chong, C.Y.; Koch, W.; Leung, H.; Braines, D.; Abdelzaher, T. Machine learning/artificial intelligence for sensor data fusion–opportunities and challenges. IEEE Aerosp. Electron. Syst. Mag. 2021, 36, 80–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Nguyen, T.; Lechner, B.; Wong, Y.D. Response-based methods to measure road surface irregularity: A state-of-the-art review. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 2019, 11, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Zhao, T.; Xie, Y.; Ding, M.; Yang, L.; Tomizuka, M.; Wei, Y.A. A road surface reconstruction dataset for autonomous driving. Sci. Data 2024, 11, 459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Koch, C.; Brilakis, I. Pothole detection in asphalt pavement images. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2011, 25, 507–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Luo, D.; Lu, J.; Guo, G. Road anomaly detection through deep learning approaches. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 117390–117404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Deng, Y.; Li, F.; Zhou, S.; Zhang, S.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Li, Y. Use of recurrent neural networks considering maintenance to predict urban road performance in Beijing, China. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 2023, 381, 20220175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Gupta, A.; Anpalagan, A.; Guan, L.; Khwaja, A.S. Deep learning for object detection and scene perception in self-driving cars: Survey, challenges, and open issues. Array 2021, 10, 100057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Caltagirone, L.; Bellone, M.; Svensson, L.; Wahde, M. LIDAR–camera fusion for road detection using fully convolutional neural networks. Robot. Auton. Syst. 2019, 111, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Wu, C.; Wang, Z.; Hu, S.; Lepine, J.; Na, X.; Ainalis, D.; Stettler, M. An automated machine-learning approach for road pothole detection using smartphone sensor data. Sensors 2020, 20, 5564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Sayed, S.A.; Abdel-Hamid, Y.; Hefny, H.A. Artificial intelligence-based traffic flow prediction: A comprehensive review. J. Electr. Syst. Inf. Technol. 2023, 10, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Suprayoga, G.B.; Bakker, M.; Witte, P.; Spit, T. A systematic review of indicators to assess the sustainability of road infrastructure projects. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 2020, 12, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Li, S.; Shu, K.; Chen, C.; Cao, D. Planning and decision-making for connected autonomous vehicles at road intersections: A review. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 2021, 34, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Ma, B.; Li, P.; Guo, X.; Zhao, H.; Chen, Y. A Novel Online Prediction Method for Vehicle Velocity and Road Gradient Based on a Flexible-Structure Auto-Regressive Integrated Moving Average Model. Sustainability 2023, 15, 15639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Staudemeyer, R.C.; Morris, E.R. Understanding LSTM—a tutorial into long short-term memory recurrent neural networks. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1909.09586. [Google Scholar]
  105. Selmy, H.A.; Mohamed, H.K.; Medhat, W. A predictive analytics framework for sensor data using time series and deep learning techniques. Neural Comput. Appl. 2024, 36, 6119–6132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Chen, S.; Hu, X.; Zhao, J.; Wang, R.; Qiao, M. A Review of Decision-Making and Planning for Autonomous Vehicles in Intersection Environments. World Electr. Veh. J. 2024, 15, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Savant Todkar, S.; Baltazart, V.; Ihamouten, A.; Dérobert, X.; Guilbert, D. One-class SVM based outlier detection strategy to detect thin interlayer debondings within pavement structures using Ground Penetrating Radar data. J. Appl. Geophys. 2021, 192, 104392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Yasuno, T.; Fujii, J.; Ogata, R.; Okano, M. VAE-iForest: Auto-encoding Reconstruction and Isolation-based Anomalies Detecting Fallen Objects on Road Surface. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2203.01193. [Google Scholar]
