Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexis Urbina

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:51, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alexis Urbina

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

He was a youth boxer who was beaten to death in 2013. He doesn't meet WP:NBOX and all of the coverage is on his murder, so WP:BLP1E applies and WP:GNG is not met.Jakejr (talk) 23:15, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe murder coverage meets WP:GNG--tragic but not sure worth a individual Wikipedia pageBoxexpo2015 (talk) 23:26, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 00:15, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:32, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I honestly see enough sources to support it. Lor^Talk 02:51, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please indicate where the significant coverage is that is unrelated to his murder? Papaursa (talk) 04:13, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Like all murders it's a tragedy, but I don't see that he would be notable otherwise. It appears to me that it's a case of someone being notable for one event and I don't believe that's enough reason to keep this article. Papaursa (talk) 04:13, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete He wouldn't be notable without the coverage of his murder and that is nothing out of the ordinary for victims. Mdtemp (talk) 21:05, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.