Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhishek Chakraborty

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 12:54, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Abhishek Chakraborty

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The person in the article fails to qualify WP:GNG per wikipedia rules. There are some references which are either WP:SPS or an offbeat interview or random mentions with other names. No significant coverage in media nor is the company/organization founded by them any significant/notable since it self does not have a Wikipedia page. Adamgerber80 (talk) 10:05, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 10:31, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 10:32, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 10:32, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 10:34, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete - Fails Wikipedia's general notability guidelines. -- HindWiki^Connect 10:59, 7 January 2018 (UTC) — HindWIKI (talk • contribs) is a confirmed sock puppet of Singer Jethu Sisodiya (talk • contribs). – Struck above comment from blocked sock per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. Sam Sailor 15:34, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MelanieN (talk) 04:39, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- no indications of notability or significance; affiliated with nn entities. Likely a paid placement, given the contents. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:41, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.