  109. Tien, C.-W.; Huang, T.-Y.; Chen, P.-C.; Wang, J.-H. Using autoencoders for anomaly detection and transfer learning in IoT. Computers 2021, 10, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Thudumu, S.; Branch, P.; Jin, J.; Singh, J. A comprehensive survey of anomaly detection techniques for high dimensional big data. J. Big Data 2020, 7, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Zhou, X.; Ke, R.; Yang, H.; Liu, C. When intelligent transportation systems sensing meets edge computing: Vision and challenges. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 9680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Wang, H.; Liu, T.; Kim, B.; Lin, C.W.; Shiraishi, S.; Xie, J.; Han, Z. Architectural design alternatives based on cloud/edge/fog computing for connected vehicles. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2020, 22, 2349–2377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Liu, S.; Liu, L.; Tang, J.; Yu, B.; Wang, Y.; Shi, W. Edge computing for autonomous driving: Opportunities and challenges. Proc. IEEE 2019, 107, 1697–1716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Hua, H.; Li, Y.; Wang, T.; Dong, N.; Li, W.; Cao, J. Edge computing with artificial intelligence: A machine learning perspective. ACM Comput. Surv. 2023, 55, 1–35. [Google Scholar]
  115. Chu, W.; Wuniri, Q.; Du, X.; Xiong, Q.; Huang, T.; Li, K. Cloud Control System Architectures, Technologies and Applications on Intelligent and Connected Vehicles: A Review. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 2021, 34, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Chellapandi, V.P.; Yuan, L.; Brinton, C.G.; Żak, S.H.; Wang, Z. Federated learning for connected and automated vehicles: A survey of existing approaches and challenges. IEEE Trans. Intell. Veh. 2023, 9, 119–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Zheng, T.; Wu, J.; Li, G. IoV data sharing scheme based on the hybrid architecture of blockchain and cloud-edge computing. J. Cloud Comput. 2023, 12, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Xie, Q.; Zhou, X.; Qiu, T.; Zhang, Q.; Qu, W. Soft Actor–Critic-Based Multilevel Cooperative Perception for Connected Autonomous Vehicles. IEEE Internet Things J. 2022, 9, 21370–21381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Bai, Z.; Wu, G.; Barth, M.J.; Liu, Y.; Sisbot, E.A.; Oguchi, K.; Huang, Z. A survey and framework of cooperative perception: From heterogeneous singleton to hierarchical cooperation. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2208.10590. [Google Scholar]
  120. Liu, C.; Chen, J.; Chen, Y.; Payton, R.; Riley, M.; Yang, S.H. Self-supervised adaptive weighting for cooperative perception in V2V communications. IEEE Trans. Intell. Veh. 2023, 9, 3569–3580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Shan, M.; Narula, K.; Wong, Y.F.; Worrall, S.; Khan, M.; Alexander, P.; Nebot, E. Demonstrations of cooperative perception: Safety and robustness in connected and automated vehicle operations. Sensors 2020, 21, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Reddy, D.K.K.; Nayak, J.; Behera, H.S.; Shanmuganathan, V.; Viriyasitavat, W.; Dhiman, G. A Systematic Literature Review on Swarm Intelligence Based Intrusion Detection System: Past, Present and Future. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 2024, 31, 2717–2784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Wang, C.; Zhang, S.; Ma, T.; Xiao, Y.; Chen, M.Z.; Wang, L. Swarm intelligence: A survey of model classification and applications. Chin. J. Aeronaut. 2024; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Zedadra, O.; Guerrieri, A.; Jouandeau, N.; Spezzano, G.; Seridi, H.; Fortino, G. Swarm intelligence and IoT-based smart cities: A review. In The Internet of Things for Smart Urban Ecosystems; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 177–200. [Google Scholar]
  125. Chakraborty, A.; Kar, A.K. Swarm intelligence: A review of algorithms. In Nature-Inspired Computing and Optimization: Theory and Applications; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 475–494. [Google Scholar]
  126. Wang, D.; Liu, Z.; Gu, X.; Wu, W.; Chen, Y.; Wang, L. Automatic detection of pothole distress in asphalt pavement using improved convolutional neural networks. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 3892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Varona, B.; Monteserin, A.; Teyseyre, A. A deep learning approach to automatic road surface monitoring and pothole detection. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 2020, 24, 519–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Xin, H.; Ye, Y.; Na, X.; Hu, H.; Wang, G.; Wu, C.; Hu, S. Sustainable Road Pothole Detection: A Crowdsourcing Based Multi-Sensors Fusion Approach. Sustainability 2023, 15, 6610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Ahmed, K.R. Smart pothole detection using deep learning based on dilated convolution. Sensors 2021, 21, 8406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Jawad, Y.K.; Nitulescu, M. Improving Driving Style in Connected Vehicles via Predicting Road Surface, Traffic, and Driving Style. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 3905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Shahian Jahromi, B.; Tulabandhula, T.; Cetin, S. Real-time hybrid multi-sensor fusion framework for perception in autonomous vehicles. Sensors 2019, 19, 4357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Chen, N.; Xu, Z.; Liu, Z.; Chen, Y.; Miao, Y.; Li, Q.; Wang, L. Data augmentation and intelligent recognition in pavement texture using a deep learning. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2022, 23, 25427–25436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Hu, J.; Huang, M.C.; Yu, X.B. Deep learning based on connected vehicles for icing pavement detection. AI Civ. Eng. 2023, 2, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Busch, A.; Fink, D.; Laves, M.H.; Ziaukas, Z.; Wielitzka, M.; Ortmaier, T. Classification of Road Surface and Weather-Related Condition Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. In Advances in Dynamics of Vehicles on Roads and Tracks; Klomp, M., Bruzelius, F., Nielsen, J., Hillemyr, A., Eds.; IAVSD 2019, Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Tasgaonkar, P.P.; Garg, R.D.; Garg, P.K. Vehicle Detection and Traffic Estimation with Sensors Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems. Sens. Imaging 2020, 21, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Appiah, E.O.; Mensah, S. Object detection in adverse weather condition for autonomous vehicles. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2024, 83, 28235–28261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Guo, S.; Bai, Y.; Bocus, M.J.; Fan, R. Digital transformation for intelligent road condition assessment. In Intelligent Systems in Digital Transformation: Theory and Applications; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 511–533. [Google Scholar]
  138. Gupta, P.; Dixit, M. Image-based crack detection approaches: A comprehensive survey. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2022, 81, 40181–40229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Li, G.; Liu, Y.; Shen, D.; Wang, B. Automatic pixel-level bridge crack detection using learning context flux field with convolutional feature fusion. J. Civ. Struct. Health Monit. 2024, 14, 1155–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Liu, J.; Wang, Y.; Luo, H.; Lv, G.; Guo, F.; Xie, Q. Pavement surface defect recognition method based on vehicle system vibration data and feedforward neural network. Int. J. Pavement Eng. 2023, 24, 2188594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Sghaier, S.; Krichen, M.; Ben Dhaou, I.; Elmannai, H.; Alkanhel, R. Identification, 3D-Reconstruction, and Classification of Dangerous Road Cracks. Sensors 2023, 23, 3578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Chen, K.; Tan, G.; Lu, M.; Wu, J. CRSM: A practical crowdsourcing-based road surface monitoring system. Wirel. Netw. 2016, 22, 765–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Gamage, Y.T.; Thotawaththa, T.A.I.; Wijayasiri, A. Measuring Road Roughness through Crowdsourcing while Minimizing the Conditional Effects. Int. J. ITS Res. 2022, 20, 581–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Li, J.; Wang, L.; Miao, Y.; Tong, X.; Ye, Z. Road Roughness Detection Based on Discrete Kalman Filter Model with Driving Vibration Data Input. Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Rebelo, F.; Dabiri, A.; Silva, H.; Oliveira, J. Laboratory Investigation of Sensors Reliability to Allow Their Incorporation in a Real-Time Road Pavement Monitoring System. In Trends on Construction in the Digital Era; Gomes Correia, A., Azenha, M., Cruz, P.J.S., Novais, P., Pereira, P., Eds.; ISIC 2022, Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; Volume 306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Masud, M.M.; Haider, S.W.; Selezneva, O.; Wolf, D.J. Representative Weigh-In-Motion (WIM) System Accuracy and Guidelines for Equipment Selection Based on Sensor, Site, and Calibration-Related Factors. Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. 2024, 17, 732–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Xiao, J.; Gao, F.; Li, P.; Ji, X. Data Acquisition Mechanism of Wireless Sensor Network Pavement Monitoring System Based on Hybrid Compressive Sensing. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2021, 121, 1707–1724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Shon, H.; Cho, C.S.; Byon, Y.J.; Lee, J. Autonomous condition monitoring-based pavement management system. Autom. Constr. 2022, 138, 104222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Neves, J.; Cristina, A.; Qamhia, I.; Al-Qadi, I.L.; Tutumluer, E. Full-scale accelerated pavement testing and instrumentation. In Advances on Testing and Experimentation in Civil Engineering: Geotechnics, Transportation, Hydraulics and Natural Resources; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 163–186. [Google Scholar]
