Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/12/16
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Варвара_Алексеевна,_Трирогов_младший_Владимир_Григорьевич,_Копылова_Варвара_Григорьевна_1905_Кострома.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![260 File:Матей Вішнєк "Пригода ведмедиків панда, яку розповів один саксофоніст, котрий мав подружку у Франкфурті" .jpg](#File:Матей_Вішнєк_"Пригода_ведмедиків_панда,_яку_розповів_один_саксофоніст,_котрий_мав_подружку_у_Франкфурті"_.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:YouTubers 1
[edit]YouTube logos not used for any educational purpose
- File:AnythingTodayNet.png
- File:BrownWIKI.jpg
- File:Carlos J. Ampér.png
- File:Foto de xPatryy.png
- File:Gabriel Cruz T.png
- File:HYDRAJIBON.jpg
- File:Jsagdshljfughfzjixvdfhgcjhf.png
- File:Logo kewDiePie P.jpg
- File:Logo Komunitas Youtuber Batam.png
- File:Logo of bananawave 2021.jpg
- File:Lokooo.png
- File:Novous Prime (TLE GAMING).jpg
- File:OsmyReal Reborn.jpg
- File:Redmuraki Аватарка.jpg
- File:Sen Teegan (1600 x 1600).png
- File:Sen Teegan - logo structure.png
- File:SrPelo.jpg
- File:Technical SM2T.png
- File:TechPico.jpg
- File:Thanks for 2.5k subscriber.jpg
- File:The bongo bir youtube.jpg
- File:Unboxholics.png
- File:Vansh And Creative Ideas.jpg
- File:VidIQ-achievement-cerfiticate-125000-views-2021-08-29.png
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yeeno (talk) 08:29, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:27, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:YouTubers 2
[edit]Unused personal photo(s), out of scope.
- File:20201229162748 IMG 2078 copy.jpg
- File:2D2A9849.jpg
- File:3.enso 14000924 020701667.jpg
- File:3.enso 14000924 020705299.jpg
- File:3.enso 14000924 020708433.jpg
- File:3.enso 14000924 0207220010.jpg
- File:Dipumaza.jpg
- File:FCxwGkzVUAMWuE12sdg.jpg
- File:Gaurav Dhakal.jpg
- File:Harajyoti saloi.jpg
- File:IMG-20210809-WA0023.jpg
- File:JASIM HUSSAIN.jpg
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:34, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:09, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
This was Uploaded by mistake .. I will upload a better version with some modifications!! 2003:F2:670A:8800:B848:7E30:F96D:F74C 10:32, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
My own pic .. uploaded by mistake... Will upload it again with some image corrections .. please delete it ASAP ... thank you Photos Worldwide (talk) 10:33, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 16:57, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded the wrong file. Sorry about that! Veticus (talk) 12:39, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 17:05, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Vdfevgetsfdgeggsggrhf 173.225.243.220 16:42, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Oppose Meaningless deletion request. cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 17:39, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request. --Achim55 (talk) 17:43, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
J’ai téléversé ce fichier par erreur Niamading dansoko (talk) 19:15, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 21:15, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
copyvio, my newb mistake Leomk0403 (talk) 03:46, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: No evidence of free license at source: https://www.inaturalist.org/photos/30019954. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:54, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
File:The leggiest animal on the planet, Eumillipes persephone, from Australia—female individual with 1,306 legs.jpg
[edit]
This file was initially tagged by Voice of Clam as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Reuters copyright image, from various news sources (e.g. [1]) - not "own work" as claimed.
Converted to regular DR, to put in order the source and author claims. Image itself seems to be indeed under CC-By by true author.-- Túrelio (talk) 21:09, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- I, Paul Marek (Aggyrolemnoixytes) created this image and licensed it under CC-BY to be used in https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-02447-0 It is not Reuters image (or anyone else's), and it can absolutely be shared freely under the guidelines of CC-BY on Wikipedia/Wikimedia. Aggyrolemnoixytes (talk) 21:24, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks. Do you prefer the author-credit for the image (which re-users need to mention) to remain Aggyrolemnoixytes or to change it to your real name? --Túrelio (talk) 21:27, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Good idea to change it to my real name, and not my Wikipedia username. Aggyrolemnoixytes (talk) 22:10, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks. Do you prefer the author-credit for the image (which re-users need to mention) to remain Aggyrolemnoixytes or to change it to your real name? --Túrelio (talk) 21:27, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, as authorship etc. has been clarified. --Túrelio (talk) 07:39, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Promotional, plain text, out of project scope Achim55 (talk) 21:18, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Herbythyme at 08:16, 17 December 2021 UTC: Content created as advertisement (G10) --Krdbot 14:29, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The photo may be free to share, but the can itself has complex visual elements and fails COM:PACKAGING. -George Ho (talk) 19:04, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I've pulled this off the main page after a report at Errors regarding COM:PACKAGING Schwede66 22:13, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:31, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted cropped version as well
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ellywa (talk) 06:23, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copy of: Rosa 'Tequila Sunrise' kz01.jpg (I forgot that I have uploaded it already) Kenraiz (talk) 22:45, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 13:17, 17 December 2021 UTC: Copy of: Rosa 'Tequila Sunrise' kz01.jpg (I forgot that I have uploaded it already) --Krdbot 20:39, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Copy of: Rosa 'Tequila Sunrise' kz02.jpg (I forgot that I have uploaded it already) Kenraiz (talk) 22:45, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 13:19, 17 December 2021 UTC: Copy of: Rosa 'Tequila Sunrise' kz02.jpg (I forgot that I have uploaded it already) --Krdbot 20:39, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Forelskets (talk · contribs)
[edit]All files are uploaded for promotion with no educational use. Out of project scope.
- File:SKULAM HINDI LOGO.svg
- File:Forelsket logo.png
- File:Startuptale.png
- File:Shubhamsharma.png
- File:Bollywoodrumor.png
BRP ever 12:50, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Not used. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 03:01, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Center for Wind Power Drives (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely not own works: low-res/web-size, disparate quality and styles, missing EXIF data. Promotional diagrams, all look like screengrabs.
- File:4MW SP.png
- File:4MW Prüfstand HIL.png
- File:1MW Prüfstand.png
- File:Back to Back Prüfstand.png
- File:CWD Gebaeude.png
- File:CWD Struktur.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:49, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:15, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Drakonarus (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal images, no educational value, out of scope. Only used on userpage of user without meaningful edits.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:50, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:15, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused logos and promotional diagrams, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope.
- File:Drd-logo.png
- File:Drdfaaliyetraporu.png
- File:Drd faaliyer raporu 1.png
- File:Derindere Filo Kiralama logo.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:51, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:16, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused promotional poster, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope. And also DW. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:17, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 03:02, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
out of scope film poster Yeeno (talk) 20:13, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 03:23, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic likely 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:03, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 03:21, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope. No educational use. BRP ever 22:06, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 03:05, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Md. Riduanul Islam (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal photo
- File:Riakash is a freelancer who works in many freelancer marketplace like Fiverr.com , Freelancer.com and so on.jpg
- File:RIakash.jpg
- File:Md Akash.jpg
Afifa Afrin (talk) 23:09, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 03:17, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by The Ice Alchemist (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Campeonato Nacional de Patinagem Artística no Gelo 2021.jpg
- File:Inauguração da pista de gelo do Palácio do Gelo em Viseu.jpg
- File:Inauguração da pista de gelo do Palácio do Gelo.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:30, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Not originally published on free license elsewhere. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 03:14, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Razaqahmed (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE. Unused company logo of questionable notability.
- File:White-CW-Logomark.png
- File:Blue-CW-Logomark.png
- File:White-CW-Lockup.png
- File:Black-CW-Lockup.png
- File:Blue-CW-Lockup.png
Netora (talk) 23:56, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 03:12, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused tiny illegible snippet, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:04, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 17:33, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
I don't think the YouTube user owns this video. First, the page says "this video is not monetized, and is not for making money or for making a profit. it is only for cultural purposes." which is already worrisome, but more importantly, if you look at the upper right corner of most of the video (not the image this .jpg was made from, but most of the video), there is a "Bades" watermark. I looked around, and there is something called a Bades Foundation YouTube account, that even has a very similar (though higher quality!) video, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IIesv5gnbSE that is not marked Creative Commons Attribution. I think this is a bad copy of a Bades Foundation video, and not free to use. GRuban (talk) 20:32, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 17:43, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal artwork, COM:WEBHOST, little educational use, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:54, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:37, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal document, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:15, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:29, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mbennett79 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logos and advertising, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:16, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:29, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused low-res diagrams of personal project, little context, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:Methoprene Affects on Pseudomonas putida.png
- File:Affects of Methoprene on Pseudomonas putida.png
- File:Methoprene on Psuedomonas putida.png
- File:Pseudomonas graph.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:23, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:29, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wikidoge04 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unfree sports team logos. Unlikely to be own work. Too complex for {{PD-textlogo}}.
