Commons:Deletion requests/2024/07/03

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
2 July 2024
4 July 2024
Deletion requests on 3 July 2024

July 3

[edit]

Files uploaded by Commonsignore (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused text images, out of scope. And likely copyrighted text.

P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:51, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Most or all of these files are used in Wikisource. And they aren't copyrighted, they are {{PD-GermanGov}}. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:33, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:90-летие основания Национальной библиотеки Беларуси.jpg

[edit]

I doubt it fits the BY copytright applied It is neither postal stamp, nor banknote no etc. Altenmann (talk) 05:12, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Plate 13- Aquila.pdf

[edit]

superseded by File:Plate 13- Aquila.jpg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 07:11, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by AndyHarem (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Artworks from Polish artists Ewa Beniak-Haremska. We need a COM:VRT ticket to keep these images.

Günther Frager (talk) 08:06, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Louise Candlish NSP9593 Low Res.jpg

[edit]

EXIF says Copyright reserved Neil Spence 2022, would need some Commons:Volunteer Response Team permission if Spence has decided he wants the image to be credited instead to User:Nipcheese if it's reused online or in print, or has licenced the image to someone under terms that would allow that. Belbury (talk) 09:52, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Coats of arms of Rouergue

[edit]

Unsuccessful, unusable and unused draft file. The main issue is with the rope (see other version).

Kontributor 2K (talk) 10:13, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Roquefeuil de Padiès.svg

[edit]
Bonjour, Ce blason était utilisé sur l'article Armorial des familles du Gévaudan, J'ai créé cet article et les blasons conformément aux blason représenté sur l'armorial du Gévaudan du vicomte de Lescure.
Les armes sont décrites page 731 et le dessin est représenté page XVI.
De plus le fait qu'un fichier n'est pas utilisé sur wikipedia, ne veut pas dire qu'il n'est pas utilisé ailleurs, sur d'autres sites.
Je ne vous donne pas l'accord de supprimer mon fichier, vous pouvez toujours utiliser le votre et le présenter en alias en précisant la source qui doit être je pense différente de Lescure.
Cordialement,
Louis Brun Zardoz91 (talk) 15:36, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour Zardoz91,
Je le retire de la liste,
J'ai les autres fichiers dans ma liste de suivi, vous pouvez intervenir dessus si besoin.
Cordialement,--Kontributor 2K (talk) 15:51, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Zardoz91: cela n'empêche pas le blason d'être une réprésentation erronée, même si c'est du fait de la référence.
Cordialement,--Kontributor 2K (talk) 16:20, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour, sur quelle référence vous basez vous pour prétendre que cette représentation est erronée.
Cordialement Zardoz91 (talk) 16:40, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
En théorie une cordelière devrait contenir au moins un nœud, contrairement à des cordons (ou morceaux de corde).
Après, c'est loin d'être la seule erreur dans l'Armorial du Gévaudan, ce qui n'empèche pas, effectivement, que cette confusion soit sourcée.
Cordialement,--Kontributor 2K (talk) 16:50, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Bonsoir, j'ai repris la cordelière ancienne représentée dans les cachets, et que nous trouvons régulièrement dans les armoriaux, elle contient un noeud simple, différent de ce que vous proposez, pour être cohérent, il faudrait reprendre tous les fichiers de roquefeuil avec la cordelière simple.
Cordialement Zardoz91 (talk) 20:19, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merci Zardoz91 de votre intervention sur cette page ;
On ne peut pas vraiment dire que je propose un modèle, je n'ai fait que reprendre des existants, plus présentables que d'autres à moindres frais ; le modèle avec la cordelière simple, quant à lui, demande encore un certain investissement avant de pouvoir être réellement ré-utilisé, comme vous pouvez le voir en zoomant sur le svg.
Cela reste donc à faire,
Cordialement,--Kontributor 2K (talk) 21:01, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by أيمن 1974 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All of these death notes are copyrighted by author/agency who made them. One of them contains water mark for original creator. User claims Either public domain logo or script. But these have complex caligraphy and designs which puts them above the originality threshold

