Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/12/24

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 24th, 2020
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{G7}}. 作者又は投稿者が削除を求めた場合 Motokoka (talk) 02:31, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deleted per COM:CSD#G7. -- CptViraj (talk) 06:40, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{G7}}. 作者又は投稿者が削除を求めた場合 Motokoka (talk) 02:31, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deleted per COM:CSD#G7. -- CptViraj (talk) 06:44, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tcworks20 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All appear to be promoting a Google site, found elsewhere on the web and missing exif data, unlikely to be own work.

Dylsss (talk) 14:50, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Advertising (likely copyvio) either way speedy. --Herby talk thyme 14:51, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake SIVAPRIYA FOUNDATION (talk) 01:53, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted unused file; uploader mistake & del request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:21, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File that is/was part of the "hoax" on the English Wikipedia for Template:Country data Kingdom of Louisiana (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Country_data_Kingdom_of_Louisiana) Salavat (talk) 03:51, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, hoax or private fantasy; OOS. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:24, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This has watermark and I am not owner Waiyantunoo (talk) 08:03, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Billinghurst at 08:15, 24 Dezember 2020 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1): Copyright violation: copyrighted photo according to watermark --Krdbot 15:12, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Республика Крым находится в составе Российской Федерации 176.52.96.213 14:33, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, Crimea is depicted ruled as it is disputed. --Achim (talk) 17:04, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Foute afbeelding SenneBoeckx (talk) 16:37, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deleted per COM:CSD#G7. -- CptViraj (talk) 18:15, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Shakeel21DB (talk) 14:49, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 20:27, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Italy. Architect César Pelli died in 2019, still within the 70 p.m.a. of the country A1Cafel (talk) 01:48, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: This photo is focusing on the Porta Garibaldi, the UniCredit Tower is not notable enough. If it really concerns you, the Tower could be blurred or removed. --203.145.95.252 08:27, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination, Unicredit Tower cropped. --A1Cafel (talk) 05:03, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspicious exif information, low quality image. (`・ω・´) (talk) 12:16, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Billinghurst at 11:32, 28 Dezember 2020 UTC: out of scope; autobiography --Krdbot 15:08, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
photo is useful to publications that need image of author.

Out of scope - unused personal image. Kaulder (contribs | talk) 07:24, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:42, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo of non notable person 2409:4042:2506:1CA0:BD34:AD59:7D67:3D2B 05:02, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, It's a userpage image of a globally established user which is in use, and I'ld like to keep it. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat contribs | talk ] 05:35, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep In use at w:ne:प्रयोगकर्ता:Tulsi Bhagat. Also used in a Wikimedia Foundation news posting, which indicates that this has a realistic educational use.[1] Verbcatcher (talk) 13:47, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep, also in use on Wikidata.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 17:46, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy kept per above comments, No valid reason for deletion. -- CptViraj (talk) 03:54, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

My name is Jobran Abu-Hammad, and this is my signature, however I did not consent to having it online, please email me regarding this post for more questions at, jobranhammad@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 104.249.227.30 (talk) 21:49, 23 December 2020‎ (UTC)[reply]

How do you feel about File:Prince Jobran Abu-Hammad.jpg?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 04:05, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Shouldn't we ask the nominator to contact the OTRS team for this? Like anyone can request deletion from an IP address, I guess? --Pratyya (Hello!) 18:49, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Pratyya Ghosh: The nominator likes discussing on User talk:Jobran Abu-Hammad.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 07:55, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and ticket:2020123010006252. --Krd 16:16, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promo on enwp Minoraxtalk 05:42, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 02:13, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, re-uploaded, see ie. Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Rakesh_bariha.jpg Martin Urbanec (talk) 16:01, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:CSD#F10. — Tulsi Bhagat contribs | talk ] 03:58, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Downsized, poorly cropped version of File:WartburgLutherstube1900.jpg. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:13, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am persuaded that this file could be deleted as long as a better copy exists as it does on Wikimedia. I am in favor of deletion.Drboisclair (talk)

Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:48, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gewgwegweggre (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All uploads by this user appear to be copyvios. The odd .tif filetype indicates that these are all from a single source - likely a collection of scientific papers.

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:14, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:48, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickrwashing, account only has this photo, 0 followers 0 following Gbawden (talk) 07:14, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:49, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickrwashing, acccount has 2 photos, 0 followers, 0 following

Gbawden (talk) 07:27, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:49, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused photo of non notable persons with inscriptions - author's grievances, sole upload. Pibwl (talk) 12:59, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:50, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-simple logo/flag of w:Adana Demirspor. Dylsss (talk) 13:33, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:50, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 13:37, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:50, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal selfie, out of scope NinjaStrikers «» 16:02, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:50, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:21, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:51, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tsmiljka (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per EXIF data and watermark on each picture, copyright is held by Matija Puzar. No permission.

Smooth O (talk) 16:26, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:52, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:33, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:52, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE,

𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 16:38, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Keeping 1 (in use). --Minoraxtalk 08:52, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:42, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:52, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:43, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:51, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 16:49, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:51, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:23, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Syed Uzair Ali.jpg. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 16:53, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:52, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BeFaster.fit (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of company of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:06, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:53, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Javidseifi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:09, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:53, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Brdpdrsn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial flags of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:10, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:54, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused bar codes of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:15, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:54, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:17, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:54, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope, not used. Smooth O (talk) 17:28, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:54, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Movie screenshot, no permission. Smooth O (talk) 17:29, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:54, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gabonlp (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope,