- File:ManhattanCelticFC logo.png
- File:CentralNJ Logo2.png
- File:LYFC logo2.png
- File:GreenvilleTriumphSC 2021logo.png
- File:SteelPulseFC logo.png
- File:NJAFC OfficialLogo.png
- File:ACFC logo.png
- File:LasVegasLegends logo.png
- File:Chula Vista FC logo.png
IronGargoyle (talk) 15:37, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete all from Commons and instead reupload on Wikipedia per Fair Use. Also these ones:
- File:PLSQ logo.png
- File:SimcoeCountyRoversFC.png
- File:ScrosoppiFCLogo.png
- File:Guelph United FC man logo.png
Deletenotifier (talk) 02:28, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:33, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wikidoge04 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unfree sports team logos
- File:AUFC logo.png
- File:Capofc logo.png
- File:Chicago Mustangs 2021.png
- File:DeKalb County United logo.png
- File:RWBAdria official logo.png
- File:Deportivo Lake Mary logo.png
- File:Valley United FC logo.png
- File:NISA Nation logo.png
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:22, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:30, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo screengrabs, no educational value, out of scope. And above COM:TOO.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:23, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:30, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable event, no context/location, no educational value, out of scope. Also added:
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:27, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Are identified. Those are d:Q56377767 and d:Q105822595, both being relevant.--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 19:43, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:30, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Snow. architecture (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused promotional/advertising images and not notable, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:33, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:31, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mmpeterson2 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused low-res diagrams of personal project, little context, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:36, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:31, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused low-res diagram of personal project, little context, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:36, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:31, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused low-res diagrams without context, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:36, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:31, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:37, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:32, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Smoothcheeks (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:DW - screenshots of various non-free youtube videos; see visual characteristics and for example, File:MihoczaZoltanAltabornagy.jpg is from here (@ ca. 2:04); File:BorondiGaborAltabornagy.jpg is from here (@ ca. 0:34); etc.
- File:MihoczaZoltanAltabornagy.jpg
- File:Toyotahiluxhonvedelem.jpg
- File:Gidrans.jpg
- File:BorondiGaborAltabornagy.jpg
- File:KoromFerencVezerezredes.jpg
- File:A Leopard 2a4HU.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 16:09, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:00, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Smoothcheeks (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious claims of own work on crests/shields/logos.
- File:NógrádCountyAssemblyLogo.png
- File:KomaromEsztergomCountyCouncilLogo.png
- File:JaszNagykunSzolnokCOuntyAssemblyLogo.png
- File:HevesCountyAssemblyLogo.png
- File:HajdúBiharCountyCouncilLogo.png
- File:GyőrMosonSopronCountyCouncilLogo.png
- File:FejerCountyCouncilLogo.png
- File:CsongradCountyAssemblyLogo.png
- File:BacsKiskunCountyCouncilLogo.png
- File:BaranyaCountyCouncilLogo.png
- File:BékésCountyCouncilLogo.png
- File:PestCounty Assembly Logo.png
Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:12, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:30, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Smoothcheeks (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:UKHouseofCommons2021June.png
- File:JaszNagykunSzolnokCounty Assembly.png
- File:MoldovanParliament2021July.png
- File:HevesCountyAssembly.png
- File:2021 Camborne Town Council.jpg
- File:2021 Cornwall Council (reduced).jpg
- File:Minnesota Sen.jpg
- File:Minnesota HoR.jpg
- File:Fovkozgy.jpg
- File:Budapesti Közgyűlés 2020.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:58, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:32, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of project scope: promotional
- File:مرتضی محمدی نژاد باشگاه متفاوط باشید.jpg
- File:مرتضی محمدی نژاد در استانداری یزد.jpg
- File:مرتضی محمدی نژاد الماس های کسب و کار.jpg
- File:مرتضی محمدی نژاد برگزار کننده دوره های آموزشی.jpg
- File:مرتضی محمدی نژاد نویسنده کتاب متفاوت باشید.jpg
- File:مرتضی محمدی نژاد.jpg
4nn1l2 (talk) 17:19, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:33, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Needs proof of permission Boylarva99 (talk) 18:32, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept. Moving to mass request.--Boylarva99 (talk) 19:55, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Needs proof of permission Boylarva99 (talk) 18:52, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept. Moving to mass request.--Boylarva99 (talk) 19:43, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Needs proof of permission Boylarva99 (talk) 18:54, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept. Moving to mass request.
Needs proof of permission Boylarva99 (talk) 18:56, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept. Moving to mass request. --Boylarva99 (talk) 19:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Needs proof of permission Boylarva99 (talk) 18:57, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept. Moving to mass request.--Boylarva99 (talk) 19:45, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Needs proof of permission Boylarva99 (talk) 18:59, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept. Moving to mass request. --Boylarva99 (talk) 19:41, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:34, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:34, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:37, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:34, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:39, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:34, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:40, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:34, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:47, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:35, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:49, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:35, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:49, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:35, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:51, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:35, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:52, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:35, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:53, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:35, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:55, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:35, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:58, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:35, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:01, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:35, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:02, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:35, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Needs proof of permission Boylarva99 (talk) 21:09, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept. Moving to mass request.--Boylarva99 (talk) 19:56, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:09, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:36, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:11, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:36, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:12, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:36, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:13, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:36, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Low res, no usage. Redundant to files here. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:22, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 21:05, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:26, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 21:05, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:41, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 21:06, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable event, no context/location, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:06, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 21:07, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused and needless copy of File:Sculptor-table-Hall-cleaned.jpg. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:08, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 21:07, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused text doc, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:08, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 21:07, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Likely not own works: photos of extant photos, missing original author, source, date, and permission.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:10, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 21:07, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused banner, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:11, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 21:07, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:13, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 21:08, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:15, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 21:08, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. And above COM:TOO. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:16, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 21:08, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused low-res image of nondescript place/sign, no context, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:20, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 21:08, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused screenshot, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:21, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 21:08, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable performers, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:21, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 21:09, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Smmoshahid (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logos, no educational value, out of scope. And above COM:TOO.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:30, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 21:09, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable event/people, no context/location, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:31, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 21:04, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal document, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:32, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 21:04, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:33, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 21:04, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Fails COM:LR, link no longer works. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:39, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 21:04, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo/seal, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:40, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 21:04, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wildboy5699 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:48, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 21:09, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Needs proof of permission Boylarva99 (talk) 18:47, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept. Moving to mass request.--Boylarva99 (talk) 20:11, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Needs proof of permission Boylarva99 (talk) 18:50, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept. Moving to mass request.--Boylarva99 (talk) 20:10, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Nominate for deletion
[edit]random images of a person of no importance - out of scope
- File:2006 07 08 Hallstatt 6527 (51018286945).jpg
- File:2007 09 21 Heidelberg 104 (51132852186).jpg
- File:2007 09 21 Heidelberg DSCN2516 (51133966025).jpg
- File:2007 09 21 Heidelberg DSCN2540 (51133966005).jpg
- File:2007 09 22 Heidelberg 593 (51132852536).jpg
- File:2008 07 13 Wien (35) (51145199572).jpg
- File:2008 07 13 Wien (36) (51146981315).jpg
- File:2019 09 10 Wien 010IMG 213123 (48934667506).jpg
- File:2019 09 10 Wien 010IMG 213159 (48934667466).jpg
- File:2020 09 12 Wien 073729 527 (50336613426).jpg
- File:2020 12 09 Wien 131201 521 (50714129482).jpg
- File:2020 12 09 Wien 131207 520 (50714129457).jpg
- File:2020 12 09 Wien 131244 274 (50699022816).jpg
- File:2020 12 09 Wien 131250 810 (50713308853).jpg
- File:2020 12 09 Wien 131251 651 (50714129342).jpg
- File:2020 12 09 Wien 131407 164 (50714129302).jpg
- File:2021 02 09 Ich WA0003 (50975139803).jpg
- File:2021 03 28 Wien 133242 414 (51100837773).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(51145199572).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(51146981315).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Krok6kola (talk) 00:42, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Löschen Seems like this person attempted to use commons as a file repository. Ido66667 (talk) 17:08, 16 December 2021 (UTC)- Löschen all, personal album with low educational value. --A1Cafel (talk) 08:05, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:20, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
The oxygen atoms in the OH groups should not have a negative charge. I have uploaded File:Potassium pyrophosphate monobasic.svg as a replacement. Innerstream (talk) 00:43, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Löschen This is definitly a chemical mistake. Furthermore it looks like the file is a composite of uncited fragments and is hence a case of license violation. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 22:39, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:20, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
The oxygen atoms in the OH groups should not have a negative charge. I have uploaded File:Potassium pyrophosphate tribasic.svg as a replacement. Innerstream (talk) 00:44, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Löschen This is definitly a chemical mistake. Furthermore it looks like the file is a composite of uncited fragments and is hence a case of license violation. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 09:22, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:20, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Lack of source, therefore not a reliable map. No educational value. Nanahuatl (talk) 08:59, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:21, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Lack of source, therefore not a reliable map. No educational value. Nanahuatl (talk) 09:00, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:21, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Lack of source, therefore not a reliable map. No educational value. Nanahuatl (talk) 09:01, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:21, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal low quality photo GPSLeo (talk) 09:30, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:21, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo with no indication of importance. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 09:49, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:22, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal artwork Malcolma (talk) 09:56, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:22, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by %USER% as no permission FMM-1992 (talk) 06:55, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I withdraw my nomination -- FMM-1992 (talk) 06:59, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, as retracted by nominator. --Túrelio (talk) 07:46, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
likely copyright violation; proshot image uplaoded by user with only this (and a cropped variant) upload Ringerfan23 (talk) 10:04, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No permission. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:22, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
likely copyright violation; proshot image uploaded by user with only this (and a cropped variant) upload Ringerfan23 (talk) 10:05, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. No permission. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:22, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused and unidentified team shirt. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 10:07, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:22, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
out of scpoe Satirdan kahraman (talk) 10:20, 16 December 2021 (UTC) Hello, this is my own personal photo and it belongs to me.
