Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waluscha De Sousa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 20:55, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Waluscha De Sousa

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Came across this page and it seems that the depicted actor/model is not notable. Seems to have only done one film which fails guidelines of WP:NACTOR. furthermore all coverage is about whom she is cast with or who she is linked to, lacks WP:INDY/in-depth coverage. As a model she is not notable too with no big campaigns. Her debut film Fan (film) had her at best as a supporting role or just a side role. With only one released film she fails WP:NACTOR Correct me if I am wrong but she does not qualify for a page on wiki. Tw123456 (talk) 15:14, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Roller26 (talk) 15:18, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Roller26 (talk) 15:18, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Roller26 (talk) 15:18, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Roller26 (talk) 15:18, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Article will pass WP:BASIC [1], plus a lot of smaller mentions which would pass based on "If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability". NACTOR she would pass as a model, her cover shoots would qualify as "Has had significant roles in multiple notable ... productions". // Timothy :: talk 22:55, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:01, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:20, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per TimothyBlue. ─ The Aafī (^talk) 12:42, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.