MiguelAlanCS (talk) 17:38, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:56, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in use artwork. The Commons cannot be a repository for just anything and it is not an online photo album. Ldorfman (talk) 17:43, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:57, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 20:12, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:58, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vs`132 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 20:13, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:58, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some doubt that this actress-portrait is own work by uploader, as file has no metadata and as alleged author is the actress herself. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:39, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - actress is author, otrs needed, no exif data available, google hits not available, rest of the user upload was copyvio. Thanks --C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 09:58, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:31, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo needs a license. See COM:ART#Photograph of an old sculpture found on the Internet, or in a book. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:52, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Magog the Ogre: I imported it from enwiki where it was said to be in PD. I do not have enough idea about Commons Licence templates. Can you please help? — Meghmollar2017Talk06:49, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry, I cannot. Only the original uploader can provide that. The deletion script only notified you as a courtesy. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:44, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:40, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. The person in the photo died in 1987. Maxinvestigator (talk) 03:52, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:39, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a valid license. Municipalities retain their copyrights unless they explicitly renounce them. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:54, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:39, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work? 1940? pandakekok9 07:14, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:37, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickrwashing, account has 1 photo, 0 followers, 0 following and its from FB per MD Gbawden (talk) 07:28, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:36, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ggonzalez-Avanti (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Potential copyvio. Don't have exif data. Per these file name, seem these files come from this website. Also the first and third file are out of scope and advertising per file description and name.

SCP-2000 07:46, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:36, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Silyanov Photo (EXIF). Not own work --NoFrost (talk) 09:44, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:35, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is the uploader's Only image on Commons and it happens to show a model named Camila Escribens? The image has no camera metadata to establish the uplaoder's copyright as he/she has only 1 image on Commons. Leoboudv (talk) 11:13, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:34, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickrwashing, account has 0 following, 0 followers cannot be trusted Gbawden (talk) 11:21, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:30, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Two undefined stereocenters. Have File:Vibegron.svg that is chemically improved, and also a higher-quality image overall. DMacks (talk) 14:53, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 20:21, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The usual graphical weaknesses...opaque BG, uneven margins, not very large. Have File:Phenylethanolamine.png as higher quality replacement DMacks (talk) 14:58, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 20:22, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Identifiable images of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga

[edit]

I am Krishna Chaitanya, User:KCVelaga - an active Wikimedia user, including on Wikimedia Commons. Due to some concerning privacy issues lately, I would like to delete the following images identifiable of mine uploaded onto Wikimedia Commons at various instances. I would like to note that the images uploaded by others were taken with my consent at that point, however, recently they gave rise to some privacy issues for me, which is the reason I would like them to be deleted.