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:22, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
out of scope, advertising GPSLeo (talk) 11:04, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:22, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
advertising; likely copyright violation GPSLeo (talk) 11:27, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:23, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Private photo of an unknown person with a negative signature. It is doubtful that the author and the person depicted are the same person, there is no permission to publish the photo. -- Nikolay Omonov (talk) 11:36, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:23, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
No educational value without further context or mapping background. Enyavar (talk) 11:54, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:23, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
No educational value without further context or mapping background. Enyavar (talk) 11:54, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:23, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 17:32, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:24, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:32, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:24, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Very low quality pictures, not likely own work. —MdsShakil (talk) 17:34, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:24, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:37, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:24, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:38, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:24, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 17:40, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:24, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 17:41, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:24, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:41, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:24, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 17:42, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:24, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 17:47, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:24, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:48, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:24, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:49, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:24, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:50, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:24, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dopasmc2001 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album
- File:Dopas Mc pintando en Isabel Riquelme Lampa el.jpg
- File:Dopas mc trabajando en propaganda con la brigada ramona parra de la pintana.jpg
- File:Dopas mc 2019.jpg
- File:Dopas mc 2019 festival chelero.jpg
—MdsShakil (talk) 17:52, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- estas fotos corresponden al articulo de wikipedia Dopas Mc, si alguien quiere trabajar el articulo doy autorizacion de las imagenes, soy artista, politico y docente chileno y mi correo personal es [email protected] si alguien me quiere ayudar a concretar el articulo lo agradeceria . 190.196.167.66 19:00, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:24, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 17:53, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:25, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
).jpg){kind=link}
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:55, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:25, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:55, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:25, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:56, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:25, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:57, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:25, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:58, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:25, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Aniruddha97350 (talk) 18:22, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:25, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
My clinic amman 181.203.71.207 23:24, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:26, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Amigooos para siempree 181.203.71.207 23:26, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:26, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Corte el hombre. 181.203.71.207 23:26, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:26, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Souvenir de Alicante 181.203.71.207 23:27, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:26, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Premiado 181.203.71.207 23:28, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:26, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
No me gusta. 181.203.71.207 23:29, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:26, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
No se necesita, se puede borrar. 181.203.71.207 23:30, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Tulsi Bhagat at 04:29, 26 December 2021 UTC: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10) --Krdbot 07:58, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
copyright Syced (talk) 14:42, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:28, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
As of 1 October 2021, former Beuth Hochschule/Beuth University of Applied Sciences is called Berliner Hochschule für Technik (BHT). The file "Logo BHT Berlin.svg" shows the old Logo which is no longer used but the file name suggests that it is the current official logo of the BHT. 2001:638:812:5:0:0:0:71 14:44, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Dies ist das Logo der Beuth Hochschule für Technik. Seit 1. Oktober 2021 heißt die Hochschule "Berliner Hochschule für Technik (BHT)". Da der Dateiname des Logos "Logo BHT Berlin.svg" lautet, wird es fälschliche als das Logo der BHT angezeigt. Z.B. wird es von Google als Logo der Einrichtung verwendet. 2001:638:812:5:0:0:0:71 15:59, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- The file name could just be changed to make this clear. --Leyo 20:03, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We keep historical logos of notable organizations. Feel free to request a file name via the process at COM:RENAME. Thanks!. --Missvain (talk) 22:40, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by 1989 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F3 Needs a proper DR. Yann (talk) 12:01, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Löschen Characters SpongeBob and Gary the snail are non-free characters from Nickelodeon. 1989 (talk) 12:08, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:43, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I don't like it Trangmai150809 (talk) 15:06, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:43, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Not own work: credit in EXIF data not matching the uploader. Missing permission. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:12, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:43, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused text table, should be in wiki-table format if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:12, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:43, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Historical photo, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:14, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:43, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. And above COM:TOO. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:17, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:43, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
useless selfie image for self promotion... also contains so much of personal info such as father's name. address, Mobile number etc et.... should be deleted immediately Shreekanth Ramasamy (talk) 16:20, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:43, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
duplicate of File:Z jednego strumienia szesnaście nowel 009.jpg Wieralee (talk) 16:59, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:44, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
While being used on a Userbox at enwiki, this is too small to be educationally useful. In addition to that, it is a derivative work of the speedily-deleted File:RiskInPlay.jpg, deleted as lacking permission for commercial license. This is a screenshot of a copyrighted game anyway. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:57, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:54, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Not in scope. Picture of a non-notable individual who did not make significant edits to Wikimedia projects. Buidhe (talk) 04:51, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:54, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:15, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:46, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:18, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:46, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
撮影日を「1926年4月1日」と偽っている。 ブルーメンタール (talk) 01:01, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Just my photo album(自己所有アルバムからの著作権の消滅した写真である。全く問題ない) Just my photo album(自己所有アルバムからの著作権の消滅した写真の実写である。事実は変わらないのである。全く問題ない。貴方は事実をねじ曲げ、思い込みで当て付け、削除依頼を出しまくる荒らし行為を慎みなさい。 かんがくたろう
昭和中期頃？またまた噓をつきましたね。
画面右奥の白い校舎は1979年（昭和54年）に建てられた土樋キャンパス1号館です。なので、この画像の撮影時期は1979年（昭和54年）以降です。それなのにかんがくたろうさんは「1926年5月14日」「昭和中期頃」などと嘘を連発しておられる。本当に見苦しいですよ。
なお、この画像ファイルに PD-Japan-oldphoto は適用されません。ブルーメンタール (talk) 01:12, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
画像の所有者と撮影者は必ずしも同一ではありません。かんがくたろうさんにはこの画像を撮影したということを証明する義務があります。ブルーメンタール (talk) 01:50, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: More screen shots - the quality isn't very good so regardless of copyright these would likely not be very helpful to Wikimedia projects. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 15:47, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
撮影日を「1926年5月14日」と偽っている。 ブルーメンタール (talk) 01:02, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Just my photo album(自己所有アルバムからの著作権の消滅した写真の実写である。事実は変わらないのである。全く問題ない。貴方は事実をねじ曲げ、思い込みで当て付け、削除依頼を出しまくる荒らし行為を慎みなさい。 かんがくたろう
昭和中期頃？またまた噓をつきましたね。
画面右奥の白い校舎は1979年（昭和54年）に建てられた土樋キャンパス1号館です。なので、この画像の撮影時期は1979年（昭和54年）以降です。それなのにかんがくたろうさんは「1926年5月14日」「昭和中期頃」などと嘘を連発しておられる。本当に見苦しいですよ。
なお、この画像ファイルに PD-Japan-oldphoto は適用されません。ブルーメンタール (talk) 01:13, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
画像の所有者と撮影者は必ずしも同一ではありません。かんがくたろうさんにはこの画像を撮影したということを証明する義務があります。ブルーメンタール (talk) 01:49, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: More screen shots - the quality isn't very good so regardless of copyright these would likely not be very helpful to Wikimedia projects. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 15:47, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
東北学院大学公式ページからの無断転載画像である。（[新着情報｜学校法人東北学院]） 「日付：1936年5月2日」「作者：かんがくたろう」という説明も完全な噓。 ブルーメンタール (talk) 01:07, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep this is mislabeled content, that appears to be out of copyright -- we should try to update the description, Sadads (talk) 01:09, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- I will save this one specific image, but, the referencing isn't great (this editor seems to be making a habit of taking screen shots of still photographs from their computer). Please update it if you can. Thanks. Missvain (talk) 15:49, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep this is mislabeled content, that appears to be out of copyright -- we should try to update the description, Sadads (talk) 01:09, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Just my photo album(自己所有アルバムからの著作権の消滅した写真の実写である。事実は変わらないのである。全く問題ない。事実は変わらない。貴方は事実をねじ曲げ、思い込みで当て付け、削除依頼を出しまくる荒らし行為を慎みなさい。 かんがくたろう
でも本当は東北学院大学公式ページから無断転載したんですよね。なぜかんがくたろうさんは原典を偽るのですか？それから、1938年は昭和中期頃ですか？またまた噓をつきましたね。ブルーメンタール (talk) 01:05, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Keeping per User:Sadads - Please update the content and work together to do it as needed. Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. This is my final decision, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 15:49, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Poor quality image - out of scope - not clear what it is. Incompetely uploaded? Krok6kola (talk) 01:32, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 15:49, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, logo in center is a copyvio ◢ Ganbaruby! (Say hi!) 02:01, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope promotional image - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 15:51, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ganbaruby as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Image on Yu Jen Jai's online store, unlikely that there's permission: https://web.archive.org/web/20141113160039/http://www.1877.com.tw/webc/html/products/show.aspx?num=217&kind=84&Page=1. Converting to DR, it appears that the user claims to be the owner of the website. @Yi Chen Wu: Please send proof that you are the owner of the website to COM:VRT. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:07, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 15:51, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
I do not see the claimed free license at the source site. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:07, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 15:51, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 1989 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:NETCOPYVIO . Converting to DR to discern age and PD status per COM:ITALY. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:08, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Keep PD-Italy best guess circa 1940 for the date. --RAN (talk) 04:54, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Per RAN. That watermark needs to go though and the sourcing is weird. Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. This is my final decision, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 15:53, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
This picture does not show any useful information but is only the imagination of the original author. It is neither used in any user pages on Wikipedia or other wiki-related projects. Mahogany115 (talk) 02:14, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 15:53, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Tol as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Source is from English Wikipedia (w:en:File:Edward T. Hall 1966.jpg), where this is listed as a non-free file. No information has been provided to suggest that this is freely licensed under the CC BY-SA 4.0 as stated. Pre-1978 US photo, should be discussed. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:15, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Well, it's tagged as CC BY-SA 4.0, which is almost certainly wrong given that the uploader specified the author as "idk" ("I don't know") and the source as a non-free image from the English Wikipedia. For reference, the source given on English Wikipedia is the Society for Visual Anthropology. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 02:44, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- The decision is made not based on what the file description currently claims (which can easily be fixed by editing), but on what the true status of the work is. I have converted it to DR to allow people to search for evidence that it may have been published prior to 1978 without a copyright notice. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:13, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts: Ah, I see. I've looked into the Society for Visual Anthropology and found that it got the image from the New York Times. I can't find further information on "Norris McNamara/Nancy Palmer Agency", which the NYT says the image comes from, nor can I figure out whether it was published with a copyright notice. What happens when we don't know if it was published with a copyright notice? Tol (talk | contribs) @ 20:38, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- If no one finds evidence that it was published without a copyright evidence, then it will be deleted when this DR is closed per COM:PRP. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:53, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- That makes sense; thank you! Tol (talk | contribs) @ 02:56, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- If no one finds evidence that it was published without a copyright evidence, then it will be deleted when this DR is closed per COM:PRP. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:53, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts: Ah, I see. I've looked into the Society for Visual Anthropology and found that it got the image from the New York Times. I can't find further information on "Norris McNamara/Nancy Palmer Agency", which the NYT says the image comes from, nor can I figure out whether it was published with a copyright notice. What happens when we don't know if it was published with a copyright notice? Tol (talk | contribs) @ 20:38, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- The decision is made not based on what the file description currently claims (which can easily be fixed by editing), but on what the true status of the work is. I have converted it to DR to allow people to search for evidence that it may have been published prior to 1978 without a copyright notice. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:13, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely copyright violation - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 15:53, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: screenshot. @Gorkaazk: Are you the owner of this website? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:18, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Screen shot, out of scope - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 15:54, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
trademark, not a free or under CC license logo — danyele 04:04, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 15:54, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Violation of architect's copyright. This work, Bucharest City Hall, was designed by architect Petre Antonescu who died in 1965. Unfortunately, Romanian copyright law does not grant commercial freedom of panorama, and these two images of Petrescu's artistic work are lacking permission for use of free culture Creative Commons licenses from the architect's heirs.
