Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enfocus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 16:07, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Enfocus

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is about a small non-notable company. A search for references turns up nothing significant in terms of independent reliable sources - routine coverage only. Does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. The article is entirely the product of single-purpose accounts, several of which have an obvious username connection to the company such as Enfocusmarketing (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), EnfocusMKT (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), and Enfocus (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). This article is nothing more than blatant self-promotion. Deli nk (talk) 13:15, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 14:04, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 14:04, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:50, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 02:07, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect to Esko (company): A Prod in 2010 was removed with the objection that the company's Pitstop software is notable, but the WP:NCORP standards require more than a suggestion of inheriting notability. I am not seeing evidence of specific notability for the company. There is brief coverage at the article on the immediate parent company, so a redirect could be appropriate. AllyD (talk) 06:37, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.