Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Bowles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete qualifies for speedy deletion A10; name is miss-spelled in article. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 20:24, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Bowles

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about supposed murderer which is too old to be eligible for BLP PROD. Completely unsourced and a quick search revealed no independent coverage by reliable sources, no coverage at all, in fact. Fails WP:CRIM. Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 10:28, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 10:30, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 10:30, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 10:30, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This person's name is actually Eric Volz and an article about him already exists. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 22:03, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. Bearian (talk) 20:13, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- What's the point of redirecting when the name "Eric Bowles" was just made up by the article's creator, and is therefore not a likely search term? Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 23:20, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - I assumed this was some well-known alias. Bearian (talk) 17:26, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is not a demonstrable alias, it seems more likely a misspelling.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:48, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nothing at all for the necessary improvements for solid independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 05:23, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.