If either no COM:VRTS permission from the heirs is received by the Wikimedia Foundation or the country does not reform their laws to remove non-commercial restrictions (to suit new media/digital media and free culture age), these two images must be deleted and remain so - until 2036 (70+1 years after Petrescu's death), in which his work and other works throughout Romania will fall public domain and visual reproductions like photos of it can be freely used commercially without the need of license from Petrescu's heirs.
- File:47, Bulevardul Regina Elisabeta, Bucharest (Romania).jpg
- File:Detail of the Bucharest City Hall.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:29, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 15:54, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused, very low quality version of File:2025 United States gubernatorial elections.svg. Elli (talk) 05:40, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 15:57, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Author request, unused and has never been used by anyone but me. Elli (talk) 06:07, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 15:57, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
dublicate of File:Tabela de nós matemáticos 01, crop.jpg Zaripov999 (talk) 06:12, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Not even same type of file. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 17:47, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Alas, not duplicates. One has a black background, one doesn't. Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. This is my final decision, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 16:08, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Not own work Suzukaze-c (talk) 06:55, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely copyright violation - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 16:10, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Not own work Suzukaze-c (talk) 06:56, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely copyright violation - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 16:11, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Not own work Suzukaze-c (talk) 06:56, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely copyright violation - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 16:11, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Not own work Suzukaze-c (talk) 06:56, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely copyright violation - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 16:11, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Not own work Suzukaze-c (talk) 06:56, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Neutral @Suzukaze-c: I believe you, but where can we find that? - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 16:38, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Richardkiwi: It's the Google Ngram Viewer. Fish bowl (talk) 11:18, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely copyright violation - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 16:11, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Military phone blueprint ca 1942, can not be own work Drakosh (talk) 09:24, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Данный чертёж выполнен мной лично с использованием бесплатной учебной лицензионной копии программы Компас 3Д. За основу был взят оригинальный телефонный аппарат выпуска 1945 года. Могу перезагрузить данное изображение дополнив поля об авторстве своим ником (внесение имени в рамках правил википедии не имеет смысла). Мне как автору принадлежат все авторские права на это изображение. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kursant504 (talk • contribs) 10:55, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
На следующей неделю перерисую чертёж и сделаю его с отличием от ранее опубликованных мной на форумах и загружу новую версию. Думаю тогда проблем быть не должно.Kursant504 (talk) 11:37, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept, per discussion. Taivo (talk) 10:38, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Please delete this image. I was thinking that I will use it in wiki, but I can't do this because it will be my own research. Kursant504 (talk) 07:48, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 16:11, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Book cover artwork. No reason to believe it is the uploader, Masterchef Devaki, own work. Adakiko (talk) 08:34, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 16:11, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Very low quality (resolution 100x114), horrible image made in Paint. This is not official coat of arms (villages in Poland doesn't have coats of arms). Hoa binh (talk) 08:37, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kommentar file is in use at the moment (here). Strakhov (talk) 17:32, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Huh. We actually have an entire category of coats of arms for villages and areas in Poland. Also this file is in use. Not convinced we need to delete this file at this time. Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. This is my final decision, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year! --Missvain (talk) 17:02, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Map has been taken from a copyrighted source https://www.countryreports.org/country/CotedIvoire.htm Jack (talk) 09:59, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 17:41, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
J’ai téléversé ce fichier par erreur Rçag (talk) 10:05, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion. Unused file - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 17:42, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
File:4990010197223 - Lok Rahasya, Chattopadhyay,BankimChandra, 120p, LANGUAGE. LINGUISTICS. LITERATURE, bengali (1874).pdf
[edit]Duplicate file at File:লোকরহস্য (প্রথম সংস্করণ).pdf Bodhisattwa (talk) 10:31, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: The one you nominated is bigger than the one you want kept. I don't see that as a reason to delete. Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. This is my final decision on this nomination, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 17:54, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
This fan art seems to close to the original creation to be accepted. Same thing for File:Horus Bilal.JPG (same author/uploader). TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 10:44, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Derived works of copyrighted works - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 17:42, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
No es trabajo propio, use File:Jimmy Mizen young.jpg. Hay que categorizar también. 191.126.162.215 11:00, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 17:53, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
File:4990010196842 - Bibidho Samalochan, Chattopadhyay,Bankim Chandra, 160p, LANGUAGE. LINGUISTICS. LITERATURE, bengali (1876).pdf
[edit]duplicate file at File:বিবিধ সমালোচন (বঙ্কিমচন্দ্র চট্টোপাধ্যায়).pdf Bodhisattwa (talk) 11:02, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: The one you nominated is bigger than the one you want kept. I don't see that as a reason to delete. Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. This is my final decision on this nomination, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 17:54, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
File:4990010197108 - Indira O Jugalanguriya, Chattopadhyay,Bankim Chandra, 104p, LANGUAGE. LINGUISTICS. LITERATURE, bengali (1877).pdf
[edit]duplicate file at File:উপকথা.pdf Bodhisattwa (talk) 11:06, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: The one you nominated is bigger than the one you want kept. I don't see that as a reason to delete. Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. This is my final decision on this nomination, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 17:54, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
OSM base map doesn't have satellite pictures: where is that coming from?
Also, this looks like an unused low-resolution map of little educational value, as long as the symbols remain unexplained. Chaoyang district is large, cannot find the specified bridge, based on this image. Enyavar (talk) 11:18, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Personal map. Also questionable copyright. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 17:55, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
OSM base map doesn't have satellite pictures: where is that coming from?
Also, this looks like an unused low-resolution map of little educational value, as long as the symbols remain unexplained. Chaoyang district is large, cannot find the specified bridge, based on this image. Enyavar (talk) 11:18, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: ut of scope. Personal map. Also questionable copyright. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 17:56, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://unsplash.com/photos/7ohxaXHDHy8 unsplash images are usually OK. Yann (talk) 12:02, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Löschen "Media published on Unsplash from 5 June 2017 onwards is not considered to be freely licensed and can't be accepted on Commons." This image was published on 27 May 2021. Johnj1995 (talk) 16:05, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 17:56, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ΔώραΣτρουμπούκη as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://ergoxalkidikis.gr/2018/02/blog-post_15-25.html This seems to be old. Yann (talk) 12:06, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- You are right! My mistake, sorry! ΔώραΣτρουμπούκη (talk) 17:21, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. This is my final decision, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 17:56, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ΔώραΣτρουμπούκη as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://ergoxalkidikis.gr/2018/02/blog-post_15-25.html How old is this picture? Yann (talk) 12:07, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Probably up to 1928. ΔώραΣτρουμπούκη (talk) 17:20, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep If from 1928 then "PD-EU-no author disclosure".
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. This is my final decision, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 17:56, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by GNM-MA as Speedy (Löschen) and the most recent rationale was: Aktuelleres Foto von 2021 soll verwendet werden --GNM-MA (talk) 10:33, 14 December 2021 (UTC) Yann (talk) 12:17, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Welp, we don't have one. So for now, it's this one. Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. This is my final decision, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 17:56, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mateoedu56 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Both files are scans or photographies of works of art. One of them is signed, but I can't read it due to the low resolution. Judging from the style I seriously doubt that they are old enough to be in the public domain (also, Daniel Hermida died in 1956).
