Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aankh Michouli
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 03:11, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Aankh Michouli (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Film appears to fail WP:NFILM, nothing but database listings. No reviews.
DEPROD with rationale "AfD it, not for PROD" DonaldD23 talk to me 21:30, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. DonaldD23 talk to me 21:30, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep - I can't think of film reviews from the 1940s, but being part of Encyclopedia of Indian Cinema is a big deal. Shahid • Talk2me 11:28, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I agree with DonaldD23 there are no notable sources PaulPachad (talk) 23:06, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:54, 26 May 2022 (UTC)- Keep, notable for being included in encyclopedia in Indian Cinema per point 4 of WP:NFOE#2. ☆★Mamushir (✉✉) 10:02, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Meets WP:GNG. Expand the article with more reliable sources. -- Choose🎵 (talk) 06:49, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.