California Criminal Prosecution of Law Enforcement Officers Initiative (2018)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
California Criminal Prosecution of Law Enforcement Officers Initiative
Flag of California.png
Election date
November 6, 2018
Topic
Civil and criminal trials and Law enforcement
Status
Not on the ballot
Type
Constitutional amendment
Origin
Citizens



The California Criminal Prosecution of Law Enforcement Officers Initiative (#17-0022) was not on the ballot in California as an initiated constitutional amendment on November 6, 2018.

The measure would have provided that law enforcement officers be held to a reasonable person standard in criminal prosecutions involving the use of lethal or near-lethal force. The measure would have also required law enforcement officers being prosecuted for abuse of power or authority under color of law, unlawful or excessive use of force under color of law, or a violent felony whether or not under color of law before a jury, not a bench trial.[1]

Text of measure

Ballot title

The official ballot title was as follows:[2]

" Defines Legal Standard for Claim of Self-Defense in Certain Criminal Prosecutions of Law-Enforcement Officers. Requires Jury Trial for Specified Criminal Prosecutions of Law-Enforcement Officers. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.[3]

Petition summary

The summary provided for inclusion on signature petition sheets was as follows:[2]

" Requires that law-enforcement officers who are prosecuted for crimes involving use of lethal or near-lethal force be held to a reasonable-person standard equal to or higher than that required for ordinary citizens to prevail on self-defense claims. Requires that criminal trials of law-enforcement officers be by jury for charges related to abuse of power or authority, unlawful or excessive force under color of law, or violent felonies.[3]

Fiscal impact

Note: The fiscal impact statement for a California ballot initiative authorized for circulation is prepared by the state's legislative analyst and director of finance.

The fiscal impact statement was as follows:[2]

" Likely minor net fiscal impact on annual state and local criminal justice costs.[3]

Full text

The full text of the measure is available here.

Path to the ballot

See also: California signature requirements and Laws governing the initiative process in California

In California, the number of signatures needed to qualify a measure for the ballot is based on the total number of votes cast for the office of governor. For an initiated constitutional amendment, petitioners must collect signatures equal to 5 percent of the most recent gubernatorial vote. To get a measure on the 2018 ballot, the number of signatures required was 585,407. In California, initiatives can be circulated for 180 days. Signatures needed to be certified at least 131 days before the 2018 general election, which was around June 28, 2018. As the signature verification process can take several weeks, the California secretary of state issues suggested deadlines for several months before the certification deadline.

The timeline for the initiative is as follows:[4]

  • Nadia Turner submitted a letter requesting a title and summary on August 22, 2017.
  • A title and summary were issued by the California attorney general's office on October 27, 2017.
  • Proponents of the initiative needed to submit 365,880 valid signatures by April 25, 2018, in order for it to make the 2018 ballot.
  • On May 10, 2018, the secretary of state announced that the initiative failed to make the ballot.

See also

External links

Footnotes