-sasha- (talk) 12:20, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely copyright violation - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:08, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Зузина (Шахматова) Варвара Алексеевна, Трирогов младший Владимир Григорьевич, Копылова Варвара Григорьевна 1905 Кострома.jpg
[edit]_%D0%92%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B0_%D0%90%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B0,_%D0%A2%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B2_%D0%BC%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B4%D1%88%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D0%92%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%80_%D0%93%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%8C%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87,_%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%BF%D1%8B%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0_%D0%92%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B0_%D0%93%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%8C%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B0_1905_%D0%9A%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%B0.jpg){kind=link}
_%D0%92%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B0_%D0%90%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B0,_%D0%A2%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B2_%D0%BC%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B4%D1%88%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D0%92%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%80_%D0%93%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%8C%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87,_%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%BF%D1%8B%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0_%D0%92%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B0_%D0%93%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%8C%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B0_1905_%D0%9A%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%B0.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Drakosh as no source (No source since) RAN (talk) 13:31, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Uploader cannot be author. No source of previous publishing. --Drakosh (talk) 13:41, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: They have updated the source. Assuming good faith. Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. This is my final decision on this nomination, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:09, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Can be found elsewhere too. Glorious 93 (talk) 14:11, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:09, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Cette page redirection est une erreur : le prétend être une image de l’église de Saulxures, mais dirige vers l’église de la Bresse, village voisin. Tubamirum (talk) 14:18, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:11, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Il s'agit bien d'une erreur d'identification. Compte tenu des illustrations existantes, celle-ci peut être supprimée. Merci de votre vigilance. Cordialement--René Dinkel (talk) 09:42, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Photographs-of-photographs: COM:Derivative works, original source and author unknown.
MKFI (talk) 14:18, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:11, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation: "promotion photo for heartless- EP". Likely not own work. MKFI (talk) 14:26, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:11, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
no permission, logo from not notable company Hoyanova (talk) 14:30, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:11, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
source and author unknown Hoyanova (talk) 14:31, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:11, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
This has either insufficient permissions or is spam. If it isn't one it must be the other. Uploading user has been blocked as a sockpuppet of a banned user at en.wikipedia. The Alternate Mako (talk) 14:39, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:12, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bahjatyahya (talk · contribs)
[edit]Uploader is apparently the subject. Photographer(s) unknown. File:Concert Bahjat Yahya 1.jpg and File:To La Dlmay.jpg are Youtube video title images: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=22XY1SqVCmw and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9NyOKWyynM, not CC licensed. File:Bahjat yahya saz.jpg is a music video still. VRT permission needed.
MKFI (talk) 14:43, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:12, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Either has insufficient permissions or is spam. If it isn't one, it must be the other. Uploading user was banned as a sockpupped of the blocked user at en.wikipedia The Alternate Mako (talk) 14:44, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope - promotional - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:12, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Promotional logo/image, no educational value, out of scope. Only used on userpage of user without meaningful edits. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:54, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:12, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
not beautilful Kounouz (talk) 20:33, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept: not a deletion reason. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:01, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
I closed this wrong back in 2015. The uploader asked for deletion the same day as upload, so it should have been speedily deleted as COM:CSD#G7. Now that I come across this file again, I can also add that it is an unused text doc, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:59, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:13, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
No evidence to be PD Каракорум (talk) 15:04, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:13, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Created in 2008, not PD Каракорум (talk) 15:05, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:13, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Per EXIF copyright holder is Alina Faida, no proof of permission Gikü (talk) 15:33, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- The photos is made by DespaFilms, they were paid to take photos at Jean's wedding. So copyright holder is Jean Gavril Feel4rap (talk) 15:41, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- I've tried to have photos that I can use, but please tell me if I cannot use it and I will change it Feel4rap (talk) 15:44, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyrighted photo of non-notable subjects (no Wikipedia articles) - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:14, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Saya mengunggahnya secara tidak sengaja Freddy Junky (talk) 15:38, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:14, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Saya mengunggahnya secara tidak sengaja Freddy Junky (talk) 15:39, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:14, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Mistake in the SVG-File, File not in Use Newt713 (talk) 15:55, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:14, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:11, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- 제가 사용자 문서에 쓰려고 만든 windows 그림판으로 그린 그림입니다. --밀크맛 우유 (talk) 22:50, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- 원래 사용자 문서에서 썼었으나, 하지만 현재는 사용자 문서 정리로 인해 쓰지 않고 있습니다. --밀크맛 우유 (talk) 22:52, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:14, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from modern art. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:15, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:15, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
COM:SPAM and COM:SELFIE. See "Artwork without obvious educational use, including non-educational artwork uploaded to showcase the artist's skills" and "realistically useful for an educational purpose". Commons was not meant to a personal art repository. Ido66667 (talk) 16:24, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep It is uploaded for sharing for its exclusive value for furry fandom and objective educational usages. For being a long-time and well-done artwork on Commons, this nomination is just a random witch-hunting done by a user who seldom visited Commons. 🐱💬 17:54, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: I admit, I did get a chuckle out of "COM:SELFIE" for this image. While it might not be everyone's cup of tea...per Meow. Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. This is my final decision on this nomination, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:16, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
copyright infringement 95.31.191.213 16:25, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:OOS - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:16, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
COM:SPAM and COM:SELFIE. See "Artwork without obvious educational use, including non-educational artwork uploaded to showcase the artist's skills" and "realistically useful for an educational purpose". Commons was not meant to a personal art repository. Ido66667 (talk) 16:25, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep It is uploaded for sharing for its exclusive value for furry fandom and objective educational usages. For being a long-time and well-done artwork on Commons, this nomination is just a random witch-hunting done by a user who seldom visited Commons. 🐱💬 17:54, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: I admit, I did get a chuckle out of "COM:SELFIE" for this image. While it might not be everyone's cup of tea...per Meow. Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. This is my final decision on this nomination, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:16, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
COM:SPAM and COM:SELFIE. See "Artwork without obvious educational use, including non-educational artwork uploaded to showcase the artist's skills" and "realistically useful for an educational purpose". Commons was not meant to a personal art repository. Apologies for not using mass delete for these images and their multiple variants, I'm not familiar with commons. Ido66667 (talk) 16:26, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep It is uploaded for sharing for its exclusive value for furry fandom and objective educational usages. For being a long-time and well-done artwork on Commons, this nomination is just a random witch-hunting done by a user who seldom visited Commons. 🐱💬 17:54, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: If these weren't in use in an active Wikimedian's account, I'd delete them. But they are and therefore COM:INUSE. Again, not my cup of tea, but, Meow makes a thoughtful and convincing argument. Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. This is my final decision on this nomination, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year! --Missvain (talk) 18:18, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
COM:SPAM and COM:SELFIE. See "Artwork without obvious educational use, including non-educational artwork uploaded to showcase the artist's skills" and "realistically useful for an educational purpose". Commons was not meant to a personal art repository. Apologies for not using mass delete for these images and their multiple variants, I'm not familiar with commons. Ido66667 (talk) 16:31, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep It is uploaded for sharing for its exclusive value for furry fandom and objective educational usages. For being a long-time and well-done artwork on Commons, this nomination is just a random witch-hunting done by a user who seldom visited Commons. 🐱💬 17:53, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: If these weren't in use in an active Wikimedian's account, I'd delete them. But they are and therefore COM:INUSE. Again, not my cup of tea, but, Meow makes a thoughtful and convincing argument. Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. This is my final decision on this nomination, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:19, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
COM:SPAM and COM:SELFIE. See "Artwork without obvious educational use, including non-educational artwork uploaded to showcase the artist's skills" and "realistically useful for an educational purpose". Commons was not meant to be a personal art repository. Apologies for not using mass delete for these images and their multiple variants, I'm not familiar with commons. Ido66667 (talk) 16:32, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep It is uploaded for sharing for its exclusive value for furry fandom and objective educational usages. For being a long-time and well-done artwork on Commons, this nomination is just a random witch-hunting done by a user who seldom visited Commons. 🐱💬 17:53, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: If these weren't in use in an active Wikimedian's account, I'd delete them. But they are and therefore COM:INUSE. Again, not my cup of tea, but, Meow makes a thoughtful and convincing argument. Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. This is my final decision on this nomination, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:19, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
COM:SPAM and COM:SELFIE. See "Artwork without obvious educational use, including non-educational artwork uploaded to showcase the artist's skills" and "realistically useful for an educational purpose". Commons was not meant to be a personal art repository. Apologies for not using mass delete for these images and their multiple variants, I'm not familiar with commons. Ido66667 (talk) 16:33, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep It is uploaded for sharing for its exclusive value for furry fandom and objective educational usages. For being a long-time and well-done artwork on Commons, this nomination is just a random witch-hunting done by a user who seldom visited Commons. 🐱💬 17:53, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: If these weren't in use in an active Wikimedian's account, I'd delete them. But they are and therefore COM:INUSE. Again, not my cup of tea, but, Meow makes a thoughtful and convincing argument. Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. This is my final decision on this nomination, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:19, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
COM:SPAM and COM:SELFIE. See "Artwork without obvious educational use, including non-educational artwork uploaded to showcase the artist's skills" and "realistically useful for an educational purpose". Commons was not meant to be a personal art repository. Ido66667 (talk) 16:34, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep It is uploaded for sharing for its exclusive value for furry fandom and objective educational usages. For being a long-time and well-done artwork on Commons, this nomination is just a random witch-hunting done by a user who seldom visited Commons. 🐱💬 17:53, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: If these weren't in use in an active Wikimedian's account, I'd delete them. But they are and therefore COM:INUSE. Again, not my cup of tea, but, Meow makes a thoughtful and convincing argument. Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. This is my final decision on this nomination, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:19, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
I could not find in the source confirmation that these file are available under this license. Sayrelis (talk) 16:34, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:19, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP US statues are protected. This statue was created after Rick Husband died in 2003, resulting in it being copyrighted Sennecaster (talk) 16:34, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:19, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
I could not find in the source confirmation that these file are available under this license. Sayrelis (talk) 16:35, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:19, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
I could not find in the source confirmation that these file are available under this license. Sayrelis (talk) 16:35, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:19, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Dubious ownwork Sahaib3005 (talk) 16:42, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- The person in question is a politician - photos of politicians are free for use in most cases in Bulgaria, afaik. They have less rights of privacy. Yupyuphello (talk) 16:44, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: The uploader has only one file under their belt, no EXIF data, and I'd be shocked if they photographed this subject. Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:20, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Dubious ownwork Sahaib3005 (talk) 16:42, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- The person in question is a politician - photos of politicians are free for use in most cases in Bulgaria, afaik. They have less rights of privacy. Yupyuphello (talk) 16:44, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Снимката е авторска, но няма забрана за ползването й. Каква е причината да искате изтриване? Надежда2503 (talk) 23:56, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Translation of the above: The photo is copyrighted, but nobody has forbidden its use. What's the reason for its deletion?
