Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 10

August 10

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 10, 2024.

Manalo Cult

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 19:01, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Manalo Cult → Iglesia ni Cristo (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

I cannot find reliable sources calling this church a cult. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:34, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There are lots of sources that do describe the target as a cult so this is a likely search term. We need reliable sources to call them a cult in Wikipedia's voice, we just need sources for a redirect. Thryduulf (talk) 11:33, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: — Preceding unsigned comment added by Explicit (talk • contribs) 23:48, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:34, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. POV titles are allowed. PARAKANYAA (talk) 00:35, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

comment I'll send a ping to WP:PINOY as this is a rather complex topic. --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:10, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Soft Delete~~ Keep, see below - There are no online news articles so far that directly refer to the group as the Manalo Cult. They have been described as a cult in some online news articles; many so far having the mention of Manalo Cult from the search results are opinion pieces/editorials from Reddit and Facebook.^[1]^[2] With this, I find that the redirect "Manalo Cult" is invalid with the lack of enough notable direct citation or reference for it to stand on its own. In comparison, there is the redirect "Iglesia ni Manalo" which can be cited to a news article.^[3]Markoolio97 (talk) 14:25, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That comment is difficult to parse but "opinion pieces/editorials from Reddit and Facebook." indicate that this is a term that is in use and which people unfamiliar with it will plausibly search for on Wikipedia - i.e. it's a reason to keep the redirect. Thryduulf (talk) 14:48, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Got this, will move for a keep in this case.Markoolio97 (talk) 14:57, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ https://www.christianpost.com/news/church-group-accused-cult-buys-connecticut-ghost-town-1-85-million.html
^ https://www.nbcnews.com/news/wbna44830900
^ PEP.ph Nora Aunor apologizes to INCÂ for "Iglesia Ni Manalo" remark Jan 10, 2017

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

SSFII

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep and hatnote. (non-admin closure) feminist🩸 (talk) 02:01, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SSFII → Super Street Fighter II (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

super smash flash 2 is a game that also exists and has ssf2 as a redirect to it. leave as is (give or take a hatnote) since super Streets™ 2 is "a little more popular" than super smash flash 2, dabify, or retarget this to super smash flash 2 since it seems the acronym is more commonly used to refer to it? i'm kind of leaning towards the first option because of the roman numeral, but eh cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 14:09, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: — Preceding unsigned comment added by Explicit (talk • contribs) 23:48, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:34, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep but add a hatnote. मल्ल (talk) 21:32, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Maintain as is; Super Smash Flash 2 does not use roman numerals, and already contains a hatnote to Super Street Fighter II. Perhaps one can be instilled on the Street Fighter article as well. If the favored suggestion by nom was to "leave as is, give or take a hatnote", I'm not sure why it was taken to RfD? Alternatives to XfD should be pursued first; hatnoting it would've saved a discussion. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 00:10, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Turbo Edition

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 05:15, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Turbo Edition → Street Fighter II (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

was going to retarget to sf2 turbo, but then i remembered... other things have turbo editions as well. some motorola phones, racing game remasters, cars, etc. now i'm torn between deleting and dabifying cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 14:02, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: — Preceding unsigned comment added by Explicit (talk • contribs) 23:48, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:34, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

...what? is this a malformed relist with two people behind it? how does it even- cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 15:41, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Explicit attempted to relist but the script malfunctioned and didn't post the relist notice properly. I corrected the malfunction, which posted my signature automatically, and decided that was a reasonable representation of what happened so didn't correct it. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 04:54, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

oh, that makes sense

thanks cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 12:12, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as far too vague. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:34, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: too vague to be helpful, doesn't seem to be a clear primary topic. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 19:16, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Praamzius

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Dievas#Lithuanian and Latvian interpretations. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:44, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Praamzius → 420356 Praamzius (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

I kind of doubt that the minor planet is more relevant than the deity here, so this should probably point at the same target as the redirect just below. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 23:12, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. I originally created the redirect assuming no such article for the deity existed, I endorse changing it with this in mind. exoplanetaryscience (talk) 23:26, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, but not to the refined "List of gods" of the below nomination (assuming this is the target the nom meant). Praamzius is mentioned multiple times in List of Lithuanian gods and mythological figures, so can be retargeted there. Jay 💬 19:08, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jay, it should point at the same target as the redirect below, whatever that will be. Is your comment a "keep" vote in relation to the nomination below? I've proposed retargeting. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 15:08, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I misunderstood that the target you wanted was "List of Lithuanian gods and mythological figures#List of gods". Oddly, I find the entry at "List of Lithuanian gods and mythological figures", with the varied spellings, more useful than Dievas itself. So yes, it will be a keep with respect to the nomination below. Dievas may be linked at the list article entry though. Jay 💬 17:35, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Went for retarget for the below and will do for the same here. Struck my initial target. Jay 💬 11:09, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Praamžius

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Dievas#Lithuanian and Latvian interpretations. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:42, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Praamžius → List of Lithuanian gods and mythological figures#List of gods (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Dievas would probably be more specific of a target. A Praamžis redirect should exist (be created later) with the same target as this one. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 23:11, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, retarget to Dievas#Lithuanian and Latvian interpretations. Jay 💬 11:07, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Mario Bandstand