Quick-ease2020 (talk) 10:19, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Quick-ease2020, the death notes has no originality at all. It is only text of names + some dates. There is no creative materials to be copyrrited. There is an entire category for death notes.
Instead, death notes provide a way to prove the imprtance of the person depnding on who issued the death note + it confirm the death date and the family relashionships, which are vey hard to prove in many cases.
The watermark is used to shows that this is not fake death note, it is only used in the online verion. It my be seems naive or outdated, but this is how thing work in Syria. Michel Bakni (talk) 10:46, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I guess it boils down to is whether there is copyright on such death notes. Here are my arguments of why I think they are:
1. Original writing:
The makers of this poster had to source the information about the deceased's family and relatives and published it in this note. Which might make their writing copyrighted. Thus you can't take a photo of it without permission.
2. Design :
All of these posters contain calligraphy of "إلى رحمة الله تعالى". Which is an artistic expression. They are also unique in their styling. Bolding of different words, Size of font, arrangement of names.
All of these could make it above the threshold of originality in terms of design.
I would love any input on these two points. I am not well versed in copyright law! Quick-ease2020 (talk) 14:42, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please read the threshold of originality. It reads: "If a work contains a portion that is complex enough to receive copyright protection". The two arguments that you bring does not fit well here. Michel Bakni (talk) 06:54, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Redstor Logo.jpg

[edit]

This is an old logo and has been replaced with a new version. 82.39.81.143 11:15, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Keith Mitchell (isolated).png

[edit]

photoshopped, widely available on the internet, unlikely to be own work Gbawden (talk) 11:19, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, widely available on the internet because the subject is a brand ambassador for my employer and has been used for other digital creative works surrounding Keith Mitchell. As one of our brand ambassadors, we have several 'own work' photos of Keith used for marketing purposes. Example: https://getleadline.com/ambassadors/keith-mitchell/ MTLwannabe (talk) 14:23, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vodafone icon.svg

[edit]

like File:Vodafone.svg InterComMan (talk) 11:20, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:VODAFONE ALBANIA.svg

[edit]

like File:Vodafone.svg InterComMan (talk) 11:22, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vodafone Stiftung Deutschland logo.svg

[edit]

like File:Vodafone.svg InterComMan (talk) 11:23, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Press conference in 2016.jpg

[edit]

Photo grabbed from Facebook, see FBMD Solomon203 (talk) 13:22, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Deckblatt des Berichts.jpg

[edit]

Unused book cover of non-notable publication, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9  ✉ 13:24, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Report concerning Red Army Faction trials. Added categories to it. Herbert Ortner (talk) 15:02, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, this is not the report, but a photo of a bland report cover. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:21, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Camila Ramme (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused low-res diagrams without clear purpose, no educational use, out of scope.

P 1 9 9  ✉ 13:25, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pomnik Zbrodni Wołyńskiej w Domostawie.jpg

[edit]

Może naruszać prawa autorskie Pamulab (talk) 13:29, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oczywiste NPA. Do usunięcia. Glaube (talk) 11:30, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Joe P Chris Donofrio Champagne Jam.jpg

[edit]

Likely not own works: low-res/web-size image with transmission code in EXIF data. P 1 9 9  ✉ 13:41, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is an image created and owned by the band Deal Casino, from the Front Bottoms' Champagne Jam Festival 2018:
https://www.concertarchives.org/concerts/champagne-jam--14
The photo was taken by Cody Cutter and is used by the band on a perpetual license agreement. They have permission to post it anywhere and use it commercially. Please refrain from deleting this or any other of the band's photos. Pergonomics (talk) 16:09, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Permission from the photographer or rights-owner needs to be submitted via COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 21:29, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:The-Broadway-Melody-Technicolor-Frame.png

[edit]

still copyrighted until the end of 2024. Undelete on January 1, 2025. SDudley (talk) 13:54, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files uploaded by Mehshekan.mag (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused logos, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:00, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Color still Gold Diggers of Broadway.jpg

[edit]

Portion of the film that is still under copyright until the end of 2024. Undelete on January 1, 2025. SDudley (talk) 14:01, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Painting the Clouds With Sunshine.pdf

[edit]

The copyright was renewed on this under R184534, so undelete on January 1, 2025. SDudley (talk) 14:05, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Lullaby of broadway 1935.webp

[edit]

Numerous renewals for this song. Since the sheet music was fixed as a whole, this cover is also copyrighted. Undelete in 2031. SDudley (talk) 14:08, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


  •  Keep The cover of the sheet music, would not be covered by the copyright to the musical composition. The stake holder would be the photographer, not the composer of the song. --RAN (talk) 19:05, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gold-diggers-of-broadway-sheet-music-2.jpg

[edit]

