India's new Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) has replaced the IPC, introducing community service as a penalty for minor crimes like theft under Rs 5,000. This marks a shift towards rehabilitative justice, offering offenders alternatives to fines or jail time. Despite its positive intent, the implementation faces challenges due to unclear monitoring guidelines. Experts emphasize the need for structured frameworks and specific tasks to ensure uniform application and effective community contribution, highlighting the reform's potential in blending justice with social welfare.
AgenciesImage used for representative purpose only
Effective July 1, Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) has replaced the Indian Penal Code (IPC), marking a significant shift in how India addresses certain crimes. One notable addition is the inclusion of community service as a punitive measure for several offenses, signaling a move towards more rehabilitative practices in law enforcement.
Community Service as Alternative Punishment Under BNSS, community service is now an option for minor offenses such as petty thefts, public nuisance, and false defamation complaints. Offenders involved in thefts of property valued under Rs 5,000 can avoid traditional punishments by returning the stolen goods and performing community service.
Legal Framework and Punishments BNSS specifies penalties for various offenses, including fines, imprisonment, and now community service. It allows courts to choose community service over incarceration or fines, emphasizing social contribution as part of the punishment.
Challenges in Implementation Despite the legal provisions, practical implementation poses challenges. Law enforcement agencies and administrative bodies lack clear guidelines on monitoring and enforcing community service sentences. This ambiguity extends to identifying responsible parties for overseeing and ensuring compliance with court-mandated community service.
TOI.in
Expert Opinions Naveed Mehmood Ahmad, team lead (crime and punishment) at Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy, acknowledges the positive intent of introducing community service but highlights the need for clearer guidelines and a structured framework to ensure uniform application across cases.
Aditya Bhati, a lawyer at the district court, outlines potential community service activities such as park cleaning, tree planting, volunteering at orphanages, and assisting in animal shelters. He emphasizes the importance of defining specific tasks to align community service with rehabilitative goals effectively.
Utkarsh Vats, special public prosecutor at Ghaziabad court, views community service as an opportunity for offenders to contribute constructively to society. He suggests activities that promote social welfare and community engagement as suitable forms of community service.
Administrative Challenges and Recommendations Babloo Kumar, additional CP (headquarters) in Noida, expresses concerns over the absence of a structured framework for community service implementation. He proposes designating district program officers as nodal points for managing and monitoring community service sentences to ensure their effective execution.
As BNSS ushers in reforms in India's criminal justice system, the introduction of community service represents a progressive approach to handling minor offenses. However, addressing logistical and procedural challenges will be crucial in realizing its potential to combine justice with community welfare effectively.
Agencies
TOI.in
Get Unlimited Access to The Economic Times