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:03, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mario Bandstand → Mario Party (video game) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Minigame not mentioned in the target. Mia Mahey (talk) 20:08, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unlikely search term, unlikely to be mentioned in article. Sergecross73 msg me 22:24, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Boo's Haunted Bash

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:43, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Boo's Haunted Bash → Mario Party 4 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not mentioned in the target. Mia Mahey (talk) 20:07, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The page has history, but is not substantial (and content is unsourced), hence I have not tagged it as such. Jay 💬 19:34, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be a place/board in the game [1], but mention at target in unnecessary; delete per nom. Cremastra (talk) 23:06, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Unio personalis

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 27#Unio personalis

Christologistical

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:04, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Christologistical → Christology (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Neelix creation; not a meaningful word and does not seem to have ever been used (the two hits on Google pertain to this redirect's existence). 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 14:55, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete with prejudice - "Neelix creation" was all you needed to say. The X1 speedy criterion missed this one. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{threads critiques} 07:43, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As someone who dealt with the Neelix cleanup, it's not accurate to say that the X1 criterion missed this one. All Neelix redirects were generated into lists at User:Anomie/Neelix list and were removed after being checked by an editor or deleted. This redirect was removed by Tazerdadog with this edit. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:36, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No objection to deletion - The scale of the Neelix redirects meant that I could only realistically spend a handful seconds on each one on average, and I was judging on a criterion of "Do I think this makes it through a full RFD, or gets deleted early under the snowball clause". Based on the title and target it looked plausible, but I trust the nom's search that this isn't a real term, so delete it. Tazerdadog (talk) 02:15, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

delete as Neelix cleanup --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:34, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. More Neelix nonsense. Softlavender (talk) 01:06, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Brahmanical Hinduism

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Historical Vedic religion#Brahmanism. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:30, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Brahmanical Hinduism → Historical Vedic religion (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Turn into a disamb-page; "Brahmanical Hinduism" has multiple meanings; see ~~here~~ my version of "Brahmanical Hinduism" as a disamb-page, including references. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 14:02, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Historical Vedic religion#Brahmanism to make the redirect more precise. The other implications of the term are less frequently used ones. Brahmanical Hinduism is commonly used to refer to the phase of the religion during the late Vedic period (Brahminism). Or alternatively, Keep without changing. PadFoot (talk) 14:16, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's not; see the sources here. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 03:43, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've looked at the sources your provided, but the primary topic seems to me to be the same as I mentioned above. It also appears that scholars consider the term synonymous to Brahminism which is a redirect to Historical Vedic religion. PadFoot (talk) 09:11, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seems, that is, ambigious. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 11:49, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eamon Murphy (2023), Hindu Nationalism and Terrorism in India: The Saffron Threat to Democracy, Taylor & Francis:

One of the key distinctions made within Hinduism is between what is known as Brahmanical Hinduism, the religion of the elie as interpreted by Brahmins and communicated through classical Sanskrit language, and folk Hinduism, which is the form practiced by the majority and has it's own gods and goddesses, priests and rituals. Brahmanical Hinduism is the version best known in the west and the one propagated by Hindu nationalists [...] The Hindu nationalist version of Hinduism attempts to present an idealised, simplified and sanitised version of Brahmanical Hinduism.

This is not about ancient or historical Brahminism, this is about present-day Hinduism, just as Michaels (2004) p.22 has argued; see here.

This quote also applies to you: presenting the ancient Vedic religion as an ancient form of Hinduism, whereas scholars argue that "Hinduism," as a synthesis of Brahmanical Sanskrit culture and local folk religions, came into existence around the beginning of the Common Era. See also Ram Puniyani (2012), Hindutva Politics - Impact on Human Rights, p.150. In: Human Rights and the Third World: Issues and Discourses, edited by Subrata Sankar Bagchi, Arnab Das, Lexington Books: "... the construction of Brahmanism as Hinduism."

Pradyot Kumar Maity (1989), Human Fertility Cults and Rituals of Bengal: A Comparative Study, Abhinav publications, p.2:

Thus Hinduism may be studied under two heads: (i) Brahmanical Hinduism i.e. upper class religion and (ii) folk-religion i.e. religion of the vast majority of the population.