Images uploaded by me (KCVelaga) featuring me (Krishna Chaitanya Velaga)
  1. File:Group_photo_at_WMIN_ExCom_Induction_Meet_2017.jpg
  2. File:Members_assemble_after_election_of_office_bearers_at_WMIN_ExCom_Induction_Meet_2017.jpg
  3. File:Suyash,_Sanket_and_Krishna_during_lunch_on_Day_2_of_WMIN_ExCom_Induction_Meet_2017.jpg
  4. File:Pavan_and_Krishna_during_session_1_of_MOC_2017_Edit-a-thon_session.jpg
  5. File:Resource_persons_along_with_the_MOC_team_of_MOC_2017_Edit-a-thon.jpg
  6. File:Group_Photo_at_MOC_2017_Edit_a_thon.jpg
  7. File:Krishna_during_BVRIT_2017_Edit-a-thon.jpg
  8. File:Presenting_Memento_to_the_venue_BVRIT_2017_Edit-a-thon.jpg
  9. File:BZA_WMIN_Strategy_Meet,_Krishna_addressing_the_session.jpg
  10. File:BZA_WMIN_Strategy_Meet,_Krishna_cuts_the_cake.jpg
  11. File:BZA_WMIN_Strategy_Meet,_Krishna_explaining_about_Wikimedia_organization.jpg
  12. File:BZA_WMIN_Strategy_Meet,_Krishna_explaining_the_2030_strategy.jpg
  13. File:VIVA-VVIT_Edit_a_thon,_Krishna_Chaitanya_Velaga.jpg
  14. File:VVIT_Edit-a-thon_Part_2_Group_Photo_with_Trainer_2.jpg
  15. File:OpenCon_2018_New_Delhi_organizing_team_(72).jpg
  16. File:Wikidata_Workshop_at_IIIT_Hyderabad_on_2_Feb_18.jpg
  17. File:V_K_Chaitanya_during_session_(1lib1ref_Guntur_2018).jpg
  18. File:Books_presentation_to_the_library_(1lib1ref_Guntur_2018).jpg
  19. File:Krishna_during_a_session_(1lib1ref_Warangal_2018).jpg
  20. File:Group_photograph_1_(1lib1ref_Warangal_2018).jpg
  21. File:Group_photograph_2_(1lib1ref_Warangal_2018).jpg
  22. File:Opening_ceremony_(1lib1ref_Warangal_2018).jpg
  23. File:Krishna_Chaitanya_at_Wikimania_2019.jpg
Images uploaded by others featuring me in portrait style or in focus
  1. File:VVITWikiConnect_Wikidata_Workshop_1(5_July_2018)Facilitators.jpg
  2. File:User_Krishna_Chaitanya_Velaga.jpg
  3. File:Ashwin_and_Krishna_during_TTT2017.jpg
  4. File:CISA2KTTT17_-_Krishna_Chaitanya_Velaga_02.jpg
  5. File:CISA2KTTT17_-_Krishna_Chaitanya_Velaga_01.jpg
  6. File:Krishna_Chaitanya_Velaga.jpg
  7. File:TTT2017_participants_and_presentations_at_Bangalore_34.jpg
  8. File:Krishna_Chaitanya_2.jpg
  9. File:Krishna_Chaitanya_3.jpg
  10. File:Krishna_Chaitanya_and_Pavan_2.jpg
  11. File:Krishna_Chaitanya_and_Pavan.jpg
  12. File:Krishna_Chetanya_Velaga_during_Zoo_visit.jpg
  13. File:Krishna,_Satdeep_and_Tulsi_during_Zoo_visit_-_TTT2018.jpg
  14. File:Krishna_at_Day_0_of_TTT_2019_10.jpg
  15. File:Krishna_at_Day_0_of_TTT_2019_11.jpg
  16. File:Krishna_at_Day_1_of_TTT_2019.jpg
  17. File:Krishna_Chaitanya_Velaga_-_WAT2018.jpg
  18. File:Krishna_Chaitanya_Velaga_-2_-_WAT2018.jpg
  19. File:Wikidata_Advanced_Training_Pic_By_Gapu_-_65.jpg
  20. File:Krishna_Chaitanya_Velaga_at_EduWikiSAARC2019.jpg
  21. File:Wikimedia_Education_SAARC_Conference_2019_(25).jpg
  22. File:Krishna_C.V._at_Wikimedia_Education_SAARC_Conference_2019.jpg
  23. File:Krishna_Chaitanya_Velaga_1.jpg
  24. File:OpenCon_2018_New_Delhi_(10).jpg
  25. File:OpenCon_2018_New_Delhi_(11).jpg
  26. File:Wikimedians_at_Wikigraphists_Bootcamp_(2018_India)_(39).jpg
  27. File:Wikimedians_at_Wikigraphists_Bootcamp_(2018_India)_(59).jpg
  28. File:Wikimedians_at_Wikigraphists_Bootcamp_(2018_India)_(76).jpg
  29. File:Wikimedians_at_Wikigraphists_Bootcamp_(2018_India)_(83).jpg
  30. File:Wikimedians_at_Wikigraphists_Bootcamp_(2018_India)_(20).jpg
  31. File:Wikimedians_at_Wikigraphists_Bootcamp_(2018_India)_(79).jpg
  32. File:Wikimedians_at_Wikigraphists_Bootcamp_(2018_India)_(80).jpg
  33. File:Wikimedians_at_Wikigraphists_Bootcamp_(2018_India)_(81).jpg
  34. File:Wikimedians_at_Wikigraphists_Bootcamp_(2018_India)_(82).jpg
  35. File:Wikimedians_at_Wikigraphists_Bootcamp_(2018_India)_(84).jpg
  36. File:Wikimedians_at_Wikigraphists_Bootcamp_(2018_India)_(85).jpg
  37. File:Wikimedians_at_Wikigraphists_Bootcamp_(2018_India)_(87).jpg
  38. File:Wikimedians_at_Wikigraphists_Bootcamp_(2018_India)_(88).jpg
  39. File:Wikimedians_at_Wikigraphists_Bootcamp_(2018_India)_(89).jpg
  40. File:Wikimedians_at_Wikigraphists_Bootcamp_(2018_India)_(90).jpg
  41. File:Citation_Hunt_walk-through_by_Krishna.jpg
  42. File:KC_Velaga.jpg
  43. File:Access_to_Arts_Conference(8).jpg
  44. File:KC_Velaga_at_Access_to_Arts_Conference_Chandigarh.jpg
  45. File:KCVelaga_at_Access_to_Arts_Conference_Chandigarh.jpg
  46. File:Panel_at_Access_to_Arts_Conference.jpg
  47. File:CISA2KTTT17_-_Krishna_Chaitanya_Velaga_during_Field_Trip_at_Cubbon_Park_01.jpg
  48. File:Krishna_Chaitanya_Velaga_01.svg
  49. File:Krishna_Chaitanya_presentation.jpg
  50. File:Access_to_Arts_Conference_Panel_(21).jpg
  51. File:Krishna_Chaitanya_at_Wikimania_2019.jpg
Images uploaded by others featuring me as part of group
  1. File:INVISIBLE_NO_MORE-WIKI_EVENT_2019-30.jpg
  2. File:INVISIBLE_NO_MORE-WIKI_EVENT_2019-31.jpg
  3. File:INVISIBLE_NO_MORE-WIKI_EVENT_2019-1.jpg
  4. File:Day_1_of_TTT_2019_02.jpg
  5. File:Day_1_of_TTT_2019_03.jpg
  6. File:OpenCon_2018_New_Delhi_organizing_team_(71).jpg
  7. File:Wikimedians_at_Wikigraphists_Bootcamp_(2018_India)_(57).jpg
  8. File:Wikimedians_at_Wikigraphists_Bootcamp_(2018_India)_(53).jpg
  9. File:Wikimedians_at_Wikigraphists_Bootcamp_(2018_India)_(54).jpg
  10. File:Wikimedians_at_Wikigraphists_Bootcamp_(2018_India)_(55).jpg
  11. File:Wikimedians_at_Wikigraphists_Bootcamp_(2018_India)_(58).jpg
  12. File:Access_to_Arts_Conference(5).jpg
  13. File:Access_to_Arts_Conference(6).jpg
  14. File:Wikilover90_at_Access_to_Arts_Conference_Panel.jpg
  15. File:Satdeeo_Gill_speaking_at_Access_to_Arts_Conference_Chandigarh.jpg
  16. File:Wikilover90_speaking_at_the_Access_to_Arts_Conference.jpg
  17. File:Access_to_Arts_Conference_panel_(2).jpg

KCVelaga (talk · mail) 15:10, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 18:00, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:26, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:25, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:25, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:53, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:25, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 17:01, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:25, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by احمد خداد (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work, promo photos available on different sources on-line.

Smooth O (talk) 17:36, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 18:40, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mrnagle (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work. Random internet images without original source and permission.

