Jump to content

User talk:Peterkingiron: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Great Elm: new section
→‎Oldham: new section
Line 316: Line 316:


Thanks for your edit to [[Old Iron Works, Mells]] however I have reverted it as the link to [[Great Elm]] was correct.&mdash; [[User:Rodw|Rod]] <sup>[[User talk:Rodw|talk]]</sup> 14:08, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your edit to [[Old Iron Works, Mells]] however I have reverted it as the link to [[Great Elm]] was correct.&mdash; [[User:Rodw|Rod]] <sup>[[User talk:Rodw|talk]]</sup> 14:08, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

== Oldham ==

So are you going to fix [[History of Oldham Athletic A.F.C.]] with the sourcing that supposedly exists, or are you going to just let it stink up the wiki forever?! <span style="color:green">'''Ten Pound Hammer'''</span> • <sup>([[User talk:TenPoundHammer|What did I screw up now?]])</sup> 21:02, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:02, 17 January 2018

Abdeslam Serghini

Hi Peter. I am writing regarding the discussion on this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Abdeslam_Serghini I am the author of the article and I put some comments on the talk tab of that page, but no editor is responding or willing to discuss the matter further with me. I don't even know if the editors saw my comments on the talk tab. Also, I am not sure either that this is the right way of contacting you (editors don't have a visible email or clear way of how to contact them, and please ignore my ignorance on the wikipedia subject and how it works). I agree with you that the article is very badly written and I also agree with you that it should be edited and corrected and not deleted. Some of the editors keep arguing that Abdeslam Serghini may not be notable (famous). I am from Morocco, and I am an expert on the "Sufism" field and I know all the past great scholars in Morocco. I know 100% that he was a great scholar. He taught the grand-father of the current Moroccan King. The royal family in Morocco know about him. Notability is not an issue. The editor CoffeeWithMarkets even go further by saying notability is not inherited. What CoffeeWithMarkets does not know is that those influential figures in Morocco, most of them were the student of Abdesslam Serhini, and it was the professor who taught them the activism and the one who initiated the movement in the first place. The reason the students were more famous later and more mentioned on the Internet than their professor, that is a different story, which I can explain in a different place (not here). Concerning the non-relevant (or bad) references I included in the article (some of them were mirrored by other sites, which I did not know) is because one editor told me that only English and French references can be included. I could not find any good source in English or French to include. There are however a great number of sources in Arabic, but I was not allowed to include them. I also mentioned in my comments that I have the book of Abdesslam Serghini (one of his many lectures was recorded and published as book. The book includes a detailed official biography). I am willing to upload the book, and collaborate in anyway needed to make the article well written. However, and very unfortunate, I am not hearing anything from the editors. Please advise me what to do. I have a huge respect and love for this great scholar and he deserves to be on wikipedia. I can even contact the royal family in Morocco and provide a confirmation from them that he was a very notable great scholar.

Thanks Peter. I can be notified by email at [email protected] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sid.bm (talkcontribs) 19:23, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral notification

You previously voted, opined, commented, or otherwise took part, at Template talk:Succession box#RfC. Please see a related discussion at Template talk:Infobox officeholder#RfC Congressmen's tenures in infobox. Kraxler (talk) 15:16, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Irish language in Britain for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Irish language in Britain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irish language in Britain until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Peter You contributed to the deletion discussion last year. I have hopefully improved the article and would appreciate your comment. I am considering renaming it University of Leeds halls of residence although Nottingham uses upper case H and R? I have added to the list and included partnership buildings as there will probably be 100% privatization eventually. Keomike (talk) 17:33, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Next meetups in North England

Hello. Would you be interested in attending one of the next wikimeets in the north of England? They will take place in:

If you can make them, please sign up on the relevant wikimeet page!

If you want to receive future notifications about these wikimeets, then please add your name to the notification list (or remove it if you're already on the list and you don't want to receive future notifications!)

Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 22:55, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Typo?

In this discussion, did you mean Category:Buildings and structures completed in 1701 rather then 'Buildings Category:and Structures completed in 1701'?

A CFD discussion you may be interested in - Churches/Church buildings

As a participent in Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2008 October 17#Category:Churches, you may be interested in knowing that I've just initiated a new CFR discussion to fix the whole tree - Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 May 1#Churches/Church buildings. Feel free to participate there. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 03:41, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Are you going to reply

Just like to know, do you intend to reply to me at the Category discussion regarding your slurs against me or not? AusLondonder (talk) 16:49, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfD: Pantacles of Athens has closed

The Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pantacles of Athens discussion has closed as a consensus "merge." The closing admin, SamWalton, identified four of the 40 articles for further talk page discussion whether they should be merged to the list or maintained as stand-alone articles: Talk:Dandes of Argos, Talk:Philinus of Cos (athlete), Talk:Oebotas of Dyme and Talk:Eurybus of Athens. Your input is requested on those article talk pages. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 20:01, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

History of blast furnace iron production in Great Britain and in RF

Hello. I do not know if it is interesting to you but there are two articles — History of blast furnace iron production in Russian Federation and History of blast furnace iron production in Great Britain. You can understand the text using Googl translator. I am sorry for trouble. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 17:40, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Post Towns in the US

I wish we had this term in the U.S. because many people in rural areas identify strongly with their mailing address "city" even if they live far outside their city limits. For instance, I'm rewriting the Felton, Delaware article and 90%+ of the population who identifies as living in Felton is outside the municipal limits and that's hard to explain to an (urban) American reader. RevelationDirect (talk) 17:30, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Kopychyntsi

Hi! maybe have you change your mind?--Бучач-Львів (talk) 08:22, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm an AFC reviewer, I have just declined the above-mentioned draft. I see you had previously (in February 2014) been involved with helping the draft-writer. I left a review note briefly explaining the problem. I hope you could help as it certainly looks like a worthwhile article - if the terminology problem can be resolved. I think WikiProjects such as Technology, Mining or Archaeology could also be of assistance. (Removing the "discussion" above the start of the actual article to the Talk page would help "declutter" the page. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:46, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject TAFI

Hello, Peterkingiron. You're invited to join WikiProject Today's articles for improvement, a project dedicated to significantly improving articles with collaborative editing in a week's time.

Feel free to nominate an article for improvement at the project's Article nomination board. If interested in joining, please add your name to the list of members. Thanks for your consideration. North America1000 08:02, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:1866_establishments_in_British_Burma

Hi, I think you !voted the opposite way to your intention at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 September 9#Category:1866 establishments in British Burma. – Fayenatic London 20:55, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Marcocapelle interpreted your comments the same way. It would be helpful if you would edit your !vote to say "Support" rather than "Oppose". – Fayenatic London 15:23, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

British Burma in 1866

In 1866 British Burma would be another name for Lower Burma while Upper Burma was an independent country outside of British control.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:34, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dry places in New Jersey

Following the "keep" closure for the CFD of Category:Dry places in New Jersey, I've followed the closer's recommendation and submitted a new CFD to rename it to Category:Dry municipalities in New Jersey. Please offer your opinion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 September 16 if you have one. Nyttend (talk) 15:26, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Welsh-speaking sportspeople DRV

Hello; I recently closed a discussion for the above category CFD here. A deletion review of the decision has been opened DRV here. I'm notifying you because you participated in the CFD. Thanks, Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:47, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article for Deletion/Keeping

Hey hope you are doing well. There is a page again is being considered for deletion: List of Christian Nobel laureates. You are welcome to put in any input on the issues by going to the page and clicking on the link for that article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Christian Nobel laureates (2nd nomination). Jobas (talk) 15:47, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You participated in the recent discussion which resulted in Category:Climate change skeptics being renamed to Category:Climate change deniers. The new category has now been nominated for renaming back to Category:Climate change skeptics. The new discussion is here. Good Ol’factory (talk) 05:50, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Peterkingiron. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wade Burleson.
Message added 08:17, 6 December 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Request to revisit the discussion per sources presented there. I pinged users there, but the ping may not have worked (per a comment at the discussion). North America1000 08:17, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposals re British, English, Scottish & Irish politicians by century

