Commons:Deletion requests/2024/07/02

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

July 2

[edit]

Unfree emblem (here) TentingZones1 (talk) 03:13, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 03:35, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. DM. 186.172.221.246 20:47, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The stuffed toy is in the middle of the photo, plus the title indicated that the stuffed sheep is the purpose of taking this photo, so no way to say it is under de minimis--A1Cafel (talk) 16:25, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate Rogermccart (talk) 04:07, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate of File:Starr 040403-0043 Cordia subcordata.jpg Rogermccart (talk) 11:55, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate Rogermccart (talk) 04:07, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate of File:Starr 040608-0007 Cordia subcordata.jpg Rogermccart (talk) 11:56, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate Rogermccart (talk) 04:08, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate of File:Starr 050108-3005 Cordia subcordata.jpg Rogermccart (talk) 12:00, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate Rogermccart (talk) 04:09, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate of File:Starr 050208-3845 Cordia subcordata.jpg Rogermccart (talk) 12:02, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate Rogermccart (talk) 04:10, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate of File:Starr 050517-1422 Cordia subcordata.jpg Rogermccart (talk) 12:04, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate Rogermccart (talk) 04:11, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate of File:Starr 070206-4118 Cordia subcordata.jpg Rogermccart (talk) 12:07, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate Rogermccart (talk) 04:11, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate of File:Starr 070215-4472 Cordia subcordata.jpg Rogermccart (talk) 12:08, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate Rogermccart (talk) 04:12, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate of File:Starr 080117-2031 Cordia subcordata.jpg Rogermccart (talk) 12:09, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate Rogermccart (talk) 04:13, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate of File:Starr 080208-2436 Cordia subcordata.jpg Rogermccart (talk) 12:10, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate Rogermccart (talk) 04:13, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate of File:Starr 080208-2437 Cordia subcordata.jpg Rogermccart (talk) 12:11, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate Rogermccart (talk) 04:14, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate of File:Starr 080512-4445 Cordia subcordata.jpg Rogermccart (talk) 12:12, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by XmchaikenX

[edit]

All tagged as own work, which would be impossible for many of these images unless the uploader was Paul Morrissey himself.

Not including File:Village Voice ad for the Film-makers' Cinematheque. June 17, 1965. p. 15.png, which pretty clearly isn't by the uploader but does fall under {{PD-US-no notice advertisement}}. --hinnk (talk) 05:54, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I sought and was given permission to post these images by Paul Morrissey himself. They all come from his personal archive of photos and posters. I can assure you that there will be no claim brought against any of these. They are unique to this page XmchaikenX (talk) 09:57, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Additionally, many of these images are archival promotional materials. They were freely distributed to promote Mr. Morrissey’s films at the time of their original release. None of these images widely circulate at the quality I have uploaded them here because I sought these out and was given these high quality copies by Mr. Morrissey’s personal archivist. If necessary, I could obtain and send to you a letter of permission for their usage. I’m quite interested in Mr. Morrissey’s work and sought to create the best page possible with annotated text and high quality images. Thank you. XmchaikenX (talk) 10:05, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Evidence of permission should go to Commons:Volunteer Response Team. It's awesome that his archive is willing to provide material, but we need confirmation that they hold the copyright to these items and are willing to provide them under a free license. For example, File:Paul Morrissey Screen Test ca. 1965.jpg appears to be a still from an Andy Warhol film, so we wouldn't want someone getting in trouble with the Andy Warhol Foundation if the copyright was held by them. hinnk (talk) 11:19, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your reply. I can get clearences from Paul Morrissey and his archive as well as the Andy Warhol Foundation. What is the best way to send these confirmations to you? Would proof of correspondence with both parties suffice? Or would you prefer a written permission addressed directly to Wikipedia? 67.254.194.205 18:35, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Commons:Volunteer Response Team has instructions. If you have questions around that process I'd suggest checking the FAQ, emailing them, or asking at the noticeboard. hinnk (talk) 18:55, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I just spoke to Paul and his archivist and they are going to send an email to the Volunteer Response Team. Additionally, they sent me a self portrait to use for the main image so I won't have to clear through the Andy Warhol Foundation. XmchaikenX (talk) 19:31, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Cool, VRT should be able to sort everything out, and if any deletions happen before VRT gets to it, don't worry, they can restore the images. Once they've updated everything, feel free to ping me on my talk page and I'll be happy to get everything added to the relevant articles. hinnk (talk) 21:28, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by CusterDome (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work - scans of old photos/publications, likely copyrighted per COM:HIRTLE. Some files indicate "Photo obtained from the McNeely family" - permission from the photographer should be provided to COM:VRT.

Consigned (talk) 09:25, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, other than the "This Week" pamphlet, these images were literally taken from family photo albums by may aunt who sent them to me in the mail to scan for the Ouabache article. I will try to get my aunt to send a permission email. Thanks. CusterDome (talk) 12:49, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks CusterDome. There are some useful email templates at COM:Email templates and en:Wikipedia:Example requests for permission which have the full legalese to cover the licensing. Consigned (talk) 13:57, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no freedom of panorama for 3D works in the US. Günther Frager (talk) 10:18, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Eric Walker D23 Expo 2019-08-23.jpg. Found online before upload https://www.thecompanion.app/star-wars-ewoks-movies/ - uploader claims to be in the photo - needs to prove they own the photo Gbawden (talk) 10:23, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That website used my photo from Wikipedia, which I uploaded in December 2022. The full photo with me in it was just to show that I had the whole original photo and not the cropped one. They must have edited their article with different photos. The original photo is from August 2019. I also posted it on my Facebook back in 2019.
You can see it here.
https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=10218834704528608&set=a.10218824041942050 Supermanfan1979 (talk) 16:20, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source cites "Senat" as source, but a reverse search only shows her Facebook account and her website. There is no indication it was released under a CC-BY license. Günther Frager (talk) 11:08, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Bianchibeatrice (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Contradictory assertions of authorship, and copyright murkiness. BianchiBeatrice claims (i) that these are works by it:Marco Carnà (en:Draft:Marco Carnà, now deceased) or Uliano Lucas, yet (ii) that they're her own work.

