Commons:Deletion requests/2024/07/01

30 June 2024

2 July 2024

Deletion requests on 1 July 2024

July 1

File:Patile - Hinisim-com.jpg

"com" me parece como archivo robado 186.173.30.113 01:31, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Pierre Gencey

These images appear to be unused amateur sketches of people that were uploaded by the artist. So they should be deleted as OOS since we don't generally host amateur artwork.

Adamant1 (talk) 03:19, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a reason we can't just use the images? For example, en:wp:Jacques Hitier doesn't have any image of the guy. JPxG (talk) 10:13, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Probably because en:wp:Jacques Hitier doesn't exit. Regardless, that's not usually how this works and it doesn't even look like him to begin with if it was. I have no problem with using sketches in articles in theory, but they should at least be accurate representations of the subject. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:23, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacques_Hitier JPxG (talk) 23:51, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mori Empire at it's maximum peak under Dhaval Maurya(644 AD).jpg

Poorly worked map , please delete. चन्द्र वर्धन (talk) 09:17, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion; if there is no alternative it is better than nothing, if it is problematic use a tempkate from Category:Problem tags to address your concerns. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:16, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mori Empire at it's maximum peak under Dhaval Maurya(644 AD).jpg

copied my worked file from site https://www.jatland.com/home/File:Mori_Empire_at_it%27s_maximum_peak_under_Dhaval_Maurya(644_AD).jpg .No proper attribution given. Please delete. 103.110.48.55 07:52, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rana Afzal Khan in 2013.jpg

No es un recorte del File:Rana Afzal Khan.jpg? Es obra propia de un usuario en rojo? Pregunto, no juzgo. 186.173.30.113 08:08, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Buksovich (talk · contribs)

all of these are credited to someone else

Gbawden (talk) 09:08, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Louis Thannberger en 2003.jpg

Cette photographie de Marcos Quinones (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Louis_Thannberger_en_2003.jpg?uselang=fr) conservée à la Bibliothèque municipale de Lyon, n'a jamais été en "CC-BY-SA-4.0", mais en "CC BY-NC-ND 2.0" qui en interdit toute modification ainsi que l'usage commercial, comme la plupart des photographies contemporaines conservées et mises en ligne sur le site institutionnel "Photographes en Rhône-Alpes". Ceci est vérifiable sur la page d'origine : https://numelyo.bm-lyon.fr/BML:BML_01ICO001014ce71354c5db4 Merci de corriger cette erreur. Bien cordialement, 2A01:E0A:456:2040:5D7B:4240:BD8F:FDEA 09:14, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fensterputzer mit extremer Wischer-Verlängerung im Kino UFA-Palast Düsseldorf, Juni 2024.jpg

The film posters are presumably copyrighted works. Since the picture was taken inside a building and such film posters are usually not permanently attached, freedom of panorama unfortunately does not apply. Lukas Beck (talk) 09:14, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Die mit abgebildeten Poster sind nicht eigentlicher Inhalt des Fotos. Sie erscheinen zwangsläufig nebenbei bei dem Foto einer besonderen Fensterputzarbeit, die ohne den Hintergrund nicht dargestellt werden kann. -- Kürschner (talk) 09:25, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ich widerspreche. Die beiden Plakate machen einen Großteil des Bildhintergrundes aus und sinn deutlich und scharf erkennbar. Hier noch von Nebensächlichkeiten, von deminimi zu sprechen, halte ich für falsch. Lukas Beck (talk) 11:20, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Louis Weckerlin 1966.jpg

Cette photographie de Georges Vermard (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Louis_Weckerlin_1966.jpg) est conservée à la Bibliothèque municipale de Lyon qui en interdit toute modification ainsi que l'usage commercial, comme la plupart des photographies contemporaines conservées et mises en ligne sur le site institutionnel "Photographes en Rhône-Alpes". Ceci est vérifiable sur la page d'origine : https://numelyo.bm-lyon.fr/BML:BML_01ICO001014ce71354c5db4 Merci de corriger cette erreur de licence. Bien cordialement, 2A01:E0A:456:2040:5D7B:4240:BD8F:FDEA 09:18, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lise Lesèvre.jpg