Smooth O (talk) 17:48, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 18:40, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Janna Kilimnik (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Paintings of Alexandr Kachkin, living painter. No permission.

Smooth O (talk) 19:24, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:23, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal(?) photo, sole upload. Pibwl (talk) 19:25, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:21, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 20:11, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:21, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Licence is not valid, source did not allow to post materials NV (talk) 20:26, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:21, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright holder and author - Anastasiya Lapkovskaya per exif. Author permission required. Саня Новиков (talk) 20:33, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:16, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright holder and author - Valeriy Gorbunov per exif. Author permission required. Саня Новиков (talk) 20:35, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:16, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image with no useful description or file name. Johnj1995 (talk) 22:06, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:15, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Needs COM:OTRS. P 1 9 9   23:53, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:15, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not own work. See COM:DW. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:10, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, questionable licensing and likely a copyright violation. Salavat (talk) 03:11, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • According to bigthings.ca: "It was constructed to honour John G. Diefenbaker, Canada's 13th Prime Minister (1957 - 1963). Diefenbaker defended many court cases in Humboldt as a criminal lawyer in the 1920's and 1930's. Dimensions: Height: 8 Feet (2.4 Metres) Width: 6 Feet (1.8 Metres) Construction Materials: Acrylic enamel automotive paint with 4 coats of clear on .064 aluminum." Without adequate information on who created this graphic artwork, I'm leaning towards  Delete as COM:FOP Canada doesn't cover majority of 2D artistic works like murals. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:26, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 01:02, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright belongs to the mural creator, not only the photographer. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:20, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 01:02, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright belongs to the mural creator, not only the photographer. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:22, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 01:02, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some information is missing. Therefore an updated PDF can be uploaded Pramathesh Talukdar (talk) 08:25, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 11:32, 1 Januar 2021 UTC: No license since 24 December 2020 --Krdbot 21:06, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jeff G. as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F4, License review NOT passed: No evidence of a free license at the claimed source.


Deleted: per nomination, as no evidence of a permission. --Túrelio (talk) 17:00, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Italy. Architect César Pelli died in 2019, still within the 70 p.m.a. of the country A1Cafel (talk) 01:47, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: below ToO, de minimis, etc. Ruthven (msg) 08:57, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 01:51, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Below the threshold of originality. Ruthven (msg) 08:54, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Italy

A1Cafel (talk) 01:51, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: nothing copyrightable: the building doesn't exist anymore [3]. Ruthven (msg) 08:54, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 01:49, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: building under construction, copyright not applicable. Ruthven (msg) 09:41, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to my request at Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with "OGL v1.0" "gov.scot", looks like OGLv1.0 is misapplied to photographs. From the copyright statement provided:

Images, photography and video
Images and photographs on this site are subject to Crown copyright protection unless otherwise indicated. You may re-use Crown copyright images subject to the conditions stated above. Images and videos on the Scottish Government's Flickr site and Scottish Government's You Tube channel are subject to the licence restrictions shown on those sites, but are normally available to be re-used with attribution for non-commercial purposes only.

Ytoyoda (talk) 19:19, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; The copyright statement quoted refers to the flickr channel whose license restrictions take preference. These are all NC which is not compatible with commons. --Gbawden (talk) 09:06, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

اسم این دانشکده دانشکده علم پایه هست که به اشتباه موقع بارگداری دانشکده فنی مهندسی قید شده است Ariyana77 (talk) 15:01, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Please follow the instruction of Commons:File renaming. --Hanooz 17:14, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This horse statue, named 黄金の馬(アハルテケ), was erected in ja:平成18年 ( =2006 ). [4] No FoP in Japan for statues. Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:33, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 05:51, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This horse statue, named ja:ハイセイコー (en:Haiseiko), at ja:中山競馬場 (en:Nakayama Racecourse) was erected in 2001. [5] No FoP in Japan for statues. Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:05, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:22, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There's no COM:FOP for artistic works in Japan. Mhhossein talk 06:34, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:25, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There's no COM:FOP for artistic works in Japan. (also see this similar case.) Mhhossein talk 06:36, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--Mhhossein talk 06:38, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:26, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These images are licensed with the Open Government License 1.0, but looking at the copyright statement provided, it appears photographs are protected by Crown Copyright, and the license only applies to "information", i.e laws, regulations, announcements etc, not photographs:

Images, photography and video
Images and photographs on this site are subject to Crown copyright protection unless otherwise indicated. You may re-use Crown copyright images subject to the conditions stated above. Images and videos on the Scottish Government's Flickr site and Scottish Government's You Tube channel are subject to the licence restrictions shown on those sites, but are normally available to be re-used with attribution for non-commercial purposes only.

Since these photographs are too new to be out of copyright, they're not free enough to be on Commons.

