Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanket Mhatre

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 14:45, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sanket Mhatre (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I've done a fair amount of digging and I can find no evidence this person is notable and while they may have done some voice work, it appears that they've done so as self published voice work and was not solicited or selected by any studios - I can't find any truly reliable sources (not even non-RS like iMDB!) reporting on his dubbing. Praxidicae (talk) 18:15, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I take that back, I did find this and this but nothing truly substantial. Praxidicae (talk) 18:57, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:11, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:11, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. While this person has a lot of credits listed, a quick Google search brings up only some minor sources such as a YouTube interview. Voice of Ben 10 in Hindi is notable! A little more research would be needed. So I am undecided if this should stay or not. If it stays, it definitely needs to have some reliable references.--AfPEN (talk) 14:06, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you're talking about the same youtube videos I came across, they're self published and do not indicate in any way that he did anything more than what I indicated in the nom, which is basically the equivalent of self-publishing. Praxidicae (talk) 15:50, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I am sure there are camera operators who can claim an impressive list of WP-notable films they worked on, but without GNG, they don’t get WP articles. The lack of refs in the article tells the story. I could find zero WP:SIGCOV in a good RS on this subject (explains why their core BIO details are non-existent). The extensive list of films clearly raises COI-UDP issues as well. Britishfinance (talk) 13:28, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.