Cette photographie de Marcos Quinones (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lise_Les%C3%A8vre.jpg) conservée à la Bibliothèque municipale de Lyon, n'a jamais été en "CC-BY-SA-4.0", mais en "CC BY-NC-ND 2.0" qui en interdit toute modification ainsi que l'usage commercial, comme la plupart des photographies contemporaines conservées et mises en ligne sur le site institutionnel "Photographes en Rhône-Alpes". Ceci est vérifiable sur la page d'origine : https://numelyo.bm-lyon.fr/BML:BML_01ICO0010158d27e1b8292c Merci de corriger cette erreur. Bien cordialement, 2A01:E0A:456:2040:5D7B:4240:BD8F:FDEA 09:20, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

La source est déjà référencée dans wikimedia commons. 2A01:CB00:A25:D600:D547:82F7:C33:244D 19:03, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Guènia Cuzin.jpg

Cette photographie de Marcos Quinones (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gu%C3%A8nia_Cuzin.jpg) est conservée à la Bibliothèque municipale de Lyon qui en interdit toute modification ainsi que l'usage commercial, comme la plupart des photographies contemporaines conservées et mises en ligne sur le site institutionnel "Photographes en Rhône-Alpes". Ceci est vérifiable sur la page d'origine : https://numelyo.bm-lyon.fr/BML:BML_01ICO00101569e8ad93acaf Merci de corriger cette erreur. Bien cordialement, 2A01:E0A:456:2040:5D7B:4240:BD8F:FDEA 09:22, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:C. Sperry Andrews

Artists died in 2005 so not free yet. Although a work of a NPS employee it still needs permission from the painter. Category can also be deleted

Gbawden (talk) 09:44, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Preparing fish for winter is a family activity in rural Alaska. (88086dc0-1dd8-b71b-0b15-b85330b15e3d).jpg

Credited to Beth Wald who was never a NPS employee Gbawden (talk) 09:57, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gbawden: Credited where? https://npgallery.nps.gov/AssetDetail/88086dc0-1dd8-b71b-0b15-b85330b15e3d just says "NPS photo" and "Public domain:Full Granting Rights". - Jmabel ! talk 17:49, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright holder Copyright Beth Wald 2012 in exif Gbawden (talk) 06:38, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. So copyfraud by a U.S. government agency? - Jmabel ! talk 18:28, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These do seem copyrighted. A clumsy search also finds these images with similar metadata:

– BMacZero (🗩) 01:37, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Les Joueurs CA Planteurs - لاعبين النادي أتلتيك بلونتار.jpg

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 10:29, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be of a sports team Enhancing999 (talk) 13:34, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kommentar Looks like articles about the sports team has been deleted twice from Fr:w fr:CA Planteurs, fr:Club Athlétique Planteurs. Someone with admin ability on fr:w may wish to take a look - hoax or problem? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:35, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:الشيخ سعيد بن أحمد الفلاحي.jpg

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 10:30, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blason Olphe-Galliard, Armorial Haut-Alpin, subdélégations de Gap, d'Embrun et de Briançon, Jean Grosdidier De Matons, Mémoire et documents, novembre 2003.jpg

Parce que ce blason est basé sur un blasonnement erroné (voir débat dans la discussion sur la page de la famille Olphe-Galliard). Un nouveau blason est en réalisation. Très cordialement. Montcorin (talk) 11:41, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:BANDERA CANTEL.png

This file was initially tagged by Escolop as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: The image dimension is too small. Yann (talk) 13:28, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In use. But derivative work, so we need a permission. Yann (talk) 13:29, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I grant permission to delete. escl_1 (talk) 02:01, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Clapiers

There is no freedom of panorama in France.