  150. Xing, J.; Wu, W.; Cheng, Q.; Liu, R. Traffic state estimation of urban road networks by multi-source data fusion: Review and new insights. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Its Appl. 2022, 595, 127079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Jagatheesaperumal, S.K.; Bibri, S.E.; Ganesan, S.; Jeyaraman, P. Artificial Intelligence for road quality assessment in smart cities: A machine learning approach to acoustic data analysis. Comput. Urban Sci. 2023, 3, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Lal, N.; Kumar, S.; Chaurasiya, V.K. A Road Monitoring Approach with Real-Time Capturing of Events for Efficient Vehicles Safety in Smart City. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2020, 114, 657–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Sun, T.; Feng, B.; Huo, J.; Xiao, Y.; Wang, W.; Peng, J.; Li, Z.; Du, C.; Wang, W.; Zou, G.; et al. Artificial Intelligence Meets Flexible Sensors: Emerging Smart Flexible Sensing Systems Driven by Machine Learning and Artificial Synapses. Nano-Micro Lett. 2024, 16, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Dutta, J.; Mathew, R. An Overview of Sensors in Intelligent Transportation Systems and Electric Vehicles. In AI Enabled IoT for Electrification and Connected Transportation; Marati, N., Bhoi, A.K., De Albuquerque, V.H.C., Kalam, A., Eds.; Transactions on Computer Systems and Networks; Springer: Singapore, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Dacanay, J.P.T.; Torio-Kaimo, L.V.; Bronuela-Ambrocio, L.B. An Assessment of Road Condition Monitoring Practice and Technologies in the Philippines. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Civil Engineering. ICOCE 2023. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, Singapore, 24–26 March 2023; Strauss, E., Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2024; Volume 371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Lee, D.; Jung, M.; Yang, W.; Kim, A. LiDAR odometry survey: Recent advancements and remaining challenges. Intell. Serv. Robot. 2024, 17, 95–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Javadnejad, F.; Jahanbakh, M.; Pinto, C.A.; Saeidi, A. Analyzing incentives and barriers to electric vehicle adoption in the United States. Environ. Syst. Decis. 2023, 44, 575–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Sharma, A.; Zheng, Z. Connected and Automated Vehicles: Opportunities and Challenges for Transportation Systems, Smart Cities, and Societies. In Automating Cities; Wang, B.T., Wang, C.M., Eds.; Advances in 21st Century Human Settlements; Springer: Singapore, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Verma, S.K.; Verma, R.; Singh, B.K.; Sinha, R.S. Management of Intelligent Transportation Systems and Advanced Technology. In Intelligent Transportation System and Advanced Technology; Upadhyay, R.K., Sharma, S.K., Kumar, V., Eds.; Energy, Environment, and Sustainability; Springer: Singapore, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Rana, M.M.; Hossain, K. Connected and Autonomous Vehicles and Infrastructures: A Literature Review. Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. 2023, 16, 264–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Wang, W.; Zaheer, Q.; Qiu, S.; Wang, W.; Ai, C.; Wang, J.; Wang, S.; Hu, W. Transportation Infrastructure Management. In Digital Twin Technologies in Transportation Infrastructure Management; Springer: Singapore, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Amditis, A.; Lytrivis, P.; Portouli, E. Sensing and Actuation in Intelligent Vehicles. In Handbook of Intelligent Vehicles; Eskandarian, A., Ed.; Springer: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Stenholm, D.; Corin Stig, D.; Ivansen, L.; Bergsjo, D. A framework of practices supporting the reuse of technological knowledge. Environ. Syst. Decis. 2019, 39, 128–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Noura, M.; Atiquzzaman, M.; Gaedke, M. Interoperability in Internet of Things: Taxonomies and Open Challenges. Mobile Netw. Appl. 2019, 24, 796–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Ye, Z.; Wei, Y.; Yang, S.; Li, P.; Yang, F.; Yang, B.; Wang, L. IoT-enhanced smart road infrastructure systems for comprehensive real-time monitoring. Internet Things Cyber-Phys. Syst. 2024, 4, 235–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Dhirani, L.L.; Mukhtiar, N.; Chowdhry, B.S.; Newe, T. Ethical Dilemmas and Privacy Issues in Emerging Technologies: A Review. Sensors 2023, 23, 1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Ismagilova, E.; Hughes, L.; Rana, N.P.; Dwivedi, Y.K. Security, Privacy and Risks Within Smart Cities: Literature Review and Development of a Smart City Interaction Framework. Inf. Syst. Front. 