Ytoyoda (talk) 19:14, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there is a clear basis to proceed to a mass deletion. These images have been uploaded by several different users, over the period of several years, having originated from versions found on the Scottish Government website and the Scottish Government Flickr channel. There is some information on Meta about OGL [6]. There hasn't been any problems around this issue previously flagged up, nor any current discussion there about this. The Scottish Government Crown Copyright page also advises of an email address to use for "Any enquiries regarding the use and re-use of this information resource".
To look at one of these images as an example: File:John Swinney, Deputy First Minister.png is a cropped image of relatively low resolution- 259 × 263 pixels, with a file size of 72 KB. It was uploaded on 2 August 2017 and the source listed as https://beta.gov.scot/about/who-runs-government/cabinet-and-ministers/deputy-first-minister/ The Scottish government website has undergone quite some change since then. There are multiple sizes of that image available on the Scottish Government Flickr site [7] and there is some additional information listed there [8] such as the image being dated 28 May 2016, and is marked as public, but also marked as having some rights reserved under Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC 2.0). Drchriswilliams (talk) 15:39, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Drchriswilliams I checked the Internet Archives and the licensing language hasn't changed that much in the last 10 years. If anything, OGL is a newer addition, while photographs have always been copyright protected. And Attribution-NonCommercial is not accepted on Commons. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:52, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I also disagree that there's a clear basis for deletion here - within the OGL itself, "Information" has a wide definition and would cover the images: Information means information protected by copyright or by database right (for example, literary and artistic works, content, data and source code) offered for use under the terms of this licence. see here under Definitions for more info. Lirazelf (talk) 13:44, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Lirazelf: I think what's noteworthy though is that the language of the copyright statement specifically calls out photographs as being under a separate license. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:52, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ytoyoda: mmm, I see where you're coming from, however, the text "You may re-use Crown copyright images subject to the conditions stated above" loops back to the first paragraph's reference to the OGL, and therefore the "Information" definition which would include them. hmmmmm. There's an outstanding question on the meta page here that asks if the OGL overrides the license on Flickr. I wonder if we might be able to contact them direct / get a clarification on this (I can put my other user:Sara Thomas (WMUK) hat on tomorrow.) Lirazelf (talk) 19:23, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Lirazelf: I think you're right that "information" casts a pretty wide net that includes photographs and I'm now more confused about the point of the clarification about images found on social media channels. Ytoyoda (talk) 15:48, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ytoyoda: right?? it seems like it's there just to remind folks that er, well, Flickr has their own licensing stuff, hah. Lirazelf (talk) 16:16, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I've added Flickr links and license info for images I could easily find. Again, since the licensing statement provided by the uploaders explicitly say "Images and videos on the Scottish Government's Flickr site and Scottish Government's You Tube channel are subject to the licence restrictions shown on those sites", at the very least, those images should be deleted. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:37, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: No clear basis for the deletion of such an array of media. Especially given that some of these photos have now been on the site for four years. They are Scottish Government photographs and surely must be available under Open Government Licences. Goodreg3 (talk) 21:17, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment @Ytoyoda: @Goodreg3: @Drchriswilliams: Just to update you, following contact with the Scottish Government Communications Directorate, they have updated the license on almost everything on their Flickr account to be wiki-compatible / line with OGL, with a small number of exceptions which have had to be left on -NC. This should mean that not only can we save the items listed above (I haven't checked them individually yet), but can also bring over some more. Sara Thomas (WMUK) (talk) 17:41, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. --Yasu (talk) 15:28, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

needs to be confirmed by the BAB through OTRS Veverve (talk) 00:04, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 06:46, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was first published in Sweden where the copyright term is 70 years pma. Several contributors died in the 1950s so this journal issue is not yet free in the country of origin. De728631 (talk) 00:59, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominated from Category:Arkiv för zoologi:

De728631 (talk) 02:05, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:45, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no evidence that the licence is correct, and definitely not the work of the uploaders  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:40, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 06:45, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file appears nonsensical. It is also in French but is on the English commons. It lacks an adequate explanation of the map and is also inaccurate anyway. I for one think it should be removed, or at least improved and translated. 81.99.162.4 21:19, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, Wikimedia Commons is a multilingual project. --Thibaut (talk) 17:18, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to this page, this is a painting by Henry Hintermeister. He is young enough that a lot of his works are probably still copyrighted. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:35, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: According to the "Catalog of Copyright Entries: Works of art" published by Library of Congress in 1918, this painting was copyrighted at 1912 for John Henry Hintermeister (1869-1945). I suppose it makes this picture PD at the moment. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:10, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Об удалении файла просил незадолго до смерти Славомир Антонович - лицо, изображенное на фото. Сейчас просит его сын Максим. Kozmaprut (talk) 06:53, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The reason for deletion is not clear enough. However, date. license and authorship of this photograph are dubious enough to delete it. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:24, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary low-quality duplicate of File:Bertha Froriep - Portrait of Victoria Åberg - A I 757 - Finnish National Gallery.jpg. Mlang.Finn (talk) 13:22, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I also cannot see why we need this black and white corrupted copy of the coloured painting. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:27, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted billboard ad. Permission (via COM:OTRS email) from the artists who created this ad (not the owner of the management who physically owns it) is required, as there is no freedom of panorama for graphic works in the Philippines. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:30, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Functus officio  : the picture is very informative on the question of what is the street or road name and Barangay; I was looking for the exact address and Barangay and street for my Category in New Manila Wikimedia since I was roaming and walking street by street to photo at least 2 or more pictures to reach Gilmore to the Monastery of St. Therese and St. Paul University QC from the LRT 2 and when I found this I shot it; I should have uploaded a new version and put the template Bad Name If It Is OK I have No Objection to the deletion Wala po akong tulol Burahin ang larawan Gumagalang and Yours Sincerely Judgefloro Maligayang Pasko Judgefloro (talk) 07:43, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 03:37, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ليست لطيفه Aboalfa98 (talk) 16:54, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 09:06, 14 März 2021 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Aboalfa98 --Krdbot 14:14, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Larryasou as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: See [related items]:「本授權範圍僅及於著作權保護之範圍,不及於其他智慧財產權利,包括但不限於專利、商標、及機關標誌之提供。」("The scope of this license is limited to the scope of copyright protection, not to other intellectual property rights, including but not limited to the provision of patents, trademarks and agency logos.")  — billinghurst sDrewth 08:20, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the license specifically says, that administrator's logos are copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 11:39, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source Flickr page clearly states "© Gordon Edgar - All rights reserved. Please do not use my images without my explicit permission". While the image is tagged in Flickr as CC BY-SA 2.0, it is clear that this was not the intention of Gordon Edgar. Edgar is a professional photographer who has published his photographs in multiple books. I am fairly sure that this is a violation of his intent. The description here is copied from the Flickr page and includes a truncated version of the copyright notice. Laplorfill (talk) 03:30, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These are conflicting

