Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarjubala Devi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Ekabhishek^talk 03:46, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sarjubala Devi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable boxer Peter Rehse (talk) 13:06, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 13:06, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 13:44, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 13:44, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, @Jinkinson: She is notable Indian boxer, please have a look; I just tried to restructure the content and added some reliable references. CutestPenguin {talk • contribs} 17:14, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The notability seems clearer after the fix-up and she may meet WP:NBOX. Youth events don't really count and I do have one question. In 2011 she is listed as Gold at the national level for both senior and junior. Which one was it. The tone is still a little breathless.Peter Rehse (talk) 17:38, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: - @PRehse: I think your AfD nomination for Sarjubala Devi was reasonable since the article during nomination was really worse, but now it can be expended with the support of reliable references. For any other query please follow the cite. CutestPenguin {talk • contribs} 17:51, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article meets WP:ANYBIO and the achievement has been published in this national newspaper -- Sahil (talk) 11:29, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I believe she meets both WP:GNG and WP:NBOX. Papaursa (talk) 19:55, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.