Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Best Quality Software Awards

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:25, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

National Best Quality Software Awards

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG - corporate promotion ^{Atsme📞📧} 21:56, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Adding that this promotional article links to the following two articles: BCS Sri Lanka Section which is an AfD, and Draft:Creately at MfD. ^{Atsme📞📧} 17:04, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:10, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non notable awards. Dan arndt (talk) 02:35, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:43, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:43, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 09:30, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 15:46, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Software award article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up PR and incidental mentions like [1], but no significant WP:RS coverage.Dialectric (talk) 16:18, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.