Talk:Battle of Sunda Strait
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Sunda Strait article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Decisive Victory?
editThank you to whoever deleted "decisive" from the description, "Japanese victory". The tag "decisive" is over-used, as very few actions decide anything. I suppose this action could qualify as "major" or maybe even "complete", if someone objects to the deletion, but it didn't really decide anything that wasn't already decided the day before in the Java Sea. Xyl 54 09:23, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
HNLMS Evertsen was part of Battle
editYou guys do know that by any definition the HNLMS Evertsen should be included in the battle rollcall. Just because they cowardly tried to flee doesn't make them any less part of the battle. LOL Henryjones000 (talk) 23:51, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- Totally outnumbered and outgunned, a retreat/evasion to save the ship and the lives of the crew is not 'cowardly.' Shame on you. HammerFilmFan (talk) 22:16, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Battle of Sunda Strait. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141203155704/http://www.dutcheastindies.webs.com/SundaStrait.html to http://www.dutcheastindies.webs.com/SundaStrait.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:28, 24 December 2017 (UTC)