Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rickshawala (1993 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:02, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rickshawala (1993 film)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet notability guideline for films. Only two sources I could find were on the page and are IMDb and Movie buff. Both sources are bare bones, really only saying the film exists, so don't have significant coverage (and per WP:NFSOURCES cannot then be used to determine notability). Most other sources through Google are for the later film of the same name or they are WP:CIRCULAR websites. Creator has created this article to promote Jayanta Nath, like other pages they have created which have been deleted recently through AfD. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 09:18, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:50, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:51, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Further, I have found [1] but this source is not useful for defining notability, because it does not have significant coverage and WP:NFSOURCES states that these sources don't define notability. This still leaves no sources which define notability for this article. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 15:18, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:16, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This article fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM because it lacks sufficient WP:SIGCOV or any real coverage at all except that it exists. There is nothing any editor could do to make this article have a place on Wikipedia, as the coverage just isn't there. Newshunter12 (talk) 03:13, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.