Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dharu Megh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:58, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dharu Megh

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recently created article that fails criteria A7. The only claim that is asserted is unsubstantiated. M A A Z T A L K 13:29, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment WP:A7 only requires that there is a credible claim of significance, which this article on its face seems to pass as claiming to be a saint is a significant claim, and I don't see anything not credible about the claim, but I'll leave that debate to users with some experience in this area. Iffy★Chat -- 14:13, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh, and if you think it fails A7, you should add the A7 tag to the article yourself and possibly end this AfD quicker. There's no rule against CSD and AfD running together. Iffy★Chat -- 14:18, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:49, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:49, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:49, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:49, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the article has absolutely no sources at all.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:23, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:04, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:55, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails GNG. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller! (distænt write) 15:16, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all I could find was a passing mention. If a saint, he kept a low profile. FloridaArmy (talk) 23:45, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.