Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patricia Apolot

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 09:16, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Patricia Apolot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Kickboxer who fails to meet the notability criteria at WP:KICK. Coverage is routine sports reporting and winning a title from a minor organization does not show notability.Mdtemp (talk) 17:36, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 21:31, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Routine sports reporting and promotion is not considered significant independent coverage for purposes of meeting WP:GNG. Mdtemp (talk) 17:32, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
1. These articles aren't promotional articles - they're articles by the largest newspapers in Uganda. The New Vision is the largest newspaper in Uganda, which, along with the Daily Monitor, are the two most important newspapers in Uganda(Media_in_Uganda). 2. There are several independent stories that go beyond routine sports reporting. The 2nd biggest newspaper in Uganda, the Daily Monitor, went out of its way to do a special interview with the subject - even mentioning how hard it was to secure the interview "Catching up with Patricia Apolot for an interview demands the patience of the Biblical Job. She will answer your calls, but she will also be busy with this or the other; at a mall fixing her gadget, at a press conference, persuading a potential sponsor or at the gym training for her coming fight" (http://www.monitor.co.ug/Magazines/Full-Woman/Patricia-Apolot--Uganda-s-female-kickboxing-star/-/689842/2822464/-/jwrjxr/-/index.html). Why would the second largest newspaper in Uganda waste its time pursuing a special interview with someone if they were not notable? Another major Ugandan newspaper, the The Observer (Uganda), also did a story that covered more than simple routine sports reporting (http://www.observer.ug/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=33299:-babe-of-the-week-apolot-kicks-her-way-to-national-title&catid=42:sizzling-entertainment&Itemid=74). An independent TV station in Uganda went out of it's way to do a special segment on the subject(http://www.ntv.co.ug/news-features/living-life/living-life-story-female-kick-boxer-patricia-apolot), a story that later made it to China Central Television via the Associated Press (http://newscontent.cctv.com/NewJsp/news.jsp?fileId=309998). There's at least 3 different, reliable, major sources in Uganda that have gone out of their way to do in-depth reports on the subject. If this doesn't satisfy your definition of going beyond "routine sports reporting", please show me a link in the notability guidelines that specifies the requirements for fulfilling this condition.
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 02:52, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 02:52, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.