- The same user also commented in my talk page that the photo was taken by her and that Wikimedia is free to use it. Yupyuphello (talk) 05:12, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Снимката е авторска, но няма забрана за ползването й. Каква е причината да искате изтриване? Надежда2503 (talk) 23:56, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: If they did indeed take the photograph, please send a letter confirming such to COM:VRT. Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:21, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Dubious ownwork Sahaib3005 (talk) 16:42, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- The person in question is a politician - photos of politicians are free for use in most cases in Bulgaria, afaik. They have less rights of privacy. Yupyuphello (talk) 16:45, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Privacy isnt' the argument here - it's who took it? Is it really freely licensed? Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:21, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation; work by Alfred Manessier; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 16:56, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:21, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Dubious own-work claim: user upload history (only 2 files, one of which has already been deleted: Commons:Deletion requests/File:سكس بنات.jpeg) 4nn1l2 (talk) 17:01, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:21, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Dubious own-work claim: missing EXIF, small size, user upload history (File:Ashkan.gif) 4nn1l2 (talk) 17:06, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:21, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Interior of St. Gereon (Köln)
[edit]Copyright violation; stained glass windows by contemporary artist (Buschulte (d. 2013); Meistermann (d. 1990) et al.); no freedom of panorama (see http://www.glasmalerei-ev.net/pages/b7304/b7304.shtml)
- File:20200523 Pigrimage to Cologne 25.jpg
- File:20200523 Pigrimage to Cologne 27.jpg
- File:Dekagon und Chor St. Gereon 2018.jpg
[[User:Wittwer([[User talk:Wittwer/ Ich kann mir wirklich nicht vorstellen, inwiefern dieses Foto gegen Urheberrecht verstoßen kann, erstens sind die Fenster so klein abgebildet, dass sie nicht Hauptgegenstand sind, zum anderen sind sie auch noch relativ unscharf, so dass von einer reproduzierenden Wiedergabe nicht die Rede sein kann. Ich würde mich freuen, wenn über diesen Aspekt noch einmal nachgedacht würde. Gruß, Michael Wittwer
- File:Keulen - Kirche St. Gereon 2.jpg
- File:Keulen - Kirche St. Gereon 3.jpg
- File:Köln st gereon kuppel dekagon.jpg
- File:Köln st gereon orgel im dekagon.jpg
- File:Köln St Gereon2.JPG
- File:San Gereone interno.jpg
- File:San Gereone, vetrata.jpg
- File:Sankt Gedeon, Kuppel Decke, Kirche, Köln.jpg
- File:St. Gereon Köln - Dekagon-9701.jpg
- File:St. Gereon Köln - Dekagon-9702.jpg
- File:St. Gereon Köln - Kirchenschiff in Richung Chor-9698.jpg
- File:St. Gereon Köln 7.jpg
- File:St. Gereon Köln, Wanddetail.JPG
- File:St. Gereon, Kuppel des Dekagon.jpg
- File:St. Gereon, Köln, Dekagon innen.jpg
- File:St.Gereon Köln das Dekagon fd JPG.JPG
- File:St.Gereon Köln.JPG
- File:StGereonfvn2.JPG
Martin Sg. (talk) 17:10, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Not all of the photograhps show especially the windows, panorama views should be allowed. -- Kürschner (talk) 17:29, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- But: the german definition of de minims is quite strict. --Martin Sg. (talk) 18:40, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Imho the majority can be kept, some images can be deleted though because they are quite blury --Isderion (talk) 23:07, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Keep for
- File:St. Gereon Köln - Dekagon-9701.jpg
- File:St. Gereon Köln - Dekagon-9702.jpg
- File:St. Gereon Köln - Kirchenschiff in Richung Chor-9698.jpg
- Windows are overexposed and de minimis related to the architecture. To on the safe side I have pixelized the windows. Raymond 07:16, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Kept three, deleted the rest. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:22, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
- Undeleted File:20200523 Pigrimage to Cologne 27.jpg to allow for discussion after undeletion request. Ellywa (talk) 22:53, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
- Some Restored as per [3]. Yann (talk) 12:01, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Metadata credits a third party, "® Tobias Eineder", says "all rights reserved" and it's a Facebook file. There's no evidence that the Flickr account is allowed to relicense the image. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:19, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:22, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
File:An news article about Sam Lewis saving a woman from a suicide attempt during a flight.jpg
[edit]
The file is protected with two copyrights: article and photo. Who were their authors? When and where they were published? If publication country is USA, were they published with or without copyright message? When the authors died? Taivo (talk) 17:29, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Löschen I'd nominate the photo for a "no permission" deletion if it weren't already nominated for a discussion. --I dream of horses (talk) 07:54, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete it. I would have deleted it if I could. Shewriteshistory (talk) 23:06, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The date is 22 August 1938. It appeared in the Los Angeles Examiner. Author=anonymous as are almost all news articles. According to the renewal database "Los Angeles Examiner: no issue renewals found in CCE or registered works database". --RAN (talk) 08:08, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Per RAN. Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. This is my final decision on this nomination, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:23, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
The meaning of the image is unclear. No COM:EDUSE. 37.161.174.216 13:35, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Unsure. The image has clear educational use. It is an image of LSD as well as a representation of a historical event. What concerns me more is the copyright of the image. Was this produced before 1978? It does not have a copyright notice. There is no evidence for the date of publication/production. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:23, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 15:51, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Provenance for this image is terrible - it's literally "I found it on an artist's website", per someone who uploaded it in 2017, has made no other contributions to Commons, and has been blocked from enwiki as a disruptive user. There's no reason to believe that the image is by the artist whose website it was taken from, either - Tineye can point to versions of the image that have been circulating since at least 2008. I've seen claims that this image was released in 2006 to celebrate Hoffman's 100th birthday. Since the provenance is terrible, there's no reason to believe that the Creative Commons license is valid, and we have no way of knowing if it was published before 1978, and therefore precautionary principle says take it down. DS (talk) 18:41, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Löschen. Finally tracked down some reliable information on blotterbarn.com (despite the name, actually a reliable source on this sort of thing). It's from 1994 and from Europe. There wasn't anything more specific, but either of those are enough to rule out the US publication, no copyright notice before 1978 theory. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:39, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Delete based on User:IronGargoyle's analysis. For the future, blocked user doesn't mean much to me on Commons (yes, sometimes even trolls create decent content). Likely copyright violation - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:25, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
This is a copyvio. The picture is scanned from the Smithonian Animal-encyclopedia. It appears in this exact layout in the 2011 edition on page 99. It also appeared in earlier edition, though I don't have the page-number. Seb az86556 (talk) 02:48, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Löschen This seems to be a clear case. Frédéric (talk) 20:10, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. MBisanz talk 18:34, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Bad source, actual origin unclear Boylarva99 (talk) 18:43, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Weird sourcing for sure - Likely copyright violation - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:25, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
copyvio from https://autoreview.ru/news/miniven-mitsubishi-delica-d-5-desyatiletniy-yubiley-i-versiya-active-gear Barbarian (talk) 18:48, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:26, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
wrong image, sorry Madamebiblio (talk) 18:52, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:26, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
low quality, not educationally useful, likely crop of copyrighted material Sobsz (talk) 19:11, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:26, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi everyone, There is no statement in the Intellectual and Artistic Works Law that state symbols are in the public domain. Therefore, this template is invalid. Jelican9 (talk) 19:17, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: I don't see any opposition, so deleting. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:26, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
File:رسالة ماجستير بعنوان الدور الوسيط للقيادة التبادلية في العلاقة بين ممارسات إدارة الموارد البشرية و إستدامة التميزpdf.pdf
[edit]This is a 96-page long PDF, the English name is "The mediating role of transactional leadership in the relationship between human resource management practices and the sustainability of excellence" I think it is pretty clearly outside of the scope of commons, specifically the section on "Excluded educational content". Beeblebrox (talk) 19:20, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:27, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Clearly not own work, no evidence of permission GPinkerton (talk) 17:18, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- Here it has been published as free. - Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 20:31, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - per Dr.Wiki54 and COM:INUSE. CuriousGolden (talk) 08:35, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Per keeps - If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do soIf one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. Happy holidays.. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 16:52, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
This image was taken from AzKataloq.org, where it was posted along with a statement that it was free for commercial use under Creative Commons. I've examined AzKataloq.org and I see no reason why they are authorized to make such a claim about historic images - it appears to be one person's project. The terms of service, etc, are literally Lorem Ipsum. With no better provenance for that image than "someone hosting a personal website said that the photo was available per CC", we can't know whether the release is valid. Per the precautionary principle, I advocate it be taken down. DS (talk) 19:21, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Löschen Agree with the nomination; licence laundering. GPinkerton (talk) 14:36, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Good job on the research. We always want to go above and beyond just "not own work" "no evidence"- sometimes there is more to it. Thanks. Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:27, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Logo invented by user. No COM:EDUSE. Also, idiosyncratic combination: the characters in the blue band are Nordic runes; the characters in the green band appear to be Elvish letters invented by Tolkien. 37.161.174.216 13:49, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: The nom has been blocked for their disruptive and offensive behavior. Therefore, I am being bold and closing these as keeps. If one wishes to renominate this file with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. Happy holidays. --Missvain (talk) 15:53, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