2022, 24, 393–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Gomes Correia, M.; Ferreira, A. Road Asset Management and the Vehicles of the Future: An Overview, Opportunities, and Challenges. Int. J. ITS Res. 2023, 21, 376–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Hansson, S.O.; Belin, M.Å.; Lundgren, B. Self-Driving Vehicles—An Ethical Overview. Philos. Technol. 2021, 34, 1383–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Ryan, M. The Future of Transportation: Ethical, Legal, Social and Economic Impacts of Self-driving Vehicles in the Year 2025. Sci. Eng. Ethics 2020, 26, 1185–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Irannezhad, E.; Xue, S.; Karl, C. Minimum Physical Infrastructure Standard for the Operation of Automated Driving Part A: Infrastructure Investment; Project FPI6258; ARRB Group Limited: Port Melbourne, Australia, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  172. ITF. Preparing Infrastructure for Automated Vehicles; ITF Research Report; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  173. Pompigna, A.; Mauro, R. Smart roads: A state of the art of highways innovations in the Smart Age. Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J. 2022, 25, 100986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Guerrieri, M. Smart Roads Geometric Design Criteria and Capacity Estimation Based on AV and CAV Emerging Technologies. A Case Study in the Trans-European Transport Network. Int. J. Intell. Transp. Syst. Res. 2021, 19, 429–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Dinnella, N.; Chiappone, S.; Guerrieri, M. The innovative “NDBA” concrete safety barrier able to withstand two subsequent TB81 crash tests. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2020, 115, 104660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Corriere, F.; Divincenzo, D.; Guerrieri, M. A logic fuzzy model for evaluation of the railway station’s practice capacity in safety operating conditions. Arch. Civ. Eng. 2013, 59, 3–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Guerrieri, M.; Corriere, F.; Parla, G.; Ticali, D. Estimation of pollutant emissions from road traffic by image processing techniques: A case study in a suburban area. ARPN J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2013, 8, 668–676. [Google Scholar]
  178. Guerrieri, M.; Parla, G.; Ticali, D. A theoretical and experimental approach to reconstructing the transverse profile of worn-out rails. Ing. Ferrov. 2012, 67, 23–37. [Google Scholar]
  179. Guerrieri, M.; Corriere, F.; Lo Casto, B.; Rizzo, G. A model for evaluating the environmental and functional benefits of innovative roundabouts. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2015, 39, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Nalin, A.; Vignali, V.; Lantieri, C.; Zamengo, B.; Simone, A. Assessing veracity of big data: An in-depth evaluation process from the comparison of Mobile phone traces and groundtruth data in traffic monitoring. J. Transp. Geogr. 2024, 118, 103930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Guerrieri, M.; Parla, G.; Khanmohamadi, M.; Neduzha, L. Asphalt Pavement Damage Detection through Deep Learning Technique and Cost-Effective Equipment: A Case Study in Urban Roads Crossed by Tramway Lines. Infrastructures 2024, 9, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Baldo, N.; Rondinella, F.; Celauro, C. Prediction of Airport Pavement Moduli by Machine Learning Methodology Using Non-destructive Field Testing Data Augmentation. In Trends on Construction in the Digital Era; Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 306 LNCE; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 62–75. [Google Scholar]
  183. Rasol, M.; Schmidt, F.; Ientile, S.; Lucas, A.; Boumediene, N.; Kane, M.; Chevalier, C. Progress and monitoring opportunities of skid resistance in road transport: A critical review and road sensors. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 3729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Barbieri, D.M.; Lou, B. Instrumentation and testing for road condition monitoring—A state-of-the-art review. NDTE Int. 2024, 146, 103161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Time series of Google Trends searching interest, years 2014–2024, for “sensor technologies”.
