Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Excuse Me Madam: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 06:15, 15 October 2020

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as G12. Jackmcbarn (talk) 06:15, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse Me Madam

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG or WP:FICT. No independent coverage apart from press releases. ChunnuBhai (talk) 17:58, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. ChunnuBhai (talk) 17:58, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ChunnuBhai (talk) 17:58, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep- Sourcing definitely needs to be improved but it is a nationally broadcast series that is currently airing. Sunshine1191 (talk) 09:40, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:40, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:NTV, which says that nationally broadcast television shows are likely to meet notability standards. I added a review from The Times of India, "Excuse Me Madam first-episode review: Rajesh Kumar and Nyra Banerjee show looks promising with laugh-worthy moments". I don't see a problem here. — Toughpigs (talk) 21:46, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
-===[[:Excuse Me Madam]]===
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|M}}
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was '''speedy delete''' as [[WP:G12|G12]]. [[User:Jackmcbarn|Jackmcbarn]] ([[User talk:Jackmcbarn|talk]]) 06:15, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
+===[[:Excuse Me Madam]]===
 <noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
 :{{la|Excuse Me Madam}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Excuse Me Madam|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 October 11#{{anchorencode:Excuse Me Madam}}|View log]]</noinclude>)
@@ Line 10: / Line 15: @@
 *'''Weak Keep-''' Sourcing definitely needs to be improved but it is a nationally broadcast series that is currently airing. [[User:Sunshine1191|Sunshine1191]] ([[User talk:Sunshine1191|talk]]) 09:40, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
 <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />
-<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<span style="font-size: x-small;">1000</span>]]</sup></span> 16:40, 11 October 2020 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Excuse Me Madam]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
+<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<span style="font-size: x-small;">1000</span>]]</sup></span> 16:40, 11 October 2020 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
 *'''Keep''' per [[WP:NTV]], which says that nationally broadcast television shows are likely to meet notability standards. I added a review from ''The Times of India'', "[https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tv/news/hindi/excuse-me-madam-first-episode-review-rajesh-sharma-and-nyra-bannerjee-show-looks-promising-with-laugh-worthy-moments/articleshow/78110719.cms Excuse Me Madam first-episode review: Rajesh Kumar and Nyra Banerjee show looks promising with laugh-worthy moments]". I don't see a problem here. — [[User:Toughpigs|Toughpigs]] ([[User talk:Toughpigs|talk]]) 21:46, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
+{{clear}}
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>