Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malpan Koonammakkal Thoma Kathanar
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 18:19, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Malpan Koonammakkal Thoma Kathanar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is one case where I absolutely cannot tell whether the person is notable or not. Provided sources don't demonstrate so; web searches get hopelessly muddled with flowery church eulogies, and with similarly named 18th century scholars. I can't even determine whether his position in the St. Thomas Christian community is distinguished enough for our purposes. Someone with Malayalam capacities might have more luck here. As it is, I'm not seeing WP:NSCHOLAR satisfied. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 17:12, 5 March 2019 (UTC) Elmidae (talk · contribs) 17:12, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 17:23, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 17:23, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 17:23, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:05, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:05, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. It easy to tell that his work has not been cited on GS. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:46, 16 March 2019 (UTC).
- Delete fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG, as substantive coverage in multiple independent and reliable sources is not established. — Nearly Headless Nick {c} 16:05, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.