Günther Frager (talk) 14:05, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:GroupeCasino.svg

Doubts about this file to be PD-textlogo as calligraphic part can show an artistic intent (artworks have a lower TOO in France, the country of origin for this logo) - Luchoxtrab (talk) 14:55, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ritratto Persico.jpg

Own work? See this color photo. Copyright? Wouter (talk) 15:28, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:West Point Football Field.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Ww2censor as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This file looks like a private work of this guy and not official US military work. If this is US official work we need the full original url to verify that. Yann (talk) 17:02, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Löschen Agreed. Needs a valid source--Headlock0225 (talk) 12:29, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:هيثم ميار - Haitham Mayar.jpg

Any scope? 200.39.139.31 17:25, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so. Delete. 200.39.139.31 15:52, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:SD Crvena zvezda

These files were both nominated for deletion individually by Ранко Николић. The rationale was the same for both files: No permission, taken from https://sd-crvenazvezda.net/klubovi/ , 2016 @ СД Црвена звезда, Designed by MojaCrvenaZvezda.Net & SCART-Design Ранко Николић (talk) 18:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC). I think it ought be better if they both appear in a mass request since they are so similar.[reply]

Jonteemil (talk) 18:02, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As I wrote in Commons:Deletion requests/File:FK Kolubara logo.svg, another pending DR regarding a Serbian logo, the Red Star Belgrade logo also seems like a pretty uncomplex text-logo but COM:TOO Serbia doesn't exist so I guess we can't know for sure. Jonteemil (talk) 01:27, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo CWHL 2016.png

Is the maple leaf in the logo really below COM:TOO Canada? It's quite different from the one in the flag of Canada. Jonteemil (talk) 19:21, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Very simple logo, Maple Leaf is definitely below threshold of originality and very small. Xgeorg (talk) 10:51, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo Toronto Furies 2016.png

Is the leaf in the logo really below COM:TOO Canada? It's quite different from the one in the flag of Canada. Jonteemil (talk) 19:28, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree, very simple logo. Not every maple leaf is above originality. Xgeorg (talk) 10:50, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2019 EWHL Logo.png

I'm not sure which is the relevant TOO but if it's COM:TOO Hungary then this logo is clearly above TOO. If the relevant logo is COM:TOO Austria, then it's probably above TOO as well, but not as clear. Jonteemil (talk) 19:39, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree, very simple logo. Xgeorg (talk) 10:49, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Vinzenz Winter (talk · contribs)

These are likely copyvios unless deemed below COM:TOO Austria which I'll let an admin decide.

Jonteemil (talk) 19:45, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, both are very simple text-based logos. Are you somehow bored, Jonteemil? There's plenty of other work here... Xgeorg (talk) 10:53, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Xgeorg Firstly, please remain civil in all discussions, even if you think they are dumb or unnecessary. Secondly, the fact that there are more complex logos here doesn't make these two okay. I looked at your past participations in deletion requests and you have consistantly voted for keep with a similar rationale text-logo, very simple, yet the files have been deleted every time. So it strikes me that you don't have a good grasp on thresholds of originality and Commons's rules regarding it. Files on Commons need to be free in both the country of origin AND the US and if there is significant doubt, then we delete per COM:PCP. File:Australian Aboriginal Flag.svg and w:File:EDGE magazine (logo).svg are both much less complex than File:Los Angeles Football Club.svg, yet the first two have copyright whereas the last doesn't. It's all got to to with the country of origin and its TOO laws. Regarding these logos I totally disagree that they are very simple text-based logos. The ICE in the middle of the logo is stylized with gradients to get that "icy" impression and also the line above and the text HOCKEY LEAGUE is stylized with the same gradients. For a TOO that is described as low which COM:TOO Austria is, I'd be very doubtful if this logo would be clearly below it. Jonteemil (talk) 11:54, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your input. I appreciate the reminder to keep discussions civil and respectful, and I will keep that in mind. I understand that more complex logos don't automatically justify the use of simpler ones.

I wonder that you have time to study my voting behavior...