Please see my two proposals to create categories for English, Scottish & Irish politicians by century Discussion of 8 January 2016. Hugo999 (talk) 22:09, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A name of the category

Hello. Wich variant for category's name is better and more correct in the English language - cooling system of blast furnace or blast furnace cooling system? I'm going to create this category in the Wikimedia Commons. Thank you. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 18:33, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The name of the profession

Hello. Look, please, on the upper left corner of this picture File:The Pennsylvania railroad. What is the English name of the profession of those men who are on the top of the blast furnace and charge it? Dictionaries I have do not contain this word. How do you call a wheelbarrow on their hands? Have it a specific name or not? Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 16:38, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • I assume the men are filling a blast furnace. If so, I would call them "fillers". I am not sure that there is a specific name for the barrow, though I suspect that it would have a precisely defined capacity. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:53, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. But have you ever seen the name of the profession in the literature? Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 17:17, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I will allow myself to trouble you once more. I'm a little surprised that the English language does not have a special name for this profession. Well, I think that there may be such a category name: "Blast furnace fillers", "Blast furnace chargers" or just "Fillers" or "Chargers". Which variant you choose? Please, answer my question, I'm going to create a category in Wiki commons just after your reply. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 12:32, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I think I have seen them called fillers, but I cannot think where. A furnace would have a founder (who was the chief workman), a keeper to oversee the furnace when he was asleep and a couple of fillers. However this was not a particularly skilled occupation (certainly not a "profession"). He might bee referred to as a filler at a blast furnace. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:17, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, word "fillers" is main. But wich variant is better, "Blast furnace fillers" or "Filler at a blast furnace" or "Fillers at blast furnaces"? I need your opinion as of a man who are a native-English spiker. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 22:17, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Any of these would do, buy furnace(s) should only be plural if the same man was filling several of them. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:11, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Thank you for your answers. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 18:02, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

3rd party opinion of experienced wikipedia user wanted

Article in question: Batn Rabigh Caravan Raid

On above article I quoted Sahih al-Bukhari, 5:57:74 . This primary source EXPLICITLY mentions Sa'd was the first to shoot an arrow for Islam,

The secondary sources in Batn Rabigh Caravan Raid also EXPLICITLY mentions Sa'd was the first to shoot an arrow for Islam.

I have been accused of violating WP:SYNTHESIS. What is your opinion, is this synthesis? --Misconceptions2 (talk) 21:29, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • If that is what the sources say, I do not see why WP should not repeat them. If other serious sources say something different, or deny the event, they should presumably be referred to as well, to give a NPOV. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:17, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

English Overseas Trade

Ed. Hicks. Were you by any chance at the book launch last year in Winchester? Hope all is well! Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 09:36, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No. I might have been if I had known of it, but it is a long way from here. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:18, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Could've got a lift with Tony Pollard! Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 11:07, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A new section in CFD

I started a proposal at village pump here for a new section in CFD called CFRc (Categories for recategorization) where users who like to change sub- or parent-categories, can ask the experienced community. I believe you will like to join the discussion and poll. CN1 (talk) 22:52, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The category was empty because Betty Logan removed all the pages tagged under the category without discussion. The user has seems to be been blocked before for moving pages without consensus. Do you know of the process on how to restore a deleted page or category? Where should I go?--Taeyebaar (talk) 16:11, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

At Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_April_14#Category:Writers_who_have_returned_the_Sahitya_Akademi_Award you mentioned that the subject article does not have a list of awardees. Its actually a forked list at Lists of Sahitya Akademi Award winners, which in turn has links to language-wise recipients. Just fyi... §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:37, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