Another example of the song being renewed and so the sheet music which was fixed with it is also copyrighted. Undelete in 2025. SDudley (talk) 14:10, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep This is the cover of the sheet music, which would not be covered by the copyright to the musical composition, which was renewed. The stakeholder would be the anonymous photographer for the image. The copyright would cover the music itself and the sheet music representing the tune, not the cover art. --RAN (talk) 19:03, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Descripcion cuadrado.png

[edit]

duplicado imagen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Antonio Zurgena (talk • contribs) 2017-11-29T16:48:21‎ (UTC)

Kept: in use. Ruthven (msg) 10:16, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Descripcion cuadrado.png

[edit]

Low-res diagram without clear purpose, no educational value, out of scope. No longer in use. And should be in wiki-table format if needed. P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:10, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fad2miWXEAAwWmb.jpg

[edit]

Portion of the film that is still under copyright until the end of 2024. Undelete on January 1, 2025. SDudley (talk) 14:11, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

should also retitle it once undeleted. SDudley (talk) 14:11, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Gold-diggers-of-broadway-sheet-music-5-2 aus nz.jpg

[edit]

See this deletion request and this one for info. Undelete in 2025. SDudley (talk) 14:14, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Archiv Deutsches Museum 26.jpg

[edit]

Auf Bitten des Abgebildeten und des Hochladenden Pimpinellus((D)) • MUC•K•T 14:17, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:What Will I Do Without You.webp

[edit]

This song was renewed, so the sheet music is copyrighted as part of that. Undelete in 2025. SDudley (talk) 14:17, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Archiv Deutsches Museum 34.jpg

[edit]

Wunsch des Abgebildeten und des Hochladenden Pimpinellus((D)) • MUC•K•T 14:18, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Archiv Deutsches Museum 35.jpg

[edit]

Wunsch des Abgebildeten und den Hochladers Pimpinellus((D)) • MUC•K•T 14:20, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Archiv Deutsches Museum 42.jpg

[edit]

Auf Wunsch des Abgebildeten und des Hochladers Pimpinellus((D)) • MUC•K•T 14:20, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bitte löschen auf Wunsch der abgebildeten Person und des Hochladers Pimpinellus((D)) • MUC•K•T 14:22, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gold-diggers-ad.jpg

[edit]

Not a 1920s contemporary piece. This is a modern ad. SDudley (talk) 14:21, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Quito’s Basilica del Voto Nacional.jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in source country. Missing permission. TentingZones1 (talk) 14:22, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Nobelpreis Philipp Lenard 05.jpg

[edit]

Unvorteilhaft, bitte löschen auf Wunsch des Abgebildeten und des Hochladers Pimpinellus((D)) • MUC•K•T 14:23, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Urkunde von 1907 "Das prächtige Versprechen" 1.jpg

[edit]

Bitte Löschen auf Wunsch des Abgebildeten und des Hochladenden Pimpinellus((D)) • MUC•K•T 14:25, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Urkunde von 1907 "Das prächtige Versprechen" 2.jpg

[edit]

Eine Person findet sich unvorteilhaft portraitiert, auf deren Wunsch und auf Wunsch des Hochladenden Pimpinellus((D)) • MUC•K•T 14:26, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wappen Bistum Chur.png

[edit]

Löschantrag: Falsches Wappen Bistum Chur Kommunikation, Bistum Chur (talk) 14:41, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wenn es nur darum geht, Kreuz und Krummstab zu vertauschen, könnte man es korrigieren. --Achim55 (talk) 16:34, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dr Malar Santhi Santherasegapan.png

[edit]

This image maybe copyrighted: Google Lens results Sriveenkat (talk) 14:46, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:En el macizo de O Pindo, abriendo la via Candela 6b.jpg

[edit]

Blurred, non-notable climber on a non-notable climb. no value to WikiCommons Aszx5000 (talk) 14:49, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bavani Veeraih.png

[edit]

Cropped work using Snapedit from copyrighted FB banner: https://www.facebook.com/shashaveraiah Sriveenkat (talk) 14:49, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yuneswaran Ramaraj.png

[edit]

Image from https://www.parlimen.gov.my/profile-ahli.html?uweb=dr&id=4179 Sriveenkat (talk) 14:52, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Château de Bernard Buffet à Fuveau.jpg

[edit]

pour diverses raisons Staroad.fr (talk) 15:11, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karakurt.jpg

[edit]

possible copyvio (c) Ilkay Karakurt - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 15:36, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Cats' photos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos published in the 1990s in Italy, but still copyrighted in the US due to Bern Convention. Notice that File:Francesca Mambro and Valerio Fioravanti.jpg and related images are hosted in itwiki because of this problem and shouldn't be uploaded to Commons.

