Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharana Sree

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. apparent consensus DGG ( talk ) 04:10, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sharana Sree

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet the notability guidelines of WP:BASIC and WP:ARTIST.

No mention in reliable third party references. Marvellous Spider-Man 08:38, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the sources are here There are some of the sources that i have collected from the respective person. Here I am sharing an open link. Please check them all if they can contribute toward proving the notability of a subject. And help us regarding this issue. Thank You. Click here to Open Google Drive Link --ImTHOP (talk) 11:30, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Some Newspaper Articles about Sharana Sree Authors from various Newspapers published few articles about Sharana Sree. Most of these articles are written in her native language "Telugu". You can also check them through the following link. You will find photos of all articles referred in the content. Click here to Open Google Drive link containing photos of News articles — ImTHOP (♥~ℳe) 15:16, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 16:15, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Sources are blogs and zines; no indepth third-party coverage. As per nom. _Muffled ^Pocketed

Acceptable (Don't Delete) as article contains enough information about subject that is supported by primary sources and secondary sources. Hence article is eligible to be on wikipedia.49.213.19.79 (talk) 15:02, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Some of what would seem to be the most useful sources are not online. Usually, I would grant them weight anyway, assuming good faith. However, the history of highly-promotional edits by the obviously-connected contributor (they're uploading pictures of primary documents) makes it problematic to assume that the materials are of proper import and depth. -Nat Gertler (talk) 15:55, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There is a lot wrong with the article beyond the state of the references. Over promotional hyperbole aside subject does not meet any notabliilty guidelines. This is nothing more than a self serving promo piece - long tagged as such even though they are consistently removed by the primary editor.Peter Rehse (talk) 17:22, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't see the significant independent coverage required to meet WP:GNG, nor do I see the accomplishments that show she meets the notability criteria for dancers, musicians, or martial artists. The puffery, (e.g., " a multi splendored genius") is not grounds for deletion, but it does indicate a likely COI. Papaursa (talk) 19:49, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:52, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:52, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:52, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:52, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:GNG. I searched, and could find no third-party references whatsoever. None of the claimed achievements or awards appears to be notable. Narky Blert (talk) 17:38, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: WP:SPAM. Unable to find single passing mention for this individual in any Indian national mainstream sources. Anup [Talk] 04:00, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.