Affordability of Employer Coverage for Family Members of Employees rule (2022)
![Administrative State Banner - Circle Graphic - V2.jpg](https://ballotpedia.s3.amazonaws.com/images/e/eb/Administrative_State_Banner_-_Circle_Graphic_-_V2.jpg)
What is a significant rule? Significant regulatory action is a term used to describe an agency rule that has had or might have a large impact on the economy, environment, public health, or state or local governments. These actions may also conflict with other rules or presidential priorities. As part of its role in the regulatory review process, the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) determines which rules meet this definition. |
Administrative State |
---|
![]() |
Five Pillars of the Administrative State |
• Nondelegation • Judicial deference • Executive control • Procedural rights • Agency dynamics |
Click here for more coverage of the administrative state on Ballotpedia.
|
Click here to access Ballotpedia's administrative state legislation tracker. |
The Affordability of Employer Coverage for Family Members of Employees rule is a significant rule issued by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) effective December 12, 2022, that amended regulations under the Internal Revenue Code governing eligibility for the premium tax credit. The IRS proposed amendments to regulations to conform with Executive Order 14009 in which the Biden administration aimed to promote strengthening the Affordable Care Act.[1]
Timeline
The following timeline details key rulemaking activity:
- December 12, 2022: The final rule took effect.[1]
- October 13, 2022: IRS published the final rule.[1]
- June 6, 2022: IRS closed the comment period.[2]
- April 7, 2022: IRS published a proposed rule and opened the comment period.[2]
- January 28, 2021: President Joe Biden (D) issued Executive Order 14009: Strengthening Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act which directed the Secretary of the Treasury to review regulations regarding their compliance with the Biden administration's aim to strengthen the Affordable Care Act.[3]
Background
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) published regulations on February 27, 2015, establishing "that an eligible employer-sponsored plan provides minimum value only if, in addition to covering at least 60 percent of the total allowed costs of benefits provided under the plan, the plan benefits include substantial coverage of inpatient hospital services and physician services," according to the IRS' proposed rule. In response to the HHS regulations, The U.S. Department of the Treasury proposed regulations on September 1, 2015, to incorporate the minimum value rule under Section 36B of the Internal Revenue Code. The Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is a federal law that codifies federal tax laws.[2][4]
President Joe Biden (D) on January 28, 2021, issued an executive order that directed the Secretary of the Treasury to review regulations regarding their compliance with the Biden administration's aim to strengthen the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The IRS reviewed the regulations regarding the affordability of employer coverage for family members of employees and determined that the regulations did not conform to the purpose of the ACA. In response, the IRS proposed amended regulations on April 7, 2022.[2][3]
Summary of the rule
The following is a summary of the rule from the rule's entry in the Federal Register:
|
Summary of provisions
The following is a summary of the provisions from the rule's entry in the Federal Register:[1]
" | The final regulations revise § 1.36B–2(c)(3)(v)(A)(2) to provide a separate affordability test for related individuals based on the cost to the employee of family coverage. The final regulations do not change the affordability test for the employee. When a family applies for Exchange coverage, the Exchange will ask for information concerning which of the family members are offered coverage by their own employer, and the family members to whom the employer's coverage offer extends. When an applicant for whom APTC is otherwise allowed indicates that their employer offers them coverage, the Exchange will ask for the premium for self-only coverage for the applicant and make an affordability determination for the applicant on that basis. When an applicant for whom APTC is otherwise allowed indicates an offer of coverage through an employer of another family member, the Exchange will ask for the premium for family coverage and make an affordability determination for the applicant on that basis. It is therefore possible that family members would be eligible for APTC but the employee would not. In this case, if the entire family chooses to enroll in Exchange coverage with APTC, the APTC would be paid only for coverage of the employee's family members but would not be paid for coverage of the employee.[5] | ” |
Significant impact
- See also: Significant regulatory action
Executive Order 12866, issued by President Bill Clinton (D) in 1993, directed the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to determine which agency rules qualify as significant rules and thus are subject to OMB review.
Significant rules have had or might have a large impact on the economy, environment, public health, or state or local governments. These actions may also conflict with other rules or presidential priorities. Executive Order 12866 further defined an economically significant rule as a significant rule with an associated economic impact of $100 million or more. Executive Order 14094, issued by President Joe Biden (D) on April 6, 2023, made changes to Executive Order 12866, including referring to economically significant rules as section 3(f)(1) significant rules and raising the monetary threshold for economic significance to $200 million or more.[1]
The text of the rule states that OMB deemed this rule significant, but not economically significant:
" | EOs 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
These final regulations have been designated as subject to review under E.O. 12866 pursuant to the 2018 MOA between the Treasury Department and OMB regarding review of tax regulations.[5] |
” |
Text of the rule
The full text of the rule is available below:[1]
Responses
The following section provides a selection of responses to the rule issued by IRS to amend regulations governing eligibility for the premium tax credit under the Internal Revenue Code.
The Urban Institute published a policy brief to analyze the IRS' proposed rule and its ability to address concerns with eligibility for premium tax credits which it refers to as the family glitch:[6]
|
Louise Norris, a health insurance broker, wrote an article about the rule and its impact on eligibility concerns for premium tax credits or the family glitch:[7]
|
The Foundation for Government Accountability published a paper opposing the rule, arguing that the amended regulations were inconsistent with the Affordable Care Act:[8]
|
Katie Mahoney, vice president of health policy at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, wrote a letter critiquing the proposed regulations arguing that the change would allow healthy individuals to qualify for ACA coverage, according to SHRM:[9]
|
See also
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 Federal Register, "Affordability of Employer Coverage for Family Members of Employees," October 13, 2022
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Federal Register, "Affordability of Employer Coverage for Family Members of Employees," April 7, 2022
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Federal Register, "Strengthening Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act," February 2, 2021
- ↑ United States Census Bureau, "Title 26, U.S. Code," accessed October 27, 2023
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ Urban Institute, "Changing the 'Family Glitch' Would Make Health Coverage More Affordable for Many Families," May 2021
- ↑ healthinsurance.org, "IRS regulations fix the ACA's 'family glitch' as of 2023," April 19, 2023
- ↑ FGA, "A Glitch in the System: How the Biden Administration Unilaterally Changed Health Care Laws," April 10, 2023
- ↑ SHRM, "Final Rule Lessens Family Members' Dependence on Employer Health Plans," October 14, 2022
|