Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mariathas Manojanraj

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:03, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mariathas Manojanraj (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I dont see the notability here the person was just a delivery man not a journalist. it says that his death was part of a series of killing of Tamil media workers, what makes this persons death stand out compared to the other people who had died? Redsky89 (talk) 05:38, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - Number of mentions in Reporters without borders, local newspapers and other Human Rights NGO's. Kanatonian (talk)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:08, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:09, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:09, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - His death was mentioned in number of media and a blow to a delivery man in the media industry, should be considered as a blow to the media industry itself; it should not be considered as another person's death of the ill-fated Sri Lankan Tamil community.Lapmaster (talk) 21:27, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - of the references cited only one of the links appears to be working. Without being able to verify those references there doesn't appear to be sufficient independent sources to establish notability of the subject.Dan arndt (talk) 23:00, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for pointing it out and have fixed 9 references will do some more.It is nearly 7 years since the article was created and the links added.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 00:46, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.