Regarding my votings in deletion requests, I want to emphasize that I always strive to understand and apply Commons's rules and guidelines to the best of my ability, but in general I don not agree to the strict rules regarding logos this projects has given itself. On the other hand, I have nominated already hundreds of files for deletion, if clear CR violations - see Commons:Deletion requests/Files by User:Sv3n19341997 Xgeorg (talk) 13:47, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Ijok-Irin (talk · contribs)

Various copyright violations. Most are uploaded as own work but seem to be COM:NETCOPYVIO, various filezies and most missing EXIF. Some clear examples are File:Chief Hon. Erastus C. Awortu Esq.jpg/File:Chief Barr. Erastus C Awortu JP, Executive Chairman of Andoni Local Government Area of Rivers State.jpg, found at [1] prior to being uploaded here; File:Images - official image of Hon. Alabo Dax George-Kelly PhD.jpg credited to Kalabari TV; File:2465738_an00128905001l jpega543e5bfd8385bac9ca52cd90eec9f08.jpg found at [2]; File:Andoni Unity Beach Carnival.jpg has a copyright notice.

Consigned (talk) 20:47, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reinhard Schlossinger.jpg

Appears to be from https://www.oefb.at/Profile/Spieler/444409?Reinhard-Schlossinger Adeletron 3030 (talk) 20:53, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hami.mahmoudi 14030409 223447801.jpg

The FBMD metadata, low resolution, and file name suggest this is a web download, not an original photo Adeletron 3030 (talk) 20:58, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

With regards, this image was taken with a camera and published in the Internet archive, and then due to the lack of access to the work in the device's memory, it was downloaded from there and published. Thank you. دکتر سمیعی (talk) 07:40, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File usage are part of deletion requests at Wikipedias. Suggest that there is nothing in this photograph that clearly meets realistic educational scope. Also noting commenter has had account locked. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:20, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Een open plek in een berken-eiken (Betulo-Quercetum).jpg

Compleet onzinnig om deze redirect te bewaren. Lendskaip (talk) 20:58, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Christel.Loggers (talk · contribs)

Professional photos, unlikely the uploader's own work. File:DagvoorzitterEwoutGenemans.jpg can be found prior to being uploaded here at [3], File:KLUUN-DvdL-1019909 (1).jpg has hits on Google Lens though I can't open them, see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:2022 Image Ewout Genemans.jpg from the same uploader. If the uploader is the photographer, please provide proof to COM:VRT.

Consigned (talk) 20:58, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marc Lavoie Fencing 1976.jpg

Not released public domain at the source. Credited to the Canadian Press and taken in 1976 so not yet PD per COM:CANADA (70 years pma). Consigned (talk) 21:23, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marc Lavoie and Wynne Godley (2002).jpg

Photo seems to be uploaded by Marc Lavoie, the subject of the photo, but not the photographer. Permission needed from the photographer. Consigned (talk) 21:24, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bell Memorial plaque mounted byg the HSMB of Canada, August 2010 -no copyright applies.jpg

Photo of a plaque published by the Government of Canada. Government works are usually Crown Copyright, which is copyrighted for 50 years after publishing (see {{PD-Canada}}; per the description this plaque seems to have been released in 2010. Though technically 3 dimensional, per COM:FOP Canada I think this qualifies as a 2d work (and not a work of artistic craftsmanship) thus not eligible for FOP. Consigned (talk) 21:27, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Weber-aufmacher.jpg

Possible copyvio: This is obviouly a professional promo photo. The date is certainly wrong; this was not taken in 2024 (he left Myanmar in 2021). Who is the photographer / copyright holder? Is this really "own work"? 2003:C0:8F1E:DB00:19E0:802F:415:977E 21:29, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On a side note: The article this was intended for has been speedy deleted on the German WP as clearly non-notable. --2003:C0:8F44:6D00:885D:F9C7:31F6:F866 08:49, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bad Harzburg, Baudenkmal, ID-37704226, ehem. Krodohaus Siemens, Wohnhaus, Kleine Krodostr. 6, Bild 2.jpg

Baudenkmal wurde im Denkmalatlas Niedersachsen falsch zugewiesen, wird neu erfasst. Steffen Dietrich (talk) 21:56, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hier gilt dasselbe wie bei Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bad Harzburg, Baudenkmal, ID-37704226, ehem. Krodohaus Siemens, Wohnhaus, Kleine Krodostr. 6, Bild 1.jpg. Das Bild muss nicht gelöscht werden. Viele Grüße Z ^thomas 11:38, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bad Harzburg, Baudenkmal, ID-37704226, ehem. Krodohaus Siemens, Wohnhaus, Kleine Krodostr. 6, Bild 1.jpg

