Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Screencastify
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:48, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Screencastify (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability concerns. I see no coverage about the company, just the product; and that coverage is user-generated review sites. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 02:00, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 02:00, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete This article has no reliable sources and appears to lack notability. Coopman86 (talk) 04:40, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 02:04, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 02:04, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. I found some additional sources that are just more of the same. ––FORMALDUDE(talk) 06:57, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as there appears to be no coverage other than just of the product. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 15:50, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: No reliable sources, No evidence of notability. TheDreamBoat (talk) 06:33, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.