Günther Frager (talk) 16:35, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose
Not all these photos were published in 1990s. For those photos published before 1996:
Template:PD-Italy
<<The country of origin of this photograph is Italy. It is in the public domain there because its copyright term has expired. According to Law for the Protection of Copyright and Neighbouring Rights n.633, 22 April 1941 and later revisions, images of people or of aspects, elements and facts of natural or social life, obtained with photographic process or with an analogue one, including reproductions of figurative art and film frames of film stocks (Art. 87) are protected for a period of 20 years from creation (Art. 92). This provision shall not apply to photographs of writings, documents, business papers, material objects, technical drawings and similar products (Art. 87). Italian law makes an important distinction between "works of photographic art" and "simple photographs" (Art. 2, § 7). Photographs that are "intellectual work with creative characteristics" are protected for 70 years after the author's death (Art. 32 bis), whereas simple photographs are protected for a period of 20 years from creation.>>
According to Berne Convention:
<<It shall be a matter for legislation in the countries of the Union to determine the term of protection of photographic works and that of works of applied art in so far as they are protected as artistic works; however, this term shall last at least until the end of a period of twenty-five years from the making of such a work.>>
https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%20828/volume-828-I-11850-English.pdf Cats' photos (talk) 17:02, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No photo published created and published in Italy after December 31, 1975 and without a simultaneous US publication is in the US public domain. Günther Frager (talk) 17:16, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
They were not simultaneously published in the USA. Cats' photos (talk) 17:48, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Cats' photos please read the sentence again, the word without is important. Günther Frager (talk) 17:56, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Günther Frager. I had not noticed the "No" at the beginning. I have read better the copyright protection of the USA. Do what you want. This is quite useless. Cats' photos (talk) 18:18, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Indarkeria jasan zuten emakumeak (2017).jpg

[edit]

photo of the screen rather than the image itself Prototyperspective (talk) 16:42, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alternatively, replace the file with the proper image. I wonder what the user intended here. The file seems in use, I guess it should be replaced with the actual image and then the prior version get deleted. Prototyperspective (talk) 16:42, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:1467431244 7 novyy-razmer.jpg

[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created after 2008. Derivatives of work - photo nonfree sculpture. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:59, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:James Morgan Payne.jpg

[edit]

Because I did not agree to it Blocky Boy Y (talk) 17:34, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files uploaded by Kirill101745 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private photographs. Google don't show any notability of Емцев Алексей Кириллович. No category (I don't think, that we should seek a potential encyclopedical use in categories like "men of Russia" and "obesity").

Pibwl (talk) 17:38, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files found with Special:Search/incategory:"Panini association football cards" 84

[edit]

Panini images published in 1984. These images are currently in the public domain in Italy (20 years after publication), but they were not in 1996 at URAA date. Thus, it is still copyrighted in the US. Following COM:PCP we cannot keep this images.

Günther Frager (talk) 17:42, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:2 divas.png

[edit]

not used, unknown persons, no realistic use for an educational purpose apparent Andel (talk) 17:54, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:FpCwxOPWAAUE87p.png

[edit]

not used, unknown person, no useful category or description, no realistic use for an educational purpose apparent Andel (talk) 18:07, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Byron Katie 2.jpg

[edit]

Possible copyvio: Photographer Rick Rusing is not credited. No indication that the uploader is the photographer / copyright holder. 2003:C0:8F22:D700:899:503E:7EE4:6120 19:32, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Document15.pdf

[edit]

Personal text doc, out of scope. Only used on user page of user without meaningful edits. P 1 9 9  ✉ 20:05, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep In what way is this a 'personal text doc' ? It appears to be an economics text, and within scope for Wikibooks or Wikisource (comments at Wikibooks suggest that the file format isn't favoured for that project, but that's just a format issue, not scope). Andy Dingley (talk) 21:42, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Per COM:PS: "Excluded educational content includes: ... Files that contain nothing educational other than raw text." --P 1 9 9  ✉ 00:12, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So move it to Wikibooks or Wikisource. Neither option of which is delete. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:21, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Löschen Hi, as the importer from Wikibooks, because every of its files are now here, I can say that it shouldn't return their.
Its author had uploaded it by believing that the project could host non-collaborative books in PDF, which is not the case (the PDFs should actually be generated from the wiki pages).
Concerning the Wikisource option, it should be excluded too because it infringes s:Wikisource:What is Wikisource?: no original writings by a contributor to the project.
That's why the only option to me is the suppression. JackPotte (talk) 09:34, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sturm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from drawings, presentation, etc.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:00, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sturm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:TOYS &/or copyrighted sculptures/characters