Baudenkmal wurde im Denkmalatlas Niedersachsen falsch zugewiesen, wird neu erfasst. Steffen Dietrich (talk) 21:56, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kommentar File is still COM:INUSE at de:Liste der Baudenkmale in Bad Harzburg. --Rosenzweig τ 11:00, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Steffen Dietrich das Foto muss im Prinzip nicht gelöscht. Es ist zwar nicht denkmalgeschützt, es darf aber trotzdem hochgeladen werden. wenn du möchtest kann ich das foto auf einen anderen Dateinamen verschieben. Viele Grüße Z ^thomas 11:32, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Thomas, ist Okay. Das Gebäude gehört zum großflächigen Bereich des Diakonissenmutterhaus Bad Harzburg e.V. im Krodotal und es ist ein Pfarrhaus. Wohnhaus mit Carport befinden sich nicht in der Kleine Krodostr. 6 sondern gehört zum Areal "Obere Krodostr. 30". Text- und Bildänderungen werde ich erst bei Wiki vornehmen, wenn das "Niedersächsisches Landesamt für Denkmalpflege" (NLD) in Hannover mir ihr Okay für diese Korrektur gegeben haben und das kann wegen der Urlaubszeit dauern. Gruß Steffen Steffen Dietrich (talk) 13:22, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Steffen Dietrich ich hab es noch nicht ganz verstanden :-)

Das Bild zeigt "Kleine Krodostr. 6". Die ist auch im Niedersächsischen Denkmalaltas verzeichnet. Denkmalatlas

Aber eigentlich ist die "Kleine Krodostr. 6" kein Baudenkmal sondern die "Obere Krodostr. 30". und die ist nicht im Denkmalatlas verzeichnet und das möchtest du beim Denkmalamt ändern lassen? Z ^thomas 05:42, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Thomas, falsch sind im "Niedersächsischen Denkmalatlas", das ausgewiesene Gebäude vom Baudenkmal (ehem. Krodohaus Siemens, ID:37704226) und der dazugehörige Straßenname. Die Kleine Krodostr. 6 muss Obere Krodostr. 30 heißen, die Hausnummer 6 in der Kleine Krodostr. gibt es überhaupt nicht. Siehe auch [4], das Gebäude (L-förmig) oberhalb der Bugenhagenkapelle ist der richtige Standort für das Baudenkmal. Eine historische Postkarte von mir aus dem Jahr 1922 brachte den Fehler ans Licht.

Leider lässt mich das Thema Category nicht los. Diese Angaben zu "Categories:" bringen mich völlig durcheinander File:Bad Harzburg, Baudenkmal, ID-37701371, Villa Sylvana, Villa, Papenbergstraße 11.jpg zu

File:Bad Harzburg, Baudenkmal, ID-37701237, Wohnhaus, Papenbergstraße 3.jpg.

Weitere Baustelle ist der Objekttyp (Wohnhaus, Schlosserei, Pfarrhaus, Wohn-/ Geschäftshaus, Schule etc.), die werden mal aufgeführt und mal nicht. Die Zuweisung der versch. Objekttypen stammt aus der Zeit, als es ein Baudenkmal wurde, die Nutzung heute kann eine völlig andere sein. Wünsche dir ein schönes Wochenende. Steffen Steffen Dietrich (talk) 11:03, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Thomas, ich nerve mal wieder. Habe zwei Baudenkmale mit dem Denkmalstatus "Ehemaliges Denkmal" gefunden, sie werden im Denkmalatlas nicht mehr aufgeführt. Sollte ich diese auch in der "Liste der Baudenkmale in Bad Harzburg" löschen und wie umgehen mit dem Bildmaterial? Gruß Steffen Steffen Dietrich (talk) 16:01, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Steffen Dietrich du nervst überhaupt nicht, deine Fragen sind gut!

ich hab dir auf deiner disk in der wikipedia geantwortet.

