Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kisse Pyaar Karoon
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Daniel (talk) 04:36, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Kisse Pyaar Karoon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to fail WP:NFILM as I couldn't find any reviews in a BEFORE.
PROD removed with "AFD it if you like. I see reviews by Bollywood Hungama and the likes. Just don't have time to edit it at the moment".
I couldn't find the review that was referred to above. DonaldD23 talk to me 03:43, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. DonaldD23 talk to me 03:43, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep - reviews added, and BO information as well. The nominator might want to consider withdrawing the nomination. Shahid • Talk2me 15:07, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
- Weak delete, sources seem weak. See if more can be added, then I'd move to keep. — Moops ⋠T⋡ 21:10, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Moops: Please explain what's weak about the Hindustan Times, one of the leading newspapers in India which has been in print for almost a century and reviews this film; about the most notable entertainment web portal for Hindi cinema Bollywood Hungama with a review written by a notable critic Taran Adarsh, among others. I understand you're not aware of them for obvious reasons, but it doesn't mean they're weak. Shahid • Talk2me 12:01, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
- Per updates, I'll amend my comment to Keep, for the record, I said 'Weak Delete' meaning that I was amenable to a keep if we could makes changes as done now. Please Keep. TY — Moops ⋠T⋡ 18:06, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Moops: Please explain what's weak about the Hindustan Times, one of the leading newspapers in India which has been in print for almost a century and reviews this film; about the most notable entertainment web portal for Hindi cinema Bollywood Hungama with a review written by a notable critic Taran Adarsh, among others. I understand you're not aware of them for obvious reasons, but it doesn't mean they're weak. Shahid • Talk2me 12:01, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
- Based on the newly added reviews by Shahid, I now believe this film passes WP:NFILM and I change my opinion to Keep DonaldD23 talk to me 16:23, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: As User:Shshshsh said above. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙♂️Let's Talk ! 11:07, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: With the changes to the article, this meets WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Adding the review section is especially helpful! Ravensfire (talk) 00:11, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.