This too is not about historical or ancient Brahmanism, but about present-day Hinduism. Regards, Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 12:15, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Joshua Jonathan @PadFoot2008 Sorry, lot of changes / reverts have happened around this topic on different pages and trying to understand all the changes and saw this. Just to confirm - does Michaels (2004) p. 21-22 end up identifying his conception of "Brahmanic-Sanskritic Hinduism" with Brahmanism/Brahmanical Hinduism or does he differentiate the two? Seems he uses Brahmanism in other places in the text (for example, p. 46), without reference to Brahmanic-Sanskritic Hinduism and so perhaps in a different sense? Asteramellus (talk) 14:35, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell, he differentiates the two. Samuel also uses the term for an early form of "Hinduism," noticeable in the Gupta-era, a form which he still doesn't want to fully call "Hinduism." Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 15:18, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Historical Vedic religion#Brahmanism: Agree with PadFoot. "As a polemical term" covers other meanings. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 13:00, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, I hadn't noticed. "Brahmanical Hinduism" vs. "folk Hinduism" also fits in there, and the connection with Hindu nationalism. Regards, Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 15:18, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

-_- I suggested that above and you spent the entire day arguing with me. I told you that Brahmanical Hinduism is synonymous with Brahmanism (not Historical Brahminism), and that section covers all the implications of that term. You can withdraw this RfD now and retargeted the redirect. PadFoot (talk) 17:02, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, you didn't. You only suggested to make the redirect more precise; you didn't notice or suggest what Redtigerxyz noticed. Nor did you say Brahmanical Hinduism is synonymous with Brahmanism (not Historical Brahminism); you wrote Brahmanical Hinduism is commonly used to refer to the phase of the religion during the late Vedic period (Brahminism). Regards, Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 18:10, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's still the common usage, isn't it? PadFoot (talk) 07:03, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Silly mountain

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 18#Silly mountain

Perfect victory

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:14, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect victory → Street Fighter II (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

a term used for winning a round without being hit, used in pretty much every fighting game that doesn't call it "flawless" instead. surprisingly, though, there seems to be an actual primary topic for this term. more surprisngly, that primary topic seems to be light yagami. not sure if it should be retargeted to him or to fighting game (and adding a mention) cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 13:28, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Topic not mentioned in any of the possible pages, and I don't think it would be particularly due weight to include it. Rusalkii (talk) 19:28, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. While Light Yagami is the most common result in my searches, it doesn't rise to the level of primary topic. Looking for where it is mentioned on Wikipedia we get Kanzen Shouri Daiteioh (partial title match for the literal translation of the title), the middle of a long quote at Søren Kierkegaard#Journals, Samurai Deeper Kyo'#Episodes (title of episode 16), Sucker Punch (2011 film)#Plot, Darren Manning#International career, none of which are more than passing mentions, and titles of sources at Paul Collingwood, Sayo Hayakawa and Manchester United F.C. 9–0 Ipswich Town F.C.. Thryduulf (talk) 11:01, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguate between Light Yagami and Fighting game. It’s a plausible term for either one. 24.126.165.174 (talk) 11:14, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or disambiguate?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:53, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not mentioned at the target. --Un assiolo (talk) 09:12, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - generic phrase with no single target. Cannot be disambiguated per Rusalkii. Jay 💬 08:03, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Iasst

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to IASST. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:31, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Iasst → Institute of advanced Study in science and technology (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

This is intended as an acronym, so it should be capitalized. However, the acronym IASST --> International Association for Safety and Survival Training. ~~The Institute of advanced Study in science and technology page is new, still unreviewed, potentially non-notable.~~ The current target for Iasst has been redirected, given a previous XfD closer. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 22:57, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It is confusing to have redirects in different cases point to different targets. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:13, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Out of the two "IASST" potential targets (International Association for Safety and Survival Training and Department of Science and Technology (India), which is what encompasses the Institute of Advanced Study in Science and Technology), the latter dwarfs the former in views - see these stats: [2] (but that doesn't necessarily mean viewers are looking for Institute of Advanced Study in Science and Technology when going to Department of Science and Technology (India), so doesn't really help the PTOPIC search). Searching "IASST" in a websearch gives Safety and Survival Training as a first result, but the majority of the ones afterwards point to the Indian science dept. Seeing as a primary topic doesn't appear obvious I suggest disambiguating - ie. delete Iasst and then converting IASST to a minidab which points to both International Association for Safety and Survival Training and Department of Science and Technology (India). BugGhost 🦗👻 18:57, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:44, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No reason to delete, but the different capitalisation should not go to a different target. IASST should probably made into a disambiguation page then Iasst can redirect to it. Redirects with only the first letter capitalised are usually kept (unless consensus has changed recently), and I don't know if these are pronounced as a word but the combination of letters looks like it could be. Peter James (talk) 12:02, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I turned IASST to a dab. iasst may be retarget to it per Peter. Jay 💬 08:25, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

[1] ttps://www.christianpost.com/news/church-group-accused-cult-buys-connecticut-ghost-town-1-85-million.html

[2] ttps://www.nbcnews.com/news/wbna44830900

[3] PEP.ph Nora Aunor apologizes to INCÂ for "Iglesia Ni Manalo" remark Jan 10, 2017

[1]

[2]

[3]

August 10

Manalo Cult

SSFII

Turbo Edition

Praamzius

Praamžius

Karorius

Bute (mythology)

Diedievaite

Aušlavis

Aušautas

Mario party switch

Mario Party (Nintendo 3DS)

Mario Party 3DS

Mario party revolution

Mario Party Wii

Mario Bandstand

Boo's Haunted Bash

Unio personalis

Christologistical

Brahmanical Hinduism

Silly mountain

Perfect victory

Iasst