Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 May 13

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 13

[edit]

Category:Fictional television shows with religious themes

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename to Category:Television series about religion; revisit if necessary. There's multiple options flying around and no support for the current title; this seems to have the best weight of precedent. Timrollpickering 00:25, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: "Fictional television shows" refers to made-up shows from works of fiction. This is about real shows that are works of fiction. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 23:05, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:New Iberia Indians

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 06:20, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Has just one entry and its a redirect. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 22:06, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 10:36, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep It has enough topics to keep. This category brings order to the topic and should be kept. If you want Wikipedia to become less organized and harder to use, then delete it. Also if deleted, for once will someone fix the categories after you destroyed everything. Dont destroy unless your're going to help fix what you broke. Thanks. spatms Talk:spatms 17:43, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:New Orleans–St. Louis Stars

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure). The nomination is based on guideline WP:SMALLCAT and the keep vote is not accompanied by any strong arguments. (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:16, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Category has just two entries. One of which is a redirect. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:01, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep It has enough topics to keep. This category brings order to the topic and should be kept. If you want Wikipedia to become less organized and harder to use, then delete it. Also if deleted, for once will someone fix the categories after you destroyed everything. Dont destroy unless your're going to help fix what you broke. Thanks. spatms Talk:spatms 17:43, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.