Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaitanya Gavali

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:15, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Chaitanya Gavali

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable mixed martial artist - does not meet WP:NMMA PRehse (talk) 12:27, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. PRehse (talk) 12:28, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:32, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The subject is a Sports personality. It is advised not to delete the article but to improve it.--MahenSingha (Talk) 18:39, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Being a sports personality is not grounds for notability. Please state what notability criteria you believe he meets and show the sources that support your claim. Papaursa (talk) 15:23, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Subject is not notable MMA fighter and have not fought in any tier one promotion events. Fails WP:NMMA. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 14:12, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Papaursa (talk) 15:23, 18 September 2018 (UTC) Papaursa (talk) 15:23, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete He definitely doesn't meet WP:NMMA. He also lacks the accomplishments in BJJ to meet WP:MANOTE. I don't believe WP:GNG is currently met since the bulk of the coverage is routine sports reporting or is focused on where he trains. If additional significant independent coverage of him in reliable sources can be shown, I will reconsider my vote. Papaursa (talk) 15:23, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.