Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akhtar Raza Khan (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 08:06, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Akhtar Raza Khan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ony one source(themuslim500) lists him and that source itself is not a reputed source nor is the organization which publishes that list is notable AFAIK. No other lists mention him as notable. His name does not appear in any other major sources except referring to this one list of 500 notable , the other reputed news sources only fall back to this sole source. I did find some books mentioning him where not much is mentioned about him except that he heads some institutions of the barelvi sect. Summichum (talk) 11:50, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No sources actually really about him. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:57, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:56, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:56, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:56, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:56, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 13:33, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Lacks third party sources and this WP:BLP is based on a single source and secondly the subject has no official position in India.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:29, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Should be reviewed positively’

The article is sourced with a good numbers of links. User:Flat Out has taken back CSD in the light of the sources provided.He is the first reviewer who raised the issue of notability.But now accepted the notability of the subject, see the talk page of the draft.Morever (@Summichum:) themuslim500, compiled by The Royal Islamic Strategic Studies Centre affiliated with The Royal Aal al-Bayt Institute for Islamic Thought, is a reputed source that is why the news of 500 influencial muslims list is reported on media all over the world.The same news sources are provided in the draft.If you dont know about something does not make that thing un reputed.Ejaz92 (talk) 04:58, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.