Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ask Ziggy Inc.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:53, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ask Ziggy Inc.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no visible notability . Previously accepted from AfC DGG ( talk ) 06:01, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:19, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:19, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:19, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and rename. The company does not seem notable. The app does – I found quite a few reviews of it on Google. I suggest that this article be rewritten to be about the app. Really, it's already about the app, but the title doesn't match. If people would rather delete it than rewrite it, that's OK with me, but someone would probably just create an article on the app anyway. The sources make it out to be pretty popular. We might as well use this existing article. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:37, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and rename per User:NinjaRobotPirate. Funny, I first typed "NinjaRobertPirate".... :) SarahStierch (talk) 00:56, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ymblanter (talk) 09:29, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Clearly passes GNG with [1] [2] [3] in addition to what's already in the article. I would rename it to just Ask Ziggy because the product and company have the same name basically. I don't see the point in removing the info about start-up funding etc. because it is sourced adequately. If it (or Windows Phone) turns out to be a complete flop, and the article becomes a permastub, it can always be upmerged to Windows Phone later. Someone not using his real name (talk) 16:00, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.