copyright statements, indeed. Therefore, deleting the file is reasonable. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 11:55, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   00:54, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation from [9] Berrely (talk) 13:49, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have authored this article and included the photo which was given to me by article's subject and not subject to copyright. If the photo is at all a concern I am very willing to delete it so that the article itself can be approved. Thank you very much to the Wiki Community. Happy holidays to all!100.12.71.72 18:26, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect. Copyright is automatic on creation (per Berne) and unless there's evidence this was formally released under the claimed licence by whoever holds the copyright (usually the photographer unless contracts stipulate otherwise) it's a copyright violation. Just because the subject gave you the photo doesn't mean they have the copyrights to it or that they transferred those rights if they do. Jéské (v^_^v) 21:47, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 09:29, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:09, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep. The information presented in this file is definitely not outside project scope. Also, being currently unused isn't a reason to delete this file. If this file is similar to, or a duplicate of, an SVG file, that file should be listed here so a comparison can be made. Without it, we can't tell if this file is redundant and inferior or not. Marbletan (talk) 18:12, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Based on DMacks recognition of a factual error in this version. Marbletan (talk) 12:21, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I agree File:Ketamine metabolites2.png is likely the file that is the "duplicate" and I agree with your assessment that the uploader thinks it's better. However, the two images are different and maybe another editor at the article where the image is used will think the first version is better. Who knows? In my mind, there is not much to gain by either deleting or keeping the image. <shrug> Marbletan (talk) 20:32, 17 May 2021 (UTC) Edited: This comment is now moot, based on DMacks' observation of a factual error in the image. Marbletan (talk) 12:21, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:23, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

G7. Author or uploader request deletion RajanD100 (talk) 05:59, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 17:31, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tourist photo, for family album, not for Commons; there is a better one: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Nederlands_openlucht_museum_arnhem_(322)_(8175159602).jpg

Nederlands openlucht museum arnhem (322) (8175159602)

JopkeB (talk) 05:07, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment What other items are you speaking in "compare the scale with other items on the photo"? A wall of unknown height? The shrubs of unknown height? The leaves on the ground? This is not an simple tourist photo, and is "providing knowledge; instructional or informative"" so is"realistically useful for an educational purpose" so see yourself Project scope. Tm (talk) 02:22, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Similar images kept and scope established in Commons:Village_pump#When_is_a_photo_out_of_scope_because_of_being_a_"holiday_snap"? and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (11) (30324098098).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (18) (42383500400).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (20) (42383499620).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (22) (42383498750).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (26) (42383497440).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (27) (43285361165).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (41) (44143064732).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (42) (44143064092).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (45) (42383492990).jpg. Tm (talk) 10:07, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, I see here educational value. For example, human is useful for showing, how big the carriage is. Taivo (talk) 12:15, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tourist photo, not for Commons; there are better ones: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Nederlands_openlucht_museum_arnhem_(363)_(8174917925).jpg and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Nederlands_openlucht_museum_arnhem_(364)_(8174912515).jpg

Nederlands openlucht museum arnhem (363) (8174917925)
Nederlands openlucht museum arnhem (364) (8174912515)

JopkeB (talk) 05:17, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • The aim of Commons is to have files that are "realistically useful for an educational purpose", see Project scope. I cannot see any use of this photograph for an educational purpose. Explicitly out of scope are "Private image collections, e.g. private party photos, photos of yourself and your friends, your collection of holiday snaps and so on." I think this is such a photo. The other two examples are not and may be useful indeed. JopkeB (talk) 19:21, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Similar images kept and scope established in Commons:Village_pump#When_is_a_photo_out_of_scope_because_of_being_a_"holiday_snap"? and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (11) (30324098098).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (18) (42383500400).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (20) (42383499620).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (22) (42383498750).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (26) (42383497440).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (27) (43285361165).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (41) (44143064732).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (42) (44143064092).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (45) (42383492990).jpg. Tm (talk) 10:07, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, I see here educational value. Taivo (talk) 11:57, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Italy. Architect César Pelli died in 2019, still within the 70 p.m.a. of the country A1Cafel (talk) 01:47, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: per {{FoP-Italy}}: works of deceased authors have de facto FoP in Italy. Ruthven (msg) 19:04, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Italy. Architect César Pelli died in 2019, still within the 70 p.m.a. of the country A1Cafel (talk) 01:48, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per {{FoP-Italy}}. Ruthven (msg) 19:06, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted artworks.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:11, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:03, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As in the image titles, these are images from a Vogue magazine photo shoot by famed photographer Tim Walker, as can be seen here: https://agnautacouture.com/2013/04/21/tim-walker/ not by an amateur Flickr user.

GRuban (talk) 04:04, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:04, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:22, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:04, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Italy. Architect César Pelli died in 2019, still within the 70 p.m.a. of the country A1Cafel (talk) 01:48, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per 1st exception at the updated COM:FOP Italy: work of a deceased author. The architect, as evidence here states, died in 2019. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:56, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination (non-admin closure) --A1Cafel (talk) 16:20, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The license given below is not stated on the url provided in the summary section, which instead mentions that it was licensed by the music label. I searched the video on YouTube with the Creative Commons filter and it is not listed. Angryjoe1111 (talk) 13:21, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Wdwd at 10:46, 24 July 2021 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 00:26, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Larryasou (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These usages of Template:GWOIA are inapplicable, because the scope of this license does not include administration's logo.