First Serbian Volunteer Division listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect First Serbian Volunteer Division. Since you had some involvement with the First Serbian Volunteer Division redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Alcherin (talk) 17:31, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you. I created this. When I did so, I knew it was far from ideal. I had hoped that someone would in due course convert this to a substantive article. Unfortuantely what has happened is that the section pointed to has been removed. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:01, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lines of succession to thrones

Hello! Could you give your opinion on this issue: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Succession Box Standardization/Guidelines#Lines of succession to thrones, please? --Editor FIN (talk) 05:58, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nice article on Stecknitz Canal

I read your new article about the Stecknitz Canal. I commend you for your attention to detail and dedication to quality. It is a terrific piece. Garagepunk66 (talk) 05:21, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Signing

Hi, you forgot to sign your comment here. Cheers, Johnbod (talk) 12:16, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article for Deletion/Keeping

Hey hope you are doing well. There is a page you have contributed to that is being considered for deletion: List of Christian Nobel laureates. You are welcome to put in any input on the issues by going to the page and clicking on the link for that article. Jobas (talk) 20:11, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you previously contributed to a deletion discussion for London bus route W7, another similar deletion discussion is ongoing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Buses route 53 which you may wish to give your input on.

Note: I've placed (or am in the process of placing) this notification on the talk page of anyone who took part in the original deletion discussion, as the most recent similar discussion, regardless of deletion preference, which is allowable under WP:CANVASS. The only exception being if that person has already contributed, or has indicated on their profile that they are inactive.

Thanks for your time. Jeni (talk) 10:37, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review

I am notifying everyone who took part in the AFD discussion on Daniel Romanovsky. Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2016 August 3 Thoughtmonkey (talk) 18:58, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An other CfR discussion for US city categories

There's a new Categories for Renaming discussion going on about categories of US cities listed in the AP Stylebook. As you have participated in at least one of the more recent discussions in the subject, you may want to participate in the discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2016 August 17#Seattle. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 20:38, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Peter. I am notifying all the participants in the previous AfD for this article that it has recently been re-created and has been nominated for deletion again. The new discussion is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Callum James Greens (2nd nomination). Voceditenore (talk) 06:06, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion you may be interested in

I have just made a new nomination for renaming categories for those U.S cities where the article doesn't include the state name. Since you participated in a recent discussion about this, you may want to express your opinion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2016 September 6#Major US cities. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:18, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merging

Hi, how do I merge one article into another (per the decision here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Master of Fogdö)? Thanks! Yakikaki (talk) 15:29, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification

Hello, in this discussion, do you perhaps mean rename instead of merge? Marcocapelle (talk) 09:26, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

A kitten for you! (excuse this, my daughter Marma loves kittens and made me send one of these to someone) have a nice day.

Holly Arcshaw (talk) 02:12, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Peter, would you swing by for a 2nd look at Blue ribbon badge, I think there's more there than met the eye. Thanks. E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:58, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Peterkingiron. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have finally got round to listing it for review as a Featured Article. All help needed! --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:49, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Roman fortifications in Snowdonia

You requested this deletion at the last Ancient Roman Forts CFd as an exception. I've opened a CFD.Laurel Lodged (talk) 11:37, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yo Ho Ho

Request for Comment on the guidelines regarding "joke" categories

This is a notice that a discussion you participated in, either at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents or at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2017 February 8 has resulted in a Request for comment at Wikipedia talk:User categories#Request for Comment on the guidelines regarding "joke" categories. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 20:39, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AFD of interest

Hello! As a participant in previous discussions about a related topic, you may be interested in commenting on this AFD. I am notifying everyone involved in previous debates on the subject. Thanks! Fyddlestix (talk) 17:11, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox

