Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. WP:TNT. Randykitty (talk) 16:17, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Daak

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has no sourcing at all. It is also hard to decipher what it is about. I would recommend deletion in its current state but if anyone can clean it up and make it understandable to the average reader then I will be happy to change this to keep MarnetteD|Talk 19:11, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per nom, just like MarnetteD I tried, but was not able to understand the article. Unsourced I performed a search for Daak clan and could not find anything.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 19:48, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hell Yeah Delete: What a freaking mess. Not quite a G1 speedy, but close. Unimproved and tagged for 3 years, unsourced since Day 1, explicit COI, and how this got gnome-edited all those years without being prodded I'll never know. Nha Trang 22:20, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.