II. Information on Related Items:

 (a) The authorized scope is only within the scope protected under copyright. It does not include other intellectual property rights, including but not limited to the provision of patents, trademarks and administration's logo.

Larryasou (talk) 03:28, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:52, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Created by Paul Rosenius (d. 1957), so not yet free in the country of origin. De728631 (talk) 02:04, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:27, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

D3 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kepler-45b (talk • contribs) 17:08, 23 December 2020‎ (UTC)[reply]

@Kepler-45b: Some evidence of why this is a copyvio (tr:WP:CSD#D3) would be nice.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 03:39, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unused logo, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   14:27, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very doubtful. It's almost the same picture as this one (photograph : Claude Mathieu). TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 08:24, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – It's clearly not the same. "Doubtful" and "almost" are weak arguments against the uploader's declaration "Œuvre personnelle". -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 14:03, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Michael Bednarek: 1) This really seems like the 2 photos were taken at the same moment and angle, so it's really incredible that two photographs could have been there at the same time ; 2) This user has already uploaded files that were supposedly "own work" while it was not (see his talk page) so it's hard to trust him ; 3) The sides of the picture are quite weird (looking like film stocks).
So no, it's not juste "weak arguments". With doubts like that for a picture like that, Commons needs more tangible proofs. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:00, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and additional comments by User:TwoWings. --P 1 9 9   14:29, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is NOT a copyright violation and the picture should NOT be deleted. Shahid Rahman is NOT the Photographer & copyright holder for this picture. Opardo (talk) 11:22, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (EXIF data states: Copyright holder Photography by Shahid Rahman). VRT ticket needed if otherwise. --P 1 9 9   14:31, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of non-free book covers. 2603:301D:22B2:4000:7DCC:D821:BC76:D5C0 14:28, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep because recognizable covers are a small part of the overall image and thus there's no copyright issue. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 15:53, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Small part? The books are the main focus, you even say it in the file name. This is not a de minimis situation, as you failed to explain how. 2603:301D:22B2:4000:D9C8:C3EB:22F6:9328 16:44, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. This is an interesting case, and the nominator's reasoning did cross my mind when I noticed this image on Barkeep49's enwiki user page for the first time. Although it may be borderline, I do think COM:DM applies. The image is a general depiction of a "table of books"; it doesn't focus on any one particular book, making this case indistinguishable from some of the other borderline de minimis keeps out there, e.g. Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Banners CIMG0256.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Museu Valencia de la Il·lustració i la Modernitat, interior.JPG (both of which are mentioned directly at COM:DM#Guidelines). Mz7 (talk) 23:25, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Mz7. --P 1 9 9   14:32, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No own work. Ekkksternet (talk) 14:48, 24 December 2020 (UTC) Also File:Demkovych 2.jpg, File:Demkovych 3.jpg.[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9   14:33, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative artwork. (Note: In use.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:17, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I don't see any derivate work. Sr. Knowthing (talk) 17:06, 24 December 2020 (UTC)See comment below. Sr. Knowthing (talk) 21:59, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and User:Infrogmation. --P 1 9 9   14:34, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

La flecha está equivocada. The arrow is pointing to the wrong person Tyler9905 (talk) 16:45, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion. G7. --P 1 9 9   14:35, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image without any description, no encyclopedic or any informaction value. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karelj (talk • contribs) 16:30, 24 December 2020‎ (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It has value in illustration. -- (talk) 20:30, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. "Value in illustrating" what???. --P 1 9 9   14:36, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Vinciussssss O revolucionário aliado (talk) 20:03, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: previously deleted, and not own work (unreliable uploader). --P 1 9 9   14:40, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Vinciussssss O revolucionário aliado (talk) 20:03, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: previously deleted, and not own work. --P 1 9 9   14:40, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Vinciussssss puppet de User talk:Vinciussssss O revolucionário aliado (talk) 20:07, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: previously deleted, and not own work (taken from FB as per EXIF data). --P 1 9 9   14:40, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A duplicate of St Peter's Church, Petersham, Archibald Sharp (d 1842).jpg AndyScott (talk) 21:29, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not duplicate (different angle & lighting). --P 1 9 9   14:42, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Krjones907 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Do not appear to be own work or freely licensed, File:Ravn-clouds.jpg appears to belong to Ravn Air per https://aviationweek.com/air-transport/airlines-lessors/cares-act-relief-paves-way-ravnair-alaska-restart and appears on their social media and File:Ravn-dash8-mts.jpg is from https://flightaware.com/photos/view/2675638-44ca7a2dac0c8f6388a76935ac2c22a4d603708f.

Dylsss (talk) 21:46, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not sure if this is part of why this is still open, but I have taken this images out of use on en.wp and i believe the nominator makes a reasonable argument that these are not free images. One link did not work for me, but you have to ask how someone would possibly get such a perfect shot of a plane at that altitude. It certainly looks like a promo shot. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:27, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination (Copyright© 2014, by Matt Hage. All rights reserved). --P 1 9 9   14:43, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of St Peter's Church, Petersham, Ann Jones (d 1750).jpg AndyScott (talk) 22:01, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not duplicate (different angle & lighting, engraving better visible). --P 1 9 9   14:45, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was first published in London, so the copyright term is 70 years pma. Several contributors to this journal volume died less than 70 years ago, so it is not yet free in the country of origin. De728631 (talk) 23:41, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also affected from Category:Annals and Magazine of Natural History (1916) (both by Ada Hill Walker):

De728631 (talk) 00:00, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. The Ada Hill Walker images can be restored in 2026, the PDF file in 2043. --Rosenzweig τ 15:05, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine. Also the file is copywrited - UA Харкiв Brateevsky {talk} 12:58, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:48, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine. Brateevsky {talk} 12:58, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:50, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is unknown and picture was taken in 1939 (see russian author note in the discription). There is no evidence that any of the points of PD-old or PD-Russia-2008 apply here. User has allready several DR at his talkpage. Per Commons:Copyright rules#When the photographer is unknown and Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle it should be deleted. Druschba 4 (talk) 18:55, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:52, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bossanoven (talk · contribs)

[edit]

False claims of own work for publications that clearly are not. There is no evidence that any of these publications are available under a CC license that didn't even exist when they were printed.

