Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Excuse Me Madam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as G12. Jackmcbarn (talk) 06:15, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse Me Madam

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG or WP:FICT. No independent coverage apart from press releases. ChunnuBhai (talk) 17:58, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. ChunnuBhai (talk) 17:58, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ChunnuBhai (talk) 17:58, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep- Sourcing definitely needs to be improved but it is a nationally broadcast series that is currently airing. Sunshine1191 (talk) 09:40, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:40, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:NTV, which says that nationally broadcast television shows are likely to meet notability standards. I added a review from The Times of India, "Excuse Me Madam first-episode review: Rajesh Kumar and Nyra Banerjee show looks promising with laugh-worthy moments". I don't see a problem here. — Toughpigs (talk) 21:46, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.