Scribd Logo
Hochladen

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Kim D. Quickley v. John Brown, Warden, 862 F.2d 314, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    29 views1 page
    1) This document is an unpublished appellate court decision from 1988 regarding a Section 1983 civil rights claim brought by Kim D. Quickley against John Brown, the warden. 2) The appellate court affirmed the district court's denial of relief for Quickley's Section 1983 claim based on the reasoning provided in the district court's opinion. 3) The appellate court found the appeal to be without merit and dispensed with oral argument since the dispositive issues had been recently decided by authoritative precedent.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1988-10-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 862 F.2d 314 Docket: 88-6768

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) This document is an unpublished appellate court decision from 1988 regarding a Section 1983 civil rights claim brought by Kim D. Quickley against John Brown, the warden. 2) The appellate court affirmed the district court's denial of relief for Quickley's Section 1983 claim based on the reasoning provided in the district court's opinion. 3) The appellate court found the appeal to be without merit and dispensed with oral argument since the dispositive issues had been recently decided by authoritative precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    29 views1 page

    Kim D. Quickley v. John Brown, Warden, 862 F.2d 314, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) This document is an unpublished appellate court decision from 1988 regarding a Section 1983 civil rights claim brought by Kim D. Quickley against John Brown, the warden. 2) The appellate court affirmed the district court's denial of relief for Quickley's Section 1983 claim based on the reasoning provided in the district court's opinion. 3) The appellate court found the appeal to be without merit and dispensed with oral argument since the dispositive issues had been recently decided by authoritative precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    862 F.

    2d 314
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Kim D. QUICKLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    John BROWN, Warden, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 88-6768.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Sept. 29, 1988.
    Decided Oct. 28, 1988.

    Kim D. Quickley, appellant pro se.


    Richard M. Kastendieck, John Joseph Curran, Jr., Office of Attorney
    General of Maryland, for appellee.
    Before K.K. HALL and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Kim D. Quickley appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42
    U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
    discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. Quickley v. Brown, C/A No. 88-161-HAR
    (D.Md. Aug. 5, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive
    issues recently have been decided authoritatively.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like