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:43, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I made the scans and clippings, so yes, they are my own work. As for authorship by other persons, the scans and clippings pertain to facts and data, so there is no authorship from other persons. - Bossanoven (talk) 21:27, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That's not what "own work" means. All of these contain substantial original prose and/or photographs, none of which are yours. Making a scan or clipping does not give you authorship of other peoples' work. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:39, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:52, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bossanoven (talk · contribs)

[edit]

False claims of own work.

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:22, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are referring to the attribution on the upload log. As you can see, this was a mishap that was quickly amended to the correct attribution, such as the Milwaukee County Sheriff's Department. Both of these images are iconic mug shots (though I admit iconic mug shots are not very prevelant) taken by arms of the law, and therefore, they are public domain. I will try to ensure that the upload log does not contain such mishaps with any future uploads on any topic. - Bossanoven (talk) 20:55, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nom, "taken by arms of the law" <> "public domain".   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 21:20, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Under typical pretenses, you'd be right, but these two particular images are iconic, especially the first one, so are they not public domain? - Bossanoven (talk) 21:35, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Iconic is irrelevant to public domain status.--Prosfilaes (talk) 21:59, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Harvey Murray Glatman. A 1945 work would have needed copyright notice and renewal, and checking is a mess, but I've never heard of such a work by a police department getting such a treatment. I feel there's more realistic concern that this isn't actually from 1945 or a mugshot of Glatman, and I'm not worried about that, either.--Prosfilaes (talk) 22:01, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
en:Harvey Glatman claims that it is his 1958 mugshot. Is there evidence that it was actually published in 1958, or merely that it was taken then? Most mugshots were not regularly published until the modern advent of mugshot websites. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:46, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - likely not published during notice-required years. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:59, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also:

The Copyright Act of R.O.C. does not cover public utility company's logo, thus, They shouldn't be in Public Domain. See:Template talk:PD-ROC-exempt. Larryasou (talk) 05:02, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

這個清單當中有大部分屬於政府機構(包含以政府機關體制運作的博物館、研究機構、媒體等),其員工為經國家正式銓敘的公務員,僅有少數屬於行政法人及國有營利事業(公司)。 Jimmy3357569 (talk) 12:46, 27 July 2021 (UTC+8)


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:00, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not an image of simple geometry ineligible for copyright. Copied from the source indicated: https://www.facebook.com/lucy4senate/photos/a.1581426322173029.1073741828.1580242482291413/1588913381424323/?type=3&theater ― Tartan357 Talk 10:25, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:01, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

First versions of files uploaded by User:Gikü

[edit]

Please revdel the first version (or in case I missed something there may be multiple versions to delete – but keep last) of the listed files. They contain my name in EXIF and I am not comfortable having my name displayed in this environment, let alone on such popular files as File:Sorin Grindeanu, interview Feb 2015.jpg. I uploaded new versions today for all of them, where I replaced the name with my Wikimedian username. Thank you for understanding. PS: Please assist hiding my name from these two PDFs as well: 1, 2 – appreciate your help! Gikü (talk) 23:02, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies for having to add more files to the list – I realised the inauguration files were also bearing my name in EXIF as soon as I clicked Submit. Will not happen anymore. Gikü (talk) 00:24, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Added one more leftover: File:Eugeniu Nichiforciuc in 2017.jpg. Gikü (talk) 11:58, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
One more: File:Nina Kraviz - 2018 RBMA.jpg. Gikü (talk) 22:05, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - Feel free to reload any or all of these without the problem EXIF. That will take much less time than REVDELing these. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:03, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jameslwoodward: Possibly not the optimal decision, as all images got unlinked and it's now a lot of work to reinsert them into the articles. --Krd 06:56, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not too simple for copyright (Australia) Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:28, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It does look as though it was contributed by the (prior) copyright holder. Thomas Bull (talk) 21:26, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: We do not know who the uploader is, so policy calls for a free license via VRT. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:03, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong license. Corporation logo shouldn't be released in PD, an OTRS is needed. Larryasou (talk) 04:56, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per above. SCP-2000 04:44, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:03, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Larryasou as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Related Items:「本授權範圍僅及於著作權保護之範圍,不及於其他智慧財產權利,包括但不限於專利、商標、及機關標誌之提供。」("The scope of this license is limited to the scope of copyright protection, not to other intellectual property rights, including but not limited to the provision of patents, trademarks and agency logos.")|source=https://web.ncku.edu.tw/p/404-1000-140790.php  — billinghurst sDrewth 08:09, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 12:04, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission, official logo in use on party's website. It's possible that this might not meet the threshold of originality required for copyright protection, though. ― Tartan357 Talk 10:07, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: kept as trivial. --rubin16 (talk) 12:05, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TĚ 10 K0K0T (talk · contribs)

[edit]

questionable copyright status + uploaded by LTA

Martin Urbanec (talk) 15:45, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 12:05, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Smooth O as no permission (No permission since) JPF (talk) 23:28, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

level of creativity is too low for copyright. --23:29, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Kept: even with the low TOO I think that simple colored squares with no gradients and simple text fond should be ineligible. --rubin16 (talk) 12:07, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]