Figure 1. Time series of Google Trends searching interest, years 2014–2024, for “sensor technologies”.
Sustainability 16 08336 g001
Figure 2. Time series of Google Trends searching interest, years 2014–2024, for “road monitoring”.
Figure 2. Time series of Google Trends searching interest, years 2014–2024, for “road monitoring”.
Sustainability 16 08336 g002
Figure 3. Time series of Google Trends searching interest, years 2014–2024, for “connected vehicles”.
Figure 3. Time series of Google Trends searching interest, years 2014–2024, for “connected vehicles”.
Sustainability 16 08336 g003
Figure 4. Main sensors used in CAVs.
Figure 4. Main sensors used in CAVs.
Sustainability 16 08336 g004
Figure 5. Examples of most common pavement defects.
Figure 5. Examples of most common pavement defects.
Sustainability 16 08336 g005
Figure 6. A framework of road network monitoring through sensor technologies implemented in vehicles.
Figure 6. A framework of road network monitoring through sensor technologies implemented in vehicles.
Sustainability 16 08336 g006
Figure 7. Qualitative evolution of annual sales of traditional vehicles and CAVs (adapted from [171]).
Figure 7. Qualitative evolution of annual sales of traditional vehicles and CAVs (adapted from [171]).
Sustainability 16 08336 g007
Figure 8. The term co-occurrence map: links between the keyword analysis of smart roads, sensors, and CAVs.
Figure 8. The term co-occurrence map: links between the keyword analysis of smart roads, sensors, and CAVs.
Sustainability 16 08336 g008
Figure 9. Smart road example.
Figure 9. Smart road example.
Sustainability 16 08336 g009
Table 1. Review of sensor technologies.
Table 1. Review of sensor technologies.
Sensor TypeFunctionalityApplication
AccelerometersMeasure forces of acceleration, vehicle dynamics, motionElectronic stability control, airbag deployment, predictive maintenance
GyroscopesDetermine angular velocity, navigation stability, controlIMUs in navigation systems, stability control, ADAS
LiDARCreate high-detail environment maps, advanced object detectionCollision avoidance, navigation, urban environments
Cameras (Optical Sensors)Visual information, navigation, object perception, decision-makingObject recognition, lane detection, traffic sign recognition, traffic flow measurement, pavement distress analysis
Radar SensorsObject detection and tracking, all-weather operationAdaptive cruise control, collision avoidance
Ultrasonic SensorsShort-range detection, parking aid, collision mitigationUrban areas, slow-speed vehicle detection
Infrared SensorsObject detection and monitoring in low light/adverse conditionsEnhanced detection at night or in fog
Microphones (Acoustic Sensors)Noise cancellation, detection of vehicle proximity and obstaclesADAS, hands-free functionality, voice commands
Temperature SensorsRegulate thermal conditions for proper operation and safetyEngine, battery, cabin temperature management
Humidity SensorsDetect moisture, prevent corrosion/mold/electrical failuresBattery health, HVAC system maintenance
MagnetometersMeasure magnetic fields for guidance and orientationReliable navigation data, urban canyon environments
Piezoelectric SensorsConvert mechanical energy into electrical signals, monitor vibrations/pressureEnergy harvesting, real-time monitoring, predictive maintenance
Strain GaugesMeasure mechanical strain, monitor stress and deformationChassis, suspension systems, gearbox monitoring
Vibration SensorsMonitor mechanical and road-induced vibrationsEngine, suspension, drivetrains monitoring
GPS (Global Positioning System) SensorsCollect location data, navigation, fleet managementReal-time tracking, route optimization
Electromagnetic SensorsObject detection, collision avoidance, autonomous navigationEnhanced detection in varied driving conditions
Proximity SensorsIdentify proximity of entities to minimize collisionsParking assistance, blind-spot detection
Tire Pressure Monitoring SensorsSend real-time data of tire pressure, prevent blowoutsOptimize vehicle functionality, tire maintenance
Table 3. Applications of sensor technologies in road condition monitoring.
