Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St Joseph's School, Bhagalpur

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 04:47, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

St Joseph's School, Bhagalpur

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable school. Fails WP:NSCHOOL, WP:SIGCOV and WP:ORG. Peter Ormond 💬 22:20, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:22, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:22, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:22, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Is the intention here to get input from editors who have the time to participate in all of today's ~~40-50~~ 84 AFDs on schools? Geschichte (talk) 22:41, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:15, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom, for failing WP:NSCHOOL. No need to travel to WP:WHATABOUTX. Ifnord (talk) 18:49, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless (talk) 19:33, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Since this clearly fails the notability guidelines for schools. There isn't even the usual trivial name drops that a lot of schools get in articles about other stuff. Not that it would be enough though, but either way I'm not seeing any reason to keep the article. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:59, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.