Elisfkc (talk) 18:39, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:42, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sturm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from posters. Should be blanked to keep.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 00:17, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sturm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama for non-architectural artworks in the U.S.. The Cloud Gate is already notorious among content creators: see this and this, as well as this article from Getty Images wiki. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Cloud Gate. Photos violate Anish Kapoor's copyright over his public art. None of the nominated Flickr imports show the Cloud Gate artwork trivially or in an unimportant manner.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:20, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Keep File:Chicago (9989580265).jpg. The photograph includes only reflections and nothing of the Cloud Gate itself.  Löschen the rest per nom. Abzeronow (talk) 17:59, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The one with the reflection is brushing the surface of COM:SCOPE. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:19, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sturm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Previously deleted by community consensus. No FoP in Qatar.

RodRabelo7 (talk) 00:48, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Most Deleted per nom; 3 kept per Túrelio -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:53, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Sturm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are some photographs whose specific flaws or generally low quality I believe makes them unlikely to be educationally useful. (I also doubt that the topics covered by these images are in such dire need of illustrations that these images should be kept merely for lack of better alternatives.)

Sinigh (talk) 20:12, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jane Hart.jpg

[edit]

Jane Hart is a curator, gallerist and artist in Miami Beach, Florida and New York. 13 KB own work? 191.125.142.66 00:03, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no reason to think this is not an own work. Older cropping software removes the EXIF data. Therefore decided to keep the image. --Ellywa (talk) 18:27, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jane Hart.jpg

[edit]

Own work? 186.172.221.246 20:34, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:CatherineLangeais-1954.png

[edit]

The source of this image is a signed postcard [1]. On its back it clearly states it was issued for an event on September 5, 1968. That is 14 years after the claimed date on the description. Regardless, anonymous works published either in 1954 or in 1968 are copyrighted in its country of origin (70 years after publication) . We can undelete it in 2064 when it enters in the US public domain. Günther Frager (talk) 20:52, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:A kid explores Kandinsky work at the "Konstruktivizm" exhibition.jpg

[edit]

This picture violates the rights of the child in the picture. This file should be deleted. Paintdog (talk) 21:46, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Development-assistance-for-infrastructure.png

[edit]

Doesn't show what's in the title and caption; error at upload? Prototyperspective (talk) 22:00, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Denis h msimbe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The kitumbua picture is used elsewhere online in sources that predate the upload, such as this Youtube video, and the cake pan image clearly looks like a product photo. Seems safe to assume copyvio in both cases, but they didn't seem blatant enough for the {{Copyvio}} tag.

Sinigh (talk) 22:59, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Concert Barbey 2010.jpg

[edit]

Photo of non-notable band: fr:Discussion_utilisateur:Juliexkard#Article_Meltin'_Kolcha_supprimé, out of scope. Nutshinou Talk! 23:25, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:La Révélation D'Arès.png

[edit]

Not own work. The poster's other upload appears to be legitimate, so this is probably the uploader's scan of it that is their own work: however the original copyright belongs to Michel Potay which is not CC or PD. PARAKANYAA (talk) 23:36, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Clubhouse App Logo.svg

[edit]

Keep the current version and please delete the inferior older versions because they were created using svg creator and latest one is the official version provided by the company, also i am the orginal uploader Anoopspeaks (talk) 23:46, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:GuildfordCoatofArms.png

[edit]

Arms granted in 1975 => not in public domain in UK.
File appears to be a derivative of image at https://www.heraldry-wiki.com/heraldrywiki/index.php?title=Guildford except with white background replaced with a transparent background. Text in this description is identical the Heraldry Wiki website, again suggesting that this is a copy.
Mertbiol (talk) 23:42, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spotify Greenroom logo.svg

[edit]

Keep the current version and delete the buggy old version, i don't know how the bug happened while I uploaded the files Anoopspeaks (talk) 23:49, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/2024/07/03&oldid=906384435"