Table 3. Applications of sensor technologies in road condition monitoring.
ApplicationDescriptionTechniques/MethodsReferences
Pothole DetectionUtilizes CNNs, LiDAR, accelerometer data fusion, and edge computing for accurate pothole detection, enhancing road safety and quality.CNNs, LiDAR, and accelerometer data fusion, edge computing[126,127,128,129]
Surface ClassificationEmploys distributed sensors, AI methodologies, and hybrid frameworks combining camera, LiDAR, and radar for accurate surface classification.Distributed sensors, AI methodologies, hybrid frameworks[87,130,131,132]
Weather ImpactUses LSTM networks, deep convolutional neural networks, and sensor data fusion to predict and classify road conditions under various weather impacts.LSTM networks, deep convolutional neural networks, sensor data fusion[133,134,135,136]
Crack DetectionApplies digital image processing, machine learning, and high-resolution cameras for real-time crack detection, enhancing road maintenance and safety.Digital image processing, machine learning, high-resolution cameras[137,138,139,140,141]
Road Roughness MeasurementLeverages accelerometers, GPS, dynamics sensors, and Kalman filter models to measure road roughness and detect cracks, improving road quality and safety.Accelerometers, GPS, dynamics sensors, Kalman filter models[142,143,144]
Table 4. Challenges and limitations in sensor technologies for road condition monitoring.
Table 4. Challenges and limitations in sensor technologies for road condition monitoring.
CategoryChallengeDescriptionReferences
Technical ChallengesSensor Accuracy and ReliabilityEnsuring sensor accuracy and reliability in pavement monitoring; challenges include thermal stress and sensor degradation over time.[145,146,147]
Data Fusion and InterpretationComplex integration of diverse data from multiple sensors due to varying data formats and resolutions.[148,149,150]
Real-time Processing and LatencyStringent requirements for real-time data transmission, processing, and response times; balancing computational demands with real-time responsiveness.[151,152]
Power Consumption and DurabilityHigh power consumption of advanced sensors and the need for durability and calibration in harsh conditions.[153,154,155]
Economic ChallengesHigh Initial CostsSignificant initial costs for deploying advanced sensor technologies, including acquisition, integration, and calibration.[156,157,158]
Return on Investment (ROI)Comprehensive understanding of the return on investment, including improved road safety, traffic management, reduced maintenance costs, and environmental impacts.[159,160,161]
Cost of Maintenance and UpgradesOngoing costs of maintaining and upgrading sensor systems, including periodic maintenance, replacement, and technology upgrades.[162,163]
Regulatory and Standardization ChallengesLack of StandardizationAbsence of standardized protocols and interfaces across different sensor types and manufacturers, hindering interoperability.[164,165]
Privacy and Security ConcernsSignificant privacy and security concerns due to the vulnerability of real-time data to cyber-attacks.[166,167]
Regulatory Approval and ComplianceComplex regulatory landscape with varying regulations by region, making it difficult to obtain necessary approvals and ensure compliance.[6,168]
Ethical and Legal ConsiderationsEthical and legal aspects of autonomous vehicles, including responsibility allocation, public opinions on safety, and programming for life-and-death decisions.[169,170]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Khanmohamadi, M.; Guerrieri, M. Advanced Sensor Technologies in CAVs for Traditional and Smart Road Condition Monitoring: A Review. Sustainability 2024, 16, 8336. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198336

AMA Style

Khanmohamadi M, Guerrieri M. Advanced Sensor Technologies in CAVs for Traditional and Smart Road Condition Monitoring: A Review. Sustainability. 2024; 16(19):8336. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198336

Chicago/Turabian Style

Khanmohamadi, Masoud, and Marco Guerrieri. 2024. "Advanced Sensor Technologies in CAVs for Traditional and Smart Road Condition Monitoring: A Review" Sustainability 16, no. 19: 8336. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198336

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop