Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Lake of Stars

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 09:52, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Lake of Stars

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

nominating this article to bring attention to it. only the times online ref meets WP:RS, and it could be considered a rather vague if not completely trivial mention at that (most of content refed isn't supported by it). believe article should either be merged as per template on the page or deleted altogether. WookieInHeat (talk) 04:49, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect You beat me to it working from the NP backlog. If I had come across it first I would have unilaterally merged and redirected it. It doesn't really need a discussion here :) --Kudpung (talk) 05:05, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment yes, you were likewise beating me to the punch on many articles in the NP backlog. by all means go ahead and perform your actions, i will withdraw my AfD. WookieInHeat (talk) 21:45, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:56, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete i withdrew my deletion nomination of this article when the other user said they were going to work on it, it has been many days and no work has happened. the article in its current form is worthy of deletion. WookieInHeat (talk) 23:39, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.