Hey you may not have been aware, but you have been supporting in my sandbox :-) - Marcocapelle (talk) 13:25, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This, with which you helped me a lot re. technical terms, got deleted last year. Eurêka, it's back. That is, I retranslated it. Wld you care having another look at it? If you're around and got the time, that is. Any further critics wld be very welcome. And anyway you have no idea how just knowing you were around gave me a good push to tackle it again. So very much thanks for that alone. Good evening to you and good continuation. Basicdesign (talk) 18:57, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gloria Carter Spann

Hello! You recently weighed in at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mamie Lincoln Isham and mentioned Jimmy Carter's siblings. After a review of his sister Gloria Carter Spann, I have nominated her page for deletion. I thought you might be interested. Best, Kbabej (talk) 23:13, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Montgomeryshire Architecture

Because nobody offered a reason not to use "Buildings and structures", and because that's clearly the naming convention, I've closed the "Montgomeryshire Architecture" CFD (Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2017 June 28) as "move to Category:Buildings and structures in Montgomeryshire". I've intentionally ignored the Powys-Montgomeryshire issue, since that's not so clear-cut, and I've started a new discussion specifically to address that issue. Please visit Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2017 July 17 (bottommost section) to offer your opinions. Nyttend (talk) 04:44, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Industrial history

I noticed that the article Industrial history has been boldly redirected to Industrial Revolution apparently because all former content of Industrial history was about the industrial revolution. Do you know if there is something like industrial history before and after the industrial revolution, as a notable topic by itself? I came here via Category:Industrial history which still exists and has quite a few subcategories. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:54, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Sutton (criminologist)

Dear Sir,

I'm very sorry to have missed the discussion on the deletion status of the biography page on Mike Sutton (criminologist). If I had taken part, I hope that I could have contributed. Having collected 18 months worth of evidence showing multiple examples of misconduct by this individual, atrocious research abilities and extensive abuse of fellow academics, I am disappointed to see his personal page removed from the deletion list. Comprehensive refutation of his claims against Darwin and Wallace, plus many of his "myth busts" are presented via 3 websites: Reign of Error, Natural Histories, and the Patrick Matthew Project.

Sutton is very much driven by ambition and pride. His Wikipedia page fuels his egocentricity, more so than it should considering it was entirely his own composition until recently, when I began following the flagged recommendations for the page, and edited some of the self aggrandisement. However, the page should be removed as it was created and written by him at the outset, and remained so for years. He even lists his Wikipedia page and others he has created under his publications section on page 21 of his 25-page CV. I find that odd, but it is also irrefutable evidence of his hand in the matter. Furthermore, there is no question that it goes beyond the impartial outlook supposed to be enforced on Wikipedia. Please can we have another look at this case?

[Update] Sutton has been aggressively trying to get his ideas onto Wikipedia for years, taken on different anonymous accounts (there is a record of his sock puppetry), and has an anti-wikipedia editors hate campaign documented on one of his several blog sites.

Thank you and best wishes, Jfderry (talk) 17:05, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting out musical groups by number cats

I have nominated several specific categories today and yesterday (see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2017 October 4#Category:Musical sextets for example) which you may wish to comment on, based on the previous discussion. Mangoe (talk) 14:58, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Peterkingiron. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Willhern

What happened at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2017_December_4&diff=prev&oldid=814721557? 208.95.51.38 (talk) 01:34, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. It is probably a consequence of my thumb touching the mouse pad accidentally and causing the cursor to jump to the wrong place. Peterkingiron (talk) 10:59, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays

Happy Holidays
Wishing you a happy holiday season! Times flies and 2018 is around the corner. Thank you for your contributions. ~ K.e.coffman (talk) 23:43, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Great Elm

Thanks for your edit to Old Iron Works, Mells however I have reverted it as the link to Great Elm was correct.— Rod talk 14:08, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oldham

So are you going to fix History of Oldham Athletic A.F.C. with the sourcing that supposedly exists, or are you going to just let it stink up the wiki forever?! Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 21:02, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]