Hoary (talk) 11:13, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 11:37, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

out of scope / no educational value LevandeMänniska (talk), 12:09, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no freedom of panorama in France. Günther Frager (talk) 13:04, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


omyłkowo załadowany Klarqa (talk) 13:04, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sculpture by Claude Ribot (1934-2010) installed in France where there is no freedom of panorama. Günther Frager (talk) 13:07, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


There is no freedom of panorama in France. Günther Frager (talk) 13:09, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Bust by Alfred Benon (1887-1965) created in 1946 and installed in Nantes. There is no freedom of panorama in France. We can undelete it 2042 when its US copyright expires. Günther Frager (talk) 13:11, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Derivative work of Among Us

Trade (talk) 14:19, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


COM:SPAM, self promotional image; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 14:48, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

out of project scope M2k~dewiki (talk) 15:05, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright-issue, see source: Het auteursrecht op de foto's in deze rubriek berust bij de Rijksoverheid en wordt uitdrukkelijk voorbehouden GeeJee (talk) 15:21, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please add the entire sentence for context, not just a snippet.
"Het auteursrecht op de foto's in deze rubriek berust bij de Rijksoverheid en wordt uitdrukkelijk voorbehouden. Het is evenwel toegestaan de foto’s te downloaden ten behoeve van redactioneel gebruik door nieuwsmedia, het tonen in openbare ruimten, privégebruik en educatieve doeleinden." S99-pro (talk) 15:27, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Löschen Which translates to "The copyright on the photos in this section rests with the central government and is expressly reserved. However, it is permitted to download the photos for editorial use by news media, display in public spaces, private use and educational purposes." That is not enough, Wikimedia Commons only accepts files which are free to be "used by anyone, anytime, for any purpose" (Commons:Licensing), including commercial purposes. --Rosenzweig τ 18:46, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No verifiable source. Multiple editors have tried but failed to find one. May be made-up to add legitimacy. Should be deleted so as not to mislead people or provide false information. Fredlesaltique (talk) 16:05, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

News article published in Argentina in 1971. It is in the public domain in its country of origin (50 years after publication), but it was not in 1996 at URAA time. Thus, it is still copyrighted in the US. Following COM:PCP we cannot keep this image. Günther Frager (talk) 16:17, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Too complex Quick-ease2020 (talk) 16:20, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

possible copyvio (c) Helmut Lunghammer - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 16:21, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Complex Logo Quick-ease2020 (talk) 16:22, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by User:Jarnevicc

[edit]

All files are listed as public domain, but the copyright has not expired for any of these files. --Wimmel (talk) 17:00, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

cropped from a deleted image File:Sabah fakhri2.jpg. Same reason for deletion as original Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Derbake Quick-ease2020 (talk) 17:12, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshot of a magazine that is presumably copyrighted; not the uploader's own work. Consigned (talk) 18:23, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

possible copyvio (c) Berkay Cankiran - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 18:33, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Logo above the strict COM:TOO UK. Consigned (talk) 18:43, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Logo which exceeds the threshold of originality in NL thus not Public Domain (COM:TOO Netherlands). Consigned (talk) 18:45, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Logos that likely exceed COM:TOO Netherlands.

Consigned (talk) 18:46, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not own work. Logo which likely exceeds the threshold of originality (though we don't have guidance at COM:TOO Belgium). If the uploader is the copyright holder, please provide permission to COM:VRT. Consigned (talk) 19:00, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no freedom of panorama for 3D artworks in Argentina. Günther Frager (talk) 19:26, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting images (uploaded as far as 2008 and used in many projects) for which we have no replacement based on a debate which is still not closed and is based on an interpretation of an interpretation of a law? Cool project, man. We need more of this. Dubstar (talk) 23:41, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No evidence the copyright has expired Trade (talk) 21:46, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Boris Larsov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvio: The picture are not from 2024, dates and licences to be fixed

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:51, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

so tell me how?? the pictures are all in the file of my grandmoter, Corry Beversluis, there are no licences...privat collection of pictures Boris Larsov (talk) 06:23, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is also no Incorrect picture. They support the text Boris Larsov (talk) 06:32, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The pictures cannot be marked from 2024, as Corry Beversluis died in 1975. Also, it is marked as personnal work and, seeing the variety of formats, it seems unlikely. Would it be possible to indicate the source and the author of the pictures? Also, if you are the author of these pictures, could you please confirm it, or confirm you have the authorization of the author, by following the process on this url: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_VRT_release_generator? CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:03, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Issues using the file with Wikisource; decided to convert to djvu file > no need for a duplicate file Beebotbaba (talk) 23:01, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The linked source is here and that site has a policy here stating that "metadata" is licensed under CC0, but the media objects themselves are taken from other institutions and shared here. As the source page and the watermark indicate, the actual source of the image is the Kunsthistorisches Institut in Florenz, where the original photo can be found here. That site's copyright policy is here, and seems to claim full copyright on materials.

That being said, this is a photo of a painting inside the historic Pitti Palace in Florence. The age of the painting isn't indicated here, but it's feasibly hundreds of years old. Can we clarify this? Per the Commons policy on reproductions of old 2D works of art, can this be tagged as PD-Art or PD-scan? R Prazeres (talk) 23:08, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]