per the previous deletion debate which was closed purely for procedural reasons: this image is of a logo that was invented by the uploader. As such, i argue that it is not within project scope. DS (talk) 19:29, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:28, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
дубль File:СП Село Трубино-P1070443.jpg Pansosh (talk) 19:32, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:28, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FOP in Hong Kong for temporary installations. — Racconish 💬 20:26, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:29, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Die Datei sollte nur zum Test verwendet werden. Leider wurde sie dann hochgeladen. 37.24.11.245 20:31, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Sagt wer? --Rosenzweig τ 10:33, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Regardless, copyright violation - Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:30, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Not under COM:TOO. (Oinkers42) (talk) 21:15, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
-2021-12-16T21:15:00.000Z-File:Twister_dial.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:30, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
The permission page of the source says that many of the images on the Beeld en Geluid Wiki website carry a CC BY-SA 3.0 license. However, it says that this is only true for all images listed in an Excel file that is linked on the permission page, and that all other images are not free. "LUCILLEWERNER.JPG" (this file) is not included in that Excel file, meaning that it does not fall under a license that allows it to be on Wikimedia Commons. Tristan Surtel (talk) 21:34, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:30, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP US and COM:TOO US, no FOP for 2d works, above TOO, copyright status or lack thereof cannot be verified Sennecaster (talk) 21:55, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep As far as I can tell its a copy of a 120 year old design and since money is PD ({{PD-USGov-money}}) I think a replica of it is too. --MGA73 (talk) 16:46, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: The copy of a 120 year old design doesn't do it for me. There is still artistic license and it's therefore a derived work. Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:31, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Needs evidence of permission, in description says "this photo is a gift to me" but that is not enough. Sennecaster (talk) 22:00, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:31, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP US, monuments are protected, and this is past TOO. Dedicated in 1991, definitely copyrighted [4] Sennecaster (talk) 22:06, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:32, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
No evidence of permission, description states that "this was a gift to me" but that is not enough proof Sennecaster (talk) 22:22, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:32, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
A formal PR picture that appears in several places on the web. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 22:34, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:32, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted album cover. Symphonium264 (talk) 22:37, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Also found some cropped images:
Symphonium264 (talk) 03:03, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:32, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
grabbed from the web: https://www.thehall.ch/de/lesen/die-samsung-hall-ist-neu-the-hall https://www.baudokumentation.ch/projekt/kultur-und-kongressgebaeude-samsung-hall/607246#nch/2006299012 https://meeting.zuerich.com/de/meeting/venue/samsung-hall and slightly adapted … most probably official commercial PR image and not own work Albinfo (talk) 22:43, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you, Albinfo! As the owners and operating company of the venue “The Hall” (formerly Samsung Hall), we actually do own this photo and would like to publish it in this article about our newly named venue, the replacement being justified by the name change of the venue.
- Best wishes, The Hall / Eventpark AG Zürich Eventpark zürich (talk) 08:47, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Es geht hier nicht, wer das Bild in Auftrag gegeben hat und aktuell die Nutzungsrechte hat. Die Urheberrechte sind beim Fotografen und den Grafikern, die manipuliert haben. Mehr dazu unter de:Hilfe:Bildertutorial/2_Bildrechte
- --Albinfo (talk) 17:11, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:32, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Dubious claim of copyright by a user with a single upload. The photo has no technical Exif data, but does indicate that the image is credited to Doubleday and is a PR handout. Higher resolution copies can easily be found on The New York Times website. Οἶδα (talk) 23:01, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:32, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
No suitable license. {{PD-IcelandGov}} was added, but this is only applicable to "acts, regulations, administrative provisions, court rulings and similar official documents". The given source (PDF) for this Althingi logo, on the other hand, states strict requirements that forbid alteration of the logo ("Merkið má hvorki klippa í sundur né afbaka" - i.e. it may not be "clipped or distorted"), with several examples of alterations that are not allowed on page 3 of the PDF; you may not even change the color. This is no free license as required by Commons. Gestumblindi (talk) 23:22, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Many government logos, such as File:Canada wordmark.svg and File:BMF Logo.svg have rather strict rules around what colours and dimensions they may be in, as part of their "official style guide". I don't see how that prevents their being on Commons, and it shouldn't with this logo either. Fry1989 eh? 00:38, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Well, apart from this, there simply is no suitable license for this logo anywhere - {{PD-IcelandGov}} is apparently for official documents in the sense of textual works (acts, regulations...), not for images/logos. If you look at Category:PD IS Government, the rest are all text documents. Gestumblindi (talk) 10:45, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:33, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Матей Вішнєк "Пригода ведмедиків панда, яку розповів один саксофоніст, котрий мав подружку у Франкфурті" .jpg
[edit]
Facebook 181.203.71.207 23:22, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely copyright violation - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:33, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Es scheint eine Urheberrechtsverletzung vorzuliegen: Im Bild ist als Autor "Orgelbau Klais, Bonn" eingeblendet – keineswegs Hans-Jörg Gemeinholzer, der hier die Autorschaft vorgibt. Auf den Verstoß deutet auch der Umstand, dass es sich nicht um die 2021 eingeweihte tatsächliche Orgel handelt, sondern um eine Computersimulation von 2020 durch den Orgelbauer. Jautaealis (talk) 23:30, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Das stimmt. Sorry, dass das zwischen die anderen Bilder geraten ist. --Gemeinholzer (talk) 22:23, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:33, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:33, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 18:33, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
same as File:Do more people live in urban or rural areas., OWID.svg WikipSQ (talk) 18:33, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- @WikipSQ - The nominated file is in use. Please replace it with an appropriate image in the articles and ping me for a review and consideration of deletion. I will reject this request if it's not replaced due to COM:INUSE. Thanks. Missvain (talk) 18:24, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and redirected for the incoming links. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:42, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Per fr:Accord d'Alger (2015), Azawad authority no longer claims independent, nor calls for a high autonomous government system, so IMHO there has no benefits on keeping this page, as well as their translations. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 06:38, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Azawad is in the list generated by Module:Countries, which includes former places and places with disputed status. This page was created to avoid redlinks in e.g. Commons:Freedom of panorama/Africa oder Commons:Unprotected works/Africa. Before deleting this entry, it should be removed from Module:Countries/Africa, which would also remove it from the list at the top of Category:Azawad. I have no idea what the other ripple effects would be. Might be simpler to leave it, as harmless. If anyone stumbles across it, it tells them the laws of Mali apply. Aymatth2 (talk) 12:10, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- For removing Azawad entry from Module:Countries/Africa (and hence from {{Countries of Africa}}), just some months ago, I proposed at here, no one responded me yet. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 13:10, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- It is a rather obscure subject, but we should be consistent. Module:Countries holds the agreed list of countries and territories, including former countries, disputed countries and former disputed countries. They have categories and media in those categories. We should have a statement on copyright rules. In this case, "same as Mali" is simple and final. I do not see the benefit of removing it. Aymatth2 (talk) 14:48, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- I'd love to ask @Verdy p: on whether remove Azawad from Module:Countries/Africa or not. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 02:00, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- It is a rather obscure subject, but we should be consistent. Module:Countries holds the agreed list of countries and territories, including former countries, disputed countries and former disputed countries. They have categories and media in those categories. We should have a statement on copyright rules. In this case, "same as Mali" is simple and final. I do not see the benefit of removing it. Aymatth2 (talk) 14:48, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- I have no opinion about this except the fact that Azawad had contents related to that area, which does not fall into any other category (so it does noit fall into any other copyright category at all, as it has no juridication to claim it). So this is an existing exception to the copyright rule, and due to this is should be listed separately. The problem is that most (any?) content created *about* this territory has been made by people that can claim copyright, because they actually live in other juridcations that protect their work worldwide. So the effective authors of these contents is important, and the absence of any auhtorship information is a good reason for possibly removing these contents as they don't have any valid licencing info. But most contents in these categories actually have authorship and licenceing info, so they are not eligible for deletion. But the copyright rules associated to these contents does not fall into the exception for Azawad and all what could remain there would be deleted, and the category would thne become empty... except content that are directly related to that territory itself, jsut to explain that it has no copyright status: this content could be created and licenced in the public domain for worldwide use (the "public domain" may be contested in some countries but not all, notably if the effetive authors are in countries that do not recognize public domain and apply a some authors rule which are exclusive and non-transferable: this concerns authors that live in countries that recognize the "moral right" of authors, such as France, so if an author in France published content for Azawad and licenced it for use worldwide in public domain, he still has an exclusive moral right on this content, even if he no longer has an exclusive author right, that was transfered and shared in the public domain; note that the public domain is very badly protected by the copyright laws, as it frequently has retroactive effects, e.g. it occured in Russia when the copyright protection was extended to cover again some contents which had already fallen in the public domain, but this only concerns content that were not explicitly licenced in the public domain in a provable way, but that just fell by default in the public domain after an existing period of copyright protection "ended" but was resumed later by the new law).
