Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kautilya Pandit (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:51, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kautilya Pandit

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unlike recent AfD discussion fro another 'Google Boy" some sources here are ones generally considered reliable but this has the same issues of credulous reports of amazing psychic powers but no actual evidence. The recognition by local politicians is obviously self-serving and not based on any usual process. WP:BLP compliance is shaky at best. WP:BEFORE does not disclose any better sources of actual accomplishments that would be recognized by WP:ANYBIO. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:25, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 21:39, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 21:40, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete On the fringes of what can be called notable, despite the media coverage/trend for a short period of time. No effort has been made to improve the article to be encyclopedic since the previous afd. MT Train^Discuss 16:20, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:18, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- child prodigies are rarely notable and this one misses the mark. WP:TOOSOON, per review of available sources. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:54, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable for stand alone article at this time; trivial. WP:CRYSTAL and WP:TOOSOON apply. Kierzek (talk) 18:15, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.