@Rosenzweig ich würde empfehlen, dass wir diese löschdisk auf behalten setzen, gilt aus meiner Sicht auch für Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bad Harzburg, Baudenkmal, ID-37704226, ehem. Krodohaus Siemens, Wohnhaus, Kleine Krodostr. 6, Bild 2.jpg. Viele Grüße Z ^thomas 05:53, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tom Goodwin.jpg

The uploader was blocked. Is it he? 186.175.60.36 21:58, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saudiarabia and singapore.png

Does it serves anything useful? 186.175.60.36 22:08, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Embajadora de Estados Unidos en Panama con Mayer Mizrachi.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Taichi as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: The photo is tagged in Flickr as Creative Commons NC-ND 2.0 license, not compatible here. — billinghurst sDrewth 22:22, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. This picture was taken from the Flickr account of the U.S. Embassy in Panama. All pictures taken by a U.S. official are property of the U.S. government, which means that is public domain. That’s the reason why I tagged like that. Whatever says on Flickr is not the correct rights. It’s a U.S. government owned picture, so it's public domain. https://www.state.gov/copyright-information/#copyright Enmanuel (talk) 22:33, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The photo gallery is not hosted on a US government owned site, there must be a reason why the US embassy account adopted CC nc-nd as its license, we can't assume it's a mistake, because in the future someone may still encounter the license incompatibility error. That is something for the US embassy to clarify, not for us to guess. Taichi (talk) 00:07, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't need to be hosted on a U.S. Government owned website, you're just overthinking it. It was taken by a U.S. government official, posted by a U.S. Embassy account. It's a public domain picture. It's literally that easy. If you search on the official website of the embassy it will take you directly to that picture. https://search.usembassy.gov/search/images?affiliate=dos_emb_wha_panama&query=texas Enmanuel (talk) 03:49, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mayer Mizrachi.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Taichi as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: The photo is tagged in Flickr as Creative Commons NC-ND 2.0 license, not compatible here. — billinghurst sDrewth 22:23, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Billinghuest, this picture was taken from the Flickr account of the U.S. Embassy in Panama. All pictures taken by a U.S. official are property of the U.S. government, which means that is public domain. That’s the reason why I tagged like that. Whatever says on Flickr is not the correct rights. It’s a U.S. government owned picture, so its public domain Enmanuel (talk) 22:28, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The photo gallery is not hosted on a US government owned site, there must be a reason why the US embassy account adopted CC nc-nd as its license, we can't assume it's a mistake, because equally In the future someone may still encounter the license incompatibility error. That is something for the US embassy to clarify, not for us to guess. Taichi (talk) 00:09, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't need to be hosted on a U.S. Government owned website, you're just overthinking it. It was taken by a U.S. government official, posted by a U.S. Embassy account. It's a public domain picture. It's literally that easy. If you search on the official website of the embassy it will take you directly to that picture. https://search.usembassy.gov/search/images?affiliate=dos_emb_wha_panama&query=texas Enmanuel (talk) 03:48, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Daryl Edwards.png

Likely copyright violation; picture was uploaded on enWiki at the same time the contributor was uploading text they copied from imbd. User's other contributions have all been copyright violations claimed as "own work". I highly doubt this picture was taken yesterday GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 22:42, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:DC9-15 N970Z DEN 1978 DIA1.jpg

Flickr user Paul Lammens says in the comments on Flickr[5], "not my own picture but scanned slide from my collection. OK to use!" Since they are not the original photographer, we don't know the correct license. Did they buy the slide and someone else owns the rights to the image? Dual Freq (talk) 23:08, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Probably so Khang To (talk) 03:30, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mukesh Patel, Along with his family visiting PM Narendra Modi.jpg

Broken image 88.97.195.160 23:35, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:St. Johannes der Evangelist, Köln-Stammheim-7013.jpg

The architect of the church was Karl Band who died in 1995. In Germany there is no FoP for interior views and exists a standard of life + 70 years Paradise Chronicle (talk) 23:45, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]