- So it's difficult for me to say if that category should be kept or not; when in fact it will be a case by case problem. The major problem for noiw having this category is that itsd relevant content could be falsely recategorized into another juridiction and users would not be aware that it could be reappropriated by such "unfair" move. Even if this content is minimalist, it should probably remain, only to let people being aware that there's an exception to the copyright rule (but uncliamed territories have some sort of applicable juridiction based on UN decision as the United Nations or its organizations may enforce a default rule there, that none of the UN member countries or parties would be able to deny by themselves in their juridiction). These exceptions to the copyright rules are likely to disappear, but for now they are still remaining, as long as the territory is not legally claimed and the UN does not take a decision about them (like the ones taken for Antarctica). We CANNOT say "Same as Mali" for this territory, unless it is really enforced. The same would apply to other unclaimed areas (e.g. some territories surrounding Northern Sudan). verdy_p (talk) 13:49, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Then we need to create very large number of CRT subpages for 1st/2nd administrative regions, e.g. /Grand Est, /Kyoto, /Shanghai, /Tatarstan, /Iowa, /Saskatchewan, etc. right? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 13:58, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- No. We just need CRT entries for places that are in Module:Countries. Most of them have their own laws, but some islands and enclaves are covered by other jurisdictions, some are disputed, some no longer exist. E.g. Guadeloupe, Ceuta, Somaliland, Yugoslavia. Aymatth2 (talk) 12:38, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- These are having splittisms in their living peopleships, but is Azawad also having? Hell no. So just consider Azawad as a province of Mali. That said, having CRT subpages for Azawad is the most nonsense within African-related Commons pages. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:05, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Aruba is part of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, but has its own laws. The COM:CRT entry explains this. Guadeloupe has the same laws as all other departments of France, but the COM:CRT entry may be useful for tourists who are not aware of this. Neukaledonien is also part of France but has a special legal status. However, the copyright laws of France apply. Somaliland is a self-declared independent country that has been self-governing for over 30 years. Under the precautionary principle, its copyrights laws and those of Somalia should be considered. With these places in module:countries, and Azawad is another, contributors may be uncertain of the legal position. A COM:CRT entry is useful, even if it just points to the entry for the country whose laws apply. Aymatth2 (talk) 15:16, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- So still, you want to have subpages of every 1st/2nd, like Shanghai, Kyoto, Iowa, Saskatchewan (NB: the reason COM:Hawaii exists is also bogus). As for the legal situation, that said, all the laws of Mali run as well as how they should be in Azawad, no border controls in Azawad and Bamako, and even visa requirements for Azawad are same as other Mali regions, no legal concerns, no autonomous rules, and no other special legal status for Azawad. (PS: For the same reason, we don't have a /Crimea subpage, because having that subpage is weird). Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:37, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Or just merge contents back to Mali pages? That said, having weird subpages for every 1st/2nd administrative regions are really HARMFUL, not harmless. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:34, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
- Aruba is part of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, but has its own laws. The COM:CRT entry explains this. Guadeloupe has the same laws as all other departments of France, but the COM:CRT entry may be useful for tourists who are not aware of this. Neukaledonien is also part of France but has a special legal status. However, the copyright laws of France apply. Somaliland is a self-declared independent country that has been self-governing for over 30 years. Under the precautionary principle, its copyrights laws and those of Somalia should be considered. With these places in module:countries, and Azawad is another, contributors may be uncertain of the legal position. A COM:CRT entry is useful, even if it just points to the entry for the country whose laws apply. Aymatth2 (talk) 15:16, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- These are having splittisms in their living peopleships, but is Azawad also having? Hell no. So just consider Azawad as a province of Mali. That said, having CRT subpages for Azawad is the most nonsense within African-related Commons pages. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:05, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- No. We just need CRT entries for places that are in Module:Countries. Most of them have their own laws, but some islands and enclaves are covered by other jurisdictions, some are disputed, some no longer exist. E.g. Guadeloupe, Ceuta, Somaliland, Yugoslavia. Aymatth2 (talk) 12:38, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Then we need to create very large number of CRT subpages for 1st/2nd administrative regions, e.g. /Grand Est, /Kyoto, /Shanghai, /Tatarstan, /Iowa, /Saskatchewan, etc. right? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 13:58, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- For removing Azawad entry from Module:Countries/Africa (and hence from {{Countries of Africa}}), just some months ago, I proposed at here, no one responded me yet. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 13:10, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no consensus for deletion. --Ellywa (talk) 19:31, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
duplicate file at File:কৃষ্ণচরিত্র.djvu Bodhisattwa (talk) 07:14, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: The files are not exact duplicates. They differ in resolution, filesize and number of page. If somebody fluid in Bengali can assess this request better then myself, please nominate the duplicate again with a clear motivation about the differences. --Ellywa (talk) 19:33, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
djvu file uploaded — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jayantanth (talk • contribs) 2015-09-13T15:59:09 (UTC)
Kept: that does not mean we have to delete this one. JuTa 21:18, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
duplicate file at File:আনন্দমঠ - বঙ্কিমচন্দ্র চট্টোপাধ্যায়.djvu Bodhisattwa (talk) 08:37, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: The files are not exact duplicates. They differ in resolution, filesize and number of page. If somebody fluid in Bengali can assess this request better then myself, please nominate the duplicate again with a clear motivation about the differences. --Ellywa (talk) 19:34, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
File:4990010205060 - Kamalakanta, Chattopadhyay, Bankimchandra, 274p, LANGUAGE. LINGUISTICS. LITERATURE, bengali (1885).pdf
[edit]duplicate file at File:কমলাকান্ত - বঙ্কিমচন্দ্র চট্টোপাধ্যায়.djvu Bodhisattwa (talk) 09:34, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: The files are not exact duplicates. They differ in resolution, filesize and number of page. If somebody fluid in Bengali can assess this request better then myself, please nominate the duplicate again with a clear motivation about the differences. --Ellywa (talk) 19:34, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
File:4990010202944 - Kabita Pustak, Chattopadhyay, Bankimchandra, 130p, LANGUAGE. LINGUISTICS. LITERATURE, bengali (1878).pdf
[edit]duplicate file at File:কবিতাপুস্তক.djvu Bodhisattwa (talk) 09:36, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: The files are not exact duplicates. They differ in resolution, filesize and number of page. If somebody fluid in Bengali can assess this request better then myself, please nominate the duplicate again with a clear motivation about the differences. --Ellywa (talk) 19:35, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Löschen per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jean-Claude Juncker delivering a speech at COP21 (1).jpg: In particular it is silent on reuse, derivatives, perpetuity and commercial use, all of which are required and cannot be assumed from silence. ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 20:12, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Kommentar see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jacques Chirac, 1974.jpg. ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 20:14, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Kommentar "All documents shall be available for reuse:
- "Documents shall be made available for reuse without application unless otherwise specified and without restrictions" Zoozaz1 (talk) 20:17, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Kommentar
ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 20:23, 16 December 2021 (UTC)Rationale for the original no-perm-tagging and for this deletion-request is a statement by an official of European Commission (EC), responsible for clearing EC material for CC-BY licensing/releasing, whereby the EC has never given general authorisation for CC-BY licensing of their images, which we as of yet assumed from this statement on their website. So, it seems that for each image on their website an individual confirmation of the CC-BY license on behalf of EC's communication dep. is necessary.
— User:Túrelio- The rationale for the template is not that the images have a CC-BY license, it is that the law of the EC means that the EC's images are allowed in Wikipedia. I will say I think there is a parameter on the template for the CC-BY license (that may be what Turelio was referring to) but most images do not fall under that and that is a separate discussion. Zoozaz1 (talk) 21:24, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Zoozaz1: what evidence is there that all of their images are compatible with Commons licensing requirements? Your comment describes their policy on documents, not necessarily images. ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 16:59, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
- The law states that documents are "any content whatever its medium." Zoozaz1 (talk) 21:25, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Zoozaz1: what evidence is there that all of their images are compatible with Commons licensing requirements? Your comment describes their policy on documents, not necessarily images. ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 16:59, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
- The rationale for the template is not that the images have a CC-BY license, it is that the law of the EC means that the EC's images are allowed in Wikipedia. I will say I think there is a parameter on the template for the CC-BY license (that may be what Turelio was referring to) but most images do not fall under that and that is a separate discussion. Zoozaz1 (talk) 21:24, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: This template is used on thousands of files, note this link. If the template is deleted those files will have no notice of licencing at all. There must searched for another solution for this problem. Perhaps all files should first be deleted, but this should be discussed extensively first. Because the current copyright notice of the EU is CC-BY-SA. --Ellywa (talk) 19:44, 10 May 2022 (UTC)