Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IILM Institute for Higher Education

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No consensus to delete this article (non-admin closure) Britishfinance (talk) 14:25, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

IILM Institute for Higher Education

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Institute has changed its name and moved its campus. Check IILM University. No need for a separate page and also there is nothing to merge. Hatchens (talk) 08:25, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 08:25, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:28, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:28, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Hatchens please can you explain this nomination, is it based on WP:GNG? according to the article the institute has not "changed its name and moved its campus": one campus has split off as a separate university, but the institute still has the same name and two other campuses. TSventon (talk) 09:34, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep What used to be the Guragon college of IILM Institute for Higher Education became IILM University. The original institute still operates, and even has a secondary college. I am not familiar with the institute in any way, but as a ranked, semi-autonomous higher education institute, existing for almost 30 years, it is most likely notable. --Muhandes (talk) 08:46, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:36, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Nomination appears to be based on a false premise. -- Necrothesp (talk) 17:12, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.